1. BRYSON, N. Umění v kontexte. In: Kessner, L. (ed), Vizuální teorie. Praha: H&H 1997, s. 237 – 263.
2. DELEUZE, G. – GUATTARI, F. Rizoma. In: Host. r. 1996, č. 3- 4, s. 3 – 27.
3. DERRIDA, J. Struktura, znak a hra v diskursu věd o člověku. In Derrida, J.,Texty k dekonstrukci PETŘÍČEK, M. (ed) Bratislava: Archa 1993, s. 177 - 196.
4. DERRIDA, J. Signatura událost kontext. In Derrida, J., Texty k dekonstrukci, Petříček, M. (ed), Bratislava : Archa 1993, s. 277 – 307.
5. ECO, U. Poetika otevřeného uměleckého díla. In Opus musicum r. 1990, roč. XXII, č. 5, s. 129 - 145.
6. INGARDEN, R. Formy poznávania literárneho diela. In Popovič, A. (ed), Slovo, význam, dielo. Bratislava : Slovenský spisovateľ 1972, s. 67 – 101.
7. JAKOBSON, R. – LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Baudelairovy Mačky. In Jakobson, R., Červenka, M. (ed), Poetická funkce. Praha : Nakladatelství H & H, 1995.
8. KRISTEVA, J., Slovo, dialog a román. In Polyfonie. Významy, pohlaví, světy. Praha : Knihovna ceny Vize 87 2008, s. 22 – 40.
9. LOTMAN, J. M. Text v textu. In Bernard, J., Tartuská škola. Sborník filmové teorie 2. Praha : NFA 1993, s. 13 – 29.
10. MUKAŘOVSKÝ, J. Záměrnost a nezáměrnost v umění. In Studie z estetiky. Praha, Odeon 1966, s. 89 – 109 alebo Studie I. Brno: Host, 1995, s. 622 – 639.
11. RICOEUR, P. Struktura, slovo, událost. In Život, pravda, symbol. Praha : OIKOYMENH 1993.
12. BARTHES, R. Smrť autora. In Profil súčasného výtvarného umenia. roč. VIII., r. 2001, č. 1 - 2, str. 8 – 14.
13. BARTHES, R. Eiffelova veža. In Rozkoš z textu. Bratislava : Slovenský spisovateľ 1994, s. 53 - 77.
14. CULLER, J. Na obranu nadinterpretácie. In COLLINI, S. (ed) UMBERTO, E. - RORTY, R. - CULLER, J. – BROOKE - ROSEOVÁ, CH., Interpretácia a nadinterpretácia. Bratislava: Archa 1995.
15. FIGAL, G. O mlčení textů. K hermeneutickému pojmu interpretace. In Hermeneutická sloboda. Praha : FILOSOFIA 1994.
16. FOUCAULT, M. Co je to autor? In Horák, P. (ed) Diskurs, autor, genealogie. Praha : Nakladatelství Svoboda 1994, s. 41 – 75.
17. FOUCAULT, M. Řád diskursu. In Horák, P. (ed) Diskurs, autor, genealogie. Praha : Nakladatelství Svoboda 1994, s. 7 – 41
18. ECO, U. Nadinterpretovanie textov. In COLLINI, S. (ed) UMBERTO, E. - RORTY, R. - CULLER, J. – BROOKE - ROSEOVÁ, CH. Interpretácia a nadinterpretácia. Bratislava : Archa 1995.
19. ECO, U. Medzi autorom a textom. In COLLINI, S. (ed) UMBERTO, E. - RORTY, R. - CULLER, J. – BROOKE - ROSEOVÁ, CH. Interpretácia a nadinterpretácia. Bratislava : Archa 1995.
20. FREUD, S. Vzpomínka z dětství Leonarda da Vinci. Praha : Orbis 1991.
21. LÉVI-STRAUSS, C., Struktura mýtov. In Struktrurální antropologie. Praha : Argo: 2006.
22. MUKAŘOVSKÝ, J. Individuum v umění a Osobnost v umění. In Studie z estetiky. Praha : Odeon 1966.
23. RORTY, R. Púť pragmatizmu. In COLLINI, S. (ed) UMBERTO, E. - RORTY, R. - CULLER, J. – BROOKE - ROSEOVÁ, CH. Interpretácia a nadinterpretácia. Bratislava: Archa 1995.
