Summary of literature of compulsory and optional subjects of the study program Didactics of Philosophy relevant to the content of the subject of the state exam.
Šuch, J.: Vybrané problémy z vyučovania filozofie, Prešov, Metodicko-pedagogické centrum, 2002. Petersen, W.H.: Učebnica všeobecnej didaktiky. Bratislava, 1993. Petlák, E.: Všeobecná didaktika. Bratislava, 1997. Petty, G.: Moderní vyučování. Praha, 1996. Kyriacou, Ch.: Klíčové dovednosti učitele, Praha, 1996. Novotný, Z.: Jak (se) učit filosofii. Olomouc, 2004.
Thematic areas:
1. A. Specific objectives in philosophy classes; B. Lesson presentation on a selected problem or figure in pre-Socratic philosophy.
2. A. Critical thinking in philosophy classes - affective strategies (description, explanation); B. Lesson presentation on a selected problem in Plato's philosophy.
3. A. Critical thinking in philosophy classes - cognitive strategies (description, explanation); B. Lesson presentation on a selected problem in Aristotle's philosophy.
4. A. Critical thinking in philosophy classes - cognitive strategies (description, explanation); B. Lesson presentation on a selected problem or a personality from medieval philosophy.
5. A. Organisation of teaching in the philosophy class; B. Lesson presentation on a selected problem or figure in Renaissance philosophy.
6. A. Classification and alternative forms of assessment in philosophy classes; B. Lesson presentation on a selected problem in modern rationalist philosophy.
7. A. Structure and writing philosophic papers and essays; B. Lesson presentation on a selected problem in modern empirist philosophy.
8. A. Criteria for assessment of written papers, essays in philosophy;
B. Lesson presentation on a selected problem in Kant's philosophy.
9. A. Material resources in philosophy classes; B. Lesson presentation on a selected problem or figure in19th century philosophy.
10. A. The personality of the philosophy teacher, graduation examination and secondary school professional activity in philosophy; B. Lesson presentation on a selected problem or figure in 20th century philosophy.
The students can take the state exam
a) After obtaining at least such number of credits that after obtaining credits for successful completion of state exams, they achieve the necessary number of credits for the proper completion of studies,
b) After successful completion of compulsory subjects, compulsory elective subjects, and elective subjects in the composition determined by the study program,
c) After fulfilling the student's obligations arising from § 71, par. 3 letter b of the Higher Education Act, d) If no disciplinary action is taken against them.
Successful completion of the state exam is one of the conditions for successful completion of the study program. The subject of the state exam is evaluated by the committee for state exams using the grading scale A-FX. The evaluation of the state exam or its part is decided by the exam committee by consensus. If the exam committee does not reach a consensus, the evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by voting.
On the basis of the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (Internal Rules and Regulations 5/2020, Art. 15), the framework dates of state exams are set by the dean in accordance with the faculty’s academic schedule. Departments are obliged to publish the dates of their state exams on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place. The student registers for the state exam through the academic information system (AIS) at least three weeks before it takes place.
The student is entitled to one regular and two resit attempts of the state exam. The regular attempt is the one for which the student applied for the first time within the deadline set for state exams. If the student was evaluated with the FX mark on the regular attempt of the state exam, the student may take resits of the state exam
a) on the following dates assigned for state exams in the relevant academic year, or
b) on the dates assigned for state exams in one of the following academic years in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Higher Education Act.
If the student is unable to come on the day of the state exam for which they have registered on serious grounds, they are obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the exam committee in advance or no later than three working days after the date of the state exam or its part, if there were serious obstacles that prevented them to do so in advance. If the student does not attend the state exam or its part without an excuse within the specified period, or if the chairman of the exam committee does not accept their excuse, they are assessed with the FX grade from that attempt of the state exam.
slovak
1. The student arrives on the registered date of the state exam according to the schedule set by the department.
2. The student receives a question from the subject of the state exam, which is submitted in writing and anonymously in the form of a random selection from printed questions or a generator.
3. The exam committee will provide the student with reasonable time to prepare an oral answer to the question.
4. The student presents the prepared answer to the question in front of the exam committee and answers the additional questions.
5. After the student finishes their answer, the exam committee decides on the results of the state exam in a closed session of the exam committee.
