Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 15 hours of preparation for a paper; 15 hours of preparation for a test. 15 hours continuous home preparation for class, self-study. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (description and explanation of the rules of the new German spelling), fixation (revision exercises, homework and dictations, game as a method), diagnostic and classification (written examination and didactic tests).

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

Duden. Die deutsche Rechtschreibung. Mannheim: Verlag Duden, 2020. 1296 s. ISBN 978-3-411-04018-6

Recommended readings:

https://www.duden.de/sprachwissen/rechtschreibregeln

HAAS, CH./MENZEL, W. 2007. Rechtschreibung – leicht gemacht!. München: Compact Verlag, 2007. 147 s. ISBN 978-3-8174-7714-2

SCHIEMANN E./BÖLCK M. 2008. Hören, sprechen, richtig schreiben. Stuttgart: Schmetterlin, 2008. 186 s. ISBN 3-89657-805-7

Course completion requirements:

assessment (paper, final test - 100/0)

The basis for the assessment is the paper and the final test. Students must pass both in order to receive a grade. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the paper and a maximum of 50 points for the final test.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66%, satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student has mastered the rules of German spelling and can explain them, recognizes errors and corrects them. The student is able to apply the acquired knowledge in different contexts.

Very good: The student as mastered the rules of German spelling, can explain and apply them with very few errors in different contexts, recognizes most errors and can correct them

Good: The student has understood the rules of German spelling, can reproduce and apply them with minor errors, can recognize and correct many errors made by others

Satisfactory: The student has only partially understood the rules of German spelling, repeatedly make mistakes when applying them. Errors made by others are only partially recognized and corrected.

Satisfactory: The rules of German spelling were only insufficiently understood and gross errors occur in the implementation; the errors of others are also hardly recognized and can only rarely be corrected.

Sufficient: sufficient treatment of the topic, minimal or no knowledge of the scientific context, a large number of orthographic, stylistic errors.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

New German spelling, its history, characteristics - basic principles, comparison with old spelling, s/ss/ß. Writing words with a consonant, special cases in the new German spelling, word division, writing foreign words, writing words together and separately, writing words with a hyphen, writing words with a capital initial letter, writing words with a small initial letter as well as punctuation are practiced. Repetition exercises, tests and dictations are aimed at consolidating the acquired knowledge.

According to the profile, the graduate has oral and written communication skills, which undoubtedly include competence in orthography.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

assessment (paper, final test - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Learning objectives: The students learn the German orthography as a basic requirement for the correct reception and production of different types of texts. The Orthographic competence is promoted. The students know the spelling rules, the correct spelling of words and the rules of punctuation and can reproduce them in exercises, dictations and texts as well as present them in detail and explain them with examples. The students have a sufficiently correct command of spelling and punctuation, but they can occasionally show influences of the mother tongue. They can recognize most of their own and others' mistakes and correct them.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 15 hours of preparation for a paper; 15 hours of preparation for a test. 15 hours continuous home preparation for class, self-study. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (description and explanation of the rules of the new German spelling), fixation (revision exercises, homework and dictations, game as a method), diagnostic and classification (written examination and didactic tests).

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

Duden. Die deutsche Rechtschreibung. Mannheim: Verlag Duden, 2020. 1296 s. ISBN 978-3-411-04018-6

Recommended readings:

https://www.duden.de/sprachwissen/rechtschreibregeln

HAAS, CH./MENZEL, W. 2007. Rechtschreibung – leicht gemacht!. München: Compact Verlag, 2007. 147 s. ISBN 978-3-8174-7714-2

SCHIEMANN E./BÖLCK M. 2008. Hören, sprechen, richtig schreiben. Stuttgart: Schmetterlin, 2008. 186 s. ISBN 3-89657-805-7

Course completion requirements:

assessment (paper, final test - 100/0)

The basis for the assessment is the paper and the final test. Students must pass both in order to receive a grade. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the paper and a maximum of 50 points for the final test.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66%, satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student has mastered the rules of German spelling and can explain them, recognizes errors and corrects them. The student is able to apply the acquired knowledge in different contexts.

Very good: The student as mastered the rules of German spelling, can explain and apply them with very few errors in different contexts, recognizes most errors and can correct them

Good: The student has understood the rules of German spelling, can reproduce and apply them with minor errors, can recognize and correct many errors made by others

Satisfactory: The student has only partially understood the rules of German spelling, repeatedly make mistakes when applying them. Errors made by others are only partially recognized and corrected.

Satisfactory: The rules of German spelling were only insufficiently understood and gross errors occur in the implementation; the errors of others are also hardly recognized and can only rarely be corrected.

Sufficient: sufficient treatment of the topic, minimal or no knowledge of the scientific context, a large number of orthographic, stylistic errors.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

New German spelling, its history, characteristics - basic principles, comparison with old spelling, s/ss/ß. Writing words with a consonant, special cases in the new German spelling, word division, writing foreign words, writing words together and separately, writing words with a hyphen, writing words with a capital initial letter, writing words with a small initial letter as well as punctuation are practiced. Repetition exercises, tests and dictations are aimed at consolidating the acquired knowledge.

According to the profile, the graduate has oral and written communication skills, which undoubtedly include competence in orthography.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

assessment (paper, final test - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Learning objectives: The students learn the German orthography as a basic requirement for the correct reception and production of different types of texts. The Orthographic competence is promoted. The students know the spelling rules, the correct spelling of words and the rules of punctuation and can reproduce them in exercises, dictations and texts as well as present them in detail and explain them with examples. The students have a sufficiently correct command of spelling and punctuation, but they can occasionally show influences of the mother tongue. They can recognize most of their own and others' mistakes and correct them.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching ; 18 hours of preparation for direct teaching 18 hours of preparation for assessment (test and dictation); 9 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study; 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: motivational (motivational demonstration of correct pronunciation), expository (explanation of the principles of correct pronunciation and basic knowledge of the theory of phonetics and phonology), fixation (practice of correct pronunciation), diagnostic and classification, etc.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

HIRSCHFELD, U. 2016. Phonetik im Fach Deutsch als Fremd- und Zweitsprache: Unter Berücksichtigung des Verhältnisses von Orthografie und Phonetik. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co, 2016. 253 s. ISBN: 9783503170180

Recommended readings:

ADAMCOVÁ, L. 2001. Phonetik der deutschen Sprache. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2001. 201 s. ISBN 80-223-1678-4

ADAMCOVÁ, L. 1996. Praktische Phonetik des Deutschen. Bratislava: Slovac Academic Press, 1996. 111 s. ISBN 80-85665-67-0

GLÜCK, H. 2010. Metzler Lexikon Sprache. Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler, 2010. 793 s. ISBN 978-3-476-02335-3

MANGOLD, M. Duden. Bd. 6. 2006. Das Aussprachewörterbuch. 6. prepracované a aktualizované vyd., Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, Zürich: Bibliographisches Institut F.A. Brockhaus AG, 2006. 864 s. ISBN 978-3411040667

RAUSCH, R./RAUSCH, I. 2002. Deutsche Phonetik für Ausländer. Berlin: Langenscheidt Verlag Enzyklopädie, 2002. 404 s. ISBN 978-3324001458

Course completion requirements:

assessment (test and dictation - 100/0)

During the semester there will be a written test focusing on theoretical knowledge of phonetics and phonology and a dictation. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the test and a maximum of 50 points for the dictation.

The grade is awarded on a scale:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

A - excellent performance, the student has mastered the principles of pronunciation and has excellent results in the basic knowledge in the theory of phonetics and phonology.

B - excellent performance, the student masters the principles of pronunciation but makes minor errors and has excellent results in the area of basic knowledge in the theory of phonetics and phonology.

C - good performance, the student knows the principles of pronunciation, makes minor errors occurring fairly frequently and has good results in the area of basic knowledge in the theory of phonetics and phonology.

D - satisfactory performance, the student masters the principles of pronunciation with only problems and has satisfactory results in the area of basic knowledge in the theory of phonetics and phonology.

E - satisfactory performance, the student has deficiencies in written pronunciation and has reasonably satisfactory performance in the area of basic knowledge in phonetics and phonology theory.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Subject, tasks, goals and perspectives of German phonetics and phonology as scientific disciplines. Brief history of phonetics and phonology, phonological schools, basic concepts of phonetics and phonology and their interpretation from the theoretical and practical point of view. Characteristics of articulation and articulatory base in German, speech organs - their functioning, classification, analysis and description of the German syllabic system. The graphemic level of the German language, the prosodic level of the German language. Suprasegmental phenomena such as accent, rhythm, pauses, tempo, juncture and their theoretical and practical analysis. Contrastive phonetics and its importance in the process of teaching foreign languages, comparison of the German and Slovak spelling systems and prosodic principles of both languages from the linguistic and didactic point of view. The content of the course contributes to the profile of the graduate, as the graduate should have extensive knowledge of the theories of the discipline of Germanic studies, Germanic linguistics and linguistic sub-disciplines.

assessment (test and dictation - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Learning objectives: to acquire basic knowledge of German phonetics and phonology and skills in standard pronunciation

Learning outcomes: the graduate will master basic theoretical information and practical knowledge and skills in German phonetics and phonology with special attention to systematics, terminology and history (phonological schools, laws of sound production and the reflection of these laws in the language system).

The graduate of the course will acquire the following transferable competences: communicative skills based on correct pronunciation in German and analytical skills based on the analysis of the German phonetic system.

Knowledge: the graduate understands the principles of syllable formation, analyses linguistic material.

Skills: the graduate applies theoretical knowledge related to the formation of vowels in pronunciation.

Competences: the graduate has competences in the field of standard pronunciation.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching ; 18 hours of preparation for direct teaching 18 hours of preparation for assessment (test and dictation); 9 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study; 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: motivational (motivational demonstration of correct pronunciation), expository (explanation of the principles of correct pronunciation and basic knowledge of the theory of phonetics and phonology), fixation (practice of correct pronunciation), diagnostic and classification, etc.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

HIRSCHFELD, U. 2016. Phonetik im Fach Deutsch als Fremd- und Zweitsprache: Unter Berücksichtigung des Verhältnisses von Orthografie und Phonetik. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co, 2016. 253 s. ISBN: 9783503170180

Recommended readings:

ADAMCOVÁ, L. 2001. Phonetik der deutschen Sprache. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2001. 201 s. ISBN 80-223-1678-4

ADAMCOVÁ, L. 1996. Praktische Phonetik des Deutschen. Bratislava: Slovac Academic Press, 1996. 111 s. ISBN 80-85665-67-0

GLÜCK, H. 2010. Metzler Lexikon Sprache. Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler, 2010. 793 s. ISBN 978-3-476-02335-3

MANGOLD, M. Duden. Bd. 6. 2006. Das Aussprachewörterbuch. 6. prepracované a aktualizované vyd., Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, Zürich: Bibliographisches Institut F.A. Brockhaus AG, 2006. 864 s. ISBN 978-3411040667

RAUSCH, R./RAUSCH, I. 2002. Deutsche Phonetik für Ausländer. Berlin: Langenscheidt Verlag Enzyklopädie, 2002. 404 s. ISBN 978-3324001458

Course completion requirements:

assessment (test and dictation - 100/0)

During the semester there will be a written test focusing on theoretical knowledge of phonetics and phonology and a dictation. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the test and a maximum of 50 points for the dictation.

The grade is awarded on a scale:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

A - excellent performance, the student has mastered the principles of pronunciation and has excellent results in the basic knowledge in the theory of phonetics and phonology.

B - excellent performance, the student masters the principles of pronunciation but makes minor errors and has excellent results in the area of basic knowledge in the theory of phonetics and phonology.

C - good performance, the student knows the principles of pronunciation, makes minor errors occurring fairly frequently and has good results in the area of basic knowledge in the theory of phonetics and phonology.

D - satisfactory performance, the student masters the principles of pronunciation with only problems and has satisfactory results in the area of basic knowledge in the theory of phonetics and phonology.

E - satisfactory performance, the student has deficiencies in written pronunciation and has reasonably satisfactory performance in the area of basic knowledge in phonetics and phonology theory.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Subject, tasks, goals and perspectives of German phonetics and phonology as scientific disciplines. Brief history of phonetics and phonology, phonological schools, basic concepts of phonetics and phonology and their interpretation from the theoretical and practical point of view. Characteristics of articulation and articulatory base in German, speech organs - their functioning, classification, analysis and description of the German syllabic system. The graphemic level of the German language, the prosodic level of the German language. Suprasegmental phenomena such as accent, rhythm, pauses, tempo, juncture and their theoretical and practical analysis. Contrastive phonetics and its importance in the process of teaching foreign languages, comparison of the German and Slovak spelling systems and prosodic principles of both languages from the linguistic and didactic point of view. The content of the course contributes to the profile of the graduate, as the graduate should have extensive knowledge of the theories of the discipline of Germanic studies, Germanic linguistics and linguistic sub-disciplines.

assessment (test and dictation - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Learning objectives: to acquire basic knowledge of German phonetics and phonology and skills in standard pronunciation

Learning outcomes: the graduate will master basic theoretical information and practical knowledge and skills in German phonetics and phonology with special attention to systematics, terminology and history (phonological schools, laws of sound production and the reflection of these laws in the language system).