ET 1. Phenomenology of (artistic) text - Roman Ingarden
ET 2. Semantic gesture as a principle of dynamic unification of meaning
ET 3. The problem of intertextuality - Julia Kristeva
ET 4. J. Derrida's poststructuralism and open structure
ET 5. Text and context - Norman Bryson
ET 6. Philosophical hermeneutics and (artistic) text
ET 7. Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari: rhizomatic arrangement
ET 8. Author's question - S. Freud
ET 9. Author's question - J. Mukařovský
ET 10. Death of the author - M. Foucault and R. Barthes
ET 11. Interpretation and overinterpretation - Umberto Eco
ET 12. Simulation and similarity - simulacra problem
ET 13. Aesthetic defect, transformation of associations and the problem of identifiable gossip (T. Kulka).
ET 14. Open work of art (U. Eco)
ET 15. Postdramatic theater
ET 16. Fluxus and the emergence of new art forms
ET 17: Aesthetic Commitment and Unity of Aesthetic Experience (Arnold Berleant)
ET 18: Performativity, performance and participatory art (Judith Butler, Erika Fischer-Lichte)
ET 19: Social and ethical turnover; participatory art forms (Claire Bishop)
ET 20: Politics and the aesthetic regime of art (Jacques Ranciere)
DE 1. Aesthetics of Ľudovít Štúr
DE 2. Aesthetics of Pavel Jozef Šafárik
DE 3. Aesthetics of Karol Kuzmány
DE 4. Aesthetics of Ján Kollár
DE 5. Aesthetics of František Palacký
DE 6. Aesthetics of Bohuslav Tablica
DE 7. Aesthetics of Ludwig Schedius
DE 8. Aesthetics of Matej Holka Jr.
DE 9. Aesthetics of Michal Greguš
DE 10. Aesthetics of Matej Daniel Ševrlay
DE 11. What did analytical aesthetics blame on classical aesthetic concepts?
DE 12. What was the essence of anti-essentialism?
DE 13. What was the attitude of analytical aestheticians to aesthetic theory?
DE 14. You characterize the institutional theory of art.
DE 15: What is the relationship of power to art according to Adorn?
DE 16. According to Baudrillard, what is the source of the disgust in today's society?
DE 17: Describe the concept of aura in Walter Benjamin
DE 18: According to Adorno, what is the affirmative position of art?
DE 19: How did Adorno understand the relationship between new and old art?
DE 20: How did Adorno understand pain in modern art?
The student can take the state exam
a) after obtaining at least such number of credits that after obtaining credits for successful completion of state exams, they achieve the necessary number of credits for the proper completion of studies,
b) after successful completion of compulsory subjects, compulsory elective subjects, and elective subjects in the composition determined by the study program,
c) after fulfilling the student's obligations arising from § 71, par. 3 letter b of the Higher Education Act,
d) if no disciplinary action is taken against them.
Successful completion of the state exam is one of the conditions for successful completion of the study program. The subject of the state exam is evaluated by the committee for state exams using the grading scale A-FX. The evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by the examination committee by consensus. If the examination committee does not reach a consensus, the evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by voting.
On the basis of the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (Internal Rules and Regulations 5/2020, Art. 15), the framework dates of state examinations are set by the dean in accordance with the faculty's academic schedule. Departments are obliged to publish the dates of their state exams on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place. The student registers for the state exam through the academic information system (AIS) at least three weeks before it takes place.
The student is entitled to one regular and two resit attempts of the state exam. The regular attempt is the one for which the student applied for the first time within the deadline set for state exams. If the student was evaluated with the FX mark on the regular attempt of the state exam, the student may take resits of the state exam
a) on the following dates assigned for state examinations in the relevant academic year
or
b) on the dates assigned for state examinations in one of the following academic years in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Higher Education Act.
If the student is unable to come on the day of the state exam for which they have registered on serious grounds, they are obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the examination committee in advance or no later than three working days after the date of the state examination or its part, if there were serious obstacles that prevented them to do so in advance. If the student does not attend the state examination or its part without an excuse within the specified period, or if the chairman of the examination committee does not accept their excuse, they are assessed with the FX grade from that attempt of the state exam.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 0/100
The student who passes the state exam has comprehensively mastered the issue of the state exam in the context of specified areas. The student has theoretical and practical skills based on the current state of information from the theory of knowledge organization and bibliometrics, as well as the ability to apply and use the skills creatively. He is able to apply the things he learned about knowledge organization and bibliometrics to interdisciplinary relationships, is able to think critically, offer solutions for the knowledge organization and bibliometrics problems, and use scientific arguments.
IUT 1. Vizuálne dielo ako znakový systém
IUT 2. Prínos Michela Foucaulta k interpretácii výtvarného diela
IUT 3. Interpretácia ťažiskových diel Marcela Duchampa.
