LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác [online]. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2016 [cit. 2021-10-10]. Available at: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf
Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2015 [cit. 2021-10-10]. Available at: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/ as/2020/20200527/04a
Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-amagisterske studium/zaverecne-prace/ Further literature according to the topic of the bachelor's thesis.
The student must submit the final thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year for the relevant date of the state exam. Submission of the final thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year for the relevant date of completion of the final exam.
The final thesis is submitted in electronic form via AIS.
The work must meet the parameters determined by the internal quality system of the Comenius University.
The provisions of Article 5 of Internal Regulation No. apply to the evaluation of the final thesis. 9/2020 (Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts, Charles University). The final thesis consultant will prepare an opinion on the final thesis and will propose an evaluation in the classification of the A-FX thesis. The student has a report available min. 3 working days before the defense.
Classification scale: 0-59% -FX, 60-67% -E, 68-75% -D, 76-83% -C, 84-91% -B, 92-100% -A
Criteria for the evaluation of the final thesis:
1. The contribution of the final thesis, the fulfillment of the objectives of the thesis in its assignment and the requirements for the content of the final thesis DPŠ given by the internal quality system of Comenius University. Assessed: demonstrates knowledge and skills, the ability to work in the study program, the ability to apply in the collection, interpretation and processing of basic literature; in the case of practically focused final work also mastering the application of theoretical principles in practice and verifiability of hypotheses;
2. Originality of the work (the final work must not have the character of plagiarism, it must not infringe the copyrights of other authors);
3. Correctness and correctness of citation of used information sources, research results of other authors and author groups, correctness of description of methods and working procedures of other authors or author groups;
4. Compliance of the structure of the final work with the prescribed composition defined by the internal quality system of the Comenius University;
5. Respecting the recommended scope of the final work of the DPŠ (minimum scope of the final work of the basic DPŠ module is 27,000 characters including spaces, the minimum scope of the final work of the extension DPŠ module is 36,000 characters including spaces.), The adequacy of the scope of work is assessed by the final thesis consultant;
6. Linguistic and stylistic level of work and formal arrangement.
The student orally presents the content, achieved goals and conclusions of the final thesis and answers to the questions and comments of the final thesis consultant, resp. members of the examination board. The committee will comprehensively evaluate the quality of the final thesis, assess the method and form of the defense and the student's ability to fully respond to the comments and questions in the opinion of the final thesis consultant and the opponent. The evaluation is achieved from the arithmetic average of the evaluation from the opinion of the final thesis consultant and the evaluation of the examination commission.
Slovak
1. Presentation of the final thesis to the students before the commission for state exams and those present.
2. Student's response to comments and questions in the rewiev from the final thesis consultant.
3. Student's response to the questions of the commission for the final exams of DPŠ and in the discussion.
0/100
The student has mastered the basic requirements of writing a scientific text in compliance with the rules of academic ethics, is able to work creatively in the field of study in which he completed the study program, and has adequate knowledge and understanding of the relevant issues. The student can apply his skills in the collection, interpretation, and processing of basic scientific literature, or even in its application in practice, or has the ability to solve a partial task related to the focus of the bachelor's thesis. After a successful defence of the final thesis, the student is able to logically deal with the theoretical background of the final thesis and respond to questions relating to the relevant issues.
• DOLA, Mónika. Módszertani útmutató a magyar nyelv tanításához. Budapest: Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem – L’Harmattan Kiadó, 2020. Available at:
https://btk.kre.hu/nyelveszet/images/Dola_Monika_modszertani_utmutato.pdf
• HEGEDŰS, Rita. Magyar nyelvtan. Formák, funkciók, összefüggések. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó, 2004, s. 269–302. ISBN 963-9372-92-7.
• ADAMIKNÉ JÁSZÓ, Anna. Anyanyelvi nevelés az ábécétől az érettségiig. Budapest: Trezor Kiadó, 2001. ISBN 963-9088-53-6.
• KUGLER, Nóra. Funkcionális grammatikai gyakorlatok a 9–12. évfolyam számára. Anyanyelv-pedagógia, 2009. Available on:
http://www.anyanyelv-pedagogia.hu/cikkek.php?id=153
• Anyanyelv-pedagógia. Szakfolyóirat magyar nyelven tanító pedagógusoknak. Avaible on:
http://www.anyanyelv-pedagogia.hu/
• Modern Nyelvoktatás. Available on:
https://epa.oszk.hu/html/vgi/kardexlap.phtml?id=3139
• BODROGI, F. M., ed. Élményközpontú irodalomtanítás [online]. Szombathely: SAVARIA UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2016 [cit. 2021-10-17]. ISBN 978-615-5251-82-5. Available: https://mek.oszk.hu/16400/16457/16457.pdf
• CSERHALMI, Zsuzsa. Amit az irodalomtanításról tudni kellene. Budapest: Korona Kiadó, 2001. ISBN 963-9191-59-0.
