<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<obsah>
   <organizacnaJednotka>Comenius University Bratislava - Faculty of Arts</organizacnaJednotka>
   <vysokaSkola>Comenius University Bratislava</vysokaSkola>
   <fakulta>Faculty of Arts</fakulta>
   <skratkaFakulty>FiF</skratkaFakulty>
   <akRok>2026/2027</akRok>
   <informacneListy>
      <informacnyList>
         <id>132719</id>
         <kodTypPredmetu>O</kodTypPredmetu>
         <skratka>A-AboSL-93</skratka>
         <kod>FiF.KSJ/A-AboSL-93/22</kod>
         <nazov>Bachelor's Degree Thesis Defence</nazov>
         <kredit>12</kredit>
         <sposobUkoncenia>State Examination - Thesis Defence</sposobUkoncenia>
         <datumSchvalenia>11.05.2026</datumSchvalenia>
         <datumPoslednejZmeny>27.02.2022</datumPoslednejZmeny>
         <podmienujucePredmety/>
         <podmienujucePredmetyNazov/>
         <podmPredmetyKodNazov/>
         <vylucujucePredmety/>
         <vylucujucePredmetyNazov/>
         <vylucujucePredmetyKodNazov/>
         <alternujucePredmety/>
         <alternujucePredmetyNazov/>
         <alternujucePredmetyKodNazov/>
         <garanti>
            <garant>
               <typGarantaId>8</typGarantaId>
               <typGaranta>Person responsible for the delivery, development and quality of the study programme</typGaranta>
               <plneMeno>prof. PhDr. Oľga Orgoňová, CSc.</plneMeno>
               <pridelenyEmail/>
            </garant>
         </garanti>
         <sposobyVyucbyRozsahMetoda/>
         <podmienujucePredmetyStrukt/>
         <vylucujucePredmetyStrukt/>
         <alternujucePredmetyStrukt/>
         <kodyTypovVyucby>
            <kodtypVyucby>A</kodtypVyucby>
         </kodyTypovVyucby>
         <studijneProgramy>
            <studijnyProgram>
               <id>2097</id>
               <skratka>boSL</skratka>
               <popis>Slovak Language and Literature</popis>
               <kodSemester/>
               <rokRocnik>-1</rokRocnik>
               <metodaStudia>on-site learning</metodaStudia>
               <semesterPoradie/>
            </studijnyProgram>
         </studijneProgramy>
         <stupneStudijnychProgramov>I.</stupneStudijnychProgramov>
         <metodyStudia>
            <metodaStudia>on-site learning</metodaStudia>
         </metodyStudia>
         <jeZaradenyVStudijnomPlane>true</jeZaradenyVStudijnomPlane>
         <stupenPredmetu/>
         <vyucujuciAll/>
         <jazykyVyucbyPredmetu>
            <jazykyVyucbyPredmetuSpolu/>
         </jazykyVyucbyPredmetu>
         <_L_>
            <popisTypuTextu>Recommended literature</popisTypuTextu>
            <texty>
               <p>• LICHNEROVÁ, L. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác [online]. Bratislava:</p>
               <p>Univerzita Komenského, 2016 [cit. 2016-10-09]. Dostupné na: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/</p>
               <p>LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf</p>
               <p>• Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave,</p>
               <p>2015 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Dostupné na: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/</p>
               <p>as/2020/20200527/04a_Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf</p>
               <p>• Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit.</p>
               <p>2021-08-09]. Dostupné na: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske studium/zaverecne-prace/</p>
               <p>Ďalšia literatúra podľa zamerania témy bakalárskej práce. </p>
            </texty>
         </_L_>
         <_PA_>
            <popisTypuTextu>Conditions for completion of course</popisTypuTextu>
            <texty>
               <p>Submission of the bachelor's thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year</p>
               <p>for the relevant date of the state examination. The bachelor thesis is submitted in an electronic version</p>
               <p>via AIS. The work must meet the parameters determined by the internal quality system of the Charles University. On the</p>
               <p>The provisions of Article 14 of the Internal Regulation no. 5/2020</p>
               <p>(Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts, Charles University).</p>
               <p>The supervisor of the final thesis and its opponent will prepare reviews of the bachelor's thesis and propose an evaluation</p>
               <p>in the A-FX classification scale, which the student has at his disposal min. 3 working days before the defense.</p>
               <p>Bachelor thesis evaluation criteria:</p>
               <p>1. The contribution of the bachelor's thesis, the fulfillment of the objectives of the thesis in its assignment and the requirements for the content of the bachelor's thesis</p>
               <p>work given by the internal quality system of the Charles University. Assessed: demonstration of knowledge and skills,</p>
               <p>ability to work creatively in the study program, ability applied in the assembly,</p>
               <p>interpretation and processing of basic professional literature; in the case of a practically oriented bachelor's degree</p>
               <p>work and mastery of the application of theoretical principles in practice and verifiability of hypotheses;</p>
               <p>2. Originality of the work (the bachelor's thesis must not have the character of plagiarism, it must not violate the author's</p>
               <p>rights of other authors); protocols are also part of the documentation for the defense of the bachelor's thesis</p>
               <p>originality from CRZP and Theses, to the results of which the thesis supervisor and the opponent comment</p>
               <p>in its opinions;</p>