The graduate of the course will acquire the following transferable competences: communicative skills based on correct pronunciation in German and analytical skills based on the analysis of the German phonetic system.

Knowledge: the graduate understands the principles of syllable formation, analyses linguistic material.

Skills: the graduate applies theoretical knowledge related to the formation of vowels in pronunciation.

Competences: the graduate has competences in the field of standard pronunciation.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (lecture), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching, 40 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study, 55 hours of preparation for the final assessment (oral examination). Total: 100 hours of student work.

Teaching methods: explanations, work with a specialist text, brainstorming, discussion of the topic, analysis of literary texts, guided self-study

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

BEUTIN, W. a i. 2019. Deutsche Literaturgeschichte: Von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Metzler, 2019. 810 s. ISBN-10:3476049523, ISBN-13:978-3476049520 (vybrané kapitoly)

Recommended readings:

MIKULÁŠ, R. 2017 Cesta ako individuačný proces a ako blúdenie: kognitívno-naratologické úvahy o centrálnom sujete vývinového románu. In: Philologia. Roč. 27, č. 1 (2017), 85–102. ISSN 1339-2026

SØRENSEN, B. A. 2020. Geschichte der deutschen Literatur Bd. I: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Romantik. C. H. Beck, 2020. 352 s. ISBN-10:3406751849, ISBN-13:978-3406751844 alebo

ZMEGAČ, V. 2004. Kleine Geschichte der deutschen Literatur. Von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Wiesbaden: Marix Verlag, 2004. 432 s. ISBN 393771524X

Course completion requirements:

continuous assessment in the form of discussions: 50 points and oral examination: 50 points (50/50), mastery of theoretical content, reading of primary literary texts (the so-called texts on the reading list), knowledge of conceptual means, active participation in discussions/analyses.

The assessment:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

Distinction: excellent knowledge of the literature of the period and the ability to interpret it on the basis of the means acquired, fluent expression, structured statements, excellent ability to think analytically and to formulate critical evaluative attitudes.

Very good: solid knowledge of the literature of the period and the ability to interpret it on the basis of the acquired means, fluent speech with minor shortcomings, very good ability to think analytically and to formulate critical evaluative attitudes.

Good: average knowledge of the literature of the period, ability to interpret it on the basis of the acquired means, fluent speech with several weaknesses, limited ability to formulate evaluative critical attitudes.

Satisfactory (D): content mastery with several weaknesses, basic mastery and understanding of the issues and interpretive practices, poor scholarly argumentation and formulation of evaluative critical stances.

Satisfactory: superficial knowledge, inaccurate use of technical terms, numerous grammatical, orthographic, stylistic errors, lack of scientific argumentation and formulation of evaluative critical stances.

Inadequate: insufficient, no knowledge of the literature of the period, insufficient mastery of conceptual tools, failure to read primary literary texts.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Literature of the early Enlightenment: the travel novel, the adventure novel, court poetry, the beginnings of literary criticism. Philosophy of the Enlightenment, the first literary talents of the Enlightenment literature, the literary quarrel between Leipzig and Zurich, its origins and consequences. The literary Rococo, doctrinal literature, literature from Halle and Prussia, anacreontics in Germany. Turning towards the constitution of a "classical" national literature. Sturm und Drang, causes of the emergence of a new ideological orientation, changes in the middle of the 18th century. Goethe from literary beginnings to his stay in Italy. Schiller from the period of his studies in Ludwigsburg to his stay in Weimar and Jena. German classics, Goethe after his return from Italy, Goethe's prose works, Goethe's work at the turn of the century, return to Faust. Schiller and Goethe, Schiller's classical dramas and the last creative phase, contemporaries of Goethe and Schiller. Transcending the classics. Goethe's late work.

continuous assessment in the form of discussions: 50 points and oral examination: 50 points (50/50), mastery of theoretical content, reading of primary literary texts (the so-called texts on the reading list), knowledge of conceptual means, active participation in discussions/analyses.

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Learning objectives: to gain an overview of German literature from the early Enlightenment to Goethe's late works.

Learning Outcomes: the graduate of the course will acquire an overview of literature as a system and institution in the broader social and especially spiritual context of the 18th century. They will learn to analyse key texts of the period, work critically with the literature, and develop argumentative and presentation strategies.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (lecture), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching, 40 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study, 55 hours of preparation for the final assessment (oral examination). Total: 100 hours of student work.

Teaching methods: explanations, work with a specialist text, brainstorming, discussion of the topic, analysis of literary texts, guided self-study

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

BEUTIN, W. a i. 2019. Deutsche Literaturgeschichte: Von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Metzler, 2019. 810 s. ISBN-10:3476049523, ISBN-13:978-3476049520 (selected chapters)

Recommended readings:

MIKULÁŠ, R. 2014. Ferdinand von Saar: podoby rakúskej novely medzi realizmom a modernou. In: Premeny poetiky novely 20. storočia v európskom kontexte. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2014, s. 136–152. ISBN 978-80-223-3714-4

MIKULÁŠOVÁ, A. 1998. Bratia Grimmovci a zberatelia rozprávok na Slovensku: podobnosti a odlišnosti v prístupe k spracovaniu ľudovej slovesnosti. In: Literatúra pre deti a mládež v procese 1. Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa, 1998, 309–315. ISBN 80-8050-160-2

SØRENSEN, B. A. 2020. Geschichte der deutschen Literatur Bd. I: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Romantik. C. H. Beck, 2020. 352 s. ISBN-10:3406751849, ISBN-13:978-3406751844 SØRENSEN, B. A. 2016. Geschichte der deutschen Literatur Bd. II: Vom 19. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart. C. H. Beck, 2016. 512 s. ISBN-10:‎ 340669733X, ISBN-13:978-3406697333 ZMEGAČ, V. 2004. Kleine Geschichte der deutschen Literatur. Von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Wiesbaden: Marix Verlag, 2004. 432 s. ISBN 393771524X

Course completion requirements:

continuous assessment in the form of discussions: 50 points and oral examination: 50 points (50/50), mastery of theoretical content, reading of primary literary texts (the so-called texts on the reading list), knowledge of conceptual means, active participation in discussions/analyses.

The assessment:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

Distinction: excellent knowledge of the literature of the period and the ability to interpret it on the basis of the means acquired, fluent expression, structured statements, excellent ability to think analytically and to formulate critical evaluative attitudes.

Very good: solid knowledge of the literature of the period and the ability to interpret it on the basis of the acquired means, fluent speech with minor shortcomings, very good ability to think analytically and to formulate critical evaluative attitudes.

Good: average knowledge of the literature of the period, ability to interpret it on the basis of the acquired means, fluent speech with several weaknesses, limited ability to formulate evaluative critical attitudes.

Satisfactory (D): content mastery with several weaknesses, basic mastery and understanding of the issues and interpretive practices, poor scholarly argumentation and formulation of evaluative critical stances.

Satisfactory: superficial knowledge, inaccurate use of technical terms, numerous grammatical, orthographic, stylistic errors, lack of scientific argumentation and formulation of evaluative critical stances.

Inadequate: insufficient, no knowledge of the literature of the period, insufficient mastery of conceptual tools, failure to read primary literary texts.

German, Slovak

Course outcomes of subject (content):

The social situation in Germany after the French Revolution, the philosophy of the period and the establishment of German studies as a scientific discipline, the possibilities of periodization of the epoch, literary centres. The beginnings of women's emancipation. Berlin salons, Romantic poetics, theorists and theoretical works of early Romanticism. The "folk tale", literary foci of early Romanticism. Between classics and romance. Between romance and realism, restoration currents after 1815; currents of emancipation- Junges Deutschland, Vormärz. Biedermeier, Vienna People's Theatre. Realism, social situation in Germany after 1848, prose works, lyrical works, dramatic works. Naturalism, theory of so-called consequential realism. Key works (primary literature) are updated at the beginning of the semester.

continuous assessment in the form of discussions: 50 points and oral examination: 50 points (50/50), mastery of theoretical content, reading of primary literary texts (the so-called texts on the reading list), knowledge of conceptual means, active participation in discussions/analyses.

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Learning objectives: to gain an overview of the 19th century literature.

Learning Outcomes: the graduate of the course will gain a differentiated view of literature as a system and institution in a broader social and especially spiritual context from the end of the 18th century to the last decades of the 19th century. The student will learn to analyze key texts of the period, work critically with literature, gain insight into the current state of the issues under study, and develop argumentative and presentation strategies.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student's workload: 5 hours of combined teaching;15 hours of preparation for the paper; 20 hours of preparation for the final test; 10 hours of continuous home preparation for the class, self-study; 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (lecture, explanation and discussion of various historical, political and social developments in Germany, independent work using various techniques), fixative (revision exercises, play as a method), diagnostic and classificatory (written examinations and didactic tests).

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

Internetový zdroj

knižná alebo elektronická verzia publikácie:

Online- und Printpublikationen der Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung [online] [citované 26/11/2021]. Dostupné na: https://www.bpb.de/

Kol. autorov. Tatsachen über Deutschland [online] [citované 26/11/2021]. Dostupné na:

https://www.tatsachen-ueber-deutschland.de/de/Deutschland-Buch-Ausgabe-2018

Recommended readings:

články z tlače, internetu . [online] [citované 26/11/2021]. Dostupné na:

http://www.dw.de/themen/s-9077

https://www.dhm.de/lemo/

https://www.dw.com/de/das-deutschlandlabor/s-32379

https://www.dw.com/de/der-mauerfall-eine-unterrichtsreihe/a-2340056

https://www.tatsachen-ueber-deutschland.de/de

https://www.zdf.de/dokumentation/momente-der-geschichte#/videos/all/cloud

internetové stránky miest ,obcí, krajov a kultúrnych inštitúcií Nemecka

SCHMIDT K. et al. 2007. Erinnerungsorte. Deutsche Geschichte im DaF-Unterricht. Cornelsen 2007. 96 S. ISBN 3060204764

Course completion requirements:

assessment (paper, final test - 100/0)

A paper and a final test are prerequisites for the grade; students must pass both in order to receive a passing grade. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the paper and a maximum of 50 points for the final test.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66% , satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student knows the main historical, political and social events, can relate them to current issues and discuss them.

Very Good: The student knows the main historical, political and social events, can follow and participate in current debates

Good: The student knows basic historical, political and social events and can follow current debates

Satisfactory: The sudent has only a fragmentary knowledge of the main historical, political and social events, has difficulties understanding current debates

Sufficient: The student has only a marginal knowledge of the main historical, political and social events, references to current debates cannot be made

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

A brief history of Germany. Geographical characteristics (mountain ranges, watersheds, islands, etc.). Political system, industry. Population, language. Society: education, science, media, sport. Culture: major figures in literature, philosophy, music, painting and architecture. Customs, traditions and festivals; peculiarities of the national cuisine. Characteristics of the individual Länder. The graduate of the course is thus equipped with a broad knowledge of German culture, history and present-day local history.

assessment (paper, final test - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

The students have basic knowledge of important topics about the German reality based on selected subjects - history (from 1945 to the present), politics (system, elections, current events and tendencies, parties, movements), society (minorities, migration, youth, marginal groups, transformations in society, environmental protection), current topics. They can read and evaluate articles, specialized texts and statistics. They can reflect on the acquired knowledge, understand connections, and make references. They can describe complex issues clearly, in detail and systematically. The students are sensitized to inter- and intracultural differences and have developed strategies and skills to better assess foreign culture phenomena and relate them to their own reality.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student's workload: 5 hours of combined teaching;15 hours of preparation for the paper; 20 hours of preparation for the final test; 10 hours of continuous home preparation for the class, self-study; 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (lecture, explanation and discussion of various historical, political and social developments in Germany, independent work using various techniques), fixative (revision exercises, play as a method), diagnostic and classificatory (written examinations and didactic tests).

