Recommended literature prescribed for compulsory and compulsory elective courses of the study program, which are relevant for the content of the final state examination. Synthetic, conceptual and theoretical works that enable a contextual overview and search for causes and contexts are dominant.
1. The interaction of language and society.
2. The language carrier in a social interaction.
3. Slovak language in relation to Czech language.
4. Principles in explanation.
5. Culturological perception of foreign words in standard Slovak.
6. Discourse.
7. Inter-language effects from a point of view of foreignness and otherness.
8. Regulation and functioning of language in the pre-standard period.
9. Regulation and functioning of language in the standard period.
10. World depiction through language.
11. Style.
12. Stylization and reception of style.
13. Style and norms.
14. Style and text.
15. Text and style in a context.
The student can take the state exam
A) after obtaining at least such a number of credits that, after obtaining credits for successful completion of state examinations, he/she achieves the required number of credits for the proper completion of studies,
B) after successful completion of compulsory courses, compulsory elective courses and elective courses in the composition determined by the study program,
C) after fulfilling the student's obligations arising from § 71, par. 3 letter b of the Higher Education Act,
D) if disciplinary action is not taken against him/her.
Successful completion of the state exam is one of the conditions for successful completion of the study program. The subject of the state exam is evaluated by the commission for state exams with classification grades A to FX. The examination commission decides on the evaluation of the state examination or its part by consensus. If the examination commission does not reach a consensus, the evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by voting.
In accordance with the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (VP 5/2020, Art. 15), the framework dates of state examinations are set by the dean and with the faculty study schedule. Departments are obliged to publish their state exam dates on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place. The student registers for the state exam through the academic information system at least three weeks before the date of its holding.
The student is entitled to one regular and two resit dates of the state exam. The regular one is that for which the student applied for the first time within the deadline set for state exams. If the student was evaluated with the FX mark on the regular date of the state exam, the student may retake the state exam
A) in the following dates for the holding of state examinations in the relevant academic year, or
B) during the state examinations period in any of the following academic years in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Higher Education Act.
If a student is unable to attend the date of the state examination for which he/she has registered, he/she is obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the examination commission in advance or no later than three working days after the date of the state examination or its part, if there were serious obstacles that made it impossible to apologize in advance. If a student does not attend the state examination or its part without an apology within the specified period, or if the chairman of the examination commission does not acknowledge his/her apology, he/she is assessed with the FX mark from the given date of the state examination.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 0/100
slovak
1. The student will attend the registered date of the state exam according to the schedule set by the department.
2. The student receives a question from the state exam course, which is entered in writing and anonymously in the form of a random selection of printed questions or a generator.
3. The examination board will give the student a reasonable amount of time to prepare an oral answer to the given question. (In the case of distance form of the state exams, the student answers without preparation.)
4. The student is ready to have a synthesizing dialogue with the examination board.
5. Upon completion of the student's answer, the examination commission will decide on the results of the state examination, which will take place at a closed meeting of the examination commission.
6. The course of the state examination and the announcement of its results are public.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 0/100
After completing the course, the student knows traditional and more current linguistic conceptions and he/she can implement them into reflecting on the structure and functioning of language; he/she is acquainted with interdisciplinary links between linguistics and Slovak studies.
Recommended literature prescribed for compulsory and optional subjects of the study program, which are relevant for the content of the final state examination. Dominant are synthetic, conceptual and theoretical works enabling a contextual overview and search for causes and contexts.
Methodology: 1. Methodology. (The concept of theoretical-methodological conception and its manifestations in linguistics. Morphology in methodological perspectives.)
2. Confrontation of theoretical and methodological concepts. (Classical model prototype theoretical-methodological conception of lexical meaning. Theory of intention model valence of a verb; predicate model explanatory conception of a sentence.)
3. Basic methods of language recognition. (Forms of analysis and their application in linguistics. Types of reasoning and place of analogous reasoning in linguistics.)
