ORGOŇOVÁ, O. – BOHUNICKÁ, A.: Lexikológia slovenčiny. Učebné texty a cvičenia. 2. vydanie. Praha: Columbus 2012. ISBN 978-80-87588-18-5; 1. vydanie (Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2011) available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/fileadmin/fif/katedry_pracoviska/ksj/ publikacie/OOAB_lexikologia.pdf
DOLNÍK, J.: Lexikológia. 1. vyd. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2003; 2. vyd. 2007. ISBN
80-223-1733-0
FURDÍK, J.: Slovenská slovotvorba. 1. vyd. Prešov : Náuka 2004. ISBN 80-89038-28-X
HORECKÝ, J. a kol.: Dynamika slovnej zásoby súčasnej slovenčiny. 1. vyd. Bratislava: Veda
1989.
MLACEK, J.: Slovenská frazeológia. 2. vyd. Bratislava: SPN 1984.
POPOVIČOVÁ SEDLÁČKOVÁ, Z.: Slang v mládežníckom diskurze. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave 2013. ISBN 978-80-223-3475-4
Other materials according to the current selection of the teacher will be made available by the teacher to all course participants.
Following the theoretical foundations and goals of the compulsory course Pragmatic Lexicology, continuous elaboration of application exercises, report or interpretation, test in 12th -13th week of the semester. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation.
Grading scale: A (100 % - 92 %), B (91 % - 84 %), C (83 % - 76 %), D (75 % - 68 %), E (67 % - 60 %). Violation of academic ethics will be punished, and the students will lose all the received points in the relevant assessment.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary.
Slovak
Student time burden – 3c = 75 h – 90 h
- completion of educational activities (S): 26 h
- continuous preparation for seminar: 20 h
- 2 written homework assignments: 7 h
- paper: 15 h
- preparation for final test: 20 h
Parole interpretation of literary lexicon from the point of view of stylistic affiliation (terms, publicisms, administrativeisms, book and colloquial expressions).
Standard and substandard lexicon (professionalisms, slang, slang, dialectisms). Lexical units in terms of time (antiquarianisms and neologisms).
Lexical units in terms of origin (Slovak expressions with a sign of foreignness and Bohemianism). Literal and figurative expressions in the text (idioms and metaphors), conceptual metaphor.
100 % preliminary.
The student is acquainted with the basic stratification of the lexical stock of Slovak and is able to consciously switch between layers of lexicon with regard to its suprasemantic properties, can interpret texts with nocional and expressive, symptomatic and symptomatic, direct and transmitted lexical means and adequately apply the text in creation different styles.
DOLNÍK, J. - BAJZÍKOVÁ, E: Textová lingvistika. Bratislava: Stimul, 1998. ISBN
80-85697-78-5.
DOLNÍK, J.: Všeobecná jazykoveda. Bratislava: Veda, 2013 (2. vydanie). ISBN 978-80-224-1201-8
IVANOVÁ, M.: Syntax slovenského jazyka. Prešov: Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, 2016 (2. vydanie). ISBN 978-80-555-1753-7. Available at: https://www.pulib.sk/web/kniznica/ elpub/dokument/Ivanova4
OLOŠTIAK, M. - OLOŠTIAKOVÁ GIANITSOVÁ, L.: Deklinácia prevzatých substantív v slovenčine. Prešov: Filozofická fakulta Prešovskej univerzity v Prešove, 2007. ISBN ISBN 978-80-8068-694-9. Available at: chrome- extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F
%2Fisvjams.weebly.com%2Fuploads%2F3%2F2%2F8%2F3%2F3283426%2Folostiak- olostiakova-2007.pdf&clen=1459952&chunk=true
MISTRÍK, J.: Slovosled a vetosled v slovenčine. Bratislava: Vyd. SAV, 1966.
Linguistic journals: Slovenská reč, Jazykovedný časopis, Kultúra slova (Available at https://www.juls.savba.sk/)
Additional literature will be announced at the beginning of the semester according to the course programme.
a. Systematic preparation for classes that is student’s individual preparation for the class discussion on a selected topic according to the course programme (e. g. creation of an opinion on a topic discussed in selected paper, searching for the linguistic material, searching for the examples of a grammatical phenomenon in use, ...).
b. Final test or colloquium in the 12th or 13th week of semester (the exact date will be announced at the beginning of the semester)
Outcomes during the semester are not possible to evaluate more than once. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation. Grading scale: A (100 % - 92 %), B (91 % - 84 %), C (83 % - 76 %), D (75 % - 68 %), E (67 % - 60 %). Credits will be given only to student who gets a minimum of the evaluation E (60 %).
Infringement of academic policy will result in annulment of the evaluation.
Slovak
Time engagement: 3 credits = 75 h
Educational activities: (2S): 26 h
Preparation for class, discussion, searching materials: 30 h
Preparation for colloquium/final test: 19 h
Grammatical analysis and interpretation.
Markedness and unmarkedness of grammatical categories in selected context.
Grammatical forms to refer to deixis of a specific person, place, and time.
Word order, Sentence order, text coherence.
Current problems of the Slovak language speakers (to be set according to preferences of a study group e. g.: declension of foreign words, feminine noun formation, the use of verb tenses in communication, transposition of verb categories of person and number).
100 % preliminary
After completing the course, a student has broadened the knowledge in the field of Slovak language grammar that previously gained in courses dealing with morphosyntax of the language. The student has learned how to analyse functionality of some language phenomena in actual context and according to the need of members of the communication besides correctness of grammatical aspect of the text. Moreover, he is capable to search for linguistic material and follow the communication behaviour of the engaged parties. The students manage to apply the gained knowledge in teaching experience, science, language counselling and own creative work.
Recommended literature will be updated based on the place chosen for the excursion in the given year.
The student must obtain at least 60 points out of 100 possible points. The student obtains points by completing the mandatory part of the excursion program (50 points) and preparing a short paper or by completing a colloquium after the excursion (50 points).
Grading scale: 100-92: A; 91-85: B; 84-75: C; 74-67: D; 66-60: E; 59-0: FX. Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of the obtained points in the relevant evaluation item.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary
The content of the subject will depend on the place chosen for the excursion in the given year.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary
1. MISTRÍK, J.: Štylistika. 3. vyd. Bratislava: SPN, 1997. 600 s. ISBN: 80-08-02529-8.
2. FINDRA, J.: Štylistika súčasnej slovenčiny. Martin: Osveta, 2013. 320 s. ISBN: 978-80-8063-404-9.
3. HOFFMANNOVÁ a kol.: Stylistika mluvené a psané češtiny. Praha: Academica, 2016. ISBN: 978-80-200-2566-1.
4. ORGOŇOVÁ, O. - BOHUNICKÁ, A.: Interakčná štylistika. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2018. ISBN: 978-80-223-4566-8.
5. Pravidlá slovenského pravopisu. 4. nezmenené vydanie. Bratislava: VEDA, 1998. ISBN 80-224-0532-9.
Selected parts of the literature.
Active participation and handing in publicistic texts according to the course programme that will be announced at the beginning of the semester. Participation in proofreading and other editorial activities connected with preparation of the journal. A part of the semester is in on-site learning mode (to be specified at the beginning of the semester). The final evaluation is based on the quality level of the hand-in text, for example if student does not offer own pictures for the text, makes many stylistic or grammatical mistakes – low language quality, low content quality or if he/she misses the deadline. Outcomes during the semester are not possible to evaluate more than once. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation. Infringement of academic policy will result in annulment of the evaluation.
Grading scale:
A: 100 - 92 %
B: 91 - 84 %
C: 83 - 76 %
D: 75 - 68 %
E: 67 - 60 %
FX: 59 %
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary.
Slovak, Czech
1. Assumptions to publicistic text production.
2. Problematic aspects of publicistic text production.
3. Autoregulation of the productive process of the text.
4. Problematic grammatical aspects.
5. Proofreading.
6. Taking pictures for the texts.
7. Final graphic and visual aspect of the journal.
8. Own literary input (prose, poem).
9. Interview with selected respondents.
10. Writing reviews on literary publications, films, music.
11. Own publication defence.
12. Own publication presentation.
100 % preliminary
After completing the course, student has practical competence in writing the publicistic texts and editorial preparation of a publication.
1. MISTRÍK, J.: Štylistika. 3. vyd. Bratislava: SPN, 1997. 600 s. ISBN: 80-08-02529-8.
2. FINDRA, J.: Štylistika súčasnej slovenčiny. Martin: Osveta, 2013. 320 s. ISBN: 978-80-8063-404-9.
3. HOFFMANNOVÁ a kol.: Stylistika mluvené a psané češtiny. Praha: Academica, 2016. ISBN: 978-80-200-2566-1.
4. ORGOŇOVÁ, O. - BOHUNICKÁ, A.: Interakčná štylistika. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2018. ISBN: 978-80-223-4566-8.
5. Pravidlá slovenského pravopisu. 4. nezmenené vydanie. Bratislava: VEDA, 1998. ISBN 80-224-0532-9.
Selected parts of the literature.
Active participation and handing in publicistic texts according to the course programme that will be announced at the beginning of the semester. Participation in proofreading and other editorial activities connected with preparation of the journal. A part of the semester is in on-site learning mode (to be specified at the beginning of the semester). The final evaluation is based on the quality level of the hand-in text, for example if student does not offer own pictures for the text, makes many stylistic or grammatical mistakes – low language quality, low content quality or if he/she misses the deadline. Outcomes during the semester are not possible to evaluate more than once. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation. Infringement of academic policy will result in annulment of the evaluation.
Grading scale:
A: 100 - 92 %
B: 91 - 84 %
C: 83 - 76 %
D: 75 - 68 %
E: 67 - 60 %
FX: 59 %
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary.
Slovak, Czech
1. Assumptions to publicistic text production.
2. Problematic aspects of publicistic text production.
3. Autoregulation of the productive process of the text.
4. Problematic grammatical aspects.
5. Proofreading.
6. Taking pictures for the texts.
7. Final graphic and visual aspect of the journal.
8. Own literary input (prose, poem).
9. Interview with selected respondents.
10. Writing reviews on literary publications, films, music.
11. Own publication defence.
12. Own publication presentation.
100 % preliminary
After completing the course, student has practical competence in writing the publicistic texts and editorial preparation of a publication.
1. MISTRÍK, J.: Štylistika. 3. vyd. Bratislava: SPN, 1997. 600 s. ISBN: 80-08-02529-8.
2. FINDRA, J.: Štylistika súčasnej slovenčiny. Martin: Osveta, 2013. 320 s. ISBN: 978-80-8063-404-9.
3. HOFFMANNOVÁ a kol.: Stylistika mluvené a psané češtiny. Praha: Academica, 2016. ISBN: 978-80-200-2566-1.
4. ORGOŇOVÁ, O. - BOHUNICKÁ, A.: Interakčná štylistika. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2018. ISBN: 978-80-223-4566-8.
5. Pravidlá slovenského pravopisu. 4. nezmenené vydanie. Bratislava: VEDA, 1998. ISBN 80-224-0532-9.
Selected parts of the literature.
Active participation and handing in publicistic texts according to the course programme that will be announced at the beginning of the semester. Participation in proofreading and other editorial activities connected with preparation of the journal. A part of the semester is in on-site learning mode (to be specified at the beginning of the semester). The final evaluation is based on the quality level of the hand-in text, for example if student does not offer own pictures for the text, makes many stylistic or grammatical mistakes – low language quality, low content quality or if he/she misses the deadline. Outcomes during the semester are not possible to evaluate more than once. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation. Infringement of academic policy will result in annulment of the evaluation.
Grading scale:
A: 100 - 92 %
B: 91 - 84 %
C: 83 - 76 %
D: 75 - 68 %
E: 67 - 60 %
FX: 59 %
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary.
Slovak, Czech
1. Assumptions to publicistic text production.
2. Problematic aspects of publicistic text production.
3. Autoregulation of the productive process of the text.
4. Problematic grammatical aspects.
5. Proofreading.
6. Taking pictures for the texts.
7. Final graphic and visual aspect of the journal.
8. Own literary input (prose, poem).
9. Interview with selected respondents.
10. Writing reviews on literary publications, films, music.
11. Own publication defence.
12. Own publication presentation.
100 % preliminary
After completing the course, student has practical competence in writing the publicistic texts and editorial preparation of a publication.
1. MISTRÍK, J.: Štylistika. 3. vyd. Bratislava: SPN, 1997. 600 s. ISBN: 80-08-02529-8.
2. FINDRA, J.: Štylistika súčasnej slovenčiny. Martin: Osveta, 2013. 320 s. ISBN: 978-80-8063-404-9.
3. HOFFMANNOVÁ a kol.: Stylistika mluvené a psané češtiny. Praha: Academica, 2016. ISBN: 978-80-200-2566-1.
4. ORGOŇOVÁ, O. - BOHUNICKÁ, A.: Interakčná štylistika. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2018. ISBN: 978-80-223-4566-8.
5. Pravidlá slovenského pravopisu. 4. nezmenené vydanie. Bratislava: VEDA, 1998. ISBN 80-224-0532-9.
Selected parts of the literature.
Active participation and handing in publicistic texts according to the course programme that will be announced at the beginning of the semester. Participation in proofreading and other editorial activities connected with preparation of the journal. A part of the semester is in on-site learning mode (to be specified at the beginning of the semester). The final evaluation is based on the quality level of the hand-in text, for example if student does not offer own pictures for the text, makes many stylistic or grammatical mistakes – low language quality, low content quality or if he/she misses the deadline. Outcomes during the semester are not possible to evaluate more than once. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation. Infringement of academic policy will result in annulment of the evaluation.
Grading scale:
A: 100 - 92 %
B: 91 - 84 %
C: 83 - 76 %
D: 75 - 68 %
E: 67 - 60 %
FX: 59 %
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary.
Slovak, Czech
1. Assumptions to publicistic text production.
2. Problematic aspects of publicistic text production.
3. Autoregulation of the productive process of the text.
4. Problematic grammatical aspects.
5. Proofreading.
6. Taking pictures for the texts.
7. Final graphic and visual aspect of the journal.
8. Own literary input (prose, poem).
9. Interview with selected respondents.
10. Writing reviews on literary publications, films, music.
11. Own publication defence.
12. Own publication presentation.
100 % preliminary
After completing the course, student has practical competence in writing the publicistic texts and editorial preparation of a publication.
MISTRÍK, J.: Štylistika. 3. vyd. Bratislava: SPN, 1997. 600 s. ISBN: 80-08-02529-8.
FINDRA, J.: Štylistika súčasnej slovenčiny. Martin: Osveta, 2013. 320 s. ISBN: 978-80-8063-404-9.
HOFFMANNOVÁ a kol.: Stylistika mluvené a psané češtiny. Praha: Academica, 2016. ISBN: 978-80-200-2566-1.
ORGOŇOVÁ, O. - BOHUNICKÁ, A.: Interakčná štylistika. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2018. ISBN: 978-80-223-4566-8.
Pravidlá slovenského pravopisu. 4. nezmenené vydanie. Bratislava: VEDA, 1998. ISBN 80-224-0532-9.
Selected parts of the literature.
Active participation and handing in publicistic texts according to the course programme that will be announced at the beginning of the semester. Participation in proofreading and other editorial activities connected with preparation of the journal. A part of the semester is in on-site learning mode (to be specified at the beginning of the semester). The final evaluation is based on the quality level of the hand-in text, for example if student does not offer own pictures for the text, makes many stylistic or grammatical mistakes – low language quality, low content quality or if he/she misses the deadline. Outcomes during the semester are not possible to evaluate more than once. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation. Infringement of academic policy will result in annulment of the evaluation.
Grading scale:
A: 100 - 92 %
B: 91 - 84 %
C: 83 - 76 %
D: 75 - 68 %
E: 67 - 60 %
FX: 59 %
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary.
Slovak. Czech
1. Assumptions to publicistic text production.
2. Problematic aspects of publicistic text production.
3. Autoregulation of the productive process of the text.
4. Problematic grammatical aspects.
5. Proofreading.
6. Taking pictures for the texts.
7. Final graphic and visual aspect of the journal.
8. Own literary input (prose, poem).
9. Interview with selected respondents.
10. Writing reviews on literary publications, films, music.
11. Own publication defence.
12. Own publication presentation.
100 % preliminary
After completing the course, student has practical competence in writing the publicistic texts and editorial preparation of a publication.