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

Internetový zdroj

knižná alebo elektronická verzia publikácie:

Online- und Printpublikationen der Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung [online] [citované 26/11/2021]. Dostupné na: https://www.bpb.de/

Kol. autorov. Tatsachen über Deutschland [online] [citované 26/11/2021]. Dostupné na:

https://www.tatsachen-ueber-deutschland.de/de/Deutschland-Buch-Ausgabe-2018

Recommended readings:

články z tlače, internetu . [online] [citované 26/11/2021]. Dostupné na:

http://www.dw.de/themen/s-9077

https://www.dhm.de/lemo/

https://www.dw.com/de/das-deutschlandlabor/s-32379

https://www.dw.com/de/der-mauerfall-eine-unterrichtsreihe/a-2340056

https://www.tatsachen-ueber-deutschland.de/de

https://www.zdf.de/dokumentation/momente-der-geschichte#/videos/all/cloud

internetové stránky miest ,obcí, krajov a kultúrnych inštitúcií Nemecka

SCHMIDT K. et al. 2007. Erinnerungsorte. Deutsche Geschichte im DaF-Unterricht. Cornelsen 2007. 96 S. ISBN 3060204764

Course completion requirements:

assessment (paper, final test - 100/0)

A paper and a final test are prerequisites for the grade; students must pass both in order to receive a passing grade. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the paper and a maximum of 50 points for the final test.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66% , satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student knows the main historical, political and social events, can relate them to current issues and discuss them.

Very Good: The student knows the main historical, political and social events, can follow and participate in current debates

Good: The student knows basic historical, political and social events and can follow current debates

Satisfactory: The sudent has only a fragmentary knowledge of the main historical, political and social events, has difficulties understanding current debates

Sufficient: The student has only a marginal knowledge of the main historical, political and social events, references to current debates cannot be made

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

A brief history of Germany. Geographical characteristics (mountain ranges, watersheds, islands, etc.). Political system, industry. Population, language. Society: education, science, media, sport. Culture: major figures in literature, philosophy, music, painting and architecture. Customs, traditions and festivals; peculiarities of the national cuisine. Characteristics of the individual Länder. The graduate of the course is thus equipped with a broad knowledge of German culture, history and present-day local history.

assessment (paper, final test - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

The students have basic knowledge of important topics about the German reality based on selected subjects - history (from 1945 to the present), politics (system, elections, current events and tendencies, parties, movements), society (minorities, migration, youth, marginal groups, transformations in society, environmental protection), current topics. They can read and evaluate articles, specialized texts and statistics. They can reflect on the acquired knowledge, understand connections, and make references. They can describe complex issues clearly, in detail and systematically. The students are sensitized to inter- and intracultural differences and have developed strategies and skills to better assess foreign culture phenomena and relate them to their own reality.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student's workload: 5 hours of combined teaching;15 hours of preparation for the paper; 20 hours of preparation for the final test; 10 hours of continuous home preparation for the class, self-study. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (lecture, explanation and discussion of historical, political and social developments in Austria, Liechtenstein and Switzerland, independent work using various techniques), fixative (revision exercises, play as a method), diagnostic and classificatory (written examinations and didactic tests).

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

http://www.austria.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=15718

http://www.liechtenstein.li/

http://www.swissworld.org/de/schweiz/ressourcen/download/praesentationen/

Recommended readings:

https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home.html

https://www.erinnern.at/

https://www.llv.li/inhalt/1590/amtsstellen/liechtenstein-in-zahlen

https://www.statistik.at/web_de/services/oesterreich_zahlen_daten_fakten/index.html

https://www.zeit.de/serie/servus-gruezi-hallo

Internetový zdroj – rôzne články z tlače, internetu. [online] [citované 26/11/2021].

Course completion requirements:

assessment (paper, final test - 100/0)

A paper and a final test are prerequisites for the grade; students must pass both in order to receive a passing grade. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the paper and a maximum of 50 points for the final test.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66%, satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student knows the main historical, political and social facts, can relate them to current issues and discuss them.

Very Good: The student knows the main historical, political and social facts, can follow and participate in current debates.

Good: The student knows basic historical, political and social facts and can follow current debates

Satisfactory: The sudent has only a fragmentary knowledge of historical, political and social facts, has difficulties understanding current debates.

Sufficient: The student has only a marginal knowledge of historical, political and social facts, references to current debates cannot be made.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Discussion of a given landscape science topic, sociocultural and intercultural competence and knowledge of stereotypes, cultural memory, collective memory and national symbols. Topics: Brief history of Austria, Switzerland and Liechtenstein. Geographical characteristics (mountain ranges, watersheds, islands, etc.). Political system, industry. Population, language. Society: education, science, media, sport. Culture: major figures in literature, philosophy, music, painting and architecture. Customs, traditions and festivals; peculiarities of the national cuisine. Characteristics of the individual countries. Society and culture in Austria, Switzerland and Liechtenstein. Living conditions. Interpersonal relations, social conventions, ritual behaviour, body language. Values, beliefs and opinions.

The graduate of the course is thus equipped with a broad landscape knowledge of the culture, history and present of Austria.

assessment (paper, final test - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

The students have basic knowledge of important topics about Austrian, Swiss and Liechtenstein reality based on selected subjects – history (from 1945 to the present), politics (system, elections, current events and tendencies, parties, movements), society (minorities, migration, youth, marginal groups, transformations in society, environmental protection), current topics. They can read and evaluate articles, specialized texts and statistics. They can reflect on the acquired knowledge, understand connections and make references. They can describe complex issues clearly, in detail and systematically. The students are sensitized to inter- and intracultural differences in German-speaking countries and have developed strategies and skills to better assess foreign culture phenomena and relate them to their own reality.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student's workload: 5 hours of combined teaching;15 hours of preparation for the paper; 20 hours of preparation for the final test; 10 hours of continuous home preparation for the class, self-study. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (lecture, explanation and discussion of historical, political and social developments in Austria, Liechtenstein and Switzerland, independent work using various techniques), fixative (revision exercises, play as a method), diagnostic and classificatory (written examinations and didactic tests).

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

http://www.austria.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=15718

http://www.liechtenstein.li/

http://www.swissworld.org/de/schweiz/ressourcen/download/praesentationen/

Recommended readings:

https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home.html

https://www.erinnern.at/

https://www.llv.li/inhalt/1590/amtsstellen/liechtenstein-in-zahlen

https://www.statistik.at/web_de/services/oesterreich_zahlen_daten_fakten/index.html

https://www.zeit.de/serie/servus-gruezi-hallo

Internetový zdroj – rôzne články z tlače, internetu. [online] [citované 26/11/2021].

Course completion requirements:

assessment (paper, final test - 100/0)

A paper and a final test are prerequisites for the grade; students must pass both in order to receive a passing grade. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the paper and a maximum of 50 points for the final test.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66%, satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student knows the main historical, political and social facts, can relate them to current issues and discuss them.

Very Good: The student knows the main historical, political and social facts, can follow and participate in current debates.

Good: The student knows basic historical, political and social facts and can follow current debates

Satisfactory: The sudent has only a fragmentary knowledge of historical, political and social facts, has difficulties understanding current debates.

Sufficient: The student has only a marginal knowledge of historical, political and social facts, references to current debates cannot be made.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Discussion of a given landscape science topic, sociocultural and intercultural competence and knowledge of stereotypes, cultural memory, collective memory and national symbols. Topics: Brief history of Austria, Switzerland and Liechtenstein. Geographical characteristics (mountain ranges, watersheds, islands, etc.). Political system, industry. Population, language. Society: education, science, media, sport. Culture: major figures in literature, philosophy, music, painting and architecture. Customs, traditions and festivals; peculiarities of the national cuisine. Characteristics of the individual countries. Society and culture in Austria, Switzerland and Liechtenstein. Living conditions. Interpersonal relations, social conventions, ritual behaviour, body language. Values, beliefs and opinions.

The graduate of the course is thus equipped with a broad landscape knowledge of the culture, history and present of Austria.

assessment (paper, final test - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

The students have basic knowledge of important topics about Austrian, Swiss and Liechtenstein reality based on selected subjects – history (from 1945 to the present), politics (system, elections, current events and tendencies, parties, movements), society (minorities, migration, youth, marginal groups, transformations in society, environmental protection), current topics. They can read and evaluate articles, specialized texts and statistics. They can reflect on the acquired knowledge, understand connections and make references. They can describe complex issues clearly, in detail and systematically. The students are sensitized to inter- and intracultural differences in German-speaking countries and have developed strategies and skills to better assess foreign culture phenomena and relate them to their own reality.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 20 hours of self-study and continuous home preparation for class (preparation of a report); 25 hours of seminar work. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: explanation, narration, interview, discussion, brainstorming, students' own work, work with Internet resources, practice, repetition.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

VAJIČKOVÁ, M. 2009. Lexikalisches Grundwissen in Sprachsystem und Sprachgebrauch. Einführung in die Lexikologie der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 2., neu bearbeitete und ergänzte Auflage, Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2009. 164 s. ISBN 978-8-0223-2595-0

BILLINA, A./GEIGER,S./TECHMER,M. 2019. Deutsch üben: Wortschatz und Grammatik C1. München: Hueber Verlag, 2019. 136 s. ISBN 978-3-19-727493-5 

Recommended readings:

FLEISCHER, W./BARZ, I. 1995. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübigen: Niemeyer 1995. 382 s. ISBN 978-3-4841-0682-6

LOHDE, M. 2006. Wortbildung des modernen Deutschen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 2006. 352 s. ISBN 978-3-8233-7211-0

RÖMER, CH./MATZKE, B. 2005. Lexikologie des Deutschen: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 2005. 236 s. ISBN 978-3-8233-6128-2

SCHIPPAN, T. 2005. Lexikologie der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: De Gruyter, 1993. 306 s. ISBN 978-3-4847-3002-1

Course completion requirements:

During the semester, the student will prepare a visual presentation, present a paper, and prepare a term paper. Active participation in discussions, independent and group problem solving, and the student's own creative work are required. Points: active participation in the seminar: 15 points, preparation/presentation of a paper: 30 points, seminar paper: 55 points (100/0).

The grade is awarded on a scale of:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

Excellent: Precise articulation of the intent and objectives of the paper/seminar paper, demonstration of excellent knowledge of the topic, clear, logical reasoning, ability to flexibly and promptly demonstrate theoretical knowledge through practical examples, nuanced language, correct use of technical terms, excellent composition, clear style and a minimum of grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, taking into account the vast amount of literature, formally correct editing (adherence to the citation standard and the authorial plural, correct inclusion of bibliographical references in the text and in the index, etc. ), excellent ability to independently present the results of the work and to incorporate comments from the oral presentation of the paper, active participation in discussions, independent and group problem solving, own creative work during the semester.

Very good: solid treatment of the topic in relation to the objectives pursued, demonstration of good knowledge of the topic, logical structure of the thesis, logical argumentation, ability to demonstrate theoretical knowledge with practical examples, active participation in discussions, clear language, only a small number of grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, consideration of a reasonable amount of literature, formally correct editing (adherence to the citation standard and the author's plural, correct inclusion of bibliographical references in the text and in the list, etc.), correct use of the author's plural and the author's plural. ), very good ability to present the results of the work independently and to incorporate comments from the oral presentation of the paper, independent and group problem solving and own work during the semester.

Good: Average treatment of the topic in relation to the stated objectives, logical reasoning, correct communication of arguments from secondary literature, demonstration of good knowledge, but the paper contains inaccurate and irrelevant facts in relation to the topic in places, mostly correct use of technical terms, some elements of composition present, prevalence of theoretical information over practical examples, grammatical, orthographic, stylistic level good, appropriate amount of literature taken into account, formally correct editing (observance of the citation standard and the author's plural, correct inclusion of bibliographical references both in the text and in the index, etc.), correctness of the citation standard and the author's plural ), good ability to independently present the results of the work and incorporate comments, participation in discussions, independent and group problem solving.

Satisfactory: Only a rough outline of the problem to be solved, apparently little knowledge related to the topic, imprecise presentation of arguments taken from secondary literature, the topic is treated mainly theoretically without implementation of practical examples, largely correct use of technical terms, several grammatical, orthographic, stylistic errors, superficial preparation for seminars, multiple grammatical, orthographic, and stylistic errors, use of little secondary literature, inaccuracies in adherence to citation standards, incorrect inclusion of bibliographic references in the text and/or in the list, minimal incorporation of comments from the oral presentation, infrequent participation in discussions, group problem solving throughout the semester.

Sufficient: Results treat the chosen topic superficially and without practical examples by mechanical reading from various sources, knowledge related to the topic is very weak, imprecise use of technical terms, numerous grammatical, orthographic, stylistic errors, superficial preparation for seminars, use of a small amount of secondary literature, inaccuracies in adherence to citation standards, incorrect inclusion of bibliographic references in the text and/or in the list, lack of ability to independently present theoretical knowledge in connection with practical applications, passive participation in discussions, group problem solving during the semester.