0%/100%
After successfully passing the state final examination in the subject Didactics of Philosophy, students have adequate theoretical knowledge in the field of didactics of philosophy, as well as practical skills in conceiving, conducting and organizing a teaching lesson in philosophy at secondary school. On the basis of an oral answer to one selected question, consisting of two sub-questions from the subject Didactics of Philosophy (one question concerning theoretical knowledge would use in the design of a model lesson in the teaching of philosophy), the student demonstrates the ability to interpret and practically demonstrate the acquired knowledge on the subject, as well as to respond promptly in the course of the discussion to the questions raised.
1. Kolář, Peter - Svoboda, Vladimír. Logika a etika. Úvod do metaetiky. Praha: Filosofia, 1997. ISBN: 80-7007-100-1.
2. BRÁZDA, Radim: Ethicum. Zlín: VeRBuM, 2010. ISBN: 978-80-904273-9-6.
3. LONGINO, Helen. Usmerňovanie sociálneho obratu vo filozofii vedy. Filozofia. 2009. roč. 64, č. 4, s. 312-324. ISSN 0046-385X (Available on: http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2009/4/312-323.pdf).
5. SZAPUOVÁ, Mariana, NUHLÍČEK, Martin, CHABADA, Michal (eds). Veda, spoločnosť a hodnoty. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2019. ISBN 978-80-223-4749-5
(selected chapters)
6. GAHÉR, František. Logická sémantika a všeobecná teória prekladu. Bratislava: Stimul, 2010. ISBN 978-80-89236-97-8. Available on: https://stella.uniba.sk/texty/fg-lsavtp.pdf
7. GAHÉR, František, ŠTEVČEK, Marek, BRAXATORIS, Martin. Nástroje a pravidlá produkcie a interpretácie koncízneho textu (s osobitným zreteľom na normativitu). In: Jazykovedný časopis. 2019, roč. 70, č. 1, s. 75-94. ISSN (online) 1338-4287.
8. GAHÉR, František. Vetné operátory: ich interakcie (s vektormi času, kauzality a epistemickej relevancie) a ich konštrukcie. In: Jazykovedný časopis. 2020, roč. 71, č. 2, s. 197-212. ISSN (online) 1338-4287.
9. BIELIK, Lukáš. Metodologické aspekty vedy. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2019. ISBN 978-80-223-4788-4
10. DALY, Chris. An Introduction to Philosophical Methods. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2010. ISBN 978-1-55111-934-2.
11. H. Holzhey, W. Röd: Filosofie 19. A 20. století. II. Praha: Oikoymenh, 2006.
12. R. Thurnher, W. Röd, H. Schmidinger: Filosofie 19. A 20. století. III. Praha: Oikoymenh, 2009.
13. J. Bodnár, P. Cmorej, I. Hrušovský, A. Riška, ed.: Logický empirizmus a filozofia prírodných vied. Antológia z diel filozofov, 9. zv. Bratislava: VPL, 1968.
Thematic areas: History of Philosophy:
1. Phenomenological method, the phenomenological understanding of consciousness and intentionality, and the phenomenological critique of naturalism and historicism (Husserl, Heidegger).
2. Existentialism and its view of the authentic form of the life of the human individual and the philosophical approach to existence and being. The issue of freedom and the meaning of human existence (Sartre, Jaspers).
3. Heidegger's philosophy of being and his analysis of the structures of human existence. The concept of the existential and ontological differentiation.
4. Theory of knowledge and understanding of truth and science in classical pragmatism (Peirce, James, Dewey).
5. Critical theory of the Frankfurt School: neo-Marxist critique of Western civilization and the theory of communicative rationality (Horkheimer, Adorno, Habermas).
6. Radical critique of metaphysics and different conceptions of metaphysics in 20th century philosophy (logical positivism, Heidegger, pragmatism, Frankfurt School, Derrida).
7. The notion of structure and the basic features of the structural method in French structuralist and post-structuralist philosophy (Lévi-Strauss, Foucault, Barthes, Althusser).
8. The turn to language and the role of modern logic in early analytic philosophy (Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein). Conceptual analysis as a method of philosophy. Fregean semantics.
9. The concept of philosophy and the philosophy of science in logical positivism and logical empiricism (Vienna Circle, Berlin Society for Empirical Philosophy).