MISTRÍK, J.: Štylistika. 3. vyd. Bratislava: SPN, 1997. 600 s. ISBN: 80-08-02529-8.
FINDRA, J.: Štylistika súčasnej slovenčiny. Martin: Osveta, 2013. 320 s. ISBN: 978-80-8063-404-9.
HOFFMANNOVÁ a kol.: Stylistika mluvené a psané češtiny. Praha: Academica, 2016. ISBN: 978-80-200-2566-1.
ORGOŇOVÁ, O. - BOHUNICKÁ, A.: Interakčná štylistika. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2018. ISBN: 978-80-223-4566-8.
Pravidlá slovenského pravopisu. 4. nezmenené vydanie. Bratislava: VEDA, 1998. ISBN 80-224-0532-9.
Selected parts of the literature.
Active participation and handing in publicistic texts according to the course programme that will be announced at the beginning of the semester. Participation in proofreading and other editorial activities connected with preparation of the journal. A part of the semester is in on-site learning mode (to be specified at the beginning of the semester). The final evaluation is based on the quality level of the hand-in text, for example if student does not offer own pictures for the text, makes many stylistic or grammatical mistakes – low language quality, low content quality or if he/she misses the deadline. Outcomes during the semester are not possible to evaluate more than once. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation. Infringement of academic policy will result in annulment of the evaluation.
Grading scale:
A: 100 - 92 %
B: 91 - 84 %
C: 83 - 76 %
D: 75 - 68 %
E: 67 - 60 %
FX: 59 %
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary.
Slovak. Czech
1. Assumptions to publicistic text production.
2. Problematic aspects of publicistic text production.
3. Autoregulation of the productive process of the text.
4. Problematic grammatical aspects.
5. Proofreading.
6. Taking pictures for the texts.
7. Final graphic and visual aspect of the journal.
8. Own literary input (prose, poem).
9. Interview with selected respondents.
10. Writing reviews on literary publications, films, music.
11. Own publication defence.
12. Own publication presentation.
100 % preliminary
After completing the course, student has practical competence in writing the publicistic texts and editorial preparation of a publication.
MISTRÍK, J.: Štylistika. 3. vyd. Bratislava: SPN, 1997. 600 s. ISBN: 80-08-02529-8.
FINDRA, J.: Štylistika súčasnej slovenčiny. Martin: Osveta, 2013. 320 s. ISBN: 978-80-8063-404-9.
HOFFMANNOVÁ a kol.: Stylistika mluvené a psané češtiny. Praha: Academica, 2016. ISBN: 978-80-200-2566-1.
ORGOŇOVÁ, O. - BOHUNICKÁ, A.: Interakčná štylistika. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2018. ISBN: 978-80-223-4566-8.
Pravidlá slovenského pravopisu. 4. nezmenené vydanie. Bratislava: VEDA, 1998. ISBN 80-224-0532-9.
Selected parts of the literature.
Active participation and handing in publicistic texts according to the course programme that will be announced at the beginning of the semester. Participation in proofreading and other editorial activities connected with preparation of the journal. A part of the semester is in on-site learning mode (to be specified at the beginning of the semester). The final evaluation is based on the quality level of the hand-in text, for example if student does not offer own pictures for the text, makes many stylistic or grammatical mistakes – low language quality, low content quality or if he/she misses the deadline. Outcomes during the semester are not possible to evaluate more than once. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation. Infringement of academic policy will result in annulment of the evaluation.
Grading scale:
A: 100 - 92 %
B: 91 - 84 %
C: 83 - 76 %
D: 75 - 68 %
E: 67 - 60 %
FX: 59 %
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary.
Slovak, Czech
1. Assumptions to publicistic text production.
2. Problematic aspects of publicistic text production.
3. Autoregulation of the productive process of the text.
4. Problematic grammatical aspects.
5. Proofreading.
6. Taking pictures for the texts.
7. Final graphic and visual aspect of the journal.
8. Own literary input (prose, poem).
9. Interview with selected respondents.
10. Writing reviews on literary publications, films, music.
11. Own publication defence.
12. Own publication presentation.
100 % preliminary
After completing the course, student has practical competence in writing the publicistic texts and editorial preparation of a publication.
MISTRÍK, J.: Štylistika. 3. vyd. Bratislava: SPN, 1997. 600 s. ISBN: 80-08-02529-8.
FINDRA, J.: Štylistika súčasnej slovenčiny. Martin: Osveta, 2013. 320 s. ISBN: 978-80-8063-404-9.
HOFFMANNOVÁ a kol.: Stylistika mluvené a psané češtiny. Praha: Academica, 2016. ISBN: 978-80-200-2566-1.
ORGOŇOVÁ, O. - BOHUNICKÁ, A.: Interakčná štylistika. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2018. ISBN: 978-80-223-4566-8.
Pravidlá slovenského pravopisu. 4. nezmenené vydanie. Bratislava: VEDA, 1998. ISBN 80-224-0532-9.
Selected parts of the literature.
Active participation and handing in publicistic texts according to the course programme that will be announced at the beginning of the semester. Participation in proofreading and other editorial activities connected with preparation of the journal. A part of the semester is in on-site learning mode (to be specified at the beginning of the semester). The final evaluation is based on the quality level of the hand-in text, for example if student does not offer own pictures for the text, makes many stylistic or grammatical mistakes – low language quality, low content quality or if he/she misses the deadline. Outcomes during the semester are not possible to evaluate more than once. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation. Infringement of academic policy will result in annulment of the evaluation.
Grading scale:
A: 100 - 92 %
B: 91 - 84 %
C: 83 - 76 %
D: 75 - 68 %
E: 67 - 60 %
FX: 59 %
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary.
Slovak, Czech
1. Assumptions to publicistic text production.
2. Problematic aspects of publicistic text production.
3. Autoregulation of the productive process of the text.
4. Problematic grammatical aspects.
5. Proofreading.
6. Taking pictures for the texts.
7. Final graphic and visual aspect of the journal.
8. Own literary input (prose, poem).
9. Interview with selected respondents.
10. Writing reviews on literary publications, films, music.
11. Own publication defence.
12. Own publication presentation.
100 % preliminary
After completing the course, student has practical competence in writing the publicistic texts and editorial preparation of a publication.
• DŽAMBAZOVIČ, Roman. Chudoba na Slovensku. Diskurz, rozsah a profil chudoby. Bratislava: UK v Bratislave, 2007. ISBN 978-80-223-2428-1.
• DŽAMBAZOVIČ, Roman: Priestorové aspekty chudoby a sociálneho vylúčenia. Sociológia. 2007, 39(5), s. 423-458. ISNN 0049-1225.
• FRASER, Nancy. Rozvíjení radikální imaginace. Globální přerozdělování, uznání a reprezentace. Praha: Filosofia, FU AV ČR, 2007. ISBN 978-80-700-7251-6.
• HOLUBEC, Stanislav. Sociologie světových systémů. Hegemonie, centra, periferie. Praha: SLON, 2009. ISBN 978-80-741-9014-8.
• GANS, Herbert J.: The Positive Functions of Poverty. The American Journal of Sociology. 1972, 78 (2), pp. 275-289
• KATRŇÁK, Tomáš. Třídní analýza a sociální mobilita. Brno: CDK, 2005. ISBN 80-7325-067-5.
• KELLER, Jan. Tři sociální světy. Sociální struktura postindustriální společnosti. Praha: SLON, 2010. ISBN 978-80-7419-044-5.
• MAREŠ, Petr. Sociologie nerovnosti a chudoby. Praha: SLON, 1999. ISBN 80-85850-61-3.
• MATĚJŮ, Petr, STRAKOVÁ, Jana a Arnošt VESELÝ: Nerovnost ve vzdělávání. Od měření k řešení. Praha: SLON, 2010. ISBN 978-80-7419-032-2.
• PLATT, Lucinda. Understanding Inequalities. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015. ISBN 978-15-095-2126-5.
• SOPÓCI, Ján a kol.: Sociálna stratifikácia a mobilita na Slovensku. Bratislava: Stimul, 2019. ISBN 978-80-8127-242-4.
Additional literature and an extended syllabus of the course will be presented at the beginning and during the semester.
a) during the semester (30 points): papers on selected issues in the field of social inequalities
b) in the examination period (70 points): written test. The student will be admitted to the test only with a minimum of 15 points from continuous evaluation. Violation of academic ethics will be punished, and the student will lose all the received points in the relevant assessment.
Grading scale:
0-59: FX, 60-67: E, 68-75: D, 76-83: C, 84-91: B, 92-100: A
The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation.
The exact date for continuous evaluation and the topic of the paper will be announced at the beginning of the semester. The dates for the final test will be announced through AIS no later than in the last week of the instruction period.
Slovak
1. Social inequalities (basic definition; why social inequalities are a social problem)
2. Social problem and its phases (possible definitions, criteria, development of social problems, social actors)
3. Positive functions of social inequalities (Can inequalities have positive consequences for the functioning of society?)
4. Types of social inequalities (basic definition, socio-cultural and socio-economic inequalities)
5. Socio-cultural inequalities (gender and age aspect)
6. Basic types of socio-economic inequalities
7. Global aspects of inequalities
8. Spatial aspects of inequalities (regional, interlocal and local dimensions)
9. Intergenerational reproduction of inequalities (family capital, poverty culture)
10. Inequality in access to education / educational inequality (social and cultural reproduction, modernization theories, theory of rational choice)
11. Sociological concepts of poverty - different ways of defining and measuring it
12. Different forms of poverty, approaches to the poor and ways of tackling poverty in selected historical periods
13. Causes and consequences of poverty - identification and perception of the causes and possible consequences of poverty
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 20/80
The course focuses on the social science analysis of one of the main thematic areas of sociology of social problems - social inequalities. Upon successful completion, students are able to identify the main types and different forms of social inequalities. They will gain skills to analyze selected types and forms of inequalities in Slovakia as well as the wider spatial context, they will gain information about the extent and characteristics of these types and forms of inequalities. At the end of the course, students are able to use selected sociological terms and concepts and have mastered sociological approaches to their grasp and cognition. They can use the acquired knowledge in theoretical and empirical research of these phenomena and social facts.
LUBELCOVÁ, Gabriela: Sociálna politika I. (online). Bratislava: Stimul 2017. ISBN 978-80-8127-195-3. dostupné na:
http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/FIF_GL_socialna_politika1.pdf
DUDOVÁ, Iveta a kol.: Sociálna politika. Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer 2018. ISBN 97-0-16-66-9
BEBLAVÝ, Miroslav: Sociálna politika. eBook 2012: https://www.academia.edu/23899623/Soci%C3%A1lna_politika
VEČEŘA, Miloš: Sociální stát. Praha: Slon 2001. ISBN 80-85850-16-8
MACKOVÁ, Zuzana: Právo sociálneho zabezpečenia. Bratislava: Heuréka 2017. ISBN 9788081730481
Students will be acquainted with the supplementary literature in the course of the following topics.
Requirments.: written exam in the exam period. min. 60 points from 100
Rating: A: 100% - 92%, B: 91% - 84%, C: 83% - 76%, D: 75% - 68%, E: 67% - 60%, FX: 59% - 0%
The teacher accepts max. 2 absences with proven documents.
The course and the specification of the final exam will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
slovak
1. Definition of social policy, basic functions of SP, basic determinants
2. Historical sources of social policy and their development
3. Formation of the welfare state (economic and social conditionality)
4. Basic types of welfare state, development and trends
5. Social policy actors, their position and competencies in SP
6. Employment and labor market policy
7. Structure of social policy, basic areas and tools
8 Social security - the core of the SP and the system of its tools
9. Social insurance subsystem - principles, types, tools
10. State social support subsystem - principles, tools
11. Social assistance subsystem - principles, tools, actors
12. Living wage - definition, construction, social functions
0/100
During the course, students get acquainted with the system of social protection in its current form in our country, as well as the historical contexts of its formation. After completing the course, the student knows the basic characteristics, structure and tools of social security in our country. Understands the demographic and economic context of the social situation of the population and the background of the formation of social policy instruments. He is able to apply the acquired knowledge for solving social situations in personal life, as well as for their application in the field of future professional activity (especially suitable for teachers, teachers, andragologists, political scientists, journalists, psychologists, etc.)
JELÍNEK, Stanislav. et al. Raduga 1: pracovný zošit; ruština pre stredné a jazykové školy. Bratislava: Fraus, 1997. ISBN 80-88844-18-5.
JELÍNEK, Stanislav et al. Raduga 1: učebnica; ruština pre stredné a jazykové školy. Bratislava: Fraus, 1997. ISBN 80-88844-17-7.
MADEJ, Lizaveta. Lektorské cvičenia 1-2. Didaktické materiály k výučbe ruského jazyka pre študentov prvého ročníka ruských a východoeurópskych štúdií. Bratislava: Stimul, 2019. ISBN 978-80-8127-253-0.
PAŘÍZKOVÁ, Štěpánka. Ruština pro začátečníky a samouky. Dolní Ředice: P a P, 2002. ISBN 80-903072-0-5.
ЧЕРНЫШЕВ, Станислав – ЧЕРНЫШЕВА, А. Поехали! Русский язык для взрослых. Начальный курс: учебник, часть 1.1. СПб: Златоуст, 2019. ISBN 978-5-907123-00-7. Available at: https://mgu-russian.com
ЧЕРНЫШЕВ, Станислав – ЧЕРНЫШЕВА, А. Поехали! Русский язык для взрослых. Начальный курс: рабочая тетрадь, часть 1.1. СПб: Златоуст, 2019. ISBN 978-5-907123-08-3. Available at: https://mgu-russian.com
More materials are made available to students by the teacher according to his/hers current selection
a) completing and submitting preliminary tasks focused on verifying grammatical knowledge and training vocabulary (20%);
b) succesful completion of preliminary test (30%). The test must be completed at minimally 60% of points;
c) succesful completion of final exam, which consists of written lexical-gramatical test and oral presentation of a selected conversation topic (50%).
Continuous preparation for seminars, completion of tasks, continuous written homeworks will be specified in the course programme at the beginning of the semester. Content of the course, date of the preliminary test and date of the final exam will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Preliminary outputs do not have a correction date. The teacher will accept a maximum of two documented absences.
The evaluation is carried out according to this classification scale: A (100 % - 92 %), B (91 % - 84 %), C (83 % - 76 %), D (75 % - 68 %), E (67 % - 60 %).
Slovak
1. Russian alphabet. Russian writing.
2. Phonetic system of Russian language. Basic orthoepic rules. Stress, intonation.
3. Conversation topic Getting to know each other: personal identity (basic vocabulary), formal and non-formal communication. Personal pronouns.
4. Syntactic construction of simple sentences in Russian. Using the word „be“.
5. Conversation topic My family: basic vocabulary, possesive pronouns.
6. Verbs of the 1. and the 2. conjugacy forms.
7. Conversation topic Free time: basic vocabulary, training of verb use.
8. Conversation topic Dwelling: basic vocabulary, using of substantives in plural forms.
9. Accusative case and prepositional case of singular substantives.
10. Conversation topic My day: basic vocabulary, using of numeralias. Conjugacy of irregular verbs of the 1. and the 2. conjugacy forms. Basic adverbs.
11. Creation of simple texts focused on the aspects of everday life.
12. Development of communication abilities: creation of questions and answers, training of basics of coherent speech.
100 % preliminary
Graduate of the course posseses knowledge from Russian language at beginners level (A1) – according to standards of the Russian for Foreigners programme. He/she is informed with basic phonetic, orthographic and morphological specifics of Russian language, he/she understands and has adopted the principles of creation and use of simple sentences in Russian. He/she has adopted the ability to react to common question and basic communication abilities in everyday topics.
JELÍNEK, Stanislav. et al. Raduga 2: pracovní sešit; ruština pro střední a jazykové školy. Plzeň: Fraus, 1997. ISBN 80-85784-74-2.
JELÍNEK, Stanislav et al. Raduga 2: učebnice; ruština pro střední a jazykové školy. Plzeň: Fraus, 1997. ISBN 80-85784-73-4.
MADEJ, Lizaveta. Lektorské cvičenia 1-2. Didaktické materiály k výučbe ruského jazyka pre študentov prvého ročníka ruských a východoeurópskych štúdií. Bratislava: Stimul, 2019. ISBN 978-80-8127-253-0.