IUT 4. Clement Greenberg a modernistická maľba
IUT 5. Charles Baudelaire a interpretácia moderného umenia
IUT 6. Štrukturalizmus a štrukturálna analýza (R. Barthes: Eiffelova veža)
IUT 7. Michel Foucault a rád diskurzu
IUT 8. Dekonštrukcia a čítanie textu
IUT 9. Epos a román
IUT 10. Konflikt interpretácií
IUT 11. Gaston Bachelard – psychoanalytický koncept interpretácie umeleckého textu.
IUT 12. Poetika priestoru – fenomenologický koncept interpretácie umeleckého textu
IUT 13. Sakrálny a profánny čas a priestor (M. Eliade)
IUT 14. Morfológia rozprávky (V. Propp)
The student can take the state exam
a) after obtaining at least such number of credits that after obtaining credits for successful completion of state exams, they achieve the necessary number of credits for the proper completion of studies,
b) after successful completion of compulsory subjects, compulsory elective subjects, and elective subjects in the composition determined by the study program,
c) after fulfilling the student's obligations arising from § 71, par. 3 letter b of the Higher Education Act,
d) if no disciplinary action is taken against them.
Successful completion of the state exam is one of the conditions for successful completion of the study program. The subject of the state exam is evaluated by the committee for state exams using the grading scale A-FX. The evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by the examination committee by consensus. If the examination committee does not reach a consensus, the evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by voting.
On the basis of the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (Internal Rules and Regulations 5/2020, Art. 15), the framework dates of state examinations are set by the dean in accordance with the faculty's academic schedule. Departments are obliged to publish the dates of their state exams on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place. The student registers for the state exam through the academic information system (AIS) at least three weeks before it takes place.
The student is entitled to one regular and two resit attempts of the state exam. The regular attempt is the one for which the student applied for the first time within the deadline set for state exams. If the student was evaluated with the FX mark on the regular attempt of the state exam, the student may take resits of the state exam
a) on the following dates assigned for state examinations in the relevant academic year
or
b) on the dates assigned for state examinations in one of the following academic years in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Higher Education Act.
If the student is unable to come on the day of the state exam for which they have registered on serious grounds, they are obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the examination committee in advance or no later than three working days after the date of the state examination or its part, if there were serious obstacles that prevented them to do so in advance. If the student does not attend the state examination or its part without an excuse within the specified period, or if the chairman of the examination committee does not accept their excuse, they are assessed with the FX grade from that attempt of the state exam.
Slovak
1. The student arrives on the registered date of the state exam according to the schedule set by the department.
2. The student receives a question from the subject of the state exam, which is submitted in writing and anonymously in the form of a random selection from printed questions or a generator.
3. The examination committee will give the student reasonable time to prepare an oral answer to the question.
4. The student presents the prepared answer to the question in front of the examination committee and answers the additional questions.
5. After the student finishes their answer, the examination committee decides on the results of the state exam in a closed session of the examination committee.
The course of the state exam and the announcement of its results are public.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 0/100
The student who passes the state exam has comprehensively mastered the issue of the state exam in the context of specified areas. The student has theoretical and practical skills based on the current state of information from the theory of knowledge organization and bibliometrics, as well as the ability to apply and use the skills creatively. He is able to apply the things he learned about knowledge organization and bibliometrics to interdisciplinary relationships, is able to think critically, offer solutions for the knowledge organization and bibliometrics problems, and use scientific arguments.
According to the selected type of art.
Theater and Drama
BROCKET, O.G. Dejiny divadla. Praha: Rybka Publishers, 2019. ISBN 978-80-8795-0661
FISCHER-LICHTE, E. Dejiny drámy. Bratislava: Divadelný ústav, 2004. ISBN 80-8898-7474
MOUSSINAC, L. Divadlo od počiatku po naše dni. Bratislava: SVKL, 1965.
Film
MIHÁLIK, Peter (ed.). Antológia súčasnej filmovej teórie I. Bratislava : SFÚ, 1980.
BENJAMIN, Walter. Iluminácie. Bratislava : Kalligram, 1999. ISBN 80-7149-248-5
MUKAŘOVSKÝ, Jan: Studie I. Brno : Host, 2000. ISBN 80-86055-91-4
Fine Art
BAKOŠ, Ján. Periféria a symbolický skok. Bratislava : Kalligram, 2000. ISBN 80-7149-364-3
GERŽOVÁ, Jana. (ed.) Slovník svetového a slovenského výtvarného umenia druhej polovice 20. storočia. Bratislava : Profil, 1999 ISBN 80-968283-0-4
DANTO, Arthur C. Zneužitie krásy. Estetika a pojem umenia. Bratislava : Kalligram. 2008. ISBN
978-80-8101-025-5.