10. Philosophical reflection on the postmodern situation in society and science (Lyotard). Deconstructive reading of texts as a way of philosophizing (Derrida)
Social and ethical problems of science:
1. The social turn in the philosophy of science, its assumptions and consequences
2. Values in science and the problem of value neutrality of scientific knowledge
3. Feminist epistemology and the problem of the social nature of scientific knowledge
4. Science as a social institution and the normative structure of science
5. Ethics in science and ethics of science (internal and external ethics of science)
Methods of science and philosophy
1. Sources of knowledge and classification of statements
2. Thought experiments and their function in science and philosophy
3. Conceptual analysis and definition
4. Testing: scientific hypotheses and philosophical theses
5. Scientific theories: structure and functions
The students can take the state exam:
a) After obtaining at least such number of credits that after obtaining credits for successful completion of state exams, they achieve the necessary number of credits for the proper completion of studies,
b) After successfully completing the compulsory subjects, compulsory elective subjects, and elective subjects in the composition determined by the study program,
c) After fulfilling the student's obligations arising from § 71, par. 3 letter b of the Higher Education Act, d) If no disciplinary action is taken against them.
Successful completion of the state exam is one of the conditions for successful completion of the study program. The subject of the state exam is evaluated by the committee for state exams using the grading scale A-FX. The evaluation of the state exam or its part is decided by the exam committee by consensus. If the exam committee does not reach a consensus, the evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by voting.
On the basis of the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (Internal Rules and Regulations 5/2020, Art. 15), the framework dates of state exams are set by the dean in accordance with the faculty’s academic schedule. Departments are obliged to publish the dates of their state exams on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place. The student registers for the state exam through the academic information system (AIS) at least three weeks before it takes place.
The student is entitled to one regular and two resit attempts of the state exam. The regular attempt is the one for which the student applied for the first time within the deadline set for state exams. If the student was evaluated with the FX mark on the regular attempt of the state exam, the student may take resits of the state exam
a) On the following dates assigned for state exams in the relevant academic year, or
b) On the dates assigned for state exams in one of the following academic years in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Higher Education Act.
If the student is unable to come on the day of the state exam for which they have registered on serious grounds, they are obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the exam committee in advance or no later than three working days after the date of the state exam or its part, if there were serious obstacles that prevented them to do so in advance. If the student does not attend the state exam or its part without an excuse within the specified period, or if the chairman of the exam committee does not accept their excuse, they are assessed with the FX grade from that attempt of the state exam.
Slovak
1. The student arrives on the registered date of the state exam according to the schedule set by the department.
2. The student receives a question from the subject of the state exam, which is submitted in writing and anonymously in the form of a random selection from printed questions or a generator.
3. The exam committee will provide the student with reasonable time to prepare an oral answer to the question.
4. The student presents the prepared answer to the question in front of the exam committee and answers the additional questions.
5. After the student finishes their answer, the exam committee decides on the results of the state exam in a closed session of the exam committee.
The course of the state exam and the announcement of its results are public.
0%/100%
In the final state examination in the subject Philosophy, the students demonstrate adequate knowledge of the history of philosophy (history of philosophy of the 20th century), as well as of the profile, compulsory elective and elective subjects. On the basis of an oral answer to two selected questions from the subject Philosophy (one question from the history of philosophy and the other from systematic philosophy), the students demonstrate the ability to interpret the acquired knowledge on a given issue, as well as respond promptly in the discussion to the questions raised.
Literatúra k predmetu Metodológia pedagogických vied
Gavora, P. (2008). Úvod do pedagogického výskumu. (4. vyd.) Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave.
Gavora, P. (2007). Sprievodca metodológiou kvalitatívneho výskumu. (2. vyd.) Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave.
Chráska, M. (2007). Metódy pedagogického výzkumu. Praha: Grada Publishing.
Hendl, J. (2008). Kvalitativní výzkum. Základní teorie, metody a aplikace. Druhé aktualizované vydání. Praha: Portál.
Hendl, J. (2017). Metody výzkumu a evaluace. Praha : Portál.
Masaryk, R. (2021). Ten druhý výskum. Úvod do kvalitatívnych metód v psychológii. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave.
Strauss, A. & Corbinová, J. (1999). Základy kvalitativního výskumu. Postupy a techniky zakotvené teorie. Boskovice: Nakladatelství Albert.