• LIPÓCZI-CSABAI, Sarolta, ed. Élményközpontú nyelv- és irodalomtanítás. Kecskemét: Neumann János Egyetem, 2020. ISBN 978-615-5817-54-0.
• SIPOS, Lajos, ed. Irodalomtanítás a harmadik évezredben. Budapest: Krónika Nova, 2006. ISBN 963-9423-75-0. Available on: https://mek.oszk,hu/22000/22017/22017.pdf
• TÓTH-MÓZER, Szilvia a MISLEY, Helga. Digitális eszközök integrálása az oktatásba [online]. Budapest: ELTE, 2019 [cit. 2021-10-17]. ISBN 978-963-489-128-1. Available on: http://mindenkiiskolaja.elte.hu
The student can take the state exam
a) after obtaining at least such number of credits that after obtaining credits for successful completion of state exams, they achieve the necessary number of credits for the proper completion of studies,
b) after successful completion of compulsory subjects, compulsory elective subjects, and elective subjects in the composition determined by the study program,
c) after fulfilling the student's obligations arising from § 71, par. 3 letter b of the Higher Education Act,
d) if no disciplinary action is taken against them.
Successful completion of the state exam is one of the conditions for successful completion of the study program. The subject of the state exam is evaluated by the committee for state exams using the grading scale A-FX. The evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by the examination committee by consensus. If the examination committee does not reach a consensus, the evaluation of the state examination or its part is decided by voting.
On the basis of the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (Internal Rules and Regulations 5/2020, Art. 15), the framework dates of state examinations are set by the dean in accordance with the faculty's academic schedule. Departments are obliged to publish the dates of their state exams on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place. The student registers for the state exam through the academic information system (AIS) at least three weeks before it takes place.
The student is entitled to one regular and two resit attempts of the state exam. The regular attempt is the one for which the student applied for the first time within the deadline set for state exams. If the student was evaluated with the FX mark on the regular attempt of the state exam, the student may take resits of the state exam
a) on the following dates assigned for state examinations in the relevant academic year
or
b) on the dates assigned for state examinations in one of the following academic years in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Higher Education Act.
If the student is unable to come on the day of the state exam for which they have registered on serious grounds, they are obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the examination committee in advance or no later than three working days after the date of the state examination or its part, if there were serious obstacles that prevented them to do so in advance. If the student does not attend the state examination or its part without an excuse within the specified period, or if the chairman of the examination committee does not accept their excuse, they are assessed with the FX grade from that attempt of the state exam.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 0/100
Hungarian Language (C2)
Topic headings:
1. On the theory of teaching Hungarian as a mother tongue.
2. The teaching objective in the language component of MJL teaching.
3. The basic functions of teaching in the language component.
4. Learning content in the language component of MJL.
5. Teaching process in the language component.
6. Teaching methods in the language component.
7. Expository and direct transmission methods.
8. Methods of mediated process and methods of independent work.
9. Methods of control and evaluation.
10. MJ textbooks.
11. Didactic principles in MJ textbooks.
12. The teacher and his/her preparation for teaching MJ.
13. Teaching literature and literary science
14. Aims and objectives of teaching literature
15. The role of the teacher
16.Teaching literature in schools with Hungarian as the language of instruction in Slovakia
17. Curriculum and syllabus
18. Textbooks and teaching texts
19. Thematic teacher education plan
20. Classical model of teaching
21. Experiential teaching
22. Interpretation of a literary text
23. Specifics of teaching and interpretation of lyrical, epic and dramatic works
24. Alternative education
The student who passes the state exam has comprehensively mastered the issue of the state exam in the context of specified areas. The student has theoretical and practical skills based on the current state of information from the theory of knowledge organization and bibliometrics, as well as the ability to apply and use the skills creatively. He is able to apply the things he learned about knowledge organization and bibliometrics to interdisciplinary relationships, is able to think critically, offer solutions for the knowledge organization and bibliometrics problems, and use scientific arguments.