LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác [online]. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2016 [cit. 2021-10-10]. Available at: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf
Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2015 [cit. 2021-10-10]. Available at: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/ as/2020/20200527/04a
Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-amagisterske studium/zaverecne-prace/ Further literature according to the topic of the bachelor's thesis.
The student must submit the final thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year for the relevant date of the state exam. Submission of the final thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year for the relevant date of completion of the final exam.
The final thesis is submitted in electronic form via AIS.
The work must meet the parameters determined by the internal quality system of the Comenius University.
The provisions of Article 5 of Internal Regulation No. apply to the evaluation of the final thesis. 9/2020 (Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts, Charles University). The final thesis consultant will prepare an opinion on the final thesis and will propose an evaluation in the classification of the A-FX thesis. The student has a report available min. 3 working days before the defense.
Classification scale: 0-59% -FX, 60-67% -E, 68-75% -D, 76-83% -C, 84-91% -B, 92-100% -A
Criteria for the evaluation of the final thesis:
1. The contribution of the final thesis, the fulfillment of the objectives of the thesis in its assignment and the requirements for the content of the final thesis DPŠ given by the internal quality system of Comenius University. Assessed: demonstrates knowledge and skills, the ability to work in the study program, the ability to apply in the collection, interpretation and processing of basic literature; in the case of practically focused final work also mastering the application of theoretical principles in practice and verifiability of hypotheses;
2. Originality of the work (the final work must not have the character of plagiarism, it must not infringe the copyrights of other authors);
3. Correctness and correctness of citation of used information sources, research results of other authors and author groups, correctness of description of methods and working procedures of other authors or author groups;
4. Compliance of the structure of the final work with the prescribed composition defined by the internal quality system of the Comenius University;
5. Respecting the recommended scope of the final work of the DPŠ (minimum scope of the final work of the basic DPŠ module is 27,000 characters including spaces, the minimum scope of the final work of the extension DPŠ module is 36,000 characters including spaces.), The adequacy of the scope of work is assessed by the final thesis consultant;
6. Linguistic and stylistic level of work and formal arrangement.
The student orally presents the content, achieved goals and conclusions of the final thesis and answers to the questions and comments of the final thesis consultant, resp. members of the examination board. The committee will comprehensively evaluate the quality of the final thesis, assess the method and form of the defense and the student's ability to fully respond to the comments and questions in the opinion of the final thesis consultant and the opponent. The evaluation is achieved from the arithmetic average of the evaluation from the opinion of the final thesis consultant and the evaluation of the examination commission.
Slovak
1. Presentation of the final thesis to the students before the commission for state exams and those present.
2. Student's response to comments and questions in the rewiev from the final thesis consultant.
3. Student's response to the questions of the commission for the final exams of DPŠ and in the discussion.
0/100
The student has mastered the basic requirements of writing a scientific text in compliance with the rules of academic ethics, is able to work creatively in the field of study in which he completed the study program, and has adequate knowledge and understanding of the relevant issues. The student can apply his skills in the collection, interpretation, and processing of basic scientific literature, or even in its application in practice, or has the ability to solve a partial task related to the focus of the bachelor's thesis. After a successful defence of the final thesis, the student is able to logically deal with the theoretical background of the final thesis and respond to questions relating to the relevant issues.
BAĎURÍKOVÁ, Zita. et al.: Školská pedagogika. Bratislava: UK, 2001. ISBN 80-223-1536-2.
GAVORA, Peter. Úvod do pedagogického výskumu. Bratislava: UK, 1999. 3. vyd. 2001. ISBN 80-223-1628-8
GAVORA, Peter. Akí sú moji žiaci? Pedagogická diagnostika žiaka. Bratislava: Práca, 1999. ISBN 80-7094-335-1 .
KASPER, Tomáš – Dana KASPEROVÁ. Dějiny pedagogiky. Praha: Grada, 2008. ISBN 80-2472-429-4.
