Continuous study and writing of the thesis under the guidance of a consultant, consultations, standard formal processing, preparation for the defense

Methods: consultations, partial presentation of results, presentation at the state exam, defense, scientific debate

Workload: 300 - 360 hours (1 credit = 25 - 30 hours) Includes - repeating the study contents in the context of law, reading current literature, setting the goal, content of the form in accordance with the requirements of the department and faculty, ongoing consulting, writing, editing, submission work, reading reviews, preparing for the defense, defense.

Recommended literature:

Domestic and foreign professional literature in terms of the assigned topic of the bachelor's final thesis.

Pursuant to §51, paragraph 3 of Act No. 131/2002, as amended, a final thesis is part of the study according to each study program, which together with its defense forms one subject; the defense of the final thesis is one of the state exams. The basic requirements of final theses are also regulated by Internal Regulation No. 12/2013 Rector's Directive.

: Slovak, Czech, English/ German or another language (native, other world language)

The student chooses and registers the topic of the bachelor's thesis, consults regularly, independently writes and submits the bachelor's thesis on time, prepares for the defense by studying the reviews. During the defense, he will observe the designated time for the presentation of the results. Then he listens to the opinions and responds to the commission's questions.

The examination committee for conducting state examinations in the framework of the defense evaluates the content and formal level of the school work and its originality and overall defense as follows:

A (100-91 points, excellent - excellent results), if the treatment of the topic is in accordance with the field, formally without errors, to an adequate extent. The work is original (low % agreement), suitable literature was used, researches, studies in journals were cited, citation was consistent and according to the standard. She demonstrated the ability to know the starting points and tasks of her field, to know the possibilities of applying knowledge in practice.

B (90-81 points, very good - above average standard), same as above, but occasional minor errors

C (80-73 points, good – normal reliable work), all requirements have been met, repeated minor shortcomings in some assessed area, or an exceptionally serious error,

D (72-66 points, satisfactory - acceptable results), several shortcomings and errors, imbalance, at least part satisfactory,

E (65-60 points, sufficient – generally poor results, but meet the criteria in the context of the field, well-prepared defence,

Fx (59-0 points, insufficient - more additional work required), weak defense, negative review, work returned for revision.

The student will be able to work with a professional text: gather up-to-date information in a chronological and content sequence in the context of his field, he will be able to cite correctly, stick to the topic and discuss it in a balanced way in the chapters. He will demonstrate reliable orientation in the issue, the ability to plan therapeutic-pedagogical exercises/programs and at the same time comply with the rules of professional ethics. He will be able to present the results, defend them and respond to comments.