The student chooses one kind of art, from which the Master's Degree at least one specialized subject.
History and theory of selected art - Theater and Drama
D 1. The origin of the ancient Greek tragedy
D 2. Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides
D 3. Ancient Greek comedy
D 4. Ancient Roman drama and theater
D 5. Medieval theater: formation and genres
D 6. Renaissance theater genres and their representatives
D 7. Elizabethan Theater
D 8. W. Shakespeare
D 9. The Golden Age of Spanish Drama
D 10. French classical tragedy
D 11. The bourgeois drama in the 18th century in France and Germany
D 12. Schiller and Goethe
D 13. Romantic drama and theater
D 14. Realism and naturalism in drama and theater
D 15. Modernism in drama and theater; M. Maeterlinck
D 16. Reformer Stanislavsky and playwright Chekhov
History and theory of selected art - film
F 1. Jacques Aumont: a shift in the perception of painting in the time of modernity
F 2. André Bazin and the path of cinematography to fulfill the myth of total film
F 3. Walter Benjamin and the loss of the aura in favor of tactility and optical ignorance
F 4. Luis Delluc, Jean Epstein and the concept of Photogenic
F 5. Jean Epstein: cinematography as a scientific invention
F 6. Jan Mukařovský: his analysis of acting
F 7. Jan Mukařovský: his analysis of time and the actor in the film
F 8. Roman Jakobson: the essence of film in the light of history.
F 9. Sergei Eisenstein: a dialectical approach to film form
F 10. Roland Barthes: the search for the unspeakable in the picture, the third sense
F 11. Yuri Mikhailovich Lotman: illusion of reality - an iconic and conventional sign
F 12. Jean Francois Lyotard: Acinema and the Idea of Sovereign Film
F 13. Jacques Aumont: the principle of image expressiveness
F 14. Laura R. Oswald: Reconstruction of Jacques Derrida's Film Theory
F 15. Tom Gunning: linking film theory with history
History and theory of selected art - fine art
VU 1. Integration of non-artistic reality into artistic representation.
VU 2. Dematerialization and conceptualization of a work of art in the 20th century.
VU 3. Space, time and movement in visual display.
VU 4. Action and gesture in visual representation.
VU 5. Periphery and center: art in Slovakia until the 19th century.
VU 6. Principles of appropriation, citation and repetition in visual representation.
VU 7. The world of art according to Arthur C. Dant.
VU 8. Category of noble and avant-garde art.
VU 9. Genres, themes and directions of European and Slovak art of the 19th century.
VU 10. Impressionism and post-impressionism - the end of the classical representation of what is seen
VU 11. The phenomenon of color in painting of the 20th century.
VU 12. Forms of abstract art.
VU 13. Slovak Fine Arts 1st half. 20th century.
VU 14. Architecture of the 20th century - directions, problems, solutions, works.
VU 15. Transformations of Slovak Fine Arts 2nd half. 20th century.
The student can take the state exam
a) after obtaining at least such number of credits that after obtaining credits for successful completion of state exams, they achieve the necessary number of credits for the proper completion of studies,
b) after successful completion of compulsory subjects, compulsory elective subjects, and elective subjects in the composition determined by the study program,
c) after fulfilling the student's obligations arising from § 71, par. 3 letter b of the Higher Education Act,
d) if no disciplinary action is taken against them.
Successful completion of the state exam is one of the conditions for successful completion of the study program. The subject of the state exam is evaluated by the committee for state exams using the grading scale A-FX. The evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by the examination committee by consensus. If the examination committee does not reach a consensus, the evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by voting.
On the basis of the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (Internal Rules and Regulations 5/2020, Art. 15), the framework dates of state examinations are set by the dean in accordance with the faculty's academic schedule. Departments are obliged to publish the dates of their state exams on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place. The student registers for the state exam through the academic information system (AIS) at least three weeks before it takes place.
The student is entitled to one regular and two resit attempts of the state exam. The regular attempt is the one for which the student applied for the first time within the deadline set for state exams. If the student was evaluated with the FX mark on the regular attempt of the state exam, the student may take resits of the state exam
a) on the following dates assigned for state examinations in the relevant academic year
or
b) on the dates assigned for state examinations in one of the following academic years in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Higher Education Act.
If the student is unable to come on the day of the state exam for which they have registered on serious grounds, they are obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the examination committee in advance or no later than three working days after the date of the state examination or its part, if there were serious obstacles that prevented them to do so in advance. If the student does not attend the state examination or its part without an excuse within the specified period, or if the chairman of the examination committee does not accept their excuse, they are assessed with the FX grade from that attempt of the state exam.