KYRIACOU, Chris. Klíčové dovednosti učitele. Cesty k lepšímu vyučování. Praha: Portál, 1991. 2. vyd. 2004. ISBN 9788073674342.
KRANKUS, Milan. Pedagogika 20. storočia. Bratislava: ÚŠI, 1990.
MAŇÁK, Josef - Vlastimil ŠVEC. Cesty pedagogického výzkumu. Brno: Paido. 2004. ISBN 80-7315-078-6.
PELIKÁN, Jiří. Základy empirického výzkumu jevů. 3. vyd. Praha: Karolinum, 2007. ISBN 978-80-7184-569-0 (brož.)
PRŮCHA, Jan. Moderní pedagogika. Praha: Portál, 1997. ISBN 978-80-7367-503-5 (brož.)
SINGULE, František. Současné pedagogické směry a jejich psychologické souvislosti. Praha: SPN, 1992. ISBN 80-426-160-4.
SKALKOVÁ, Jaroslava. Obecná didaktika. Praha: Grada, 2007. ISBN: 978-80-247-1821-7.
ŠVEC, Švec. Základné pojmy v pedagogike a andragogike. Bratislava: IRIS, 1995. 2. vyd. 2002. ISBN 80-89018-31-0.
VORLÍČEK, Chrudoš. Úvod do pedagogiky. Praha: Karolinum, 1992. 2. vyd. Praha: H&H, 2000. ISBN 80-86022-79-X. (brož.)
-
The student can take the final exam: after successful completion of compulsory subjects in the composition determined by the study program for Complementary Pedagogical Studies - basic module
Successful completion of the final exam is one of the conditions for successful completion of the study program.
The student is evaluated with the A-FX grades in the final exam. The examination commission decides by consensus on the evaluation of the state examination or its part. If the examination board does not reach a consensus, the evaluation of the final examination or its part is decided by voting.
Based on the wording of the study regulations of the faculty (VP 5/2020, Art. 15), the framework dates of state examinations are set by the dean in accordance with the faculty study schedule. The department is obliged to publish its state exam dates on the website no later than 5 weeks before they take place.
The student registers for the final exam through the academic information system at least three weeks before the date.
The student is entitled to one regular and two resit dates of the state exam. The regular term is the one for which the student applied for the first time within the deadline set for state exams. If the student was evaluated with the FX mark on the regular date of the state exam, the student can make the corrective dates of the state exam
a) at the following dates for the holding of State examinations in the relevant academic year; or
b) in terms of state examinations in any of the following academic years in accordance with § 65, par. 2 of the Higher Education Act.
If a student is unable to attend the final examination date for which he / she has applied, he / she is obliged to apologize in writing to the chairman of the examination board in advance or no later than three working days after the final examination date or part thereof if there were serious obstacles that in advance. If a student does not appear for the final exam or its part without an excuse within the specified period, or if the chairman of the examination commission does not recognize his / her excuse, he / she is assessed with the FX mark from the given date of the final exam.
Slovak
1. The student arrives on the registered date of the final exam according to the schedule set by the department.
2. The student receives a question from the subject of the final exam, which is entered in writing and anonymously in the form of any choice from the printed questions or the generator.
3. The examination board will provide students with active time to prepare an oral answer to the given question.
4. The student presents the prepared answer to the question in front of the examination board and also answers the supplementary questions.
5. Upon completion of the student's answers, the examination commission will decide on the result of the state examination, which will take place in a closed session of the examination commission. The course of the final exam and the announcement of its results are public.
0/100
The student who takes the final exam comprehensively manages the issues of the final exam in the context of the specified areas. He has theoretical and practical knowledge based on the current state of knowledge in the field of pedagogy, as well as the ability to apply and use them creatively. Masters the knowledge contained in the teaching of the subjects Theoretical Foundations of Education, General Didactics, Pedagogical Communication, Pedagogical Diagnostics. He is able to apply knowledge from pedagogy to interdisciplinary relationships, he is able to think critically and argue scientifically.