               <p>3. Correctness and correctness of citation of used information sources, research results of others</p>
               <p>authors and author groups, the accuracy of the description of methods and working procedures of other authors</p>
               <p>or author groups;</p>
               <p>4. Compliance of the bachelor's thesis structure with the prescribed composition defined by the internal system</p>
               <p>UK quality;</p>
               <p>5. Respecting the recommended scope of the bachelor thesis (recommended scope of the bachelor thesis</p>
               <p>is usually 30 - 40 standard pages = 54,000 to 72,000 characters including spaces), the adequacy of the range</p>
               <p>the thesis is assessed by the supervisor of the final thesis;</p>
               <p>6. Linguistic and stylistic level of work and formal arrangement.</p>
               <p>The student orally presents the content, achieved goals and conclusions of the bachelor thesis and answers questions</p>
               <p>and comments of the thesis supervisor, opponent, resp. members of the examination board. Commission</p>
               <p>comprehensively evaluate the quality of the bachelor's thesis, assess the method and form of defense and ability</p>
               <p>the student to adequately respond to the comments and questions in the opinions of the thesis supervisor</p>
               <p>the opponent.</p>
               <p>Part of the colloquial defense of the bachelor's thesis is the answering of two questions that are related to the theoretical and methodological background of the work.</p>
               <p>The final evaluation will take into account the evaluations from the training and opponent's opinion, the evaluation of the defense of the final thesis by the commission and the evaluation of the answers to the two questions selected by the commission. In the case of the Fx mark from the second part of the colloquial defense, the same mark is awarded to him as a whole.</p>
            </texty>
         </_PA_>
         <_PJ_>
            <popisTypuTextu>Language, which knowledge is needed to pass the course</popisTypuTextu>
            <texty>
               <p>Slovak</p>
            </texty>
         </_PJ_>
         <_SO_>
            <popisTypuTextu>Brief outline of the course</popisTypuTextu>
            <texty>
               <p>1. Presentation of the bachelor's thesis to the students before the commission for state exams, the opponent</p>
               <p>bachelor thesis and those present.</p>
               <p>2. Student's response to comments and questions in the reports.</p>
               <p>3. Student's response to the questions of the commission for state exams and in the discussion.</p>
               <p>4. Student's answer to two questions selected by the commission.</p>
            </texty>
         </_SO_>
         <_VH_>
            <popisTypuTextu>Weighting of course assessment (continuous/final)</popisTypuTextu>
            <texty>
               <p>0/100</p>
            </texty>
         </_VH_>
         <_VV_>
            <popisTypuTextu>Learning outcomes</popisTypuTextu>
            <texty>
               <p>The student has mastered the basic requirements of writing a professional text in compliance with the rules</p>
               <p>academic ethics, is able to work creatively in the field of study in which he graduated</p>
               <p>program, has adequate knowledge and understanding of the issues being addressed. He knows</p>
               <p>apply their skills in the collection, interpretation and processing of basic professional literature, or in its application in practice or has the ability to solve a partial task related to the focus of the bachelor's thesis. After successfully defending the bachelor's thesis, the student is able to logically</p>
               <p>to deal with the theoretical background of the bachelor's thesis and to respond to the questions on the processed issues.</p>
            </texty>
         </_VV_>
         <hodnoteniaPredmetu>
            <hodnoteniePredmetu>
               <kod>A</kod>
               <pocetHodnoteni>6</pocetHodnoteni>
               <percentualneVyjadrenieZCelkPoctuHodnoteni>50.0</percentualneVyjadrenieZCelkPoctuHodnoteni>
            </hodnoteniePredmetu>
            <hodnoteniePredmetu>
               <kod>B</kod>
               <pocetHodnoteni>1</pocetHodnoteni>
               <percentualneVyjadrenieZCelkPoctuHodnoteni>8.33</percentualneVyjadrenieZCelkPoctuHodnoteni>
            </hodnoteniePredmetu>
            <hodnoteniePredmetu>
               <kod>C</kod>
               <pocetHodnoteni>3</pocetHodnoteni>
               <percentualneVyjadrenieZCelkPoctuHodnoteni>25.0</percentualneVyjadrenieZCelkPoctuHodnoteni>
            </hodnoteniePredmetu>
            <hodnoteniePredmetu>
               <kod>D</kod>
               <pocetHodnoteni>1</pocetHodnoteni>
               <percentualneVyjadrenieZCelkPoctuHodnoteni>8.33</percentualneVyjadrenieZCelkPoctuHodnoteni>
            </hodnoteniePredmetu>
            <hodnoteniePredmetu>
               <kod>E</kod>
               <pocetHodnoteni>1</pocetHodnoteni>
               <percentualneVyjadrenieZCelkPoctuHodnoteni>8.33</percentualneVyjadrenieZCelkPoctuHodnoteni>
            </hodnoteniePredmetu>
            <hodnoteniePredmetu>
               <kod>FX</kod>
               <pocetHodnoteni>0</pocetHodnoteni>
               <percentualneVyjadrenieZCelkPoctuHodnoteni>0.0</percentualneVyjadrenieZCelkPoctuHodnoteni>
            </hodnoteniePredmetu>
            <celkovyPocetHodnotenychStudentov>12</celkovyPocetHodnotenychStudentov>
            <pocetTypovHodnoteni>6</pocetTypovHodnoteni>
         </hodnoteniaPredmetu>
      </informacnyList>
   </informacneListy>
</obsah>