PAŘÍZKOVÁ, Štěpánka. Ruština pro začátečníky a samouky. Dolní Ředice: P a P, 2002. ISBN 80-903072-0-5.
ЧЕРНЫШЕВ, Станислав – ЧЕРНЫШЕВА, А. Поехали! Русский язык для взрослых. Начальный курс: учебник, часть 1.1. СПб: Златоуст, 2019. ISBN 978-5-907123-00-7. Available at: https://mgu-russian.com
ЧЕРНЫШЕВ, Станислав – ЧЕРНЫШЕВА, А. Поехали! Русский язык для взрослых. Начальный курс: рабочая тетрадь, часть 1.1. СПб: Златоуст, 2019. ISBN 978-5-907123-08-3. Available at: https://mgu-russian.com
More materials are made available to students by the teacher according to his/hers current selection.
a) completing and submitting preliminary tasks focused on verifying grammatical knowledge and training vocabulary (20%);
b) succesful completion of preliminary test (30%). The test must be completed at minimally 60% of points;
c) succesful completion of final exam, which consists of written lexical-gramatical test and oral presentation of a selected conversation topic (50%).
Continuous preparation for seminars, completion of tasks, continuous written homeworks will be specified in the course programme at the beginning of the semester. Content of the course, date of the preliminary test and date of the final exam will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Preliminary outputs do not have a correction date. The teacher will accept a maximum of two documented absences.
The evaluation is carried out according to this classification scale: A (100 % - 92 %), B (91 % - 84 %), C (83 % - 76 %), D (75 % - 68 %), E (67 % - 60 %).
Slovak, Russian (A1)
1. Articulation training.
2. Adjective and its grammatical categories.
3. Conversation topic Hobbies: basic vocabulary, use of adjectives.
4. Adverbs in Russian: approach to formation and specifics of use.
5. Conversation topic Traveling. Use of можно – нельзя – надо.
6. Modal verbs: conjugation and use.
7. Conversation topic Friendship.
8. Prepositional case in substantives and adjectives. Prepositional phrase.
9. Conversaton topic Food and lifestyle: basic vocabulary, conjugation of one-syllable irregular verbs.
10. Accusative case in substantives and adjectives. Prepositional phrase.
11. Conversation topic Weather and seasons: basic vocabulary, use of demonstrative pronous.
12. Reading and comprehension of oral and written texts. Creation of coherent texts on common topics. Training of communication abilities (coherent speech and spontaneous reactions).
100 % preliminary
Graduate of the course posseses knowledge from Russian language at beginners level (A1) – according to standards of the Russian for Foreigners programme. He/she has deepened his knowledge from phonetic, ortographic and morphological system of Russian language. He/she understands the basic grammatical phenomenons in Russian language. He/she has improved his/hers comprehensive reading ability, creation and presentation (oral and wirtten) of texts in basic conversation topics, extended his/hers vocabulary.
BARNET, Vladimír. et al. Ruština pro pokročilé. Voznice: LEDA, 2007. ISBN 978-80-7335-104-5
ONDREJČEKOVÁ, Erika – DEKANOVÁ, Eva. Ruský jazyk učebnica a cvičebnica. Nitra: Enigma, 2006. ISBN 80-89132-30-8.
Говорим по-русски без переводчика: Интенсивный курс по развитию навыков устной речи. Red. Л. С. Крючкова, Л. А. Дунаева. Москва: Флинта, 2016. ISBN 978-5-89349-413-6. Available at: https://mgu-russian.com
ЖИВКОВИЧ, Игорь. Русская грамматика в упражнениях: учеб. пособие. Москва: Флинта, 2016. ISBN 978-5-9765-1804-9. Available at: https://mgu-russian.com
ЧЕРНЫШЕВ, Станислав – ЧЕРНЫШЕВА, А. Поехали! Русский язык для взрослых. Начальный курс: рабочая тетрадь, часть 1.2. СПб: Златоуст, 2019. ISBN 978-5-90712-309-0. Available at: https://mgu-russian.com
ЧЕРНЫШЕВ, Станислав – ЧЕРНЫШЕВА, А. Поехали! Русский язык для взрослых. Начальный курс: учебник, часть 1.2. СПб: Златоуст, 2019. ISBN 978-5-90712-307-6. Available at: https://mgu-russian.com
More current materials, selected articles and studies from Russian linguistic scientific journals and papers will be made available by the teacher.
a) completing and submitting preliminary tasks focused on verifying grammatical knowledge and training vocabulary (20%);
b) succesfull completion of preliminary test (30%). The test must be completed at minimally 60% of points;
c) succesfull completion of final exam, which consists of written lexical-gramatical test and oral presentation of a selected conversation topic (50%).
Continuous preparation for seminars, completion of tasks, continuous written homeworks will be specified in the course programme at the beginning of the semester. Content of the course, date of the preliminary test and date of the final exam will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Preliminary outputs do not have a correction date. The teacher will accept a maximum of two documented absences.
The evaluation is carried out according to this classification scale: A (100 % - 92 %), B (91 % - 84 %), C (83 % - 76 %), D (75 % - 68 %), E (67 % - 60 %).
Slovak, Russian (A1 - A2)
1. Comprehensive reading of scientific linguistic text.
2. Listening and understanding speech.
3. International vocabulary in Russian language.
4. Linguistic terminology.
5. Training of communication abilities (coherent speech and spontaneous reactions).
6. Creation of coherent texts in selected conversation topics: clothes, job and occupation, dwelling, traveling and planning of activities etc.
7. Movement verbs in Russian language and specifics of their use.
8. Singular and plural of substantives and adjectives in genitive form.
9. Prepositional case system in Russian language.
10. Imperative and conditional sentence type.
11. Modal phrases.
12. Idiomatic system of Russian language.
100 % preliminary
Graduate of the course posseses knowledge from Russian language at beginners level (A2 – B1) – according to standards of the Russian for Foreigners programme. He/she deepened his knowledge from phonetic, ortographic and morphological system of Russian language. He/she understands the basic grammatical phenomenons in Russian language. He/she improved his/hers comprehensive reading ability of scientific (linguistic) texts, creation and presentation (oral and wirtten) of texts in basic conversation topics, extended his/hers vocabulary.
BARNET, Vladimír. et al. Ruština pro pokročilé. Voznice: LEDA, 2007. ISBN 978-80-7335-104-5
ONDREJČEKOVÁ, Erika – DEKANOVÁ, Eva. Ruský jazyk učebnica a cvičebnica. Nitra: Enigma, 2006. ISBN 80-89132-30-8.
Говорим по-русски без переводчика: Интенсивный курс по развитию навыков устной речи. Red. Л. С. Крючкова, Л. А. Дунаева. Москва: Флинта, 2016. ISBN 978-5-89349-413-6. Available at: https://mgu-russian.com
ЖИВКОВИЧ, Игорь. Русская грамматика в упражнениях: учеб. пособие. Москва: Флинта, 2016. ISBN 978-5-9765-1804-9. Available at: https://mgu-russian.com
ЧЕРНЫШЕВ, Станислав – ЧЕРНЫШЕВА, А. Поехали! Русский язык для взрослых. Начальный курс: рабочая тетрадь, часть 1.2. СПб: Златоуст, 2019. ISBN 978-5-90712-309-0. Available at: https://mgu-russian.com
ЧЕРНЫШЕВ, Станислав – ЧЕРНЫШЕВА, А. Поехали! Русский язык для взрослых. Начальный курс: учебник, часть 1.2. СПб: Златоуст, 2019. ISBN 978-5-90712-307-6. Available at: https://mgu-russian.com
More current materials, selected articles and studies from Russian linguistic scientific journals and papers will be made available by the teacher.
a) completing and submitting preliminary tasks focused on verifying grammatical knowledge and training vocabulary (20%);
b) succesfull completion of preliminary test (30%). The test must be completed at minimally 60% of points;
c) succesfull completion of final exam, which consists of written lexical-gramatical test and oral presentation of a selected conversation topic (50%).
Continuous preparation for seminars, completion of tasks, continuous written homeworks will be specified in the course programme at the beginning of the semester. Content of the course, date of the preliminary test and date of the final exam will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Preliminary outputs do not have a correction date. The teacher will accept a maximum of two documented absences.
The evaluation is carried out according to this classification scale: A (100 % - 92 %), B (91 % - 84 %), C (83 % - 76 %), D (75 % - 68 %), E (67 % - 60 %).
Slovak, Russian (A1 - A2)
1. Listening and understanding speech.
2. Singular and plural of substantives and adjectives in instrumental case.
3. Specifics of Russian syntactic system: basic syntactic units and relations.
4. Partial predicates (infinitive, participle, gerund).
5. Compound sentences and complex sentences.
6. Indirect speech.
7. Modeling of communication situations in Russina language.
8. Translation exercises.
9. Communication in topics of contemporary social life in Slovakia, Russia and the world.
10. Scientific Russian in russian scientific linguistic literature.
11. Linguistics terminology.
12. Training of communication abilities (coherent speech and spontaneous reactions).
100 % preliminary
Graduate of the course posseses knowledge from Russian language at beginners level (B1 to B2) – according to standards of Russian for foreigners education programme. He/she has deepened his/hers knowledge of phonetic, ortographic and morphological system of Russian language. He/she understands basic phenomenons in Russian language. He/she has improved in comprehensive listening, reproduction and production of texts, and has improved his ability to understand scientific (linguistic) texts. He/she has extended his/hers vocabulary, strenghtened hers his conversation abilities with emphasis on differentiation of communication conditions.
DOLNÍK, Juraj. Základy lingvistiky. Bratislava: Stimul, 1999. ISBN 80-85697-95-5.
DOLNIK, Juraj. Všeobecná jazykoveda. Opis a vysvetľovanie jazyka. Bratislava: VEDA, 2013. ISBN 978-80-224-1201-8.
HORECKÝ, Ján. Vývin a teória jazyka. Bratislava: SPN, 1983.
KRÁĽ, Ábel. Pravidlá slovenskej výslovnosti. Martin: Matica slovenská, 2016. ISBN 978-80-8128-159-4.
KRUPA, Viktor. Jazyk – neznámy nástroj. Bratislava: Slovenský spisovateľ, 1991. ISBN 80-220-0153-8.
ONDRUŠ, Šimon. – SABOL, Ján. Úvod do štúdia jazykov. Bratislava: SPN, 1987. Other current materials according to the teacher's choice will be made available by the teacher to all course participants.
a) elaboration and submission of continuous tasks on selected topics assigned by the teacher (10 %);
b) active participation in seminars in the form of engaging in discussion with relevant outputs (10 %);
c) successful completion of continuous test 1 (30 %);
d) successful completion of continuous test 2 (50 %). From each test the student must obtain at least 60 % points.
Continuous preparation for seminars, elaboration of exercises, continuous written homework will be specified in the course program at the beginning of the semester. Interim outputs do not have a correction date. The content, the date of the continuous test 1 and 2 will be announced at the beginning of the semester. Violation of academic ethics will be punished, and the student will lose all the received points in the relevant assessment. The condition for granting credits is the achievement at least 60 % success rate for continuous evaluation. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with the documentation.
Grading scale:
A: 100 - 92 %
B: 91 - 84 %
C: 83 - 76 %
D: 75 - 68 %
E: 67 - 60 %
FX: 59 %
Slovak
1. Linguistics as a scientific discipline.
2. Systems linguistics: properties of the language system.
3. Systems linguistics: language as a system of signs.
4. Language and speech: language and speech units.
5. Relations between language units.
6. The concept of category and paradigm.
7. Form and meaning of language units: qualitative and quantitative relationship between form and meaning.
8. Classification of languages (genetic, areal, typological).
9. Language functions: primary and secondary language functions, communication model.
10. The relationship between language and society. Language variability.
11. The relationship between language and thinking.
12. Origin and development of language.
100 % preliminary
The graduate of the course has knowledge of the system of central linguistic concepts and linguistic methodologies, understands the goals and methods of linguistic research and is able to operate with concepts.
DOLNÍK, Juraj et al. Morfologické aspekty súčasnej slovenčiny. Bratislava: Veda, 2010. ISBN 978-80-224-1159-2. (selected parts)
IVANOVÁ, Martina. Syntax slovenského jazyka. 2., uprav. a dopl. vyd. Prešov: Vydavateľstvo
Prešovskej univerzity, 2016 [cit. 2021-10-25]. ISBN 978-80-555-1753-7. Also available at: https://www.pulib.sk/web/kniznica/elpub/dokument/Ivanova4
IVANOVÁ, Martina et al. Valenčný slovník slovenských slovies na korpusovom základe. Prešov: Filozofická fakulta Prešovskej univerzity, 2014 [cit. 2021-10-25]. ISBN 978-80-555-1148-1.
Also available at: http://www.ff.unipo.sk/sloval/
IVANOVÁ, Martina et al. Vybrané aspekty valencie verb v slovenčine. Prešov: Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, 2018 [cit. 2021-10-25]. ISBN 978-80-555-2117-6. Available at: https:// www.pulib.sk/web/kniznica/elpub/dokument/Ivanova2
ORAVEC, Ján, BAJZÍKOVÁ, Eugénia a Juraj FURDÍK. Súčasný slovenský spisovný jazyk. Morfológia. Bratislava: SPN, 1984. (selected parts)
ORAVEC, Ján, BAJZÍKOVÁ, Eugénia. Súčasný slovenský spisovný jazyk. Syntax. 2. vyd. Bratislava: SPN, 1986. (selected parts)
POPOVIČOVÁ SEDLÁČKOVÁ Zuzana - PIATKOVÁ Kristína: Pragmatická gramatika 1. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2021. ISBN 978-80-223-5325-0 (tlač), 978-80-223-5326-7 (online).
Selected contemporary articles and essays from journals Jazykovedný časopis (available at: http: // www.juls.savba.sk/ediela/jc/), Slovenská reč (available at: http://www.juls.savba.sk/ediela / sr /), Kultúra slova (available at: http://www.juls.savba.sk/ediela/ks/), anthologies and other professional literature in printed and electronic form. Students will be informed about additional literature at the beginning of the semester.
During the teaching part of the semester: continuous preparation for seminars, active participation in seminars (participation in the discussion) and preparation of preliminary assignments (10 p), two preliminary written examinations (2 x 40 p). The condition for proceeding to the oral exam is to obtain at least 60 % in the preliminary assessment.
During the examination period: semestral oral examination (40 p).
The dates of the tests and their content will be specified in the course program at the beginning of the semester. The deadline and content and formal requirements of the seminar paper will be specified in the course program at the beginning of the semester. Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of the obtained points in the relevant evaluation item.
The dates of the oral exam will be published via AIS no later than the last week of the teaching part of the semester. Max. two documented absences are allowed.
Grading scale:
100 – 92 %: A, 91 – 84 %: B, 83 – 76 %: C, 75 – 68 %: D, 67 – 60 %: E, 59 – 0 %: Fx
Slovak
Semantic-grammatical phrase patterns.
Lexical filling of functional positions.
Derived, developed and extended phrase structures.
Phrase article representation of the structure of non-complex phrases. Complete semantics of non-complex phrases.
Complex phrases with phrasal forms of proposition.
Complex phrases with non-phrasal forms of proposition.
Compound sentences.
Complex formal-semantic analysis of phrases.
Grammar of part of speech.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 40/60
After completing the course, the student has knowledge of morphological and syntactic structure of a phrase, he/she understands the functional connection of syntactic structures and morphological means and is able to interpret a phrase on a formal-syntactic and semantic level.
DOLNÍK, Juraj, BAJZÍKOVÁ, Eugénia. Textová lingvistika. Bratislava: Stimul, 1998. ISBN 80-85697-78-5. (selected parts)
IVANOVÁ, Martina. Syntax slovenského jazyka. 2., uprav. a dopl. vyd. Prešov: Vydavateľstvo
Prešovskej univerzity, 2016 [cit. 2021-10-25]. ISBN 978-80-555-1753-7. Also available at: https://www.pulib.sk/web/kniznica/elpub/dokument/Ivanova4
MISTRÍK, Jozef. Slovosled a vetosled v slovenčine. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied, 1966. (selected parts)
MISTRÍK, Jozef. Štylistika. Bratislava: SPN, 1997. ISBN 80-08-02529-8. (vybrané časti) ORAVEC, Ján, BAJZÍKOVÁ, Eugénia a Juraj FURDÍK. Súčasný slovenský spisovný jazyk. Morfológia. Bratislava: SPN, 1984. (selected parts)
ORAVEC, Ján, BAJZÍKOVÁ, Eugénia. Súčasný slovenský spisovný jazyk. Syntax. 2. vyd. Bratislava: SPN, 1986. (selected parts)
Selected contemporary articles and essays from journals Jazykovedný časopis (available at: http: // www.juls.savba.sk/ediela/jc/), Slovenská reč (available at: http://www.juls.savba.sk/ediela / sr /), Kultúra slova (available at: http://www.juls.savba.sk/ediela/ks/), anthologies and other professional literature in printed and electronic form. Students will be informed about additional literature at the beginning of the semester.