Šeďová, K., Švaříček, R. et al. (2007). Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. Praha: Portál.
Švec, Š. et al. (1998). Metodológia vied o výchove. Bratislava: IRIS.
Literatúra k predmetu Pedagogické poradenstvo
Ďurdiak, Ľ., Gatial, V. (2006). Psychologické aspekty výchovného a kariérového poradenstva. Nitra: Pedagogická fakulta UKF v Nitre.
Hargašová, M. et al. (2009). Skupinové poradenství. Praha: Grada Publishing
Jarábek, K., Koštrnová, D. (2014). Výchovný poradca [online]. Bratislava: Metodicko-pedagogické centrum. Dostupné na: https://archiv.mpcedu.sk/sites/default/files/publikacie/jarabek_kostrnova_vychovny_poradca_web.pdf
Knotová, D. a kol. (2014). Školní poradenství. Praha: Grada Publishing.
Krnáčová, Z., Križo, V. (2021). Multidisciplinárny prístup v školách: Školský podporný tím [online].
Národný projekt ŠTANDARDY, VÚDPaP. Dostupné na: https://vudpap.sk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Multidisciplinarny-pristup-v-skolach-Skolsky-podporny-tim-v1.03.pdf
Kunčaková, S. (2021). Manuál začínajúceho sociálneho pedagóga v škole. Bratislava: VÚDPaP. Dostupné na: https://vudpap.sk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Manual-zacinajuceho-soc.ped_.v1.02.pdf
Lazarová, B. (2002). Základy pedagogicko-psychologického poradenství pro učitele. Brno: ÚPV FF Masarykovy univerzity v Brne.
Mertin, V., Krejčová, L. et al. (2020).Výchovné poradenství. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2020.
Sejčová, Ľ. (2018). Edukačné poradenstvo a perspektívy jeho rozvoja. In: Perspektívy rozvoja pedagogiky a andragogiky v Slovenskej republike a v krajinách strednej Európy [elektronický dokument]. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2018. s.122-131 [CD-ROM]
Sejčová, Ľ. (2011). Pedagogicko-psychologické poradenstvo a poradenský proces. Bratislava: Vydav. UK.
Šefránková, M. (2007). Výchovný poradca. Iris : Bratislava.
Literatúra k predmetu Didaktika pedagogiky
Majerčíková, J. et al. (2015). Předškolní edukace a dítě. Zlín: FHS UTB.
Vališová, A., & Kasíková, H. et. al. (2011). Pedagogika pro učitele. Praha: Grada.
Wiegerová, A. et al. (2015). Profesionalizace učitele mateřské školy z pohledu reformy kurikula. Zlín: FHS UTB.
Wiegerová, A., & Gavora, P. (2014). Proč chci být učitelkou mateřské školy? pohled kvalitativního výzkumu. Pedagogická orientace, 24(4), 510-534.
Wiegerová, A., & Gavora, P. (2015). Conceptualisation of the child and childhood by future pre-school teachers. Pedagogika, 65(5), 502-515.
Štátny vzdelávací program pre odborné vzdelávanie a prípravu . 75 Pedagogické vedy.
Methodology of pedagogical sciences
1. Pedagogical research - scientific theory, research, pedagogical research, theory, practice, method, methodology. The relationship between pedagogical research and educational theory and practice. Research - action research - evaluation.
2. Planning, organization and implementation of field pedagogical research. Stages of research work. Information preparation of research.
3. Ethical principles of work with research subjects, data collection and publication.
4. Thinking about the research problem: The difference between a topic and a research problem. Reasoning and reasoning of the researcher. Preparation of a research project.
5. Quantitative and qualitative research design: Comparison of qualitative and quantitative research, their philosophical foundations, goals, focus and procedures for collecting and processing research data.
6. Qualitatively oriented pedagogical research: Selected currents (branches) of qualitative research: Ethnography, Phenomenological analysis, Narrative and Dramaturgical approach.
7. Procedures in qualitative research. Entering the terrain. Research methods used in qualitative research. Data analysis in qualitative research. Thematic analysis. Grounded theory. Quality standards of qualitative research.
8. Quantitatively oriented pedagogical research: Determination of the research problem. Variables and hypotheses. Hypothesis testing in scientific research. Measurement and quantification in educational research.
