LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác [online]. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2016 [cit. 2021-10-10]. Available at: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf
Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2015 [cit. 2021-10-10]. Available at: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/ as/2020/20200527/04a
Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-amagisterske studium/zaverecne-prace/ Further literature according to the topic of the bachelor's thesis.
The student must submit the final thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year for the relevant date of the state exam. Submission of the final thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year for the relevant date of completion of the final exam.
The final thesis is submitted in electronic form via AIS.
The work must meet the parameters determined by the internal quality system of the Comenius University.
The provisions of Article 5 of Internal Regulation No. apply to the evaluation of the final thesis. 9/2020 (Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts, Charles University). The final thesis consultant will prepare an opinion on the final thesis and will propose an evaluation in the classification of the A-FX thesis. The student has a report available min. 3 working days before the defense.
Classification scale: 0-59% -FX, 60-67% -E, 68-75% -D, 76-83% -C, 84-91% -B, 92-100% -A
Criteria for the evaluation of the final thesis:
1. The contribution of the final thesis, the fulfillment of the objectives of the thesis in its assignment and the requirements for the content of the final thesis DPŠ given by the internal quality system of Comenius University. Assessed: demonstrates knowledge and skills, the ability to work in the study program, the ability to apply in the collection, interpretation and processing of basic literature; in the case of practically focused final work also mastering the application of theoretical principles in practice and verifiability of hypotheses;
2. Originality of the work (the final work must not have the character of plagiarism, it must not infringe the copyrights of other authors);
3. Correctness and correctness of citation of used information sources, research results of other authors and author groups, correctness of description of methods and working procedures of other authors or author groups;
4. Compliance of the structure of the final work with the prescribed composition defined by the internal quality system of the Comenius University;
5. Respecting the recommended scope of the final work of the DPŠ (minimum scope of the final work of the basic DPŠ module is 27,000 characters including spaces, the minimum scope of the final work of the extension DPŠ module is 36,000 characters including spaces.), The adequacy of the scope of work is assessed by the final thesis consultant;
6. Linguistic and stylistic level of work and formal arrangement.
The student orally presents the content, achieved goals and conclusions of the final thesis and answers to the questions and comments of the final thesis consultant, resp. members of the examination board. The committee will comprehensively evaluate the quality of the final thesis, assess the method and form of the defense and the student's ability to fully respond to the comments and questions in the opinion of the final thesis consultant and the opponent. The evaluation is achieved from the arithmetic average of the evaluation from the opinion of the final thesis consultant and the evaluation of the examination commission.
Slovak
1. Presentation of the final thesis to the students before the commission for state exams and those present.
2. Student's response to comments and questions in the rewiev from the final thesis consultant.
3. Student's response to the questions of the commission for the final exams of DPŠ and in the discussion.
0/100
The student has mastered the basic requirements of writing a scientific text in compliance with the rules of academic ethics, is able to work creatively in the field of study in which he completed the study program, and has adequate knowledge and understanding of the relevant issues. The student can apply his skills in the collection, interpretation, and processing of basic scientific literature, or even in its application in practice, or has the ability to solve a partial task related to the focus of the bachelor's thesis. After a successful defence of the final thesis, the student is able to logically deal with the theoretical background of the final thesis and respond to questions relating to the relevant issues.
BAZÁLIKOVA, Jana. História vyučovania pedagogiky v učiteľských ústavoch a učiteľských akadémiách na Slovensku. In: Paedagogica 20. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2008, s. 7-13.
BAZÁLIKOVA, Jana. Vývoj a súčasné poňatie predmetu pedagogika na stredných školách. In: Pedagogická revue, roč. 50, č. 4, 1998, s. 329-335.
BAZÁLIKOVA, Jana. Didaktika pedagogiky ako špeciálnej pedagogickej disciplíny. In: Paedagogica 16. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2001, s.101-106.
PODLAHOVÁ, Libuše. Pedagogická praxe. Průvodce pro současné studenty a budoucí učitele. Olomouc: VUP, 1998. ISBN 80-7067-793-7.
SKALKOVÁ, Jarmila. Obecní didaktika. Praha: Grada, 2007. ISBN 80-247-182-17.
ŠTURMA, Jaroslav. Didaktika pedagogiky. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus, 1993.
ŠVEC, Štefan. Didaktika I. Bratislava: UK, 1988.
ŠVEC, Vlastimil, FILOVÁ, Hana a Oldřich ŠIMONÍK. Praktikum didaktických dovedností. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 1996. ISBN 80-210-1365-6.
VALIŠOVÁ, Alena, SINGULE, František a Jozef VALENTA. Didaktika pedagogiky. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství, 1990. ISBN 80-7066-105-4.
VALIŠOVÁ, Alena a Hana KASÍKOVÁ. Pedagogika pro učitele. Praha: Grada. 2007. ISBN 978-80247-1734-0.