Inadequate: poor treatment of the topic, minimal or no knowledge of the scientific context, poor or no argumentation, large number of orthographic, stylistic errors, lack of or inadequate preparation for seminars, major formal deficiencies, lack of participation in discussions and group work.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Systematic relationships in vocabulary. Internationalisms, neologisms, archaisms, historicisms. Semantic analysis. Polysemy, homonymy and the process of monosemantics. Semantic models. Suprasemantic aspects of lexis. Word formation in contemporary German. Morphematic structure of a word, word-formation analysis. On the basis of the acquired knowledge the graduate of the course cultivates his/her linguistic expression. In the eventual teaching profession, the student will use the acquired knowledge and skills in the teaching of vocabulary in the teaching of German as a foreign language.

During the semester, the student will prepare a visual presentation, present a paper, and prepare a term paper. Active participation in discussions, independent and group problem solving, and the student's own creative work are required. Points: active participation in the seminar: 15 points, preparation/presentation of a paper: 30 points, seminar paper: 55 points (100/0).

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Learning objectives: to gain an overview of German lexicology, to be able to explain the word-formation procedures of individual word types and to be able to use lexical units correctly in their collocational and semantic contexts.

Learning outcomes: the graduate of the course knows the terminology of the subject, understands the lexical-semantic and collocational relations in the vocabulary. On the basis of the analysis of practical examples, he/she can define the word-formation procedures of individual word types and then demonstrate them on his/her own examples. They integrate new vocabulary into their language expression, thus achieving a higher level of communicative and presentational competence. Has the ability to recognise lexical units in new relationships (polysemy, homonymy and i) and to use them in new, original ways (creative word combinations, word formation, figurative meaning, etc.).

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student's workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 15 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study; 30 hours of preparation of the seminar paper and co-authored paper; 50 hours of preparation for the final assessment (oral examination). Total 100 hours of student work.

Teaching methods: explanation, work with professional text, brainstorming, problem solving, application of theoretical knowledge to practice, discussion of the topic, authentic presentation and critical reflection of papers, guided self-study.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

HALLET, W. a KÖNIGS, Frank G. 2019. Handbuch Fremdsprachendidaktik. Seelze. Klett u. Kallmeyer, 2019. 399 s. V. a VIII. kapitola. ISBN 978-3-7800-1053-7

KOLEČÁNI LENČOVÁ, I./DOVIČÁK, M. 2021. Od textu k projektu. Bratislava: PdF UK, 2021. 70 s. ISBN 978-80-223-5278-9

STORCH, G. 1999. Deutsch als Fremdsprache – Eine Didaktik: Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Unterrichtsgestaltung. Paderborn: Fink, 1999. 367 s., s. 305–310, 327–336. ISBN-13:978-3825281847

Recommended readings:

Gemeinsamer europäischer Referenzrahmen für Sprachen: lernen, lehren, beurteilen. Begleitband. 2020. Stuttgart: Klett.

LENČOVÁ, I. 2006. Lernen an Stationen. Pädagogisch-didaktische Überlegungen zu einem der neuen Unterrichtsmodelle. In: Germanistické štúdie. Banská Bystrica: FHV UMB, 2006, 21–33. ISBN 80-8083-224-2

LENČOVÁ, I. 2006. Das Glück hat Flügel. Literarische Stationen für Jugendliche. In: Fremdsprache Deutsch: Zeitschrift für die Praxis des Deutschunterrichts, č. 35, 38–42.

PIEPHO, H. E. et all. 1996. Aufgaben-Handbuch: Deutsch als Fremdsprache; Abriss einer Aufgaben- und Übungstypologie. München: Iudicium, 1996. ISBN 3-89129-269-4

WICKE, R. E. 2012. Aufgabenorientiertes und projektorientiertes Lernen im DaF-Unterricht. München: Iudicium, 2012. 292 s. ISBN 978-3-86205-089-5

Course completion requirements:

Continuous assessment (50 points): study of literature, active participation in discussions, 1 co-presentation focused on a selected phenomenon of educational reality in school and 1 seminar paper focused on selected concepts from didactics with examples from practice. Final assessment (50 points): presentation of the seminar paper and oral examination (50/50).

The grade is awarded on a scale:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding)

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard)

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work)

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results)

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria)

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

Excellent: active participation in discussions during the semester, persuasive presentation of the paper, precise formulation of the intention of the seminar paper, excellent knowledge of the topic, clear and logical argumentation, consideration of all aspects necessary for the treatment of the topic, a significant proportion of own contribution, argumentation and ability to make comparisons, correct use of technical terms, grammatically, orthographically and stylistically minimal errors, formally correct editing (adherence to the citation standard, etc.), good grades (excellent). ), excellent ability to independently present theoretical knowledge in connection with practical applications.

Very good: active participation in discussions during the semester, solid presentation of the abstract and formulation of the intent of the seminar paper, very good knowledge of the subject, logical structure of the paper and argumentation, clear language, few grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, consideration of a reasonable amount of literature, formally correct editing (adherence to citation standards, etc.), ability to independently present theoretical knowledge in connection with practical applications.

Good: solid treatment of the topic, insufficient connection to the current state of the research problem, logical argumentation, correct communication of arguments, mostly correct use of technical terms, grammatically, orthographically, stylistically at an average level, relatively adequate amount of literature, formally correct editing (adherence to citation standards, etc.), good ability to independently present theoretical knowledge in connection with practical applications.

Satisfactory: only a rough outline of the problem to be solved, superficial knowledge of the scientific context, imprecise presentation of arguments taken from secondary literature, largely correct use of technical terms, several grammatical, orthographic, stylistic errors, superficial preparation for seminars, use of a small amount of secondary literature, insufficient ability to present theoretical knowledge independently in connection with practical applications.

Sufficient: the results treat the chosen topic superficially and without own contribution by mechanically taking from various sources, inaccurate use of technical terms, numerous grammatical, orthographic, stylistic errors, superficial preparation for seminars, use of a small amount of secondary literature, insufficient ability to independently present theoretical knowledge in connection with practical applications.

Insufficient results: poor treatment of the topic, minimal or no knowledge of the scientific context, poor or no argumentation, large number of orthographic, stylistic errors, lack of or insufficient preparation for seminars and examination, major formal deficiencies.

German, Slovak

Course outcomes of subject (content):

1. Theoretical knowledge and research results of didactics of foreign languages and reference disciplines.

2. Interactive German language teaching, its characteristic features and principles, teacher's personality as a creative medium of the teaching process, defining the objectives and contents of teaching units, forms, and methods of work.

3. Familiarization with the European Framework of Reference and the curriculum, structural moments of the interactive teaching unit, the phase model of the interactive processes of teaching and learning, progression, and its role in the planning of the teaching process.

4. Didactic analysis of teaching units and evaluation of the process in a broader sense, comparison of effectiveness in relation to the stated objectives and contents; use of new technologies, evaluation in terms of usability in teaching.

5. The influence of mother tongue and L2 in the process of foreign language teaching.

The teaching of thematic units through the selected methods and forms of work contributes to a considerable extent to the achievement of the set objectives and learning outcomes listed in the graduate profile.

Continuous assessment (50 points): study of literature, active participation in discussions, 1 co-presentation focused on a selected phenomenon of educational reality in school and 1 seminar paper focused on selected concepts from didactics with examples from practice. Final assessment (50 points): presentation of the seminar paper and oral examination (50/50).

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Objectives: to convey the theoretical foundations of foreign language didactics together with the conceptual apparatus with a focus on the German language.

Outcomes: the graduate of the course is able to reflect on the educational reality in school and to carry out didactic analysis and evaluation of teaching units. He/she is open to new knowledge and can apply critical (self)reflection. He/she will develop the skills to apply theoretical knowledge in educational conditions of school, expand his/her competences to work with new technologies. Improves communication, presentation and argumentation skills, self-study strategies. He/she will be able to present his/her own solutions and attitudes adequately and professionally with an innovative approach.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 15 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study; 30 hours of preparation for seminar work. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (lecture, explanation and discussion of literary analysis methods, independent work using different techniques), fixation (revision exercises and homework), diagnostic and classification.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

Mikuláš a kol. 2019. Literaturwissenschaft in internationaler Perspektive. In: Literaturwissenschaft in internationaler Perspektive. Nümbrecht: Kirsch-Verlag, 2019. 509 s. ISBN 978-3-943906-35-6 (vybrané kapitoly) a literárne texty, ktoré sa aktualizujú na začiatku semestra akademického roka, v ktorom sa predmet otvára.

Recommended readings:

ALLKEMPER, A. 2001. Literaturwissenschaft. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2001. 316 s. ISBN 3-8252-2590-9

ANDREOTTI, M. 2009. Die Struktur der modernen Literatur. Bern und Stuttgart: Verlag Paul Haupt, 2009. 294 s. ISBN 978-3-8252-1127-1

CULLER, J. 2002. Krátký úvod do literární teorie. Brno: Host, 2002. 168 s. ISBN 80-7294-070-8

Felsner, K./Helbig, H./Manz, T. 2012. Arbeitsbuch Lyrik. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2012. 300 s. ISBN 3050059095

Genette, G. 2010. Die Erzählung. München: Fink, 2010. 293 s. ISBN 3825280837

GIGL, C. 2013. Textanalyse und Interpretation. Stuttgart: Klett Verlag 2013. 192 s. ISBN 978-3-12-927166-7

Jeßing, B./Köhnen, R. 2007. Einführung in die Neuere deutsche Literaturwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 435 s. ISBN-13: ‎ 978-3476021427

Martínez, M./Scheffel, M. 2020. Einführung in die Erzähltheorie. München: Beck, 2020. 234 s. ISBN 3406742831

Pfister, M. 2010. Das Drama. München: Fink, 2010. 454 s. ISBN 3825205800

Course completion requirements:

Assessment (term paper - 100/0)

The basis of the assessment is a term paper.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66% , satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student has understood the literary analysis methods and can apply them independently, can analyze literary texts of all genres in depth.

Very good: The student has understood the literary analysis methods and can apply them with minor uncertainties, can independently analyze literary texts of all genres.

Good: The student has understood the literary analysis methods and applies them with minor errors

Satisfactory: The student has only partially understood the methods of literary analysis and makes frequent mistakes applying them.

Sufficient: The student only marginally understood the literary analysis methods and big/large errors are made in the implementation.

Sufficient: the student has understood the methods of analysis in literary science only sufficiently and makes gross errors in application.

Insufficient: the student does not understand the methods of analysis in literary science, cannot analyze literary texts.

German, Slovak

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Clarification of the nature of the literary work as an aesthetic entity. The course includes a brief outline of the development of literary theory, the traditions of literary research in German studies, as well as current trends in European literary scholarship. Particular attention is paid to the application of knowledge to the main literary types and genres.

Assessment (term paper - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

The students are familiar with the basic questions and problems of literary studies. They understand main concepts and theories for the analysis of literary texts and master the technical terminology. Students gain an insight in the different steps of literary analysis and know the literary methodology. They can examine different literary texts of the three main literary genres using the latest methods analysis and interpret them on the basis of their own reading experience. The students are able to formulate their results professionally using scientific tools.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 15 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study; 30 hours of preparation for seminar work. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (lecture, explanation and discussion of literary analysis methods, independent work using different techniques), fixation (revision exercises and homework), diagnostic and classification.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

Mikuláš a kol. 2019. Literaturwissenschaft in internationaler Perspektive. In: Literaturwissenschaft in internationaler Perspektive. Nümbrecht: Kirsch-Verlag, 2019. 509 s. ISBN 978-3-943906-35-6 (vybrané kapitoly) a literárne texty, ktoré sa aktualizujú na začiatku semestra akademického roka, v ktorom sa predmet otvára.

Recommended readings:

ALLKEMPER, A. 2001. Literaturwissenschaft. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2001. 316 s. ISBN 3-8252-2590-9

ANDREOTTI, M. 2009. Die Struktur der modernen Literatur. Bern und Stuttgart: Verlag Paul Haupt, 2009. 294 s. ISBN 978-3-8252-1127-1

CULLER, J. 2002. Krátký úvod do literární teorie. Brno: Host, 2002. 168 s. ISBN 80-7294-070-8

Felsner, K./Helbig, H./Manz, T. 2012. Arbeitsbuch Lyrik. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2012. 300 s. ISBN 3050059095

Genette, G. 2010. Die Erzählung. München: Fink, 2010. 293 s. ISBN 3825280837

GIGL, C. 2013. Textanalyse und Interpretation. Stuttgart: Klett Verlag 2013. 192 s. ISBN 978-3-12-927166-7

Jeßing, B./Köhnen, R. 2007. Einführung in die Neuere deutsche Literaturwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 435 s. ISBN-13: ‎ 978-3476021427

Martínez, M./Scheffel, M. 2020. Einführung in die Erzähltheorie. München: Beck, 2020. 234 s. ISBN 3406742831

Pfister, M. 2010. Das Drama. München: Fink, 2010. 454 s. ISBN 3825205800

Course completion requirements:

Assessment (term paper - 100/0)

The basis of the assessment is a term paper.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66% , satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student has understood the literary analysis methods and can apply them independently, can analyze literary texts of all genres in depth.