9. Research method, research tool.
10. Creation of research instrument, validity and reliability of research instrument
11. Methods of collecting research data: Observation, questionnaire, assessment scales, tests of knowledge and skills, pedagogical experiment.
12. Processing of obtained research data: Analysis and interpretation of research data. Discussion of research findings. Creation of recommendations for practice.
Pedagogical consulting
1. Pedagogical consulting. Characteristics of educational counseling and counseling activities. Explanation of the terms queuing, counselling, adviser, counseling. Forms and areas of counseling. The focus and objectives of the current consultancy.
2. Historical cross-section of the development of counseling and counseling concepts. Counseling as guidance in choosing a profession, diagnostic and psychometric model, medical concept, educational and educational-formative concepts, biodromal educational and developing concept of counseling.
3. Advisory process. Conditions of the counseling process. Requirements for the consultation room and its equipment. Requirements for the consulting team.
4. Clients of the consulting process. Risk clients.
5. Personality and role of the advisor. Communication in the counseling process. Phases of the counseling process.
6. Diagnostic methods of working with the client. Pedagogical diagnostics. Phases of diagnosis in counseling. Anamnestic interview. Observation. Analysis of materials. Standardized diagnostics. Sociometry. Diagnostic techniques in the field of educational counseling.
7. Intervention methods of working with the client. Interventions according to duration, intensity, number of people, client's problem, degree of directiveness, according to individual phases of the counseling process. Individual consultation methods. Group interventions.
8. System of school and educational counseling in Slovakia. The emergence and development of educational and psychological counseling. Special educational facilities. Educational counseling and prevention school facilities.
9. Activities of an educational consultant, social pedagogue, school psychologist, special pedagogue and therapeutic pedagogue.
10. Educational advisor's toolkit. Basic documentation of the educational advisor. Educational consulting abroad (school teacher in Poland, Slovenia, Croatia, USA, educational consultant in the Czech Republic).
Didactics of pedagogy
1. Subject, goals and tasks of didactics of pedagogy and its position in the complex of pedagogical sciences. The relation of didactics of pedagogy to other sciences. The history of the development of the didactics of pedagogy and its teaching.
2. Pedagogy as a teaching subject in secondary schools, issues of the teaching process of pedagogy in different types of secondary schools - pedagogy as a professional subject, as a subject in general - educational, formative and informative goals.
3. The goal of teaching pedagogy in the analysis of basic documents - lesson plans, curricula. Concretization on different types of schools.
4. The issue of goals in teacher preparation for teaching, goals in relation to: content, teaching methods, goal-teacher, goal-student.
5. Bloom's taxonomy of goals and its concretization in the subject of pedagogy.
6. Didactic analysis of the curriculum as a basic activity of the teacher in preparation for teaching. Analysis of textbooks and other aids for the presentation of basic, expanding, supplementary curriculum.
7. Methods of teaching pedagogy. Categorization of teaching methods, the problem of their choice.
8. Social approaches in teaching. Role playing, cooperative learning.
9. Organizational forms of teaching pedagogy. Lesson, pedagogical practice, excursion, visiting, pedagogical observation, lecture, seminar, exercise, independent work.
10. Evaluation of teaching results in pedagogy, entrance exams, matriculation exams - practical - theoretical testing.
11. The personality of the pedagogy teacher, his position at the secondary school. Specifics of the activity of a pedagogy teacher. Extracurricular activity of a pedagogy teacher.
12. Material equipment of the pedagogy teacher at the school, didactic cabinet, library.
A student can take the state exam a) after obtaining at least such a number of credits that, after obtaining the credits for successfully passing the state exams, he reaches the necessary number of credits for the proper completion of his studies, b) after successfully completing the mandatory subjects, mandatory optional subjects and optional subjects in the composition determined by the study program, c) after fulfilling the student's obligations arising from § 71, par. 3 letters b of the Act on Universities, d) if no disciplinary proceedings are being conducted against him.
Successful completion of the subject of the state exam is one of the conditions for successful completion of the study program. The subject of the state exam is evaluated by the commission for state exams with classification grades A to FX. The examination board decides on the evaluation of the state exam or its part by consensus. If the examination committee does not reach a consensus, the evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by voting.