During the teaching part of the semester: continuous preparation for seminars, active participation in seminars (participation in the discussion) and preparation of preliminary assignments (10 p), two preliminary written examinations (2 x 40 p). The condition for proceeding to the oral exam is to obtain at least 60 % points in the preliminary assessment.
During the examination period: semestral oral examination (40 p).
The dates of the tests and their content will be specified in the course program at the beginning of the semester. The deadline and content and formal requirements of the seminar paper will be specified in the course program at the beginning of the semester. Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of the obtained points in the relevant evaluation item.
The dates of the oral exam will be published via AIS no later than the last week of the teaching part of the semester. Max. two documented absences are allowed.
Grading scale: 100 – 92 %: A, 91 – 84 %: B, 83 – 76 %: C, 75 – 68 %: D, 67 – 60 %: E, 59 – 0 %: Fx
Slovak
Realization of stylistic potential of morphosyntactic structures.
Information and thematic-rhematic structure of utterances.
Principles and rules of word order and phrase order.
Communication functions of utterances.
Morphosyntactic aspects of text units.
Deviations from phrasal regularities in speech.
Grammatical and stylistic error.
Slovak morphosyntax in school practice.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 40/60
After completing the course, the student has knowledge of form, content and functions of utterances, he/she understands the connection of phrases and speech context and is able to interpret the content and functions of utterances.
DOLNÍK, J.: Lexikológia. 1. vyd. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2003; 2. vyd. 2007. ISBN
80-223-1733-0
FURDÍK, J.: Slovenská slovotvorba. 1. vyd. Prešov : Náuka 2004. ISBN 80-89038-28-X HORECKÝ, J. a kol.: Dynamika slovnej zásoby súčasnej slovenčiny. 1. vyd. Bratislava: Veda 1989.
MLACEK, J.: Slovenská frazeológia. 2. vyd. Bratislava: SPN 1984.
ORGOŇOVÁ, O. – BOHUNICKÁ, A.: Lexikológia slovenčiny. Učebné texty a cvičenia. 2.
vydanie. Praha: Columbus 2012. ISBN 978-80-87588-18-5; 1. vydanie (Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2011); Available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/fileadmin/fif/katedry_pracoviska/ksj/ publikacie/OOAB_lexikologia.pdf
POPOVIČOVÁ SEDLÁČKOVÁ, Z.: Slang v mládežníckom diskurze. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave 2013. 1SBN 978-80-223-3475-4
More materials are made available to students by the teacher according to his/hers current selection
Continuous preparation for seminars (specification of tasks and deadlines in the course program at the begining of the semester), one final test, oral exam. The condition for proceeding to the final oral exam is completing the preliminary tasks graded at least to E. Preliminary outputs do not have a correction date. The teacher will accept a maximum of two documented absences. The evaluation is carried out according to this classification scale: A (100 % - 92 %), B (91 % - 84 %), C (83 % - 76 %), D (75 % - 68 %), E (67 % - 60 %). Credits will be granted to the student who has obtained at least an E as the final grade. A breach of academic ethics will result in the cancellation of the evaluation result of the relevant item.
slovak
Time burden - 4c = 100h - 120h
1. completion of educational activities (L,S): 26h
2. continuous preparation for lessons: 26 h
3. homeworks: 10h
4. preparation for final test exam: 20h
5. preparation for final oral exam: 20h
Subject and terminology of systemic, cognitive and cultural lexicology. Approaches to the reasearch of lexical meaning. Paradigmatical aspects of word. Word-formation from formal and semantic perspective. Applicative lexicology and theoretical lexicography. Sociolinguistics aspects of lexicology – usage of vocabulary. Dynamic tendencies in synchronic vocabulary.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 40/60
Student adopted the systemization of basic knowledge from systemic, cognitive and cultural lexicology and he/she is able to apply it didactically. He/she adopts approaches to vocabulary as an image of the national culture and obtains basic ability to work with paper and electronic lexicographic sources, which are applicable both in education and his/hers own work.
Recommended literature:
CHROMÝ, Jan. Základy sociolingvistiky. Praha: Karolinum, 2014. ISBN: 978-80-246-2644-4. [cit. 2021-12-24] Available at: https://karolinum.cz/knihy/chromy-zaklady-
sociolingvistiky-12909
ONDREJOVIČ, Slavomír. Jazyk, veda o jazyku, societa. Bratislava: Veda, 2008. ISBN
978-80-224-0994-0. (vybrané časti) [cit. 2021-12-24] Available at: (http://www.juls.savba.sk/ attachments/pub_jazyk_veda_o_jazyku/ondrejovic_jazyk.pdf)
DOLNÍK, Juraj. Všeobecná jazykoveda. Bratislava: Veda, 2010. 2. vyd. 2013. (kapitola Sociolingvistika, s. 336 – 365). ISBN 978-80-224-1078-6. [cit. 2021-12-24] Available at: https:// www.juls.savba.sk/attachments/pub_vseobecna_jazykoveda/vseobecna_jazykoveda.pdf KOVÁČOVÁ, Viera. Vybrané kapitoly z dialektológie. Učebné texty a materiály. Ružomberok: Verbum, 2013. ISBN 978-80-8084-933-7. (selected parts)
MILROYOVÁ, Lesley a GORDON, Matthew. Sociolingvistika: Metody a interpretace. Prekl. J. Chromý. Praha: Karolinum, 2012. ISBN 978-80-246-2125-8. (selected parts)
MÚCSKOVÁ, Gabriela, MUZIKOVÁ, Katarína a WAMBACH, Viera. Praktická dialektológia: vysokoškolská príručka na nárečovú interpretáciu. Wien: Facultas Verlags- & Buchhandels AG Wien, 2012. + CD. ISBN 978-3-200-02560-8. (selected parts)
TANCER, Jozef. Rozviazané jazyky. Bratislava: Slovart, 2016. ISBN 978-80-556-2458-7. (selected parts)
Sociolinguistica Slovaca 1 – 8. [cit. 2021-12-24] Available at: http://www.juls.savba.sk/ ediela/sociolinguistica_slovaca/ (selected parts)
Course requirements:
a) during the semester:
- Active participation in seminars and systematic work on home assignments (20%);
- Own empirical research focused on the selected phenomenon and its presentation in the second half of the semester (20%);
b) in the examination period:
- A paper based on the empirical research presented during the semester (20%);
- A final test or colloquium (40%).
The condition for final evaluation is a minimum of 50% of final test evaluation and fulfilment of all the others course requirements.
Infringement of academic policy will result in annulment of the evaluation.
Grading scale:
100-92: A
91-84: B
83-76: C
75-68: D
67-60: E
59-0: FX
The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation.
The exact syllabus and course requirements will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
The dates for the final test will be announced through AIS no later than in the last week of the instruction period.
Slovak
Czech
Course syllabus:
1. The subject of sociolinguistics, the process of establishment as a field of study.
2. Research methods of sociolinguistics and research ethics.
3. Variational sociolinguistics – bilingualism and multilingualism.
4. Variational sociolinguistics – stratification – bivarietism and multivarietism.
5. Traditional dialectology and variational dialect sociolinguistics.
6. Perceptual and folk dialectology.
7. The subject and methods of interactional sociolinguistics and theory of accommodation.
8. Language attitudes. Language and social inequality.
9. Sociology of language and linguistic socialisation – ontogenesis of language.
10. Language ecology and language diversity. Endangered languages and language death.
11. Language policy and language ideologies.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 40 / 60
Learning outcomes:
After successfully completing the course, the student has an overview of the subject, its goals, methods of sociolinguistic research. The student has the knowledge about the existing sociolinguistic publications in Slovak linguistics and in abroad and he/she can do his/her own sociolinguistic research. He/she understands the basic differences between structural linguistics and sociolinguistics and has basic knowledge about the traditional regional dialects in Slovakia and their functions in the contemporary language situation.
KRAJČOVIČ, Rudolf a Pavol ŽIGO. Dejiny spisovnej slovenčiny. 3. vyd. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2011. ISBN 978-80-223-3103-6
KRAJČOVIČ, Rudolf a Pavol ŽIGO. Príručka k dejinám spisovnej slovenčiny.3., dopl. vyd. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2015. ISBN 978-80-223-3863-9
KAČALA, Ján. Spisovná slovenčina v 20. storočí. Bratislava: Veda, 2001. ISBN 80-224-0666-X PAULINY, Eugen. Dejiny spisovnej slovenčiny od začiatkov po súčasnosť. Bratislava: SPN, 1983.
Historický slovník slovenského jazyka I. – VII. 1. vyd. Bratislava: Veda, 1991 – 2008.
Pramene k dejinám slovenčiny I. – III. 1. vyd. Bratislava: Veda, 1992, 2002, 2008. Also available at: https://www.juls.savba.sk/ediela/pramene/.
The students will be informed about the additional literature at the beginning of and during the semester.
Active participation in seminars, preparation of assignments focused on the analysis and interpretation of period texts (20%), midterm test (30%), final colloquium in the next-to-last or the last week of the teaching part of the semester (50%).
Max. two excused absences are accepted. The dates of the test and the subjects of the preliminary evaluation will be specified at the beginning of the semester. Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of the obtained points in the relevant evaluation item.
Grading scale:
A: 100 – 92 %
B: 91 – 84 %
C: 83 – 76 %
D: 75 – 68 %
E: 67 – 60 %
FX: 59 - 0 %
Slovak
1. Periodization of the history of standard Slovak. Working with documents from historical periods of the Slovak language development.
2. The Great Moravian period and the disintegration of Great Moravian traditions.
3. The pre-standard period - cultural pre-standard varieties (characters, language documents).
4. The pre-standard period - cultural pre-standard varieties in contact with other languages, Slovakized Czech (characters, language documents).
5. The standard period – the Bernolák period (characters, personalities, language documents).
6. The standard period – the Štúr period (characters, personalities, language documents).
7. The standard period – the reform period (characters, personalities, language documents).
8. The standard period – the Matica period and the Martin period (characters, personalities, language documents).
9. The standard period – the interwar period (characters, personalities, language documents).
10. The standard period – the post-war, current period (characters and personalities). Current tendencies in the codification of standard Slovak.
11. Codification centres and care for language culture in the older standard period.
12. The general rules of the standardization process and basic problems of language planning and conscious language regulation.
100 % preliminary
After successfully completing this course, the student has a comprehensive overview of the development of cultural and standard Slovak in our territory (in the Great Moravian period) to the present, of the principles of codification and codification criteria and principles. He/she knows the characteristics of older variants of cultural and standard Slovak and can identify them in period texts. He/she understands the general rules of origin, development and dynamics of the standard language and can perceive the development of the standard language in the context of socio-political, economic and cultural development of society.
Recommended literature:
KRAJČOVIČ, Rudolf. Vývin slovenského jazyka a dialektológia. 2. vyd. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2009. ISBN 978-80-223-2526-4 (vybrané časti)
KRAJČOVIČ, Rudolf a ŽIGO, Pavol. Textová príručka k dejinám slovenského jazyka. Bratislava: SPN, 1979. ISBN 67-063-79.
MÚCSKOVÁ, Gabriela, MUZIKOVÁ, Katarína a WAMBACH, Viera. Praktická dialektológia: vysokoškolská príručka na nárečovú interpretáciu. Wien: Facultas Verlags- & Buchhandels AG Wien, 2012. + CD. ISBN 978-3-200-02560-8. (vybrané časti)
ŠTOLC, Jozef. Slovenská dialektológia. Bratislava: Veda, 1994. ISBN 978-80-224-0036-7. KRÁLIK, Ľubor. Stručný etymologický slovník slovenčiny. Bratislava: Veda, 2015. ISBN 978-80-224-1493-7.
Staršia slovenská lexika v medzijazykových vzťahoch. Bratislava: Veda, 2011. ISBN
978-80-224-1217-9. [cit. 2021-10-24] Dostupné na: https://www.juls.savba.sk/attachments/ pub_starsia_slovenska_lexika/starsia.pdf
Atlas slovenského jazyka I. - IV. Bratislava: Veda, 1968 - 1984. Slovník slovenských nárečí. I. - III. Bratislava: Veda, 1994 - 2021.
Historický slovník slovenského jazyka I. – VII. Bratislava: Veda, 1991 – 2008.
Course requirements:
Active participation in seminars and systematic work on home assignments (20%); phonetic, phonological, morphological and lexical characteristics of selected text in dialect (30%); a final test (50%).
The condition for final evaluation is a minimum of 50% of final test evaluation and fulfilment of all the others course requirements.
Infringement of academic policy will result in annulment of the evaluation.
Grading scale:
100-92: A
91-84: B
83-76: C
75-68: D
67-60: E
59-0: FX
The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation.
The exact syllabus and course requirements will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Slovak
Course syllabus:
1. Genesis of the Slovak language. Theories of the origins of the Slovak language.
2. Characteristics of the basic phenomena of the West Slavic and non-West Slavic origins in the Proto-Slavic base of the Slovak language.
3. The most important phonetic and phonological changes before the 10th century and the main changes in the 10th century.
4. Development of the vocalic and consonant system of the Slovak language.
5. Development of the morphological system of the Slovak language and nominal and verbal grammar categories.
6. Specifics of lexical system development of the Slovak language.
7. Development of word-formation processes in the lexis of the Slovak language.
8. Semantic changes.
9. Development of Proto-Slavic lexicon, archaization and historicization of words.
10. Original and non-original lexicon (original words and loanwords).
11. Dialectology and the research of the Slovak dialects.
12. Dialect geography and cartography.
13. Methods of interpretation of the dialect material and analysis and interpretation of the dialect texts.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary.
Learning outcomes:
After successfully completing the course, the student understands the concept of language change and is able to identify phenomena of integration and constitutive processes in the Slovak language from the genetical point of view. He/she can identify morphological, phonological and lexical changes and contemporary differences in regional dialects of the Slovak language and is able to find them in a dialect text. The student is familiar with the publication from the field of Slovak diachronic linguistics and dialectology and is able to use the historical and dialectological dictionaries and works focused on linguistic geography.
1. KRÁĽ, Ábel.: Pravidlá slovenskej výslovnosti. Bratislava: SPN, 1996. ISBN 80-08-00305-7.
2. SIČÁKOVÁ, Ľudmila. Fonetika a fonológia pre elementaristov. Prešov: Náuka, 2002. ISBN
80-89-03815-8.
3. Pravidlá slovenského pravopisu. 4. nezmenené vydanie. Bratislava: VEDA, 1998. ISBN 80-224-0532-9
4. KRÁĽ, Ábel. Z problematiky slovenskej ortoepie a ortografie - o reforme slovenského pravopisu. In: Slovenská reč, roč. 69, č. 5 - 6, 2004, s. 193 - 301. ISSN 0037-6981.
5. DUDOK, Miroslav. Slovenský pravopis: Od "chyby" k "pravidlu", s. 34 - 39. In: Dynamické tendencie v slovenskom pravopise. Bratislava: Veda, 2009. ISBN 978-80-224-1106-6.
From the language sections (Kultúra slova magazines - selection of texts focused on orthography and orthoepy) + contemporary selection. Selected contemporary articles and studies from linguistic journals, anthologies and other professional literature in printed and electronic form.
Preparation of preliminary assignments, 1 presentation, 1 seminar paper (dates will be specified in the course programme at the beginning of the semester)/proofreading of an assigned text, (30%)
Final written exam in the 12th – 13th week of the semester (70%)
Grading scale: 100 % – 92 % = A, 91 % – 85 % = B, 84% – 77 % = C, 76 % – 67 % = D, 66 % – 60 % = E.
In order to successfully complete the course, the student must get at least 60% for the final exam.