4. Hypotheses and models. (Properties and conditions of the hypothesis - hypotheses about language, communication and society. Modeling of language and communication.)
5. Structural-functional approach to language reality. (Structural-functional approach to language - functions of language units and language. Motivation as a manifestation of the relationship between function and structure.)
6. Comparison and analogy. (Oppositional and distributional analysis of language units. Analogy as a cognitive process in linguistics.)
7. Quantitative and qualitative methods. (Statistical analysis in linguistics - its cognitive value. Interpretation of language expressions.)
8. Semiotic approach to communication. (Semiotics of significance. Approaches to metaphor.)
9. Axiological approach to language. (Axiological competence. Language as a value.)
10. Analysis of language carriers. (Linguistic confidence. Linguistic intelligence.)
Literary criticism (history): 1. Positivism as a turn to the literary method, portrait as a genre of the biographical method, the role of biography in it, recognition of intellect and rejection of extra-intellectual forces (SaintBeuve).
2. Essay on the border of science and art, topicality of the topic, relation to professional style, subjectivity,
features to encourage the reader, inaccuracy of citations, efforts to style (on the examples of Alexander 's essays
Matuška and Štefan Krčméry).
3. Russian "formal school", its contribution in the fields of theory of literature and historical poetics,
institutions, representatives and concepts (on the examples of studies by Viktor Šklovsky and Boris
Ejchenbauma).
4. Psychoanalysis and literature, starting points of Sigmund Freud, a parallel of children's play and poetry
creation, the Oedipal complex and the theory of the psychic apparatus (Ja, Ono, Nadja).
5. Psychoanalytic phenomenology, understanding of matter by Gaston Bachelard, its grasp
imagery through the natural archetypes of the poetic imagination and cultural complexes.
6. Czech structuralism, Prague Linguistic Circle, orientation of Jan's research
Mukařovský, poetic naming and aesthetic function of language, concept of structure.
7. Poststructuralism and semiology, Michel Foucault and his study of the relationship between
language and power, Umberto Eco and the shift from structuralism to the concept of "open work".
8. Postmodern conception of literature, reader-oriented theory of Jonathan Culler, his
grasping the narrative in literature and in life, Wolfgang Welsch and his notion of "anesthetics".
9. Structuralism in Slovak literary science, its interdisciplinary background, Spolok pre
scientific synthesis, Bratislava Linguistic Circle, further development and rehabilitation
structuralist methods.
10. Theory of literary communication (Nitra school), theoretical activity of the Literary Cabinet
communication in Nitra, expressive aesthetics and textual-stylistic theory of literary work,
development of literary text interpretation.
The student can take the state exam
a) after obtaining at least such a number of credits that after obtaining credits for successful completion
state examinations has reached the required number of credits for the proper completion of studies,
b) after successful completion of compulsory subjects, compulsory elective subjects and elective courses
subjects in the composition determined by the study program,
c) after fulfilling the student's obligations arising from § 71, par. 3 letter b of the Higher Education Act,
(d) if no disciplinary action is taken against him.
Successful completion of the state exam is one of the conditions for successful completion
study program. The subject of the state examination is evaluated by the commission for state examinations
grades A to FX. The examination commission decides on the evaluation of the state examination or its part
consensual. If the examination commission does not reach a consensus, evaluate the state examination or its
component shall be decided by voting.
Based on the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (VP 5/2020, Art. 15), the framework dates of state examinations are set by the dean in accordance with the faculty study schedule. Departments are required to publish their
dates of state exams on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place. The student
registers for the state exam through the academic information system at least three
weeks before the date of its action.
The student is entitled to one regular and two resit dates of the state exam. The due date is the one
to which the student applied for the first time within the deadline set for state exams. If he was a student at
regular date of the state exam evaluated by the mark FX, corrective dates of the state exam may
student perform
(a) in the following dates for the holding of state examinations in the relevant academic year
or
(b) within the time limits for holding State examinations in one of the following academic years in
in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Higher Education Act.