Based on the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (VP 5/2020, Article 15), the framework dates of state exams are set by the dean in accordance with the faculty study schedule. The department is obliged to publish the dates of the state exams on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place. The student registers for the state exam through the academic information system at least three weeks before the exam date.
The student is entitled to one regular and two correction dates of the state exam. The regular term is the one for which the student registered for the first time in the term set for the state exams. If the student was evaluated with an FX grade on the regular date of the state exam, the student can take the remedial dates of the state exam a) in the following dates for holding state exams in the relevant academic year or b) in the dates for holding state exams in any of the following academic years in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Act on Universities.
If, for serious reasons, the student is unable to participate in the state exam date for which he has registered, he is obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the examination committee in advance or no later than three working days after the state exam date or part of it, if there were serious obstacles that prevented him from apologizing in advance. If a student does not appear for the state exam or part of it on the specified date without an excuse, or if the chairman of the examination committee does not accept his excuse, he is evaluated with an FX grade for the given date of the state exam.
Slovak
1. The student will attend the registered date of the state exam according to the schedule set by the department.
2. The student receives a question from the subject of the state exam, which is entered in writing and anonymously in the form of a random selection from printed questions or a generator.
3. The examination board will give the student adequate time to prepare an oral answer to the given question.
4. The student presents a prepared answer to the question in front of the examination committee and also answers additional questions.
5. After the student's answer is finished, the examination board will decide on the results of the state exam, which will take place at a closed session of the examination board.
The course of the state exam and the announcement of its results are public.
0/100
A student who passes the state exam comprehensively manages the issues of the state exam in the context of the set areas. He has theoretical and practical knowledge based on the current state of knowledge in the field of pedagogy, as well as the ability to apply and use them creatively. He masters the knowledge contained in the teaching of the subjects Methodology of Pedagogical Sciences, Pedagogical Counseling and Didactics of Pedagogy. He can apply knowledge from pedagogy to intersubject relationships, he is able to think critically and argue scientifically.
BAZÁLIKOVA, Jana. História vyučovania pedagogiky v učiteľských ústavoch a učiteľských akadémiách na Slovensku. In: Paedagogica 20. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2008, s. 7-13.
BAZÁLIKOVA, Jana. Vývoj a súčasné poňatie predmetu pedagogika na stredných školách. In: Pedagogická revue, roč. 50, č. 4, 1998, s. 329-335.
BAZÁLIKOVA, Jana. Didaktika pedagogiky ako špeciálnej pedagogickej disciplíny. In: Paedagogica 16. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2001, s.101-106.
PODLAHOVÁ, Libuše. Pedagogická praxe. Průvodce pro současné studenty a budoucí učitele. Olomouc: VUP, 1998. ISBN 80-7067-793-7.
SKALKOVÁ, Jarmila. Obecní didaktika. Praha: Grada, 2007. ISBN 80-247-182-17.
ŠTURMA, Jaroslav. Didaktika pedagogiky. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus, 1993.
ŠVEC, Štefan. Didaktika I. Bratislava: UK, 1988.
ŠVEC, Vlastimil, FILOVÁ, Hana a Oldřich ŠIMONÍK. Praktikum didaktických dovedností. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 1996. ISBN 80-210-1365-6.
VALIŠOVÁ, Alena, SINGULE, František a Jozef VALENTA. Didaktika pedagogiky. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství, 1990. ISBN 80-7066-105-4.
VALIŠOVÁ, Alena a Hana KASÍKOVÁ. Pedagogika pro učitele. Praha: Grada. 2007. ISBN 978-80247-1734-0.
1. Subject, goals and tasks of didactics of pedagogy (concept of didactics of pedagogy, position in the complex of pedagogical sciences, didactics of pedagogy as a special pedagogical discipline)
2. Pedagogy as a subject in secondary schools (history and current state)
3. Methodological basis of didactics of pedagogy and its theoretical starting points
4. Modern trends in the teaching of pedagogy abroad (organization of student preparation for the teaching profession)
5. Issues in the process of teaching pedagogy in secondary schools (the purpose of teaching, the personality of the pupil, the personality of the teacher, teaching methods, material and organizational conditions, phases of the teacher's work, and etc.)