Very good: The student has understood the literary analysis methods and can apply them with minor uncertainties, can independently analyze literary texts of all genres.

Good: The student has understood the literary analysis methods and applies them with minor errors

Satisfactory: The student has only partially understood the methods of literary analysis and makes frequent mistakes applying them.

Sufficient: The student only marginally understood the literary analysis methods and big/large errors are made in the implementation.

Sufficient: the student has understood the methods of analysis in literary science only sufficiently and makes gross errors in application.

Insufficient: the student does not understand the methods of analysis in literary science, cannot analyze literary texts.

German, Slovak

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Clarification of the nature of the literary work as an aesthetic entity. The course includes a brief outline of the development of literary theory, the traditions of literary research in German studies, as well as current trends in European literary scholarship. Particular attention is paid to the application of knowledge to the main literary types and genres.

Assessment (term paper - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

The students are familiar with the basic questions and problems of literary studies. They understand main concepts and theories for the analysis of literary texts and master the technical terminology. Students gain an insight in the different steps of literary analysis and know the literary methodology. They can examine different literary texts of the three main literary genres using the latest methods analysis and interpret them on the basis of their own reading experience. The students are able to formulate their results professionally using scientific tools.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 15 hours of preparation for essay; 15 hours of preparation for final test. 15 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (description and explanation and interview, independent work using different techniques), fixative (revision exercises, homework, play as a method), diagnostic and classificatory (written examination and didactic tests).

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

KOITHAN, U./SCHMITZ, H./SIEBER, T./SONNTAG, R. 2015. Aspekte neu. Mittelstufe Deutsch. Teil 1. München: Klett-Langenscheidt, 192 s. ISBN 978-3-12-605027-2

Grammatik aktiv. Verstehen. Üben. Sprechen. 2017. Berlin: Cornelsen 2017. 312 s. ISBN 978-3-06-021482-2 alebo aktuálne učebné materiály na úrovni B2.

Recommended readings:

BUSCHA A./SZITA S. B-Grammatik. Leipzig: Schubert. 266 s. ISBN 3941323105

články z tlače, internetu. [online] [citované 26/11/2021]. Dostupné na:

slovníky – dvojjazyčné a výkladové

Course completion requirements:

assessment (essay, final test - 100/0)

The essay and the final test must be handed in for assessment. Both must be passed to receive a passing grade. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the essay and a maximum of 50 points for the final test.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66% , satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student masters the acquired linguistic means and can apply them in the four skills and different contexts.

Very good: The student masters the acquired linguistic means and can apply them with very few errors in the four skills and different contexts.

Good: The student can use the learned linguistic means with minor errors in most contexts and language skills.

Satisfactory: The linguistic means covered are frequently used incorrectly and can only be transferred to other contexts or language skills to a limited extent.

Sufficient: The linguistic means covered can only be used with gross errors, transfer to other contexts or language skills is hardly possible.

German, Slovak

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Practising basic language skills: reading, listening, speaking, writing, using a variety of exercises on the above topics. Reading comprehension: note-taking and key-word formation, questioning, formulating answers and appropriate reasoning. Strategies for reading a foreign language text are practised: first reading, gathering background information, key words, questions, intensive reading and structuring of the text and other strategies. The competences of writing foreign language texts are developed: selecting a topic, collecting material, sorting, organising and structuring the text, formulating ideas. In the area of narrative, free narration on a selected topic as well as appropriate argumentation are practised.

Graduates of the course are able to communicate fluently in German in a variety of situations at an appropriate level and have acquired communication skills in oral and written form.

assessment (essay, final test - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

The class aims to develop students' communication skills: different topics are discussed, linguistic means are learned and applied, specific vocabulary based on the given topic is acquired, and relevant grammar rules are repeated, and all four skills are practiced. The students can understand the main ideas of complex texts on both concrete and abstract topics; can communicate spontaneously and fluently in order to have a normal conversation with native speakers without much effort on either side; can express themselves clearly and in detail on a wide range of topics, explain their opinion on a topical issue and present arguments and counterarguments for or against a particular point of view.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 15 hours of preparation for the project; 15 hours of preparation for the final test. 15 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (description and explanation and interview, independent work using different techniques), fixative (revision exercises, homework, play as a method), diagnostic and classificatory (written examination and didactic tests).

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

BILLINA, A. 2019. Lesen und Schreiben B2. München: Hueber Verlag, 2019. 144 s. ISBN 978-3-19-597493-6 or up-to-date teaching materials at B2 level.

Recommended readings:

articles from the press, internet, dictionaries - bilingual and explanatory

Course completion requirements:

assessment (project, final exam – 100/0)

The basis of the assessment is a project and a final exam. The students have to pass both to complete the course. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the project and a maximum of 50 points for the final test.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66%, satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student understands and responds appropriately to a wide range of authentic listening and reading material.

Very good: The student understands and responds appropriately to a wide range of authentic listening and reading texts with few minor uncertainties.

Good: The student understands and responds to many authentic listening and reading texts with minor difficulty.

Satisfactory: The student understands authentic listening and reading texts only with some difficulty and finds it hard to react appropriately.

Sufficient: The student understands authentic listening and reading texts only with great difficulty and hardly reacts to them.

Insufficient: the student does not understand authentic listening texts

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Strategies for reading and listening comprehension, practicing different types of reading. Graduates of the course are able to read fluently in German in a variety of specific situations and have acquired oral and written communication skills in reading and listening comprehension.

assessment (project, final exam – 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

The students understand standard language spoken in direct contact and in the media as they normally encounter it in private, social, professional, or educational life. They understand longer speeches and talks and are able to follow complex lines of argument if reasonably familiar with the topic. They understand TV news and reports, interviews, and most films if standard language is spoken. Students can read articles and reports on current topics and problems and understand contemporary literary prose. They can read independently, adapt reading style and speed to different texts and purposes, and use appropriate reference works. They have a large reading vocabulary but may have difficulty with less frequently used phrases. Students can use a variety of listening and reading strategies to ensure comprehension, including listening for key words and using clues from the context.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 15 hours of preparation for the project; 15 hours of preparation for the final test. 15 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (description and explanation and interview, independent work using different techniques), fixative (revision exercises, homework, play as a method), diagnostic and classificatory (written examination and didactic tests).

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

BILLINA, A. 2019. Lesen und Schreiben B2. München: Hueber Verlag, 2019. 144 s. ISBN 978-3-19-597493-6 or up-to-date teaching materials at B2 level.

Recommended readings:

articles from the press, internet, dictionaries - bilingual and explanatory

Course completion requirements:

assessment (project, final exam – 100/0)

The basis of the assessment is a project and a final exam. The students have to pass both to complete the course. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the project and a maximum of 50 points for the final test.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66%, satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student understands and responds appropriately to a wide range of authentic listening and reading material.

Very good: The student understands and responds appropriately to a wide range of authentic listening and reading texts with few minor uncertainties.

Good: The student understands and responds to many authentic listening and reading texts with minor difficulty.

Satisfactory: The student understands authentic listening and reading texts only with some difficulty and finds it hard to react appropriately.

Sufficient: The student understands authentic listening and reading texts only with great difficulty and hardly reacts to them.

Insufficient: the student does not understand authentic listening texts

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Strategies for reading and listening comprehension, practicing different types of reading. Graduates of the course are able to read fluently in German in a variety of specific situations and have acquired oral and written communication skills in reading and listening comprehension.

assessment (project, final exam – 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

The students understand standard language spoken in direct contact and in the media as they normally encounter it in private, social, professional, or educational life. They understand longer speeches and talks and are able to follow complex lines of argument if reasonably familiar with the topic. They understand TV news and reports, interviews, and most films if standard language is spoken. Students can read articles and reports on current topics and problems and understand contemporary literary prose. They can read independently, adapt reading style and speed to different texts and purposes, and use appropriate reference works. They have a large reading vocabulary but may have difficulty with less frequently used phrases. Students can use a variety of listening and reading strategies to ensure comprehension, including listening for key words and using clues from the context.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 15 hours of preparation for essay; 15 hours of preparation for final test. 15 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (description and explanation and interview, independent work using different techniques), fixative (revision exercises, homework, play as a method), diagnostic and classificatory (written examination and didactic tests).

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

BETZ, U.J/BILLINA, A. 2019. Hören & Sprechen B2. München: Hueber Verlag, 2019. 160 s. ISBN 978-3-19-717493-8 alebo aktuálne učebné materiály na úrovni B2.

Recommended readings:

REININGER, D. 2009. "Aber biografisch, das bin ich selbst!“. Mündliches biografisches Erzählen als Unterrichtsaktivität im zweit- und fremdsprachlichen Deutschunterricht mit Erwachsenen. Innsbruck: studienVerlag, 2009. 328 s. ISBN 3706548038

SCHREITER, I. 2002. Schreibversuche. Kreatives Schreiben bei Lernern des Deutschen als Fremdsprache. Themenvorschläge, Arbeitsempfehlungen und viele authentische Beispiele für phantasievolle Texte. München: iudicium, 2002. 235 s. ISBN 3891297343

WOLFRUM, J. 2010. Kreativ schreiben. Gezielte Schreibförderung für jugendliche und erwachsene Deutschlernende (DaF/DaZ). Ismaning: Hueber Verlag, 2010. 184 s. ISBN 3190417512

Course completion requirements:

assessment (written composition, final test - 100/0)

In order to receive a grade, students must submit a written composition and pass the final test. Both must be passed to receive a passing grade. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the essay and a maximum of 50 points for the final test.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66% , satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student masters the acquired linguistic means and can apply in speaking and writing in different contexts.

Very good: The student masters the acquired linguistic means and can apply in speaking and writing with very few errors in different contexts.

Good: The student can use the learned linguistic means with minor errors in speaking and writing in most contexts.

Satisfactory: The students make frequent errors in reading and writing and the covered contents can only partially be transferred to other contexts.

Sufficient: The students make gross errors in reading and writing, a transfer of covered contents to other contexts is hardly possible

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Strategies for text production, discussion, argumentation on current social issues. Graduates of the course are able to communicate in German in a variety of specific situations at an appropriate professional level through the production of their own texts and have acquired oral and written communication skills in the production of written and oral communications.

assessment (written composition, final test - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

The students have mastered the principles of text production in speaking and writing. The students can communicate spontaneously and fluently in order to have a normal conversation with a native speaker. They can take an active part in discussions on familiar topics, justifying and defending their views. They can express themselves clearly and in detail on a wide range of topics, explain ideas, discuss issues and build their arguments logically. The students can write detailed texts on various topics related to their field of interest. In an essay or report they can provide information or present arguments and counterarguments for or against a particular point of view. They can write clear and coherent descriptions of real or fictional events and experiences.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 15 hours of preparation for essay; 15 hours of preparation for final test. 15 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: expository (description and explanation and interview, independent work using different techniques), fixative (revision exercises, homework, play as a method), diagnostic and classificatory (written examination and didactic tests).

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

BETZ, U.J/BILLINA, A. 2019. Hören & Sprechen B2. München: Hueber Verlag, 2019. 160 s. ISBN 978-3-19-717493-8 alebo aktuálne učebné materiály na úrovni B2.

Recommended readings:

REININGER, D. 2009. "Aber biografisch, das bin ich selbst!“. Mündliches biografisches Erzählen als Unterrichtsaktivität im zweit- und fremdsprachlichen Deutschunterricht mit Erwachsenen. Innsbruck: studienVerlag, 2009. 328 s. ISBN 3706548038

SCHREITER, I. 2002. Schreibversuche. Kreatives Schreiben bei Lernern des Deutschen als Fremdsprache. Themenvorschläge, Arbeitsempfehlungen und viele authentische Beispiele für phantasievolle Texte. München: iudicium, 2002. 235 s. ISBN 3891297343

WOLFRUM, J. 2010. Kreativ schreiben. Gezielte Schreibförderung für jugendliche und erwachsene Deutschlernende (DaF/DaZ). Ismaning: Hueber Verlag, 2010. 184 s. ISBN 3190417512

Course completion requirements:

assessment (written composition, final test - 100/0)

In order to receive a grade, students must submit a written composition and pass the final test. Both must be passed to receive a passing grade. The student will receive a maximum of 50 points for the essay and a maximum of 50 points for the final test.

Rating scale: A (100-91%, excellent - outstanding results), B (90-81%, very good - above average level), C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work), D (72-66% , satisfactory - acceptable results), E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria), Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required).

