LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác [online]. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2016 [cit. 2021-10-10]. Available at: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf

Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2015 [cit. 2021-10-10]. Available at: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/ as/2020/20200527/04a

Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-amagisterske studium/zaverecne-prace/ Further literature according to the topic of the bachelor's thesis.

The student must submit the final thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year for the relevant date of the state exam. Submission of the final thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year for the relevant date of completion of the final exam.

The final thesis is submitted in electronic form via AIS.

The work must meet the parameters determined by the internal quality system of the Comenius University.

The provisions of Article 5 of Internal Regulation No. apply to the evaluation of the final thesis. 9/2020 (Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts, Charles University). The final thesis consultant will prepare an opinion on the final thesis and will propose an evaluation in the classification of the A-FX thesis. The student has a report available min. 3 working days before the defense.

Classification scale: 0-59% -FX, 60-67% -E, 68-75% -D, 76-83% -C, 84-91% -B, 92-100% -A

Criteria for the evaluation of the final thesis:

1. The contribution of the final thesis, the fulfillment of the objectives of the thesis in its assignment and the requirements for the content of the final thesis DPŠ given by the internal quality system of Comenius University. Assessed: demonstrates knowledge and skills, the ability to work in the study program, the ability to apply in the collection, interpretation and processing of basic literature; in the case of practically focused final work also mastering the application of theoretical principles in practice and verifiability of hypotheses;

2. Originality of the work (the final work must not have the character of plagiarism, it must not infringe the copyrights of other authors);

3. Correctness and correctness of citation of used information sources, research results of other authors and author groups, correctness of description of methods and working procedures of other authors or author groups;

4. Compliance of the structure of the final work with the prescribed composition defined by the internal quality system of the Comenius University;

5. Respecting the recommended scope of the final work of the DPŠ (minimum scope of the final work of the basic DPŠ module is 27,000 characters including spaces, the minimum scope of the final work of the extension DPŠ module is 36,000 characters including spaces.), The adequacy of the scope of work is assessed by the final thesis consultant;

6. Linguistic and stylistic level of work and formal arrangement.

The student orally presents the content, achieved goals and conclusions of the final thesis and answers to the questions and comments of the final thesis consultant, resp. members of the examination board. The committee will comprehensively evaluate the quality of the final thesis, assess the method and form of the defense and the student's ability to fully respond to the comments and questions in the opinion of the final thesis consultant and the opponent. The evaluation is achieved from the arithmetic average of the evaluation from the opinion of the final thesis consultant and the evaluation of the examination commission.

Slovak

1. Presentation of the final thesis to the students before the commission for state exams and those present.

2. Student's response to comments and questions in the rewiev from the final thesis consultant.

3. Student's response to the questions of the commission for the final exams of DPŠ and in the discussion.

0/100

The student has mastered the basic requirements of writing a scientific text in compliance with the rules of academic ethics, is able to work creatively in the field of study in which he completed the study program, and has adequate knowledge and understanding of the relevant issues. The student can apply his skills in the collection, interpretation, and processing of basic scientific literature, or even in its application in practice, or has the ability to solve a partial task related to the focus of the bachelor's thesis. After a successful defence of the final thesis, the student is able to logically deal with the theoretical background of the final thesis and respond to questions relating to the relevant issues.