There are no correction dates for preliminary checks. Max. two documented absences are allowed. Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of the obtained points in the relevant evaluation item.
Slovak
1) The basics of the orthoepy theory.
2) The phonetic background of orthoepy.
3) The orthoepy of prosodic attributes.
4) Problematic orthoepy phenomena.
5) The dynamics of the acoustic aspect of language and the orthoepy standard.
6) Phonetic and orthoepic adaptation of foreign expressions.
7) The principles and rules of spelling.
8) Problematic spelling phenomena.
9) Writing capital letters.
10) The use of a comma.
11) Writing words separately and together.
12) Proofreading texts.
100 % preliminary
After completing the course, the student has theoretical knowledge of orthoepy and orthography, he/she understands the principles of the pronunciation and spelling standards and he/she can assess the correctness of orthoepy and orthography implementation into language structures.
DOLNÍK, Juraj. Spisovná slovenčina a jej používatelia. Bratislava: STIMUL, 2000. ISBN
80-88982-36-7.
DOLNÍK, Juraj. Teória spisovného jazyka so zreteľom na spisovnú slovenčinu. Bratislava: Veda, vydavateľstvo slovenskej akadémie vied, 2010. ISBN 978-80-224-1119-6.
DOLNÍK, Juraj. Jazyk v sociálnej praxi. Bratislava: VEDA, vydavateľstvo slovenskej akadémie vied, 2021. ISBN 978-80-224-1882-9.
FINDRA, Ján. Jazyková komunikácia a kultúra vyjadrovania. Martin: Osveta, 2013. ISBN 978-80-8063-385-1.
KRÁĽ, Ábel a Anna RÝZKOVÁ. Základy jazykovej kultúry. Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo, 1990. ISBN 80-08-00280-8.
Additional literature will be announced at the beginning of the semester according to the course programme.
Systematic preparation for classes and active participation in class discussion (20 points), the paper and its presentation in class (20 points), final test (60 points). Infringement of academic policy will result in annulment of the evaluation. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation. Grading scale: 100 – 92: A, 91 – 84: B, 83 – 76: C, 75 – 68: D, 67 – 60: E, 59 – 0: Fx.
Slovak
1. The subject of language culture and theory of the standard language and theory of language planning.
2. Standardization as a process of the standard language formation.
3. Functions of the standard language and its position in the national language stratification.
4. Variation in language, language dialect. Synchronic dynamics of language system. Intentional and spontaneous language changes.
5. The relationship of language praxis and codification. Sources of language codification.
6. Criterion of standard language and their application in language practice. Functional aspect of language means and the process of lexical borrowing. Systematic aspect of language means.
7. The standard language regulation approaches. Purism problem. Reflects of purism in the development of the standard Slovak language.
8. Prescriptive linguistics and language criticism.
9. Relationship between language culture and language usage. Proofreading and editorial practice.
10. Language situation concept. The language situation in Slovakia and its development.
11. Language policy and language ideology and its impact on the language legislation.
12. Language legislation in Slovakia in the international context of language policy and the language rights.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 100 % preliminary.
A student is familiar with basic problems of language culture and with current theoretical approaches dealing with the standard Slovak language. He/she is able to analyse the language phenomena based on the criterion of standard language and he/she has an overview of the current activities of the language criticism in Slovakia.
General:
McCARTHY, M. a O`DELL, F. Academic Vocabulary in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. ISBN 978-1-107-59166-0.
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. Selected topics from academic writing [online]. Bratislava: Stimul , 2022 [cit. 2022-01-01]. Dostupné na: https://dspace.uniba.sk/xmlui/handle/123456789/43.
Subject-specific:
CERAMELLA, N., a LEE, E. Cambridge English for the Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. ISBN 978-0-521-72457-9.
ELIAŠOVÁ, V. Journalism and Marketing Communication Resource Materials (1st year students). Part 1 [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2020 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_VE_JMC_1-2_9788081272981.pdf
ELIAŠOVÁ, V. Journalism and Marketing Communication Resource Materials (1st year students). Part 2 [online]. Bratislava: Stimul , 2020 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_VE_JMC_1-2_9788081272981.pdf
LACÍKOVÁ-SERDULOVÁ, M. English for Students of Psychology 1 Collection of Study Material. [online]. Bratislava: Stimul , 2018 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_MLS_english_psychology_1.pdf
LACÍKOVÁ-SERDULOVÁ, M. English for Students of Social Sciences Collection of Study Material for Students of Cultural Studies, Ethnology, Sociology [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2019 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_MLS_EFSOSS.pdf
ŠIMKOVÁ, S. English for students of archaeology 1 - a textbook for university students. Bratislava: Comenius University, 2019
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. ESP Reader for Students of Philosophy and Religious studies [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2019 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_DS_ESP_Reader_philosophy.pdf
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. Video-based Listening Tasks for ESP Classes. [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2018 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available at: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_DS_video-based_ESP.pdf
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. Video-based listening tasks for ESP classes. Volume 2 [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2021 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available at:
https://dspace.uniba.sk/handle/123456789/32
Moodle / MS TEAMS is a source for unpublished study materials (some ready for publishing) and teachers´presentations. Supplementary literature may be introduced through the course of the semester.
Evaluation:
100% Continuous assessment throughout the teaching part of the semester:
• test 50 points, presentation and written assignment (40 points)
• active participation / individual assignments (for every seminar) 10 points
Assessment: 100 % - 92 % - A, 91 % - 84 % - B, 83 % - 76 % - C, 75 % - 68 % - D, 67 %-60 % - E, 59 % and less – FX
2 absences with the proof of reason for non-attendance. In case of serious health problems, representation abroad, or other unforeseen circumstances or serious circumstances not listed here, it is necessary to discuss this in advance with the teacher and agree on an appropriate course of action.
English (minimum B1)
Selection from:
• My study programme (content, graduate profile)
• What is an academic text?
• Language conventions in the academic environment
• Academic and subject-specific terminology and its use
• Academic texts - structure, style, register
• Work with subject-specific model texts with the aim of developing specific language skills
• Development of reading competence (authentic texts from humanities and social sciences)
• Identification of definitions in texts, their use
• Text-making procedures and writing short academic texts (e.g. definitions, listing and comparative-contrast texts, etc.)
• Signal words, their meaning and function
• Use of appropriate signal words
• Transformation of graphs and diagrams into continuous text
• Transformation of continuous text into graphs and diagrams
100/0
The student has knowledge of various language skills and distinguishes various styles and genres that enable him/her to successfully master the processes of foreign language communication (oral and written) in a specific segment of the professional sphere, which is the preparation for a profession in a university environment. The student is thus able to talk about his/her university studies in Slovakia, introduce his/her own study programme, describe its practical application and explain his motivation to study. The level of achieved language competence and skills will enable the student to develop subject-specific vocabulary and obtain information from various English language sources. He/She can understand simple authentic texts from humanities and social sociences.The student is able to write a selection of texts used in the academic environment. He/She can extract information and data from simple academic texts and visually present them using graphs and tables, and use appropriate vocabulary when communicating in the academic environment.
General:
McCARTHY, M., O`DELL, F. Academic Vocabulary in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. ISBN 978-1-107-59166-0.
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. Selected topics from academic writing [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2022 [cit. 2022-01-01]. Dostupné na: https://dspace.uniba.sk/xmlui/handle/123456789/43
https://dspace.uniba.sk/xmlui/handle/123456789/43.
Subject-specific:
CERAMELLA, N., a LEE, E. Cambridge English for the Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. ISBN 978-0-521-72457-9.
ELIAŠOVÁ, V. Journalism and Marketing Communication Resource Materials (1st year students). Part 1 [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2020 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_VE_JMC_1-2_9788081272981.pdf
ELIAŠOVÁ, V. Journalism and Marketing Communication Resource Materials (1st year students). Part 2 [online]. Bratislava: Stimul , 2020 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_VE_JMC_1-2_9788081272981.pdf
LACÍKOVÁ-SERDULOVÁ, M. English for Students of Psychology 1 Collection of Study Material. [online]. Bratislava: Stimul , 2018 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_MLS_english_psychology_1.pdf
LACÍKOVÁ-SERDULOVÁ, M. English for Students of Social Sciences Collection of Study Material for Students of Cultural Studies, Ethnology, Sociology [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2019 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_MLS_EFSOSS.pdf
ŠIMKOVÁ, S. English for students of archaeology 1 - a textbook for university students. Bratislava: Comenius University, 2019
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. ESP Reader for Students of Philosophy and Religious studies [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2019 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_DS_ESP_Reader_philosophy.pdf
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. Video-based Listening Tasks for ESP Classes. [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2018 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available at: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_DS_video-based_ESP.pdf
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. Video-based listening tasks for ESP classes. Volume 2 [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2021 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available at:
https://dspace.uniba.sk/handle/123456789/32
Moodle / MS TEAMS is a source for unpublished study materials (some ready for publishing) and teachers´presentations. Supplementary literature may be introduced through the course of the semester.
100% Continuous assessment throughout the teaching part of the semester:
• test 50 points, presentation and written assignment (40 points)
• active participation / individual assignments (for every seminar) 10 points
Assessment: 100 % - 92 % - A, 91%-84% - B, 83 % - 76 % - C, 75 % - 68 % - D, 67 %-60 % - E, 59 % and less – FX
Dates will be announced during the semester. Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of earned points in the respective assessment item.
2 absences with the proof of reason for non-attendance. In case of serious health problems, representation abroad, or other unforeseen circumstances or serious circumstances not listed here, it is necessary to discuss this in advance with the teacher and agree on an appropriate course of action.
English (minimum B1)
A selection from:
• Academic and subject-specific terminology and its use
• Development of reading competence (authentic texts from humanities and social sciences)
• Work with model texts with the aim of developing specific language skills
• Plagiarism and academic code of ethics
• Citation formats
• Paraphrasing
• How to quote
• Preparing literature review and bibliography
• Summarising techniques
• Identification of main and supporting ideas texts
• Research methods in various fields of social sciences and humanities
• Presentation of research data and results
100/0
The students is able to actively use acquired subject-specific specific as well as academic vocabulary in communication in the academic environment, e.g., when presenting a short project or interpreting data from graphs and tables, which can be converted into text. The student is able to obtain information from English language sources (texts from the field of social sciences and humanities), while more detailed work with them ensures he is acquainted with various research methods and he can describe them. The student is also familiar with text summarising techniques and is able to summarize short academic texts, pinpointing the main and supporting arguments. He can write selected texts from the academic environment, using appropriate paraphrasing and citation techniques, referring to sources and he is able to compile an appropriate bibliography, thus avoiding plagiarism.
General
McCARTHY, M., O`DELL, F. Academic Vocabulary in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. ISBN 978-1-107-59166-0.
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. Selected topics from academic writing [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2022 [cit. 2022-01-01]. Available on: https://dspace.uniba.sk/xmlui/handle/123456789/43
Subject-specific
ELIAŠOVÁ, V. Marketing communication resource materials (for 2nd year students) [online]. Bratislava: Stimul , 2019 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_VE_MCRM.pdf
ELIAŠOVÁ, V.Journalism Resource Materials (for 2nd year students) [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2019 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_VE_JRM.pdf
LACÍKOVÁ-SERDULOVÁ, M. English for Students of Psychology 1 Collection of Study Material. [online]. Bratislava: Stimul , 2018 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_MLS_english_psychology_1.pdf
LACÍKOVÁ-SERDULOVÁ, M. English for Students of Social Sciences Collection of Study Material for Students of Cultural Studies, Ethnology, Sociology [online]. Bratislava: Stimul , 2019 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_MLS_EFSOSS.pdf
ŠIMKOVÁ, S. English for students of archaeology 1 - a textbook for university students. Bratislava: Comenius University, 2019. ISBN 978-80-223-4123-3.
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. ESP Reader for Students of Philosophy and Religious studies [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2019 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_DS_ESP_Reader_philosophy.pdf
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. Video-based Listening Tasks for ESP Classes. [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2018 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_DS_video-based_ESP.pdf
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. Video-based listening tasks for ESP classes. Volume 2 [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2021 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on:
https://dspace.uniba.sk/handle/123456789/32
Moodle / MS TEAMS is a source for unpublished study materials (some ready for publishing) and teachers´ presentations. Supplementary literature may be introduced through the course of the semester.
100% Continuous assessment throughout the teaching part of the semester:
• test 50 points, presentation and written assignment (40 points)
• active participation / individual assignments (for every seminar) 10 points
Assessment: 100 % - 92 % - A, 91 % - 84 % - B, 83 % - 76 % - C, 75 % - 68 % - D, 67 %-60 % - E, 59 % and less – FX
Dates will be announced during the semester. Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of earned points in the respective assessment item.
2 absences with the proof of reason for non-attendance. In case of serious health problems, representation abroad, or other unforeseen circumstances or serious circumstances not listed here, it is necessary to discuss this in advance with the teacher and agree on an appropriate course of action.
English (minimum B1)
A selection from the following:
•Developing and consolidating communication competence in the academic environment
• Active use of academic and subject-specific vocabulary
• Building reading competence (authentic texts from the filed of humanities and social sciences)
• Work with model texts from humanities/social sciences
• Use of brainstorming
• Structuring and presenting arguments
• Text outline and keyword selection
• Structure of academic papers (introduction, core, conclusion)
• Transformation of graphs and diagrams into continuous text
• Transformation of continuous text into graphs and diagrams
• Hedging and its use in academic texts
• Questionnaire, survey report and research report
• How to prepare a survey
• Presentation techniques
• Preparation of a group presentation
• Discussion strategies
100/0
The student has aquired language skills that enable him to successfully communicate in the academic environment. These skills enhance his reading comprehension of various texts from the field of social sciences and humanities. The student is thus able to use information from sources writen in English, prepare a questionnaire and conduct a survey or a simple research (based on the needs of the discipline studied) and report on it in written as well as oral form. He can write selected academic texts using suitable academic vocabulary, incorporating techniques of outline and brainstorming when searching for a suitable topic. The student is able to participate in the preparation and delivery of group presentation on a subject-specific topic as well as participate in a discussion.
General
McCARTHY, M., O`DELL, F. Academic Vocabulary in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. ISBN 978-1-107-59166-0.
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. Selected topics from academic writing [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2022 [cit. 2022-01-01]. Available on: https://dspace.uniba.sk/xmlui/handle/123456789/43
Subject-specific
ELIAŠOVÁ, V. Marketing communication resource materials (for 2nd year students) [online]. Bratislava: Stimul , 2019 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_VE_MCRM.pdf
ELIAŠOVÁ, V.Journalism Resource Materials (for 2nd year students) [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2019 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_VE_JRM.pdf
LACÍKOVÁ-SERDULOVÁ, M. English for Students of Psychology 1 Collection of Study Material. [online]. Bratislava: Stimul , 2018 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_MLS_english_psychology_1.pdf
LACÍKOVÁ-SERDULOVÁ, M. English for Students of Social Sciences Collection of Study Material for Students of Cultural Studies, Ethnology, Sociology [online]. Bratislava: Stimul , 2019 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_MLS_EFSOSS.pdf
ŠIMKOVÁ, S. English for students of archaeology 1 - a textbook for university students. Bratislava: Comenius University, 2019. ISBN 978-80-223-4123-3.
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. ESP Reader for Students of Philosophy and Religious studies [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2019 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_DS_ESP_Reader_philosophy.pdf
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. Video-based Listening Tasks for ESP Classes. [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2018 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on intranet: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/UK/FIF_DS_video-based_ESP.pdf
ŠULOVSKÁ, D. Video-based listening tasks for ESP classes. Volume 2 [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2021 [cit. 2021-10-14]. Available on:
https://dspace.uniba.sk/handle/123456789/32
Moodle / MS TEAMS is a source for unpublished study materials (some ready for publishing) and teachers´ presentations. Supplementary literature may be introduced through the course of the semester.
a) Continuous assessment throughout the semester (45% ): written assignment - (30 points) and individual assignments for every seminar (15points)
b) Examination period (55%): presentation including discussion (50+5points)
Assessment:
100 % - 92 % - A, 91 % - 84 % - B, 83 % - 76 % - C, 75 % - 68 % - D, 67 %-60 % - E, 59 % and less – FX
2 absences with the proof of reason for non-attendance. In case of serious health problems, representation abroad, or other unforeseen circumstances or serious circumstances not listed here, it is necessary to discuss this in advance with the teacher and agree on an appropriate course of action.