Excellent: The student masters the acquired linguistic means and can apply in speaking and writing in different contexts.

Very good: The student masters the acquired linguistic means and can apply in speaking and writing with very few errors in different contexts.

Good: The student can use the learned linguistic means with minor errors in speaking and writing in most contexts.

Satisfactory: The students make frequent errors in reading and writing and the covered contents can only partially be transferred to other contexts.

Sufficient: The students make gross errors in reading and writing, a transfer of covered contents to other contexts is hardly possible

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Strategies for text production, discussion, argumentation on current social issues. Graduates of the course are able to communicate in German in a variety of specific situations at an appropriate professional level through the production of their own texts and have acquired oral and written communication skills in the production of written and oral communications.

assessment (written composition, final test - 100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

The students have mastered the principles of text production in speaking and writing. The students can communicate spontaneously and fluently in order to have a normal conversation with a native speaker. They can take an active part in discussions on familiar topics, justifying and defending their views. They can express themselves clearly and in detail on a wide range of topics, explain ideas, discuss issues and build their arguments logically. The students can write detailed texts on various topics related to their field of interest. In an essay or report they can provide information or present arguments and counterarguments for or against a particular point of view. They can write clear and coherent descriptions of real or fictional events and experiences.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 18 hours of home preparation for direct teaching; 18 hours of preparation for seminar work. 9 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study. Total 50 hours of student work.

Teaching methods: expository (description of the characteristics of the professional language, fixation (practice of vocabulary and grammatical phenomena occurring in the professional language), diagnostic and classification, etc.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

ROELCKE, T. 2010. Fachsprachen. Berlin: 2010. 269 s. ISBN-13: 978-3503122219

Recommended readings:

GERGEL, P. 2021. Vermögensdelikte in der Übersetzung. Nümbrecht: Kirsch-Verlag, 2021. 151 s. ISBN 978-3-943906-56-1

MICHŇOVÁ, E. 2006. Business Deutsch. Praha: Grada, 2006. 112 s. ISBN 80-247-1643-7

MICHŇOVÁ, E.: Deutsch im Beruf. Praha: Grada, 2008. 128 s. ISBN 978-80-247-2408-9

Course completion requirements:

test (100/0)

The grade is awarded on a scale:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

Excellent: precise wording, excellent knowledge of the current state of research on technical language, consideration of the scientific context, clear and logical argumentation, nuanced language, correct use of technical terms, well-read style, minimal grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, consideration of a large body of literature, formally correct editing (adherence to citation standards, etc.).

Very good: solid treatment of the topic of the seminar paper, very good knowledge of the scientific context of professional communication, only a small number of grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, consideration of a reasonable amount of literature, formally correct editing

Good: reasonably good treatment of the topic but superficial connection with the current state of the research problem, grammatically, orthographically, stylistically at a good level, consideration of a reasonable amount of literature, formally correct editing (adherence to the citation standard, etc.)

Satisfactory: superficial knowledge of the scientific context of professional communication, imprecise presentation of arguments taken from secondary literature, largely correct use of professional terms, several grammatical, orthographic, stylistic errors.

Adequate: sufficient treatment of the topic in the field of professional language, minimal knowledge of the scientific context, a large number of orthographic, stylistic errors.

Insufficient results: insufficient treatment of the topic, no knowledge of the scientific context, poor or no reasoning, large number of orthographic, stylistic errors.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

term structure, processes of terminologization, characteristics of a professional text. Specifics of a professional text. Horizontal and vertical division of professional language, characteristics of professional language, work with professional literature on the example of texts from several areas of social and natural sciences (e.g. electrical engineering, physics, mathematics, economics, law, chemistry, biology, medicine, etc. The graduate is familiar with linguistic tendencies in professional expression and is equipped with extensive knowledge and the ability to communicate fluently in German at an appropriate professional level, i.e. the content of this course contributes in this way to the graduate's profile.

100/0

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Learning objectives: to become familiar with the structure and types of professional texts, their grammar and vocabulary.

Learning outcomes: the graduate of the course knows the term as a basic building unit of professional written and oral expression. On the basis of the analysis of selected textual examples, the student will be able to characterise the morphological, syntactic, lexical and stylistic specifics of professional texts (e.g. in the field of technology, economics, law and natural sciences). The graduate will acquire the following transferable competences: analytical skills based on the analysis of concrete linguistic material (professional texts), creativity and the ability to think abstractly and critically in the production of a seminar paper. The graduate knows the specific principles of the creation of professional texts and their linguistic specificities skills, applies the acquired knowledge in the creation of the seminar work in the integration of the acquired theoretical knowledge into the conception and implementation of small-scale research, which is part of the seminar work, in the field of competences reaches a relatively high level in professional expression and competence in the implementation of linguistic research of professional texts.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 18 hours of home preparation for direct teaching; 18 hours of preparation for seminar work. 9 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study. Total 50 hours of student work.

Teaching methods: expository (description of the characteristics of the professional language, fixation (practice of vocabulary and grammatical phenomena occurring in the professional language), diagnostic and classification, etc.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

ROELCKE, T. 2010. Fachsprachen. Berlin: 2010. 269 s. ISBN-13: 978-3503122219

Recommended readings:

GERGEL, P. 2021. Vermögensdelikte in der Übersetzung. Nümbrecht: Kirsch-Verlag, 2021. 151 s. ISBN 978-3-943906-56-1

MICHŇOVÁ, E. 2006. Business Deutsch. Praha: Grada, 2006. 112 s. ISBN 80-247-1643-7

MICHŇOVÁ, E.: Deutsch im Beruf. Praha: Grada, 2008. 128 s. ISBN 978-80-247-2408-9

Course completion requirements:

test (100/0)

The grade is awarded on a scale:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

Excellent: precise wording, excellent knowledge of the current state of research on technical language, consideration of the scientific context, clear and logical argumentation, nuanced language, correct use of technical terms, well-read style, minimal grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, consideration of a large body of literature, formally correct editing (adherence to citation standards, etc.).

Very good: solid treatment of the topic of the seminar paper, very good knowledge of the scientific context of professional communication, only a small number of grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, consideration of a reasonable amount of literature, formally correct editing

Good: reasonably good treatment of the topic but superficial connection with the current state of the research problem, grammatically, orthographically, stylistically at a good level, consideration of a reasonable amount of literature, formally correct editing (adherence to the citation standard, etc.)

Satisfactory: superficial knowledge of the scientific context of professional communication, imprecise presentation of arguments taken from secondary literature, largely correct use of professional terms, several grammatical, orthographic, stylistic errors.

Adequate: sufficient treatment of the topic in the field of professional language, minimal knowledge of the scientific context, a large number of orthographic, stylistic errors.

Insufficient results: insufficient treatment of the topic, no knowledge of the scientific context, poor or no reasoning, large number of orthographic, stylistic errors.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

term structure, processes of terminologization, characteristics of a professional text. Specifics of a professional text. Horizontal and vertical division of professional language, characteristics of professional language, work with professional literature on the example of texts from several areas of social and natural sciences (e.g. electrical engineering, physics, mathematics, economics, law, chemistry, biology, medicine, etc. The graduate is familiar with linguistic tendencies in professional expression and is equipped with extensive knowledge and the ability to communicate fluently in German at an appropriate professional level, i.e. the content of this course contributes in this way to the graduate's profile.

100/0

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Learning objectives: to become familiar with the structure and types of professional texts, their grammar and vocabulary.

Learning outcomes: the graduate of the course knows the term as a basic building unit of professional written and oral expression. On the basis of the analysis of selected textual examples, the student will be able to characterise the morphological, syntactic, lexical and stylistic specifics of professional texts (e.g. in the field of technology, economics, law and natural sciences). The graduate will acquire the following transferable competences: analytical skills based on the analysis of concrete linguistic material (professional texts), creativity and the ability to think abstractly and critically in the production of a seminar paper. The graduate knows the specific principles of the creation of professional texts and their linguistic specificities skills, applies the acquired knowledge in the creation of the seminar work in the integration of the acquired theoretical knowledge into the conception and implementation of small-scale research, which is part of the seminar work, in the field of competences reaches a relatively high level in professional expression and competence in the implementation of linguistic research of professional texts.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 25 hours of self-study and continuous home preparation for class (preparation of a report); 20 hours of test preparation. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: explanation, interview, discussion, brainstorming, students' own work, work with Internet resources, practice, revision.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

DREYER, H. 2009. Lehr- und Übungsbuch der deutschen Grammatik aktuell 1.Aufl., Ismaning: Hueber, 2009. 392 s. ISBN 978-3-19-307255-9

Recommended readings:

FÖLDEAK, H. 2013. Deutsch üben 05. Sag´s besser, Ismaning: Hueber, 2013. 191 s. ISBN 978-3-19-007454-9

FÖLDEAK, H. 2013. Deutsch üben 06. Sag´s besser 2. 2. überarb. Aufl., Ismaning: Hueber, 2013. 191 s. ISBN 978-3-19-007454-9

HALL, K./SCHEINER, B. 2014. DaF-Übungsgrammatik für die Oberstufe B2–C2. 1. neue Ausg., Ismaning: Hueber Verlag, 2014. 359 s. ISBN 978-3-19-207448-6

Course completion requirements:

During the semester, the student will prepare a visual presentation, present a paper, and take a final test. Active participation in seminars, independent and group problem solving, and the student's own creative work are required. Points: active participation in the seminar: 15 points, preparation/presentation of a paper: 25 points, test: 60 points (100/0).

The grade is awarded on a scale of:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

Excellent: demonstration of excellent knowledge of the topic, ability to demonstrate theoretical knowledge flexibly and promptly with practical examples, correct use of technical terms, minimal grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, excellent ability to independently present the results of the work in the form of an orally presented paper, active participation in seminars, independent and group problem solving, independent, creative work during the semester.

Very good: demonstration of good knowledge of the topic, ability to demonstrate theoretical knowledge with practical examples, active participation in seminars, clear language, only a small number of grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, very good ability to independently present the results of work in an orally presented paper, independent and group problem solving and own work during the semester.

Good: Demonstration of good knowledge, but the work contains inaccurate facts in relation to the topic in places, mostly correct use of technical terms, predominance of theoretical information over practical examples, grammatical, orthographic, stylistic at a good level, good ability to present the results of the work independently in the form of an orally presented paper, participation in discussions, independent and group problem-solving.

Satisfactory: apparently little knowledge related to the topic, the topic is treated mainly theoretically without implementation of practical examples, unconvincing presentation of the results of the work in the form of a report, largely correct use of technical terms, superficial preparation for seminars, a large number of grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, infrequent participation in discussions, group problem solving during the semester.

Sufficient: knowledge related to the topic is very weak, inaccurate use of technical terms, numerous grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, superficial preparation for seminars, poor ability to independently present theoretical knowledge in connection with practical applications, passive participation in discussions, group problem solving during the semester.

Inadequate: minimal or no knowledge of the topic, a large number of orthographic, stylistic errors, lack of or insufficient preparation for seminars, major formal deficiencies, lack of participation in discussions and group work.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

terminology of German grammar, verb: verb timing, rhetoric - prepositional conjugation of verbs, separable and inseparable verbs, reflexive verbs, auxiliary tense verbs, auxiliary modal verbs, infinitive, regular verb conjugations, verb tense - (in)regular forms in the past tense, past tense with haben/sein; verb genitive.

During the semester, the student will prepare a visual presentation, present a paper, and take a final test. Active participation in seminars, independent and group problem solving, and the student's own creative work are required. Points: active participation in the seminar: 15 points, preparation/presentation of a paper: 25 points, test: 60 points (100/0).

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Educational objectives: to achieve a linguistic standard which is a condition for grammatically correct reception and production of the morphosyntactic level of texts with a focus on verb forms.

Learning outcomes: the graduate of the course will acquire the relevant terminology of German grammar. Based on the practice of grammatical structures, the student will acquire practical knowledge leading to productive skills with authentic output. The student is capable of self-reflection and self-evaluation (critically assessing his/her language level) and subsequent self-correction. Integrates the acquired knowledge and skills into his/her linguistic expression, thus improving his/her communication and presentation skills.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 25 hours of self-study and continuous home preparation for class (preparation of a report); 20 hours of test preparation. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: explanation, interview, discussion, brainstorming, students' own work, work with Internet resources, practice, revision.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

DREYER, H. 2009. Lehr- und Übungsbuch der deutschen Grammatik aktuell 1.Aufl., Ismaning: Hueber, 2009. 392 s. ISBN 978-3-19-307255-9

Recommended readings:

FÖLDEAK, H. 2013. Deutsch üben 05. Sag´s besser, Ismaning: Hueber, 2013. 191 s. ISBN 978-3-19-007454-9

FÖLDEAK, H. 2013. Deutsch üben 06. Sag´s besser 2. 2. überarb. Aufl., Ismaning: Hueber, 2013. 191 s. ISBN 978-3-19-007454-9

HALL, K./SCHEINER, B. 2014. DaF-Übungsgrammatik für die Oberstufe B2–C2. 1. neue Ausg., Ismaning: Hueber Verlag, 2014. 359 s. ISBN 978-3-19-207448-6

Course completion requirements:

During the semester, the student will prepare a visual presentation, present a paper, and take a final test. Active participation in seminars, independent and group problem solving, and the student's own creative work are required. Points: active participation in the seminar: 15 points, preparation/presentation of a paper: 25 points, test: 60 points (100/0).