6. Analysis of the basic means of teaching pedagogy (focus on secondary school, secondary school of pedagogy as a specific type of vocational school, common and different features)
7. Concept of the goal of teaching pedagogy (dichotomous and trichotonic division of goals)
8. Profile of a graduate of SPŠ (concretization of the goal from the point of view of the student's personality)
9. Goal in the teaching content of the subject pedagogy (study field of teaching for kindergartens, pedagogy, free time animator, cultural and educational worker)
10. Structure of the goals of education and education at SPŠ (Pedagogical skills, knowledge, thinking, habits, motives and attitudes, concrete and abstract knowledge, relationships expressing connections)
11. Didactic analysis of the curriculum as a basic activity of the teacher in preparation for teaching (the concept of DAU, selection of the curriculum and its organization in terms of goals, formulation of learning questions and tasks, teacher preparation)
12. Methods of teaching pedagogy and their modernization (which affects the choice of methods)
13. Learning tasks and questions and their use in the teaching of pedagogy (concept of learning tasks, functions of learning tasks, classification of questions based on the taxonomy of learning tasks)
14. Organizational forms of teaching in the subject of pedagogy (concept, use of selected organizational forms of teaching)
15. The concept of pedagogical practice (goals, tasks, content, forms, evaluation, pedagogical diary – structure, goal)
16. Use of material didactic aids in the teaching of pedagogy (the concept of didactic aids, special teaching aids in the teaching of pedagogy)
17. Examination and evaluation of the educational process (forms of assessment, function, quantitative and qualitative examination, use of didactic tests and classification of pedagogical practice)
18 Specifics of entrance exams to SPŠ
19. The teacher's personality and the process of his self-improvement
20. Characteristics of the pedagogy curriculum (content in terms of knowledge, activities, various sources of curriculum content)
A student can take the state exam a) after obtaining at least such a number of credits that, after obtaining the credits for successfully passing the state exams, he reaches the necessary number of credits for the proper completion of his studies, b) after successfully completing the mandatory subjects, mandatory optional subjects and optional subjects in the composition determined by the study program, c) after fulfilling the student's obligations arising from § 71, par. 3 letters b of the Act on Universities, d) if no disciplinary proceedings are being conducted against him.
Successful completion of the subject of the state exam is one of the conditions for successful completion of the study program. The subject of the state exam is evaluated by the commission for state exams with classification grades A to FX. The examination board decides on the evaluation of the state exam or its part by consensus. If the examination committee does not reach a consensus, the evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by voting.
Based on the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (VP 5/2020, Article 15), the framework dates of state exams are set by the dean in accordance with the faculty study schedule. The department is obliged to publish the dates of the state exams on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place. The student registers for the state exam through the academic information system at least three weeks before the exam date.
The student is entitled to one regular and two correction dates of the state exam. The regular term is the one for which the student registered for the first time in the term set for the state exams. If the student was evaluated with an FX grade on the regular date of the state exam, the student can take the correction dates of the state exam
a) in the following dates for holding state exams in the relevant academic year or b) in the dates for holding state exams in any of the following academic years in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Act on Universities.
If, for serious reasons, the student is unable to participate in the state exam date for which he has registered, he is obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the examination committee in advance or no later than three working days after the state exam date or part of it, if there were serious obstacles that prevented him from apologizing in advance. If a student does not appear for the state exam or part of it on the specified date without an excuse, or if the chairman of the examination committee does not accept his excuse, he is evaluated with an FX grade for the given date of the state exam.
Slovak
1. The student will attend the registered date of the state exam according to the schedule set by the department.
2. The student receives a question from the subject of the state exam, which is entered in writing and anonymously in the form of a random selection from printed questions or a generator.
3. The examination board will give the student adequate time to prepare an oral answer to the given question.
4. The student presents a prepared answer to the question in front of the examination committee and also answers additional questions.
5. After the student's answer is finished, the examination board will decide on the results of the state exam, which will take place at a closed session of the examination board.
The course of the state exam and the announcement of its results are public.
0/100
A student who passes the state exam comprehensively manages the issues of the state exam in the context of the set areas. He has theoretical and practical knowledge based on the current state of knowledge from the didactics of pedagogy, as well as the ability to apply and use them creatively. He masters the knowledge contained in the teaching of the subjects Didactics of Pedagogy 1 and Didactics of Pedagogy 2. He is able to apply knowledge from the didactics of pedagogy to cross-subject relationships, he is able to think critically and argue scientifically.