English (minimum B1)
• Developing and consolidating communication competence in the academic environment
• Active use of subject-specific and academic vocabulary
• Developing reading competence (various texts from the field of humanities and social sciences)
• Work with model factual texts
• Writing selected academic texts (abstract, research report, etc.)
• Structure of an academic essay
• Preparing a presentation: selecting a suitable topic (brainstorming, group work)
• Preparing a presentation: hypothesis and research question
• Presentation skills, including slide preparation
• Presentation: preparation and delivery
• Participating in a discussion – useful strategies
• Active participation in the after-presentation discussion
50/50 (%)
The student actively uses the English language for communication in the academic environment. The level of achieved language competencies means that the student is able to obtain information from sources written in English (printed sources, electronic media) and work with them, building on the knowledge from his field of study. He is able to actively use academic and subject-specific vocabulary, independently prepare a suitably structured presentation on a topic from his field of study (including slides) using appropriate vocabulary. This means that he can present the results of his own research in a form that is suitable for the academic environment and actively participate in discussion. The student can write various academic texts using appropriate linguistic means. He follows the academic code of ethics (avoiding plagiarism, employing appropriate paraphrasing anf quotation techniques).
GRAEFEN, Gabriele, MOLL, Melanie. Wissenschaftssprache Deutsch: lesen-verstehen-schreiben.
Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag, 2011. ISBN 978-3-631-60948-4.
KANICHOVÁ, Renáta, PALLAY, Eduard, VLČKOVÁ, Veronika. Grammatik für
Humanwissenschaften ein Lehr- und Übungsbuch. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2011.
ISBN 978-80-223-2905-7.
KANICHOVÁ, Renáta, VLČKOVÁ, Veronika. Deutsch für Humanwissenschaften. Unicert ® III.
Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2011. ISBN 978-80-223-3010-7.
KANICHOVÁ, Renáta, VLČKOVÁ, Veronika. Deutsch für Humanwissenschaften 2. Unicert ®
III. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2014. ISBN 978-80-223-3753-3.
PERLMANN-BALME, Michaela, SCHWALB, Susanne, Dörte WEEERS. em-Brückenkurs
Deutsch als Fremdsprache für die Mittelstufe. Ismaning: Max Hueber, 2000. ISBN
3-19-001627-5.
Supplementary literature will be presented at the beginning and during the semester. Lecturer’s presentations will be available in MS Teams.
a) During the teaching part (continuous) 2 tests (70 points), presentation (30 points)
b) During the examination period: (0 points)
Rating scale:
100% - 91% - A, 90% - 81% - B, 80% - 73% - C, 72% - 66% - D, 65% - 60% - E, 59% and below - FX (student has not met the credit requirements)
The exact date and topics of the mid-term evaluation will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of earned points in the respective assessment item.
The lecturer will accept a maximum of 2 absences with documented evidence.
In justified cases (serious health problems, representation abroad, or other unforeseen circumstances), it is necessary to agree with the teacher on the possible assignment of alternative work and the subsequent recognition of the absence.
German at the level of (at least) B1 (the course is focused on working with professional literature in German)
Language training aimed at developing and consolidating communication competence (oral and written) in a specific segment of the professional sphere:
• University studies, its organization, self-study techniques, techniques of acquiring a foreigner language
• Study program, its contents, graduate profile, obtaining information about the field of study from foreign universities, comparison of studies in Slovakia and abroad (according to available information)
• Language and its conventions in everyday and academic environments
• Issues of factual texts - composition, styles, register
• Work with model factual texts with regard to the development of communication skills
• Lexical and grammatical means of factual text
• Summarization techniques, determining the main statements in the text
100 / 0
The students are able to report in a foreign language about university studies in Slovakia and its organization. The students are able to present their own study program, they can describe what their
application and motivation to study in a foreign language. The students know the techniques of summarizing texts and are able to summarize a shorter professional text and determine the main statements of the text. The students are able to actively use vocabulary specific to the given field of study and academic environment in general.
GRAEFEN, Gabriele, MOLL, Melanie. Wissenschaftssprache Deutsch: lesen-verstehen-schreiben. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag, 2011. ISBN 978-3-631-60948-4.
KANICHOVÁ, Renáta, PALLAY, Eduard, VLČKOVÁ, Veronika. Grammatik für Humanwissenschaften ein Lehr- und Übungsbuch. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2011. ISBN 978-80-223-2905-7.
KANICHOVÁ, Renáta, VLČKOVÁ, Veronika. Deutsch für Humanwissenschaften. Unicert ® III. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2011. ISBN 978-80-223-3010-7.
KANICHOVÁ, Renáta, VLČKOVÁ, Veronika. Deutsch für Humanwissenschaften 2. Unicert ® III. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2014. ISBN 978-80-223-3753-3.
PERLMANN-BALME, Michaela, SCHWALB, Susanne, Dörte WEEERS. em-Brückenkurs Deutsch als Fremdsprache für die Mittelstufe. Ismaning: Max Hueber, 2000. ISBN 3-19-001627-5.
Supplementary literature will be presented at the beginning and during the semester. Lecturer’s presentations will be available in MS Teams.
a) During the teaching part (continuous) 2 tests (70 points), presentation (30 points)
b) During the examination period: (0 points)
Rating scale:
100% - 91% - A, 90% - 81% - B, 80% - 73% - C, 72% - 66% - D, 65% - 60% - E, 59% and below - FX (student has not met the credit requirements)
The exact date and topics of the mid-term evaluation will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of earned points in the respective assessment item.
The lecturer will accept a maximum of 2 absences with documented evidence.
In justified cases (serious health problems, representation abroad, or other unforeseen circumstances), it is necessary to agree with the teacher on the possible assignment of alternative work and the subsequent recognition of the absence.
German at the level of (at least) B1 (the course is focused on working with professional literature in German)
Language training aimed at developing and consolidating communication competence (oral and written) in a specific segment of the professional sphere:
• Developing reading competence
• Professional terminology and its use
• Familiarization with some qualitative and quantitative scientific methods relevant to the field of study
• Transformation of texts into graphs, description of the graph
• Text-making procedures and their use in the practice of writing short professional texts (e.g., enumeration and comparative-contrast texts)
• Recognition of the main arguments used in professional texts
• Argument-based opinion
100/0
The students have key language resources, know the styles and genres to successfully accomplish processes of foreign language communication (oral and written) in a specific professional sphere, which is presented by vocational training in higher education. The students are able to transform the information obtained by studying the literature into a graph or other forms of visualizations and vice versa, they can describe diagrams or graphs. They know qualitative and quantitative research methods. They can recognize the main arguments presented in shorter professional texts. The students can substantiate their arguments in the discussion.
GRAEFEN, Gabriele, MOLL, Melanie. Wissenschaftssprache Deutsch: lesen-verstehen-schreiben. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag, 2011. ISBN 978-3-631-60948-4.
KANICHOVÁ, Renáta, PALLAY, Eduard, VLČKOVÁ, Veronika. Grammatik für Humanwissenschaften ein Lehr- und Übungsbuch. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2011. ISBN 978-80-223-2905-7.
KANICHOVÁ, Renáta, VLČKOVÁ, Veronika. Deutsch für Humanwissenschaften. Unicert ® III. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2011. ISBN 978-80-223-3010-7.
KANICHOVÁ, Renáta, VLČKOVÁ, Veronika. Deutsch für Humanwissenschaften 2. Unicert ® III. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2014. ISBN 978-80-223-3753-3.
PERLMANN-BALME, Michaela, SCHWALB, Susanne, Dörte WEEERS. em-Brückenkurs Deutsch als Fremdsprache für die Mittelstufe. Ismaning: Max Hueber, 2000. ISBN 3-19-001627-5.
Supplementary literature will be presented at the beginning and during the semester. Lecturer’s presentations will be available in MS Teams.
a) During the teaching part (continuous) 2 tests (70 points), presentation (30 points)
b) During the examination period: (0 points)
Rating scale:
100% - 91% - A, 90% - 81% - B, 80% - 73% - C, 72% - 66% - D, 65% - 60% - E, 59% and below - FX (student has not met the credit requirements)
The exact date and topics of the mid-term evaluation will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of earned points in the respective assessment item.
The lecturer will accept a maximum of 2 absences with documented evidence.
In justified cases (serious health problems, representation abroad, or other unforeseen circumstances), it is necessary to agree with the teacher on the possible assignment of alternative work and the subsequent recognition of the absence.
German at the level of (at least) B1 (the course is focused on working with professional literature in German)
Language training aimed at developing and consolidating communication competence (oral and written) in a specific segment of the professional sphere:
• Developing and consolidating communication competence in the academic environment
• Active use of professional vocabulary
• Basics of citation and paraphrasing
• Practical use of citations and paraphrases
• Plagiarism and academic ethics
• Identification of definitions in texts and rules of their use, formulation of definitions with the help of professional literature
• Formulation of constructive feedback
• Presentation techniques I.
100/0
The students have key language resources, know the styles and genres to successfully accomplish processes of foreign language communication (oral and written) in a specific professional sphere, which is presented by vocational training in higher education. They are able to work with definitions and, with the help of the literature, to define terms by reference to the literature. The students are able to obtain information for their own paper from the literature and to cite and paraphrase the source. The students are able to report on the role of their study program in society. They know how to express feedback constructively.
GRAEFEN, Gabriele, MOLL, Melanie. Wissenschaftssprache Deutsch: lesen-verstehen-schreiben. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag, 2011. ISBN 978-3-631-60948-4.
KANICHOVÁ, Renáta, PALLAY, Eduard, VLČKOVÁ, Veronika. Grammatik für Humanwissenschaften ein Lehr- und Übungsbuch. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2011. ISBN 978-80-223-2905-7.
KANICHOVÁ, Renáta, VLČKOVÁ, Veronika. Deutsch für Humanwissenschaften. Unicert ® III. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2011. ISBN 978-80-223-3010-7.
KANICHOVÁ, Renáta, VLČKOVÁ, Veronika. Deutsch für Humanwissenschaften 2. Unicert ® III. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2014. ISBN 978-80-223-3753-3.
PERLMANN-BALME, Michaela, SCHWALB, Susanne, Dörte WEEERS. em-Brückenkurs Deutsch als Fremdsprache für die Mittelstufe. Ismaning: Max Hueber, 2000. ISBN 3-19-001627-5.
Supplementary literature will be presented at the beginning and during the semester. Lecturer’s presentations will be available in MS Teams.
a) During the teaching part (continuous) 1 written project (30 points), continuous tasks (20 points)
b) During the examination period: 1 presentation of the project (35 points), 1 discussion for own presentation and active participation in colleagues' discussions (15 points)
Rating scale:
100% - 91% - A, 90% - 81% - B, 80% - 73% - C, 72% - 66% - D, 65% - 60% - E, 59% and below - FX (student has not met the credit requirements)
The exact date and topics of the mid-term evaluation will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of earned points in the respective assessment item.
The lecturer will accept a maximum of 2 absences with documented evidence.
In justified cases (serious health problems, representation abroad, or other unforeseen circumstances), it is necessary to agree with the teacher on the possible assignment of alternative work and the subsequent recognition of the absence.
German at the level of (at least) B1 (the course is focused on working with professional literature in German)
Language training aimed at developing and consolidating communication competence (oral and written) in a specific segment of the professional sphere:
• Preparation of the presentation: selection of a suitable professional topic
• Literature search and its subsequent study
• Structure and presentation of arguments
• Outline text and keyword selection
• Structure of professional work (abstract, keywords, introduction, core, conclusion)
• Presentation techniques II.
• Presentation of research data and research results
• Active participation in a simulated student conference
50/50
The students have key language resources, know the styles and genres to successfully accomplish processes of foreign language communication (oral and written) in a specific professional sphere, which is presented by vocational training in higher education. The students are able to prepare presentations on the chosen professional topics. They are able to substantiate their claims with arguments from studied literature, or own research. They can ask questions and lead a discussion with classmates.
BUSCHA, Anne a Szilvia SZITA. Begegnungen – Sprachniveau A1+. Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Integriertes Kurs- und Arbeitsbuch. Leipzig: Schubert-Verlag, 2013. ISBN 978-3-929526-86-8.
LINGEA. Nemecko-slovenský, slovensko-nemecký veľký slovník. Bratislava: Lingea, 2008. ISBN 978-80-89323-08-1.
SCHANEN, Francois. Grammatik Deutsch als Fremdsprache. München: Iudicium, 1995. ISBN 3-89129-262-7.
SCHMOHL, Sabrina. Akademie Deutsch A1+ Deutsch als Fremdsprache ; Intensivlehrwerk mit Audios online Bd. 1. München: Hueber, 2020. ISBN 978-3-19-101650-0.
SCHMOHL, Sabrina. Akademie Deutsch A1+ Deutsch als Fremdsprache ; Zusatzmaterial mit Audios online Bd. 1. München: Hueber, 2020. ISBN 978-3-19-111650-7.
Supplementary literature will be presented at the beginning and during the semester. Unpublished materials of the lecturers, as well as other selected professional texts will be available in MS Teams.
Course requirements:
a) Continuous - 2 tests on the material covered (70%) and smaller written assignments or tests on vocabulary and grammar (30%)
b) Exam period: 0%
Grading scale:
100% – 91% - A, 90% – 81% - B, 80% – 73% - C, 72% – 66% - D, 65%– 60% - E, 59%
and below - FX (student has not met the credit requirements)
The exact date and topics of the midterm evaluation will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Violation of academic ethics will result in the cancellation of the points earned in the respective assessment item.
The lecturer will accept a maximum of 4 absences with documented evidence.
In justified cases (serious health problems, representation abroad, or other unforeseen circumstances), it is necessary to agree with the teacher on the possible assignment of alternative work and the subsequent recognition of the absence.
Slovak/ English
No prior knowledge of the German language is required to enrol in the course.
Selected topics:
• Basics of German pronunciation
• Introducing oneself, simple conversations with a partner
• Occupations
• Family
• Office I.
• Office II.
• Hobby and leisure
• Daily schedule
• Food and drinks
• Transport in the city
• Leisure I.
• Leisure time II.
100/ 0
Upon successful completion of the course, students have lexical and grammatical language skills at the A1.1 level of the European Framework of Reference for Languages. Students understand basic information in the target language, if clearly and simply formulated; in oral speech, if delivered slowly, clearly and without using any dialect. Students understand simple questions in the foreign language on topics that are related to their person, background, or to other everyday topics already covered (shopping, travelling, finding accommodation). Students are able to answer these questions using language means they have already acquired. Students can fill in application forms in hotels and other institutions.
BUSCHA, Anne a Szilvia SZITA. Begegnungen – Sprachniveau A1+. Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Integriertes Kurs- und Arbeitsbuch. Leipzig: Schubert-Verlag, 2013. ISBN 978-3-929526-86-8.
LINGEA. Nemecko-slovenský, slovensko-nemecký veľký slovník. Bratislava: Lingea, 2008. ISBN 978-80-89323-08-1.
SCHANEN, Francois. Grammatik Deutsch als Fremdsprache. München: Iudicium, 1995. ISBN 3-89129-262-7.
SCHMOHL, Sabrina. Akademie Deutsch A1+ Deutsch als Fremdsprache ; Intensivlehrwerk mit Audios online Bd. 1. München: Hueber, 2020. ISBN 978-3-19-101650-0.
SCHMOHL, Sabrina. Akademie Deutsch A1+ Deutsch als Fremdsprache ; Zusatzmaterial mit Audios online Bd. 1. München: Hueber, 2020. ISBN 978-3-19-111650-7.
Supplementary literature will be presented at the beginning and during the semester. Unpublished materials of the lecturers, as well as other selected professional texts will be available in MS Teams.
a) Continuous - 2 tests on the material covered (60%) and smaller written assignments or tests on vocabulary and grammar (25%), presentation (15%)
b) Exam period: 0%
The exact date and topics of the midterm evaluation will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Violation of academic ethics will result in the cancellation of the points earned in the respective assessment item.
Grading scale:
100% – 91% - A, 90% – 81% - B, 80% – 73% - C, 72% – 66% - D, 65%– 60% - E, 59%
and below - FX (student has not met the credit requirements)
The lecturer will accept a maximum of 4 absences with documented evidence.
In justified cases (serious health problems, representation abroad, or other unforeseen circumstances), it is necessary to agree with the teacher on the possible assignment of alternative work and the subsequent recognition of the absence.