If, for serious reasons, a student is unable to attend the date of the state examination for which he / she has applied,
he is obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the examination commission in advance or no later than three
working days after the date of the state examination or its part, if there were serious obstacles to it
prevented themselves from apologizing in advance. If a student does not appear for a state examination without apology or
part of it, or if the chairman of the selection board does not accept his apology,
of the given date of the state exam is evaluated with the FX mark.
Weight of the intermediate / final evaluation: 0/100
Slovak
1. The student arrives on the registered date of the state exam according to the schedule set
department.
2. The student receives a question from the subject of the state exam, which is given in writing and anonymously
random selection from printed questions or generator.
3. The examination commission will give the student a reasonable time to prepare an oral answer to the assigned
question. (In the case of the distance form of SS, the student answers without preparation.)
4. The student is ready to have a synthesizing dialogue with the examination board.
5. Upon completion of the student's answer, the examination commission will decide on the results of the state examination
examinations to be held at a closed session of the selection board.
The course of the state examination and the announcement of its results are public.
0/100
The graduate has knowledge of classical and newer linguistic and literary methodologies,
understands the meaning of methodological disputes and can preferentially choose and apply adequate
method of working with research material. The student's ability to integrate learning outcomes from courses of a given degree is one of the attributes of a successful graduate.
LICHNEROVÁ, L. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác [online]. Bratislava:
Univerzita Komenského, 2016 [cit. 2016-10-09]. Dostupné na: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/
LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf
Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave,
2015 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Dostupné na: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/
as/2020/20200527/04a_Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit.
2021-08-09]. Dostupné na: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske studium/zaverecne-prace/
Podľa zamerania témy diplomovej práce
Submission of the diploma thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year
for the relevant date of the state examination. The diploma thesis is submitted in an electronic version
via AIS. The work must meet the parameters determined by the internal quality system of the Charles University. On the
the provisions of Article 14 of the Internal Regulation no. 5/2020
(Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts, Charles University).
The supervisor of the final thesis and its opponent will prepare reviews of the diploma thesis and propose an evaluation
in the A-FX classification scale, which the student has at his disposal min. 3 working days before the defense.
Diploma thesis evaluation criteria:
1. The contribution of the diploma thesis, the fulfillment of the aims of the thesis in its assignment and the requirements for the content of the diploma thesis
work given by the internal quality system of the Charles University. It is assessed whether the student has worked on the chosen topic
at the level of scientific study, with a representative selection of professional literature, with appropriately selected
verifiable scientific procedures and hypotheses. Demonstration of skills is assessed
work creatively in the field of study, the degree of demonstration of knowledge and understanding of
diploma thesis issues;
2. Originality of the thesis (diploma thesis must not have the character of plagiarism, must not interfere with copyright
rights of other authors), the documentation for the defense of the diploma thesis also includes protocols
originality from CRZP and Theses, to the results of which the thesis supervisor and the opponent comment
in its opinions;
3. Correctness and correctness of citation of used information sources, research results of others
authors and author groups, the accuracy of the description of methods and working procedures of other authors
or author groups;
4. Compliance of the diploma thesis structure with the prescribed composition defined by the internal system
quality UK.
5. Respecting the recommended scope of the diploma thesis (recommended scope of the diploma thesis
is usually 50 to 70 standard pages, 90,000 to 126,000 characters including spaces), the adequacy of the scope of work is assessed by its trainer;
6. Linguistic and stylistic level of work and formal arrangement.
The student orally presents the content, achieved goals and conclusions of the thesis and answers questions
and comments of the thesis supervisor, opponent, resp. members of the examination board. Commission
comprehensively evaluate the quality of the diploma thesis, assess the method and form of defense and ability
the student to adequately respond to the comments and questions in the opinions of the thesis supervisor
the opponent. The final evaluation will take into account the evaluations from the supervisor's and opponent's report, the evaluation of the defense of the final thesis by the commission.