1. Subject, goals and tasks of didactics of pedagogy (concept of didactics of pedagogy, position in the complex of pedagogical sciences, didactics of pedagogy as a special pedagogical discipline)
2. Pedagogy as a subject in secondary schools (history and current state)
3. Methodological basis of didactics of pedagogy and its theoretical starting points
4. Modern trends in the teaching of pedagogy abroad (organization of student preparation for the teaching profession)
5. Issues in the process of teaching pedagogy in secondary schools (the purpose of teaching, the personality of the pupil, the personality of the teacher, teaching methods, material and organizational conditions, phases of the teacher's work, and etc.)
6. Analysis of the basic means of teaching pedagogy (focus on secondary school, secondary school of pedagogy as a specific type of vocational school, common and different features)
7. Concept of the goal of teaching pedagogy (dichotomous and trichotonic division of goals)
8. Profile of a graduate of SPŠ (concretization of the goal from the point of view of the student's personality)
9. Goal in the teaching content of the subject pedagogy (study field of teaching for kindergartens, pedagogy, free time animator, cultural and educational worker)
10. Structure of the goals of education and education at SPŠ (Pedagogical skills, knowledge, thinking, habits, motives and attitudes, concrete and abstract knowledge, relationships expressing connections)
11. Didactic analysis of the curriculum as a basic activity of the teacher in preparation for teaching (the concept of DAU, selection of the curriculum and its organization in terms of goals, formulation of learning questions and tasks, teacher preparation)
12. Methods of teaching pedagogy and their modernization (which affects the choice of methods)
13. Learning tasks and questions and their use in the teaching of pedagogy (concept of learning tasks, functions of learning tasks, classification of questions based on the taxonomy of learning tasks)
14. Organizational forms of teaching in the subject of pedagogy (concept, use of selected organizational forms of teaching)
15. The concept of pedagogical practice (goals, tasks, content, forms, evaluation, pedagogical diary – structure, goal)
16. Use of material didactic aids in the teaching of pedagogy (the concept of didactic aids, special teaching aids in the teaching of pedagogy)
17. Examination and evaluation of the educational process (forms of assessment, function, quantitative and qualitative examination, use of didactic tests and classification of pedagogical practice)
18 Specifics of entrance exams to SPŠ
19. The teacher's personality and the process of his self-improvement
20. Characteristics of the pedagogy curriculum (content in terms of knowledge, activities, various sources of curriculum content)
A student can take the state exam a) after obtaining at least such a number of credits that, after obtaining the credits for successfully passing the state exams, he reaches the necessary number of credits for the proper completion of his studies, b) after successfully completing the mandatory subjects, mandatory optional subjects and optional subjects in the composition determined by the study program, c) after fulfilling the student's obligations arising from § 71, par. 3 letters b of the Act on Universities, d) if no disciplinary proceedings are being conducted against him.
Successful completion of the subject of the state exam is one of the conditions for successful completion of the study program. The subject of the state exam is evaluated by the commission for state exams with classification grades A to FX. The examination board decides on the evaluation of the state exam or its part by consensus. If the examination committee does not reach a consensus, the evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by voting.
Based on the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (VP 5/2020, Article 15), the framework dates of state exams are set by the dean in accordance with the faculty study schedule. The department is obliged to publish the dates of the state exams on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place. The student registers for the state exam through the academic information system at least three weeks before the exam date.
The student is entitled to one regular and two correction dates of the state exam. The regular term is the one for which the student registered for the first time in the term set for the state exams. If the student was evaluated with an FX grade on the regular date of the state exam, the student can take the correction dates of the state exam
a) in the following dates for holding state exams in the relevant academic year or b) in the dates for holding state exams in any of the following academic years in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Act on Universities.
If, for serious reasons, the student is unable to participate in the state exam date for which he has registered, he is obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the examination committee in advance or no later than three working days after the state exam date or part of it, if there were serious obstacles that prevented him from apologizing in advance. If a student does not appear for the state exam or part of it on the specified date without an excuse, or if the chairman of the examination committee does not accept his excuse, he is evaluated with an FX grade for the given date of the state exam.
Slovak
1. The student will attend the registered date of the state exam according to the schedule set by the department.
2. The student receives a question from the subject of the state exam, which is entered in writing and anonymously in the form of a random selection from printed questions or a generator.
3. The examination board will give the student adequate time to prepare an oral answer to the given question.
4. The student presents a prepared answer to the question in front of the examination committee and also answers additional questions.
5. After the student's answer is finished, the examination board will decide on the results of the state exam, which will take place at a closed session of the examination board.
The course of the state exam and the announcement of its results are public.
0/100
A student who passes the state exam comprehensively manages the issues of the state exam in the context of the set areas. He has theoretical and practical knowledge based on the current state of knowledge from the didactics of pedagogy, as well as the ability to apply and use them creatively. He masters the knowledge contained in the teaching of the subjects Didactics of Pedagogy 1 and Didactics of Pedagogy 2. He is able to apply knowledge from the didactics of pedagogy to cross-subject relationships, he is able to think critically and argue scientifically.