Slovak/ English
The course requires German language proficiency at A 1.1 level.
Selected topics:
• Orientation in the city
• Housing - description of the house/apartment
• Holidays, problems with accommodation
• Calendar, dates and appointment planning
• Life goals - studies and careers
• At the doctor's I - the human body
• At the doctor's II - diseases
• Description of the person and his/her character
• Household duties and their division in the family
• Social rules: what (not) to do
• Clothes
• Weather
• Holidays and their celebration
100/ 0
Upon successful completion of the course, students have lexical and grammatical language skills at the A1.2 level of the European Framework of Reference for Languages. Students understand basic information in the target language and are able to react in situations related to the topics covered, such as work life, leisure time, social life. Students have knowledge of selected cultural phenomena typical for German-speaking countries (e.g. celebration of important holidays). Students are able to summarize in writing and orally how holidays are celebrated in their family.
Students are able to present complaints related to their accommodation and summarise them in a formal letter/email. They can lead a monologue about their future goals. Students are able to describe their housing and are able to describe a person's appearance as weel as his/her internal characteristics.
BRÜSEKE, Rolf. Starten wir! Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Kursbuch. Teil: A2. München: Hueber, 2018. ISBN 978-3-19-046000-7.
ENGEL, Ulrich a Rozemaria TERTEL. Kommunikative Grammatik Deutsch als Fremdsprache die Regeln der deutschen Gebrauchssprache in 30 gemeinverständlichen Kapiteln. München: Iudicium, 1993. ISBN 3-89129-253-8.
LINGEA. Nemecko-slovenský, slovensko-nemecký veľký slovník. Bratislava: Lingea, 2008. ISBN 978-80-89323-08-1.
SCHMOHL, Sabrina. Akademie Deutsch A2+ Deutsch als Fremdsprache ; Intensivlehrwerk mit Audios online Bd. 2. München: Hueber, 2020. ISBN 978-3-19-121650-4.
SCHMOHL, Sabrina. Akademie Deutsch A2+ Deutsch als Fremdsprache ; Zusatzmaterial mit Audios online Bd. 2. München: Hueber, 2020. ISBN 978-3-19-131650-1.
Supplementary literature will be presented at the beginning and during the semester. Unpublished materials of the lecturers, as well as other selected professional texts will be available in MS Teams.
a) Continuous - 2 tests on the material covered (50%) and smaller written assignments or tests on vocabulary and grammar (30%), presentation (20%)
b) Exam period: 0%
The exact date and topics of the midterm evaluation will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Grading scale:
100% – 91% - A, 90% – 81% - B, 80% – 73% - C, 72% – 66% - D, 65%– 60% - E, 59%
and below - FX (student has not met the credit requirements)
Violation of academic ethics will result in the cancellation of the points earned in the respective assessment item.
The lecturer will accept a maximum of 4 absences with documented evidence.
In justified cases (serious health problems, representation abroad, or other unforeseen circumstances), it is necessary to agree with the teacher on the possible assignment of alternative work and the subsequent recognition of the absence.
The course requires German language proficiency at A 1.2 level.
Selected topics:
• Occupation and family
• Housing
• Tourism
• Sports
• Health and illnesses
• Work life
• Shopping
• Sightseeing
• Culture
• In the restaurant
• The most important cities in German-speaking countries
• Corporate communication
100/ 0
Upon successful completion of the course, students have lexical and grammatical language skills at the A2.1 level of the European Framework of Reference for Languages.
Students have knowledge of selected cities in German-speaking countries and are able to present their own city and living in Slovakia, as well as the cultural events of a given city. Students are able to explain to a doctor what health problems they suffer from. Students know the basic rules of synchronous and asynchronous corporate communication in German-speaking teams (making phone calls, formulating emails, etc.).
BRÜSEKE, Rolf. Starten wir! Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Kursbuch. Teil: A2. München: Hueber, 2018. ISBN 978-3-19-046000-7.
ENGEL, Ulrich a Rozemaria TERTEL. Kommunikative Grammatik Deutsch als Fremdsprache die Regeln der deutschen Gebrauchssprache in 30 gemeinverständlichen Kapiteln. München: Iudicium, 1993. ISBN 3-89129-253-8.
LINGEA. Nemecko-slovenský, slovensko-nemecký veľký slovník. Bratislava: Lingea, 2008. ISBN 978-80-89323-08-1.
SCHMOHL, Sabrina. Akademie Deutsch A2+ Deutsch als Fremdsprache ; Intensivlehrwerk mit Audios online Bd. 2. München: Hueber, 2020. ISBN 978-3-19-121650-4.
SCHMOHL, Sabrina. Akademie Deutsch A2+ Deutsch als Fremdsprache ; Zusatzmaterial mit Audios online Bd. 2. München: Hueber, 2020. ISBN 978-3-19-131650-1.
Supplementary literature will be presented at the beginning and during the semester. Unpublished materials of the lecturers, as well as other selected professional texts will be available in MS Teams.
a) Continuous - 2 tests on the material covered (50%) and smaller written assignments or tests on vocabulary and grammar (30%), presentation (20%)
b) Exam period: 0%
The exact date and topics of the midterm evaluation will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Grading scale:
100% – 91% - A, 90% – 81% - B, 80% – 73% - C, 72% – 66% - D, 65%– 60% - E, 59% and below - FX (student has not met the credit requirements)
Violation of academic ethics will result in the cancellation of the points earned in the respective assessment item.
The lecturer will accept a maximum of 4 absences with documented evidence.
In justified cases (serious health problems, representation abroad, or other unforeseen circumstances), it is necessary to agree with the teacher on the possible assignment of alternative work and the subsequent recognition of the absence.
The course requires German language proficiency at A 2.1 level.
Selected topics:
• Speech and learning
• Mail, communication, intercultural communication
• Media
• Books and print
• Selected historical events in German-speaking countries
• Cultural events
• Travel and transport
• In the hotel
• Weather and climate
• Mobility and transport
• Study and occupation
• Working abroad
100/ 0
Upon successful completion of the course, students have lexical and grammatical language skills at the A2.2 level of the European Framework of Reference for Languages.
Students are familiar with cultural differences important for communication with German-speaking partners. Students are able to conduct longer monologues on topics that are familiar to them (family, occupation, studies, hobbies) and also hold conversations on these topics. Students are able to further develop the conversation, not just answer questions. Students are able to summarise their experiences or the content of texts in oral and written form. Students are familiar with selected milestones in the history of German-speaking countries.
KICZKOVÁ, Zuzana. Rod vo feministickom diskurze. In: Kiczková, Zuzana, Szapuová, Mariana (eds.). Rodové štúdiá. Súčasné diskusie, problémy a perspektívy. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2011, s. 32-53. ISBN 978-80-223-2934-7.
SZAPUOVÁ, Mariana. Podoby feminizmu: pohľady do dejín feministického myslenia a ženského hnutia. In: Kiczková, Zuzana, Szapuová, Mariana (eds.). Rodové štúdiá. Súčasné diskusie, problémy a perspektívy. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2011, s. 98- 122. ISBN 978-80-223-2934-7.
BELL, Hooks: Feminizmus do vrecka. O zanietených politikách. Bratislava: Aspekt 2013. ISBN 978-80-8151-009-0.
OAKLEYOVÁ, Anna. Pohlaví, gender a splečnost. Praha: Portál, 2000. ISBN 80-7178-403-6
KICZKOVÁ, Zuzana, SZAPUOVÁ, Mariana. Materstvo ako téma feministického skúmania. In: Kiczková, Zuzana, Szapuová, Mariana (eds.). Rodové štúdiá. Súčasné diskusie, problémy a perspektívy. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2011, s. 209- 226. ISBN 978-80-223-2934-7.
KICZKOVÁ, Zuzana, SZAPUOVÁ, Mariana.Muži, otcovia a rodová rovnosť. In: . In: Kiczková, Zuzana, Szapuová, Mariana (eds.). Rodové štúdiá. Súčasné diskusie, problémy a perspektívy. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2011, s. 226 248. ISBN 978-80-223-2934-7.
Preliminary evaluation during the instruction period: presentation of one selected topic in form of report (30 points)
In the examination period: colloquial exam consisting of the presentation and defence of a written thesis (40 points)
The condition for admission to the exam is the scoring of min. 10 points from the preliminary assessment. Violation of academic ethics may result in the cancellation of the points scored in the relevant assessment item.
Grading scale:
A: 70-65, B: 64-59, C: 58-53, D: 52-47, E: 46-42, Fx: 41-0. Maximum 2 justified absences are accepted.
The exact date and topic of the preliminary assessment will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Dates of examination will be published via AIS no later than the last week of the instruction period.
Slovak, Czech (receptive acquaintance)
1. Basic concepts of gender studies (sex and gender, power and patriarchy).
2. Feminist theories as the theoretical and methodological basis of gender studies.
3. The development of feminist thought and the women's movement.
4. Gender roles and gender stereotypes, their structure and functioning.
5. Gender socialization and gender-sensitive education.
6. Gender structure of society, public and private spheres.
7. Issues of gender in/equality, women in the labour market.
8. Violence against women as gender-based violence.
9. Motherhood as a topic in feminist theory. Men, fathers and gender equality.
10. Reproductive rights and women's reproductive health.
11. Gender and science.
43%/ 57%
After successfully completing the course, students have knowledge of the basic topics of gender studies as an academic discipline and are familiar with its conceptual apparatus. They know feminist theories as the theoretical and methodological basis of gender studies. They understand the key issues in gender studies and the different ways of thematising them. They are able to navigate different concepts and critically reflect on current issues related to gender and gender relations.
1. BLINKA, Lukas. Online závislosti. Praha, 2016. ISBN 9788024753119. Dostupné tiež ako Google Books.
2. KALAŠ, Ivan et al. Digitálne technológie a zásahy do vyučovania [online]. Bratislava: Štátny pedagogický ústav 2020 [cit. 2020-12-18]. Available at: https://www.statpedu.sk/files/sk/o-organizacii/projekty/projekt-dvui/publikacie/dt_a_zasady_do_vyucovania.pdf
3. KREJČÍ, Matěj. DigiDetox: Jak na digitální minimalismus. Pointa, 2019. ISBN 9788088335429. Dostupné tiež ako Google Books.
4. REDECKER, Christine a Yves PUNIE. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu [online]. © European union 2017 [cit. 2021-12-09]. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/fcc33b68-d581-11e7-a5b9-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
5. VUORIKARI Riina, PUNIE Yves a Marcelino CABRERA. Emerging technologies and the teaching profession: Ethical and pedagogical considerations based on near-future scenarios [online]. © European union 2020 [cit. 2021-12-09]. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c72792a7-084f-11eb-a511-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-245503364
a) during the semester: a paper about a selected issue in the field of digital literacy in education (35 points): for example: integration of digital technologies into the approval course, risks of integration of digital technologies into education, digital literacy of the teacher within the course, digital assessment in the approval course, etc. (7 pages; 12,600 characters); b) methodological sheet (+ worksheet), which integrates digital technology and digital tools into the teaching unit (15 points).
Violation of academic ethics will be punished, and the student will lose all the received points in the relevant assessment.
Grading scale:
0-59%-FX, 60-67%-E, 68-75%-D, 76-83%-C, 84-91%-B, 92-100%-A
The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation.
The exact date for continuous evaluation and the topic of the paper will be announced at the beginning of the semester. The dates for the final test will be announced through AIS no later than in the last week of the instruction period.
Languages necessary to complete the course: Slovak
1. Digital technologies, media and people, paradigms of generations X, Y, Z, M, M2, Alpha, ... in the context of education and literacy.
2. Technology in school: laptops, tablets and interactive whiteboards in the classroom: ideals vs. fact, benefits vs. risks, effects of technologies on teaching processes. Multitasking as a phenomenon vs. education.
3. Google – Myths, and Risks. Psycho-social risks of the online environment – online identity, online communication vs. face to face, collaboration and social networks vs. education.
4. Digital security and education. Digital identity, digital footprint, personal digital environment of the student / teacher. Critical evaluation of the digital environment.
5. Technophilia, digital addictions and virtual drugs, manifestations in relation to education. Prevention, diagnostics, and solutions (in the school environment). Digital hygiene, digital minimalism, digital diet and digi-detox.
6. Game literacy, gamification of education.
7. Cyberplagiarism vs. pupil education and development. Digital, information, media literacy vs. reading literacy.
8. Models, digital literacy standards vs. education (according to UNESCO and OECD). Conflicts between DT skills requirements of teachers.
9. Ethical aspects of the balance between human autonomy and the machines involved in education, datafication of educational and pedagogical models, which are the basis of educational applications and services.
10. Connectivism, constructivism and digital didactics. Design of a teaching process integrating DT (digital content, digital methods and tools, digital outputs, digital assessment).
11. Types of students, learning styles, student motivation and teaching styles in the context of digital education and digital tools.
100/0
After successfully completing the course, the student has knowledge of the basic frameworks and models of digital literacy of students and teachers. The student has knowledge of the basic aspects of the use of digital technologies in educational processes. The student is able to evaluate the positives and negatives of the integration of digital technologies into education and know the basic problems that digital technologies bring in the educational environment. The student is able to diagnose difficulties and knows the tools for solving the negative effects of DT, which are manifested in students' behaviour. The student has knowledge of the ethical aspects of artificial intelligence in educational processes and the reserves of datafication of education. The student is knowing the strategies of integration of digital technologies into teaching with regard to constructivism and connectivism. The student is able to use the knowledge of digital didactics and design of teaching, integrating DT in the context of students' competencies. The student is able to create methodological tools integrating DT.
ČAPKOVÁ, Dagmar. Myslitelsko-vychovatelský odkaz J. A .Komenského. Praha: Academia, 1987.
ČAPKOVÁ, Dagmar. Učiteľ učiteľov. J. A. Komenský a učiteľská profesia. Bratislava: SPN, 1992.
KOMENSKÝ, Jan Amos. Vševýchova (Pampedia). Bratislava: Národné osvetové centrum, 1992
KOMENSKÝ, Jan Amos. Veľká didaktika. Bratislava: SPN, 1991.
KOMENSKÝ, Jan Amos. Opera didactica omnia/www.digitalniknihovna.cz
* additional literature will be added at the beginning or during the semester.
During the semester, the student chooses the topic of the paper / presentation (20%), continuously reads and analyzes the recommended literature (30%), at the end of the semester the student attends an oral colloquium (50%).
The condition for completing the course is to achieve min. 50% of the ongoing evaluation.
Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of the percentages obtained in the relevant evaluation item.
The rating is given on a scale:
A (100-91%, excellent - excellent results),
B (90-81%, very good - above average standard),
C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work),
D (72-66%, satisfactory - acceptable results),
E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria),
Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required)
The condition for meeting the criteria for passing the course is to achieve min. 60% of the total interim evaluation.
Min. 2 justified absences.
Violation of academic ethics will result in the cancellation of the ongoing evaluation.
The exact dates of the mid-term evaluation as well as the topics will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Weight of the intermediate / final evaluation: 100/0
slovak
1. Historical-socio-cultural conditions of the 17th century.
2. Biography of J. A. Comenius.
3. Pansoficko - educational system of J. A. Komenský
4. PANSOPHIA paradigm
5. Wandering through the labyrinth of the world and the paradise of the heart
6. The idea of lifelong learning in the work of J. A. Comenius
7. Analysis of the most important pedagogical works (Orbis Pictus, Kindergarten Informatics).
8. Analysis of the most important pedagogical works (Great Didactics, Pampedia).
9. Analysis of the most important pedagogical works (General discourse on the correction of human affairs)
10. J. A. Komenský and Slovakia. Comenius textbooks used in Hungary.
11. Comenius' requirements for the teacher's personality.
12. Contribution of J. A. Comenius to educational theory.
100/0
Upon successful completion of the course, the student has knowledge of the life and work of J. A. Comenius. He can name broader historical contexts in the context of which his most important pedagogical works were created. He has a basic knowledge of the most important works and can justify the importance and influence of Comenius' ideas in today's concepts of education. Can assess the value of Comenius' concept of lifelong learning.
HOŘÍNEK, Zdeněk. Dráma, divadlo, divák. Bratislava: Tatran, 1985.
LUKEŠ, Milan. Umění dramatu. Praha: Melantrich, 1987.