Slovak
1. Presentation of the diploma thesis to the students before the commission for state exams, the opponent
thesis and those present.
2. Student's response to reviews - comments and questions.
3. The student's response to the questions of the commission for state examinations, or in a broader discussion.
0/100
713 / 5 000
Výsledky prekladov
The student has mastered the basic requirements of writing a professional text in compliance with the rules
academic ethics. He knows the methods used in the field of study, he is able to process the chosen one
the topic of the diploma thesis at the level of scientific study, with a representative selection of professional literature, with appropriately chosen scientific procedures and hypotheses that can be verified. After successful
In defending the diploma thesis, the student is able to design, implement, critically reflect and justify
its research intention. Understands the context of the problem, can clearly formulate research
conclusions, draft their own positions and make recommendations. He can argue flexibly
respond to questions on the research topic, its methodology and conclusions
Recommended literature prescribed for compulsory and optional subjects of the study program,
which are relevant to the content of the final state examination. Dominant are synthetic, conceptual and
theoretical work enabling contextual overview and search for causes and contexts.
The answer to the state question is to include basic historical and literary-historical
context of the period, the context of the work of individual authors, the characteristics of the period and the author
poetics and a more detailed analysis and interpretation of several works by the authors mentioned in the question.
1. Social context of the development of literature in the first half of the 20th century. Characteristics
and periodization of the period. Basic tendencies in the development of poetry, prose and drama. The key
authors and their works.
2. Slovak modernism (broader social and artistic context, time and author's
definition, transformation in the poetics of poetry, prose and drama). Poetic and prose work
Ivan Krask and Janek Jesenský.
3. Prose work of Ladislav Nádaši-Jégý and Gejza Vámoš. Naturalism
and expressionism as a starting point for the transformation of prose.
4. Prose work of Ján Hrušovský and Ivan Horváth. Characteristics and transformations
authorial poetics, modernist innovation of prose.
5. Prose work of Mila Urban. Characteristics and transformations of author 's poetics, tradition and
prose innovation.
6. Prose work of Jozef Cíger Hronský. Characteristics and transformations of copyright
poetics, tradition and prose innovation.
7. Prose work of Margita Figuli and Dobroslav Chrobák. Characteristics and transformations
authorial poetics (starting points, naturism), prose innovation.
8. Prose work of František Švantner. Characteristics and transformations of author's poetics
(starting points, naturism and its overcoming), prose innovation.
9. Poetry by Emil Boleslav Lukáč, Ján Smrek and Valentín Beniak.
Characteristics and transformations of author's poetics, neosymbolism and its overcoming.
(Note: the answer should focus on one author in profile and on the other two
give only a basic overview of the work and a brief description of the author's poetics).
10. Poetry by Ladislav Novomeský. Characteristics and transformations of copyright
poetics, avant-garde and poetry innovation.
11. Poetry of Rudolf Dilong, Pavel Gašparovič Hlbin and Janek Silan (until
1948). Characteristics and transformations of author's poetics, context of Catholic modernism
(Note: the answer should focus on one author in profile and state the other two
only a basic overview of the work and a brief description of the author's poetics).
12. Poetic work of Rudolf Fabry and Vladimír Reisel in the context of surrealism
and surrealism.
13. Dramatic works by Vladimír Hurban Vladimírov, Ivan Stodol and Július Barč Ivan - tradition and drama innovation (Note: the answer should focus on
one author and for the other two give only a basic overview of the creation and a brief
characteristics of authorial poetics).
14. Literary-historical characteristics of individual decades: 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s 20.
stor. Transformations of social contexts and poetics. Key authors and their works.
15. Socialist realism - features of poetics, themes, authors and works, historical context.
(Frano Kráľ, Milan Lajčiak, Peter Jilemnický, Vladimír Mináč and František Hečko).
16. Dominik Tatarka and Ladislav Mňačko. Transformations of their work in historical contexts.
17. An unconventional view of the Second World War in drama and prose. Peter Karvaš and Ivan
Bukovčan, Leopold Lahola.