The grade is awarded on a scale of:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

Excellent: demonstration of excellent knowledge of the topic, ability to demonstrate theoretical knowledge flexibly and promptly with practical examples, correct use of technical terms, minimal grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, excellent ability to independently present the results of the work in the form of an orally presented paper, active participation in seminars, independent and group problem solving, independent, creative work during the semester.

Very good: demonstration of good knowledge of the topic, ability to demonstrate theoretical knowledge with practical examples, active participation in seminars, clear language, only a small number of grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, very good ability to independently present the results of work in an orally presented paper, independent and group problem solving and own work during the semester.

Good: Demonstration of good knowledge, but the work contains inaccurate facts in relation to the topic in places, mostly correct use of technical terms, predominance of theoretical information over practical examples, grammatical, orthographic, stylistic at a good level, good ability to present the results of the work independently in the form of an orally presented paper, participation in discussions, independent and group problem-solving.

Satisfactory: apparently little knowledge related to the topic, the topic is treated mainly theoretically without implementation of practical examples, unconvincing presentation of the results of the work in the form of a report, largely correct use of technical terms, superficial preparation for seminars, a large number of grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, infrequent participation in discussions, group problem solving during the semester.

Sufficient: knowledge related to the topic is very weak, inaccurate use of technical terms, numerous grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, superficial preparation for seminars, poor ability to independently present theoretical knowledge in connection with practical applications, passive participation in discussions, group problem solving during the semester.

Inadequate: minimal or no knowledge of the topic, a large number of orthographic, stylistic errors, lack of or insufficient preparation for seminars, major formal deficiencies, lack of participation in discussions and group work.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

terminology of German grammar, verb: verb timing, rhetoric - prepositional conjugation of verbs, separable and inseparable verbs, reflexive verbs, auxiliary tense verbs, auxiliary modal verbs, infinitive, regular verb conjugations, verb tense - (in)regular forms in the past tense, past tense with haben/sein; verb genitive.

During the semester, the student will prepare a visual presentation, present a paper, and take a final test. Active participation in seminars, independent and group problem solving, and the student's own creative work are required. Points: active participation in the seminar: 15 points, preparation/presentation of a paper: 25 points, test: 60 points (100/0).

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Educational objectives: to achieve a linguistic standard which is a condition for grammatically correct reception and production of the morphosyntactic level of texts with a focus on verb forms.

Learning outcomes: the graduate of the course will acquire the relevant terminology of German grammar. Based on the practice of grammatical structures, the student will acquire practical knowledge leading to productive skills with authentic output. The student is capable of self-reflection and self-evaluation (critically assessing his/her language level) and subsequent self-correction. Integrates the acquired knowledge and skills into his/her linguistic expression, thus improving his/her communication and presentation skills.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 25 hours of self-study and continuous home preparation for class (preparation of a report); 20 hours of test preparation. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: explanation, interview, discussion, brainstorming, students' own work, work with Internet resources, practice, revision.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

DREYER, H. 2009. Lehr- und Übungsbuch der deutschen Grammatik aktuell. 1.Aufl., Ismaning: Hueber, 2009. 392 s. ISBN 978-3-19-307255-9

Recommended readings:

FÖLDEAK, H. 2013. Deutsch üben 05. Sag´s besser, Ismaning: Hueber, 2013. 191 s. ISBN 978-3-19-007454-9

FÖLDEAK, H. 2013. Deutsch üben 06. Sag´s besser 2. 2. überarb. Aufl., Ismaning: Hueber, 2013. 191 s. ISBN 978-3-19-007454-9

HALL, K. – SCHEINER, B. 2014. DaF-Übungsgrammatik für die Oberstufe B2-C2. 1. neue Ausg., Ismaning: Hueber Verlag, 2014. 359 s. ISBN 978-3-19-207448-6

Course completion requirements:

During the semester, the student will prepare a visual presentation, present a paper, and take a final test. Active participation in seminars, independent and group problem solving, and the student's own creative work are required. Points: active participation in the seminar: 15 points, preparation/presentation of a paper: 25 points, test: 60 points (100/0).

The grade is awarded on a scale of:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

Excellent: demonstration of excellent knowledge of the topic, ability to demonstrate theoretical knowledge flexibly and promptly with practical examples, correct use of technical terms, minimal grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, excellent ability to independently present the results of the work in the form of an orally presented paper, active participation in seminars, independent and group problem solving, independent, creative work during the semester.

Very good: demonstration of good knowledge of the topic, ability to demonstrate theoretical knowledge with practical examples, active participation in seminars, clear language, only a small number of grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, very good ability to independently present the results of work in an orally presented paper, independent and group problem solving and own work during the semester.

Good: Demonstration of good knowledge, but the work contains inaccurate facts in relation to the topic in places, mostly correct use of technical terms, predominance of theoretical information over practical examples, grammatical, orthographic, stylistic at a good level, good ability to present the results of the work independently in the form of an orally presented paper, participation in discussions, independent and group problem-solving.

Satisfactory: apparently little knowledge related to the topic, the topic is treated mainly theoretically without implementation of practical examples, unconvincing presentation of the results of the work in the form of a report, largely correct use of technical terms, superficial preparation for seminars, a large number of grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, infrequent participation in discussions, group problem solving during the semester.

Sufficient: knowledge related to the topic is very weak, inaccurate use of technical terms, numerous grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, superficial preparation for seminars, poor ability to independently present theoretical knowledge in connection with practical applications, passive participation in discussions, group problem solving during the semester.

Inadequate: minimal or no knowledge of the topic, a large number of orthographic, stylistic errors, lack of or insufficient preparation for seminars, major formal deficiencies, lack of participation in discussions and group work.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Terminology of German grammar, grammatical categories, declension paradigms of nouns, adjectives, pronouns and numerals. Analytical, synthetic forms of comparison. Arrangement of word types in syntagmatic sentence structures.

During the semester, the student will prepare a visual presentation, present a paper, and take a final test. Active participation in seminars, independent and group problem solving, and the student's own creative work are required. Points: active participation in the seminar: 15 points, preparation/presentation of a paper: 25 points, test: 60 points (100/0).

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Educational objectives: to achieve a linguistic standard which is a condition for grammatically correct reception and production of the morphosyntactic level of texts with a focus on selected word types. Learning outcomes: the graduate of the course will acquire the relevant terminology of German grammar. Based on the practice of grammatical structures, the student will acquire practical knowledge leading to productive skills with authentic output. The student is capable of self-reflection and self-evaluation (critically assessing his/her language level) and subsequent self-correction. Integrates the acquired knowledge and skills into his/her linguistic expression, thus improving his/her communication and presentation skills.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 25 hours of self-study and continuous home preparation for class (preparation of a report); 20 hours of test preparation. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: explanation, interview, discussion, brainstorming, students' own work, work with Internet resources, practice, revision.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

DREYER, H. 2009. Lehr- und Übungsbuch der deutschen Grammatik aktuell. 1.Aufl., Ismaning: Hueber, 2009. 392 s. ISBN 978-3-19-307255-9

Recommended readings:

FÖLDEAK, H. 2013. Deutsch üben 05. Sag´s besser, Ismaning: Hueber, 2013. 191 s. ISBN 978-3-19-007454-9

FÖLDEAK, H. 2013. Deutsch üben 06. Sag´s besser 2. 2. überarb. Aufl., Ismaning: Hueber, 2013. 191 s. ISBN 978-3-19-007454-9

HALL, K. – SCHEINER, B. 2014. DaF-Übungsgrammatik für die Oberstufe B2-C2. 1. neue Ausg., Ismaning: Hueber Verlag, 2014. 359 s. ISBN 978-3-19-207448-6

Course completion requirements:

During the semester, the student will prepare a visual presentation, present a paper, and take a final test. Active participation in seminars, independent and group problem solving, and the student's own creative work are required. Points: active participation in the seminar: 15 points, preparation/presentation of a paper: 25 points, test: 60 points (100/0).

The grade is awarded on a scale of:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

Excellent: demonstration of excellent knowledge of the topic, ability to demonstrate theoretical knowledge flexibly and promptly with practical examples, correct use of technical terms, minimal grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, excellent ability to independently present the results of the work in the form of an orally presented paper, active participation in seminars, independent and group problem solving, independent, creative work during the semester.

Very good: demonstration of good knowledge of the topic, ability to demonstrate theoretical knowledge with practical examples, active participation in seminars, clear language, only a small number of grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, very good ability to independently present the results of work in an orally presented paper, independent and group problem solving and own work during the semester.

Good: Demonstration of good knowledge, but the work contains inaccurate facts in relation to the topic in places, mostly correct use of technical terms, predominance of theoretical information over practical examples, grammatical, orthographic, stylistic at a good level, good ability to present the results of the work independently in the form of an orally presented paper, participation in discussions, independent and group problem-solving.

Satisfactory: apparently little knowledge related to the topic, the topic is treated mainly theoretically without implementation of practical examples, unconvincing presentation of the results of the work in the form of a report, largely correct use of technical terms, superficial preparation for seminars, a large number of grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, infrequent participation in discussions, group problem solving during the semester.

Sufficient: knowledge related to the topic is very weak, inaccurate use of technical terms, numerous grammatical, orthographic and stylistic errors, superficial preparation for seminars, poor ability to independently present theoretical knowledge in connection with practical applications, passive participation in discussions, group problem solving during the semester.

Inadequate: minimal or no knowledge of the topic, a large number of orthographic, stylistic errors, lack of or insufficient preparation for seminars, major formal deficiencies, lack of participation in discussions and group work.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Terminology of German grammar, grammatical categories, declension paradigms of nouns, adjectives, pronouns and numerals. Analytical, synthetic forms of comparison. Arrangement of word types in syntagmatic sentence structures.

During the semester, the student will prepare a visual presentation, present a paper, and take a final test. Active participation in seminars, independent and group problem solving, and the student's own creative work are required. Points: active participation in the seminar: 15 points, preparation/presentation of a paper: 25 points, test: 60 points (100/0).

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Educational objectives: to achieve a linguistic standard which is a condition for grammatically correct reception and production of the morphosyntactic level of texts with a focus on selected word types. Learning outcomes: the graduate of the course will acquire the relevant terminology of German grammar. Based on the practice of grammatical structures, the student will acquire practical knowledge leading to productive skills with authentic output. The student is capable of self-reflection and self-evaluation (critically assessing his/her language level) and subsequent self-correction. Integrates the acquired knowledge and skills into his/her linguistic expression, thus improving his/her communication and presentation skills.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 18 hours of home preparation for direct teaching; 18 hours of preparation for assessment. 9 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: motivational (motivational demonstration of written pronunciation, expository (explanation of the principles of correct articulation and pronunciation, basic principles of transcription, fixation (practice of correct pronunciation and transcription), diagnostic and classification, etc.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

DAHMEN, S. 2017. Phonetik, Phonologie und Schrift. Stuttgart: UTB GmbH, 2017. 200 s. ISBN 9783825247522

Recommended readings:

ADAMCOVÁ, L. 2001. Phonetik der deutschen Sprache. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2001. 201 s. ISBN 80-223-1678-4

HIRSCHFELD, U., REINKE, K. 2009. 33 Aussprachespiele. Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Sprachen, 2009. 127 s. ISBN 978-3126751834

HiRSCHFELD, U., REINKE, K., STOCK, E. 2007. Phonotek intensiv. Aussprachetraining. München: Langenscheidt, 2007. 176 s. ISBN 978-3468497643

MANGOLD, M. 2006. Duden. Bd. 6. Das Aussprachewörterbuch. 6. prepracované a aktualizované vyd., Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, Zürich: Bibliographisches Institut F.A. Brockhaus AG, 2006. 864 s. ISBN 978-3411040667

SCHIEMANN, E., BÖLCK, M. 2008. Hören, sprechen, richtig schreiben. 2 vyd., Stuttgart: Schmetterling Verlag, 2008. 186 s. ISBN 3-89657-805-7

Course completion requirements:

dictation (100/0)

Dictation will focus on pronunciation and transcription throughout the semester. A minimum of 91 points is required for a final grade of A, a minimum of 81 points for a grade of B, a minimum of 73 points for a grade of C, a minimum of 66 points for a grade of D, and a minimum of 60 points for a grade of E. To pass the course, a minimum of 60% of the marks must be obtained.