Slovak
1. The student arrives on the registered date of the state exam according to the schedule set by the department.
2. The student receives a question from the subject of the state exam, which is submitted in writing and anonymously in the form of a random selection from printed questions or a generator.
3. The examination committee will give the student reasonable time to prepare an oral answer to the question.
4. The student presents the prepared answer to the question in front of the examination committee and answers the additional questions.
5. After the student finishes their answer, the examination committee decides on the results of the state exam in a closed session of the examination committee.
The course of the state exam and the announcement of its results are public.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 0/100
The student who passes the state exam has comprehensively mastered the issue of the state exam in the context of specified areas. The student has theoretical and practical skills based on the current state of information from the theory of knowledge organization and bibliometrics, as well as the ability to apply and use the skills creatively. He is able to apply the things he learned about knowledge organization and bibliometrics to interdisciplinary relationships, is able to think critically, offer solutions for the knowledge organization and bibliometrics problems, and use scientific arguments.
• LICHNEROVÁ, L. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác [online]. Bratislava:
Univerzita Komenského, 2016 [cit. 2016-10-09]. Available at: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/ LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf
• Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave,
2015 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Available at: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/ as/2020/20200527/04a_Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf
• Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske- studium/zaverecne-prace/
The student must submit the master’s thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year for the relevant date of the state exam. The master’s thesis is submitted in electronic form via AIS. The work must meet the parameters determined by the internal quality system of Comenius University. The provisions of Article 14 of Internal Regulation no. 5/2020 (Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts of Comenius University) apply to the evaluation of the master’s thesis.
The supervisor of the final thesis and its opponent will prepare evaluations of the master’s thesis and propose a grade in the A-FX grading scale, which the student receives a minimum of three working days before the defence.
Grading scale: 0-59% -FX, 60-67% -E, 68-75% -D, 76-83% -C, 84-91% -B, 92-100% -A
Master’s thesis evaluation criteria:
1. The contribution of the master's thesis, the fulfilment of the objectives of the thesis in its assignment, and the requirements for the content of the master's thesis given by the internal quality system of Comenius University. It is assessed whether the student has worked on the chosen topic at the level of scientific study, with a representative selection of scientific literature, with appropriately chosen scientific procedures and hypotheses that can be verified. Demonstration of the ability to work creatively in the study program is evaluated and the degree of demonstration of knowledge and understanding of the diploma thesis is reflected.
2. Originality of the work (master’s thesis must not be plagiarized, must not infringe the copyrights of other authors); the documentation for the defence of the master’s thesis also includes protocols of originality from the CRZP and Theses systems, to the results of which the thesis supervisor and the opponent express their opinions in their evaluations.
3. Correctness and accuracy of citation of used information sources, research results of other authors and group authors, correctness of the description of methods and working procedures of other authors or group authors.
4. Compliance of the structure of the master’s thesis with the prescribed composition defined by the internal quality system of Comenius University.
5. Respecting the recommended length of the master’s thesis (the recommended length of the master’s thesis is usually 50 – 70 standard pages = 90,000 to 126,000 characters, including spaces), the adequacy of the length of the thesis is assessed by the thesis supervisor.
6. Linguistic and stylistic level of work and formal adjustments.
The student orally presents the content, achieved goals, and conclusions of the master’s thesis, and answers the questions and comments of the thesis supervisor, opponent, or members of the examination committee. The committee will comprehensively evaluate the quality of the master’s thesis, assess the method and form of defence, and the student's ability to adequately respond to comments and questions from the evaluations of the thesis supervisor and the opponent. The student receives their final grade based on the average of the assessment of the thesis supervisor and opponent from their evaluations, and the assessment of the examination committee.
1. The student presents the master’s thesis in front of the committee for state exams, the opponent of the bachelor's thesis, and those present.
2. The student responds to the evaluations – comments and questions.
3. The student responds to the questions of the committee for state exams or the questions in a broader debate.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 0/100
The student has mastered the basic requirements of writing a scientific text in compliance with the rules of academic ethics. The student knows the methods used in the field of study, is able to work on the chosen topic of the master’s thesis at the level of scientific study, with a representative selection of scientific literature, with appropriately chosen scientific procedures and hypotheses that can be verified. After a successful defence of the master’s thesis, the student is able to design, implement, critically reflect, and justify his research intention. The student understands the context of the problem, can clearly define research conclusions, state his positions, and make recommendations. He can respond argumentatively and flexibly to questions about the research topic, its methodology, and its conclusions.