18. Poetics and development of poetry by Milan Rúfus and Miroslav Válek.
19. Poetics of poetic groups of the 60's. Concretists and Lone Runners.
20. Neomodernist prose of the 1960s and its later development. On the example of the work of John
Johanides and Rudolf Sloboda.
21. Literary historical classification and poetics of Dušan Mitan and Dušan Dušek.
22. Changes in literature after 1989 (in literary texts and in literary life). Overview
poetics from the 90s to the present.
23. Peter Pišťanek and Stanislav Rakús. Ironic reassessment of the present and the past
in the 90s.
24. Pavel Vilikovský. Neomodernist and postmodernist characteristics of his work.
25. The return of neo-modernist tendencies, subject prose and authenticity after 1989
(Balla, Márius Kopcsay, Marek Vadas and others).
26. The historical novel in the period of normalization and its return in the new millennium)
Ballek and Pavol Rankov).
27. Postmodernist tendencies in the prose of Igor Otčenáš and Dušan Taragel and in poetry
Peter Macsovszky and Michal Habaj.
28. Forms of contemporary literature written by women (Jana Juráňová, Monika Kompaníková,
Ivana Dobrakovová and others).
29. Ironic subversion in the dramatic work of Milan Lasica and Július Satinský,
Stanislav Štepka and Viliam Klimáček.
The student can take the state exam
a) after obtaining at least such a number of credits that after obtaining credits for successful completion
state examinations has reached the required number of credits for the proper completion of studies,
b) after successful completion of compulsory subjects, compulsory elective subjects and elective courses
subjects in the composition determined by the study program,
c) after fulfilling the student's obligations arising from § 71, par. 3 letter b of the Higher Education Act,
(d) if no disciplinary action is taken against him.
Successful completion of the state exam is one of the conditions for successful completion
study program. The subject of the state examination is evaluated by the commission for state examinations
grades A to FX. The examination commission decides on the evaluation of the state examination or its part
consensual. If the examination commission does not reach a consensus, evaluate the state examination or its
component shall be decided by voting.
Based on the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (VP 5/2020, Art. 15), the framework dates of state examinations
determines the dean in accordance with the faculty study schedule. Departments are required to publish their
dates of state exams on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place. The student
registers for the state exam through the academic information system at least three
weeks before the date of its action.
The student is entitled to one regular and two resit dates of the state exam. The due date is the one
to which the student applied for the first time within the deadline set for state exams. If he was a student at
regular date of the state exam evaluated by the mark FX, corrective dates of the state exam may
student perform
(a) in the following dates for the holding of state examinations in the relevant academic year
or
(b) within the time limits for holding State examinations in one of the following academic years in
in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Higher Education Act.
If, for serious reasons, a student is unable to attend the date of the state examination for which he / she has applied,
he is obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the examination commission in advance or no later than three
working days after the date of the state examination or its part, if there were serious obstacles to it
prevented themselves from apologizing in advance. If a student does not appear for a state examination without apology or
part of it, or if the chairman of the selection board does not accept his apology,
of the given date of the state exam is evaluated with the FX mark.
1. The student arrives on the registered date of the state exam according to the schedule set
department.
2. The student receives a question from the subject of the state exam, which is given in writing and anonymously
random selection from printed questions or generator.
3. The examination commission will give the student a reasonable time to prepare an oral answer to the assigned
question. (In the case of the distance form of SS, the student answers without preparation.)
4. The student is ready to have a synthesizing dialogue with the examination board.
5. Upon completion of the student's answer, the examination commission will decide on the results of the state examination
examinations to be held at a closed session of the selection board.
The course of the state examination and the announcement of its results are public.
0/100
The graduate has knowledge of the history of Slovak literature with an emphasis on the history of Slovak
20th and 21st century literature, knowledge from the theory of literature, literary science and literary criticism. He is able to perform accurate contextualization of researched texts and professional interpretations with his own relevant findings.