The grade is awarded on a scale:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

A - excellent performance, the student has mastered the principles of pronunciation and transcription.

B - excellent performance, student masters the principles of pronunciation and transcription but makes minor errors.

C - good performance, student masters the principles of pronunciation and transcription, makes minor errors occurring fairly frequently.

D - satisfactory performance, the student masters the principles of pronunciation and transcription with only problems.

E - satisfactory performance, the student has deficiencies in pronunciation and transcription.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Pronunciation norm and pronunciation rules of the German language, practical training in the correct pronunciation of German vowels focused on the needs of the trainees (emphasis on sentence melody, word and sentence accents and the pronunciation of German vowels and consonants), basics of phonetic transcription, work with pronunciation dictionaries, phoneme-grapheme interrelationship in the context of speaking and writing. The graduate's profile clearly includes mastery of this linguistic level of the German language.

dictation (100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Learning objectives: to learn correct pronunciation and the basics of transcription.

Learning outcomes: the graduate of the course masters the standard German pronunciation and the corresponding transcription signs, learns the correct pronunciation of German syllables and their linking in continuous speech with the help of different types of texts. They will also master the most important principles of phonetic transcription and their practical application. They will learn how to work with pronunciation dictionaries.

The graduate will acquire the following transferable competences: communication skills through the acquisition of correct pronunciation, motivation and the ability to acquire vocabulary at the same time as the phonological aspect of lexical units.

Knowledge: the graduate of the course knows the basics of transcription and written pronunciation.

Skills: the graduate applies the rules of written pronunciation in practical exercises and in everyday communication.

Competences: the graduate achieves a fairly good level of oral communication.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 18 hours of home preparation for direct teaching; 18 hours of preparation for assessment. 9 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study. 50 hours of student work in total.

Teaching methods: motivational (motivational demonstration of written pronunciation, expository (explanation of the principles of correct articulation and pronunciation, basic principles of transcription, fixation (practice of correct pronunciation and transcription), diagnostic and classification, etc.

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

DAHMEN, S. 2017. Phonetik, Phonologie und Schrift. Stuttgart: UTB GmbH, 2017. 200 s. ISBN 9783825247522

Recommended readings:

ADAMCOVÁ, L. 2001. Phonetik der deutschen Sprache. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2001. 201 s. ISBN 80-223-1678-4

HIRSCHFELD, U., REINKE, K. 2009. 33 Aussprachespiele. Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Sprachen, 2009. 127 s. ISBN 978-3126751834

HiRSCHFELD, U., REINKE, K., STOCK, E. 2007. Phonotek intensiv. Aussprachetraining. München: Langenscheidt, 2007. 176 s. ISBN 978-3468497643

MANGOLD, M. 2006. Duden. Bd. 6. Das Aussprachewörterbuch. 6. prepracované a aktualizované vyd., Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, Zürich: Bibliographisches Institut F.A. Brockhaus AG, 2006. 864 s. ISBN 978-3411040667

SCHIEMANN, E., BÖLCK, M. 2008. Hören, sprechen, richtig schreiben. 2 vyd., Stuttgart: Schmetterling Verlag, 2008. 186 s. ISBN 3-89657-805-7

Course completion requirements:

dictation (100/0)

Dictation will focus on pronunciation and transcription throughout the semester. A minimum of 91 points is required for a final grade of A, a minimum of 81 points for a grade of B, a minimum of 73 points for a grade of C, a minimum of 66 points for a grade of D, and a minimum of 60 points for a grade of E. To pass the course, a minimum of 60% of the marks must be obtained.

The grade is awarded on a scale:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding);

B (90 - 81%, very good - above average standard);

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work);

D (72 - 66%, satisfactory - acceptable results);

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet minimum criteria);

Fx (59 - 0%, inadequate - extra work required).

A - excellent performance, the student has mastered the principles of pronunciation and transcription.

B - excellent performance, student masters the principles of pronunciation and transcription but makes minor errors.

C - good performance, student masters the principles of pronunciation and transcription, makes minor errors occurring fairly frequently.

D - satisfactory performance, the student masters the principles of pronunciation and transcription with only problems.

E - satisfactory performance, the student has deficiencies in pronunciation and transcription.

German

Course outcomes of subject (content):

Pronunciation norm and pronunciation rules of the German language, practical training in the correct pronunciation of German vowels focused on the needs of the trainees (emphasis on sentence melody, word and sentence accents and the pronunciation of German vowels and consonants), basics of phonetic transcription, work with pronunciation dictionaries, phoneme-grapheme interrelationship in the context of speaking and writing. The graduate's profile clearly includes mastery of this linguistic level of the German language.

dictation (100/0)

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Learning objectives: to learn correct pronunciation and the basics of transcription.

Learning outcomes: the graduate of the course masters the standard German pronunciation and the corresponding transcription signs, learns the correct pronunciation of German syllables and their linking in continuous speech with the help of different types of texts. They will also master the most important principles of phonetic transcription and their practical application. They will learn how to work with pronunciation dictionaries.

The graduate will acquire the following transferable competences: communication skills through the acquisition of correct pronunciation, motivation and the ability to acquire vocabulary at the same time as the phonological aspect of lexical units.

Knowledge: the graduate of the course knows the basics of transcription and written pronunciation.

Skills: the graduate applies the rules of written pronunciation in practical exercises and in everyday communication.

Competences: the graduate achieves a fairly good level of oral communication.

Type, scope and method of training activities

Scope, type/method of teaching and organisational form:

5 hours of teaching per semester (seminar), combined form.

Student workload: 5 hours of combined teaching; 35 hours of preparation for continuous assessment (continuous tests), 10 hours of preparation for dictation, 10 hours of continuous home preparation for class, self-study. Total 60 hours of student work.

Teaching methods:

interpretation of the material; explanation of the material; practising and justifying spelling phenomena; analysis of problem problems, discussion of the topic

Compulsory/Recommended readings:

(Selected according to the teacher's recommendation and the focus of the paper.)

Compulsory readings:

Pravidlá slovenského pravopisu. 2013. 4., nezmenené vyd. Bratislava: Veda. 590 s. ISBN 978-80-224-1331-2

Recommended readings:

DZIVIAKOVÁ, M. 2016. Písmo. Jeho vznik, druhy a význam. 1. vyd. In: Písmo a žiaci so stratou sluchu. Ed. D. Tarcsiová. Bratislava: Iris, 21–30. ISBN 978-80-89726-88-2

NAVRÁTIL, L./ŠIMURKA, J. 2005. Praktická príručka slovenského pravopisu. 2., upravené a doplnené vyd. Nitra: Enigma. 139 s. ISBN 80-89132-19-7

RIPKA, I./IMRICHOVÁ, M./SKLADANÁ, J. 2005. Príručka slovenského pravopisu pre školy a prax. Bratislava: Ottovo nakladateľstvo. 672 s. ISBN: 80-969159-1-6

Course completion requirements:

The student will be evaluated during the semester in the form of 2 midterm tests (70 points) and a dictation (30 points). The course is completed with a grade resulting from an interim review of learning outcomes during the teaching part of the semester of study (100/0). A minimum of 91 points is required for a final grade of A, a minimum of 81 points for a grade of B, a minimum of 73 points for a grade of C, a minimum of 66 points for a grade of D, and a minimum of 60 points of the total number of points for a grade of E. A minimum of 60% of the total marks is required to pass the course.

The grade is awarded on a scale:

A (100 - 91%, excellent - outstanding results): excellent performance: the student has excellent knowledge, can apply the acquired knowledge excellently in practice, has the ability to independently solve individual tasks and assignments also in a broader linguistic context, can independently further his/her education;

B (90-81%, very good - above average standard): very good performance: the student has excellent knowledge, can apply the acquired knowledge very well in practice, has the ability to solve individual tasks and assignments independently, can pursue further education independently;

C (80 - 73%, good - normal reliable work): good performance: the student has good knowledge, can reliably apply the acquired knowledge in practice, can reliably solve individual tasks and assignments, can reliably further his/her education;

D (72-66%, satisfactory - acceptable performance): satisfactory performance: the student has satisfactory knowledge, can apply it satisfactorily in practice, solves individual tasks and assignments satisfactorily, has satisfactory skills for further learning;

E (65 - 60%, satisfactory - results meet the minimum criteria): satisfactory performance: the student demonstrates a minimum amount of knowledge, can minimally apply it in practice, solves individual tasks and assignments at a satisfactory level, has minimal skills for further learning;

Fx (59 - 0%, insufficient - additional work required): insufficient performance: student does not demonstrate sufficient knowledge, cannot apply it in practice, cannot solve individual tasks and assignments, cannot further their education.

Slovak

Course outcomes of subject (content):

1. Principles of Slovak spelling.

2. Writing i/í and y/ý in domestic words and in words of foreign origin.

3. Writing the vowel ä.

4. Writing the consonants ď, ť, ň, ľ. Writing consonants in prefixes and prepositions.

5. Writing words of foreign origin.

6. Writing words separately and together.

7. Splitting words.

8. Writing capital letters.

9. Punctuation and its functions.

10. Punctuation marks.

11. Overview of declension and conjugation.

The student will acquire theoretical knowledge of Slovak spelling. The student will acquire knowledge of the principles of Slovak spelling, the basic spelling rules applied in written communication within the written Slovak language and problematic phenomena in Slovak spelling. They will learn the correct spelling of Slovak vowels and consonants, the correct spelling of words of foreign origin, the problems of writing words separately and together and the division of words, and relevant knowledge about the correct spelling of capital letters in Slovak, the use of punctuation and its functions in written expressions of written Slovak with regard to the correct use of individual punctuation marks. In relation to Slovak spelling, the student will also deepen the basic theoretical knowledge of Slovak declension and conjugation. This leads to the student's thorough mastery of the orthographic standard of written Slovak, both in theory and in practice. Of particular importance is the acquisition of practical skills applied in the assessment and analysis of orthographic phenomena, which leads the student to apply the acquired theoretical knowledge in practical orthographic analyses and exercises, and especially in the independent solution of problematic orthographic tasks. The acquired knowledge and skills in the field of Slovak orthography can be creatively applied and used by the student in his/her further studies, as well as in his/her future teaching practice, possibly also in the basic auxiliary teaching, translation and editorial practice, i.e. wherever it is necessary to apply the ability to convincingly assess, analyse and evaluate the orthographic aspect of written linguistic expressions. Emphasis on raising the student's professional level and linguistic culture appears to be equally important in adequately conveying information about spelling phenomena to the general public, as well as in independently analysing a problem in the spelling field and offering relevant information, explanations and spelling justifications to the general public.

The student will be evaluated during the semester in the form of 2 midterm tests (70 points) and a dictation (30 points). The course is completed with a grade resulting from an interim review of learning outcomes during the teaching part of the semester of study (100/0). A minimum of 91 points is required for a final grade of A, a minimum of 81 points for a grade of B, a minimum of 73 points for a grade of C, a minimum of 66 points for a grade of D, and a minimum of 60 points of the total number of points for a grade of E. A minimum of 60% of the total marks is required to pass the course.

Learning outcomes/ Objectives and learning outcomes:

Objectives of education: to thoroughly acquire and master the orthographic norm of written Slovak, both at the theoretical and practical level; to consciously increase the linguistic culture of the listeners

Learning outcomes: the graduate of the course will become comprehensively acquainted with Slovak spelling, acquire knowledge of the principles of Slovak spelling and spelling rules applied in written communication in the written Slovak language. Particular emphasis is placed on familiarisation with problematic phenomena in Slovak orthography and on the subsequent application of the acquired theoretical knowledge in the practical practice and justification of orthographic phenomena, in practical analyses of written expressions of written Slovak from the orthographic point of view, as well as in the analysis of problem tasks. In this way, the student acquires important practical skills in assessing spelling phenomena, which can be used creatively and independently in solving problem solving tasks in the field and in the complex analysis of spelling phenomena, and thus also develops his analytical skills as well as the ability of abstract and critical thinking. The student can apply the acquired theoretical knowledge and practical skills not only in his/her further university studies, but also creatively apply them in future teaching practice, possibly also in basic teaching assistant, translation, editorial practice, as well as for the needs arising from the function of an intercultural and interlingual mediator. The listener is also able to convey information about spelling phenomena to the general public and to offer conclusions and spelling justifications to lay audiences. The emphasis is not only on raising the professional level but also the linguistic culture of the listeners, which also seems to be very necessary in terms of the future practice of the listeners.