MISTRÍK, Jozef. Dramatický text. Bratislava: SPN, 1978.
MRLIAN, Rudolf (Ed.). Teória dramatických umení. Bratislava: Tatran, 1979.
PAVIS, Patrice. Divadelný slovník. Bratislava: Divadelný ústav, 2004. ISBN 8088987245.
SZONDI, Peter. Dejiny modernej drámy. Bratislava: Tatran, 1969.
100% continuous (10% participation, 30% test 1, 30% test 2, 30% written drama / report analysis; in parts with 30 points, a minimum gain of 18 points is a condition)
Two absences per semester are allowed without excuse. Other absences can only be justified on the basis of confirmation (eg medical reasons). Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of points earned in the relevant item.
Overall course evaluation:
100 - 93 = A, 92 - 85 = B, 84 - 77 = C, 76 - 69 = D, 68 - 61 = E, 60 and less = Fx
1. Drama - general characteristics, basic division.
2. Drama between literature and theater.
3. Dramatic genres.
4. Dramatic text - general characteristics, classification.
5. Monologue and dialogue, monologue and dialog.
6. Dramatic character.
7. - 8. Dramatic motive / situation. Dramatic story and its stages. Fabula and sujet in drama. Dramatic conflict and tension.
9. Time and space in drama.
10. - 11. Overview of drama development (optional).
12. - 13. Production and its components. Theater performance. Sociology of theater.
Note: the exact program of seminars will be specified at the beginning of the semester.
100 / 0
After completing the course, students will gain knowledge of the basics of drama theory and knowledge about the transformation of drama poetics. Based on this knowledge, they will be able to analyze and interpret dramatic texts from different periods.
POKORNÝ, Milan - POKORNÁ, Dana: Redakční práce. Jak připravit text k publikování. Praha: Grada Publishing, a. s., 2011, ISBN 978-80-247-3773-7.
VAŠÁK, Pavel a kol.: Textologie a ediční praxe. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, 1993.
Kol.: Editor a text. Úvod do praktické textologie. Praha: Československý spisovatel, 1971.
Korekturní znaménka pro sazbu. Pravidla používání. ČSN 880410.
http://old.typo.cz/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/korektorske-znacky.pdf
https://docplayer.cz/1944808-12-korekturni-znamenka-pro-sazbu-typografie.html
Pravidlá písania a úpravy písomností. Slovenská technická norma STN 016910. Bratislava : Slovenský ústav technickej normalizácie, 2011. Dostupné na: https://www.tezaurus.sk/stn_01_6910.pdf.
Pravidlá slovenského pravopisu. Bratislava: Veda, 2000. ISBN 80-224-0655-4. Dostupné na: https://www.juls.savba.sk/ediela/psp2000/psp.pdf.
The course is completed by continuous assessment, part of the evaluation is the continuous elaboration of practically oriented editorial exercises and tasks during the semester and the final test at the end of the teaching part of the semester to verify knowledge and skills related to editorial and editorial work. In all parts of the evaluation, the student must achieve at least 60 percent success. Academic integrity violations will not be tolerated and will result in loosing the achieved points.
Classification scale:
A: 100% - 93%
B: 92% - 85%
C: 84% - 77%
D: 76% - 69%
E: 68% - 60%
FX: 59% - 0%
Slovak
Basics of editorial work;
Editing stages of text preparation;
Typographic standards;
Proofreading marks;
Linguistic and typographic proofreading of text and their principles; the most common text editing errors
Specifics of editorial editing of literary (artistic) text, scientific and professional text, popular science text and translation text;
Creation of registers, accompanying texts (editorial note, glossary of terms, explanations, note-taking apparatus, list of pictures and graphs), creation of covers;
Creation of introductory pages and imprint page of the publication (mention of authorship and copyright, publication of publishing data, ISBN and ISSN);
Specifics of editorial processing of periodical and non-periodical publications.
After completing the course, students will acquire basic theoretical knowledge and practical skills necessary for the editorial processing of texts of diverse character and focus (scientific and professional texts, popular science texts, literary texts, translation texts) and editorial work.
LOTMAN, Michajlovič Jurij. Semiotika filmu a problémy filmovej estetiky. Bratislava: Slovenský filmový ústav, 2008. ISBN 978-80-85187-51-9.
MACEK, Václav, PAŠTÉKOVÁ, Jelena. Dejiny slovenskej kinematografie 1896-1969. Bratislava: Slovenský filmový ústav, 2016. ISBN 978-80-85739-68-8.
PAŠTEKA, Július. Slovenská dramatika v epoche realizmu. Bratislava: Tatran, 1990. ISBN 80-222-0185-5.
STADTRUCKER, Ivan. Dejiny slovenskej televízie. Náčrt vývojových tendencií kultúrotvornej inštitúcie (1956 - 1989). Bratislava: Perfekt, 2015. ISBN 978-80-8046-738-8.
ŠVEC, Štefan. Gramatika filmového jazyka. Bratislava: Vysoká škola múzických umení, 2011. ISBN 978-80-89437-24-9.
The course is completed by continuous evaluation. Required: active participation in the seminar (50% of the evaluation); test or seminar work (50% of evaluation). In all parts of the evaluation, students have to achieve at least 60 percent success. The exact date and topics of the mid-term evaluation will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Classification scale:
A: 100% - 94%
B: 93% - 86%
C: 85% - 78%
D: 77% - 70%
E: 69% - 60%
Fx: 59% - 0%
Absences: More than 2 absences: it is required to report the reason of absence (for example proof of sickness) to the study department FiFUK. Academic integrity violations will not be tolerated and will result in loosing the achieved points.
Slovak
1. Film and literature
2. Zemianska česť (film screening)
3. Comparison of "Reštavrácia" by J. Kalinčiak with the film adaptation
4. Dobrodružstvo pri obžinkoch (film screening)
5. Comparison of "Dobrodružstvo pri obžinkoch" by J. Palárik with the television adaptation
6. Letiace tiene (film screening)
7. Comparison of "Letiace tiene" by S. H. Vajanský with the film adaptation
8. Neprebudený (film screening)
9. Comparison of "Neprebudený" by M. Kukučín with the film adaptation
10. Ženský zákon (film screening)
11. Comparison of "Ženský zákon" by J. G. Tajovský with the television adaptation
12. Rysavá jalovica (film screening)
100/0
Students will be able to determine the adaptation strategy of a film and identify the semiotic correlation between literary work and motion picture.
1. BAUMAN, Zygmunt a Tim MAY. Myslet sociologicky. Netradiční uvedení do sociologie. Praha: SLON, 2004. ISBN 80-86429-28-8.
2. BERGER, Peter L. Pozvání do sociologie. Humanistická perspektiva. Praha: Barrister and Principal, 2007. ISBN 978-80-870-2910-7
3. GIDDENS, Anthony. Sociologie. Praha: Argo, 1999. ISBN 80-7203-124-4.
4. JANDOUREK, Jan: Úvod so sociologie.Praha: Portál 2003.ISBN 8071787493
5. KELLER, Jan. Úvod do sociologie. Praha: SLON, 2005. ISBN 80-86429-30-3.
6. Kniha sociologie. Praha: Universum, 2016. ISBN 978-80-242-5395-4.
7. PETRUSEK, Miloslav. Základy sociologie. Praha: AVP, 2009. ISBN 978-80-872-0702-4.
The literature is supplemented in syllabus to individual topics of the subject.
60% mastery of the written exam at the end of the course
Classification scale: 100-93: A 91-84: B 83-76: C 75-69: D 68-61: E 60-0: FX
The teacher accepts max. 2 absences with proven documents.
The course and the specification of the final exam will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
slovak
1. Introduction to sociology, structure of sociology, basic approaches
2. Development of modern society through the eyes of a sociologist and current social trends
3. Family as an institution and family behavior - current characteristics and problems
4. Culture, society and the individual - the process of socialization and enculturation, current problems of clash of cultures
5. Social stratification of society and social inequalities
6. Dimensions of social inequalities and their manifestations in different areas of life
7. Social deviations and social norms
8. Social control and social sanctions
9. Political system of society - main institutions and processes
10. Economic system of society - main institutions and processes
11. Basic cognitive strategies of sociological research and specifics of sociological research
12. Principles of questionnaire creation and question formulation - practical application
0/100
Students will get acquainted with and understand the subject and focus of sociology and the basics of sociological cognition through the presentation of selected key problem areas in the field of sociology. They will gain knowledge about the structure and functioning of the company, its basic institutions and processes. understand the determinants of the social behavior of individuals and groups and the interconnectedness of social phenomena. They will acquire the ability to understand the contexts of social life and to be able to apply them appropriately in various areas of future professional activity.
All approved course books for teaching English as a foreign language
Inovovaný ŠVP pre 2. stupeň ZŠ (National Curriculum for Primary Schools)
Inovovaný ŠVP pre gymnáziá so štvorročným a päťročným vzdelávacím programom. (National Curriculum for 4- and 5-year Secondary Schools) Available: https://www.statpedu.sk/sk/svp/inovovany-statny-vzdelavaci-program/.
Školský vzdelávací program cvičnej školy (Curriculum of the mentoring school)
Vnútorný poriadok školy (Policy guidelines of the mentoring school)
KOSOVÁ, B. – TOMENGOVÁ, A.: Profesijná praktická príprava budúcich učiteľov. Banská Bystrica: Belianum, 2015, ISBN 978-80-557-0860-7. Available: https://www.minedu.sk/data/att/8032.pdf
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion Volume [online]. Council of Europe Publishing: Strasbourg, 2020. ISBN 978-92-871-8621-8. Available: https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/home
STEYNE, Linda M. English as a Foreign Language Student Teaching Practicums Handbook [online]. 2021. Available: https://liveuniba-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/steyne1_uniba_sk/Edet1FSx5ihBndR7ow28HH4Bku_-suPQ9RC-44F0Oj40pw?e=uwoQre
Fif KAA/A-buAN-301/15 Introduction to English Language Teaching
60% Observing all 10 lessons
15% Completed observation worksheets
25% Reflection paper
Marking scale:
A – 92 to 100%
B – 84 to 91%
C – 76 to 83%
D – 69 to 75%
E – 60 to 68%
FX (fail, no credits awarded) < 60%.
All ten (10) observations must be undertaken to pass.
Basic Slovak is welcomed, English is required.
Students are not exempt from attending other classes in order to do the lesson observations.
Students (in groups of 6 according to their study programs) observe 10 lessons with a mentor teacher at a local lower or upper secondary school.
They provide feedback on those lessons and discuss what they learn within their groups.
Each completes an online observation worksheet for each lesson and, after observing all 10 lessons, writes about the experience in a reflection paper.
Assessment is 100% coursework.
While visiting local schools and observing lessons with a mentor teacher, students do the following:
1. become familiar with the life of a teacher, in general, and English language teaching in particular
2. analyze how teachers teach and learners learn
3. evaluate and reflect on all aspects of the teaching they observe, i.e., content, delivery, preparedness, classroom management, instructions, etc.
4. reflect on what they observe as it relates to their own possible career as an English language teacher
5. discuss what they have observed with their peers, training constructive criticism and feedback skills
Selection of scholarly literature according to the chosen topic of thesis;
Current Directive of the Rector of the Comenius University on the essentials of the final thesis;
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2019-01-09]. Available at: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske-studium/zaverecne-prace/
Submitting a partial output in the form of a proposal of the main objectives and structure of the bachelor thesis, methodology, list of referenceswith an overview of available information sources on the selected topic of the bachelor thesis.
Grade percentage:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very well – above average standard,
C: 76-84%, well - reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient – the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient – additional work required
Slovak, English
Definition of the topic and objective of the final thesis.
Study of scholarly literature.
Excerption of the material.
Theoretical-methodological concept of the thesis.
Methodology of processing the research topic.
Methodology of writing the final thesis.
Formal and compositional requirements of the final theses.
Theory of citation.
Academic ethics and integrity, plagiarism, types of plagiarism.
The main principles of the construction of the scholarly text (content and structure, problems).
Requirements for the final thesis according to the internal quality system of the Comenius University.
(Základné náležitosti odovzdávania záverečných prác. Základné náležitosti obhajoby záverečných prác.)
100/0 (%)
The student can define the topic of his/her own bachelor thesis, correctly determine the process's procedure and methods, produce a time plan, and acquire the ability to work selectively and correctly with professional literature on the chosen topic. The student has mastered the basics of scholarly text writing obeying academic ethics rules. He/She has mastered the theory of citing and referencing used and has the skills to create bibliographic references and citations. He/She understands the principles of the structure and content of the bachelor thesis depending on the internal quality system of the UK. He/She understands the causes of plagiarism, recognizes different types of plagiarism, and can avoid them.
Selection of scholarly literature according to the chosen topic of thesis;
Current Directive of the Rector of the Comenius University on the essentials of the final thesis;
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov
Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2019-01-09]. Available at: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-
08-09]. Available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske-
studium/zaverecne-prace/
Submission of a partial output in the form of a whole chapter of the bachelor thesis.
Grade percentage:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very well – above average standard,
C: 76-84%, well - reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient – the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient – additional work required
Slovak, English
Theoretical-methodological concept of the thesis.
Methodology of processing the research topic.
Formal and compositional requirements of the final theses.
Presentation of results and relevant conclusions within the selected chapter.
100/0
The student can write a whole chapter of the bachelor thesis using adequate methods and relevant information sources, which they can critically evaluate and appropriately present the results and relevant conclusions.
BAZERMAN, Charles. The Informed Writer: Using Sources in the Disciplines. 3rd edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1989. ISBN 0-395-36901-0.
BLAIR, Lorrie. Writing a Graduate Thesis or Dissertation [online]. Brill, 2016. Dostupné na: EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xww&AN=1171828&lang=sk&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá
pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016. Dostupné na: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf
Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2015. Dostupné na: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/as/2020/20200527/04a_Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf
WHITE, Barry. Mapping Your Thesis [online]. Camberwell, Vic: ACER Press, 2011. ISBN 9780864318237. Dostupné na: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xww&AN=384475&lang=sk&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
All matters pertaining to state examination are set out in Article 14 of the Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts.
In the bachelor study programmes, the state examination consists only of the defence of the bachelor’s thesis. The student chooses the department as a training centre which corresponds to the discipline within which he/she wants to write the final thesis. He/she reports this choice by the deadline set by the department, provided that he/she is able to find a supervisor and a suitable topic in the relevant department.
For the successful defence of the bachelor’s thesis as the subject of the state examination in the bachelor degree programmes conducted at the Department of British and American Studies, students will receive credits according to the current study plan (currently 12 credits).
Requirements for the admission to the defence are as follows:
- fulfillment of the requirements of the study plan concerning the prescribed composition of courses and their credit value so that after awarding the credits for the state examination the student obtains the required number of credits for the bachelor's degree;
- submission of the bachelor's thesis (electronically via the academic information system AIS) by the thesis submission deadline corresponding to the relevant state examination period according to the academic year schedule set by the faculty.
The thesis is evaluated by the standard grading scale (0-59% -FX, 60-67% -E, 68-75% -D, 76-83% -C, 84-91% -B, 92-100% -A) by the supervisor of the thesis and the designated opponent in the assessment reports, which are available to the student no later than 3 working days before the state examination.
The supervisor's report shall also include the percentage of compliance results from the originality check protocols (CRZP, Theses), which must be explicitly evaluated by the supervisor with the wording "the thesis shows/does not show signs of plagiarism".
The bachelor’s thesis will take the following form:
The defence will consist of a thesis presentation (the student chooses the form of the defence, the PPT format can also be used) and the student’s response to a broader theoretical question, which is assigned to the student by the supervisor upon the bachelor's thesis submission. The supervisor will include this question in the assessment report as one of the points of discussion for the defence; it will also be included in the defence report.
The thesis presentation must:
- Include a clearly articulated thesis statement,
- have a clear and logical structure of argumentation and findings,
- reflect a new perspective on the issue as a result of adequate and appropriate work with the findings gained through own research, the conclusions of which the student is able to present and formulate.
The criteria for the evaluation (of the defence) of the bachelor's thesis at the Department of British and American Studies are as follows:
- Quality of the bachelor's thesis (originality, significance of the analysis, clear formulation of the scientific problem and hypotheses under study, scope of the professional and scientific literature used),
- the adequacy of the methodological approach to the topic under study, the analysis logically and coherently answers the research questions,
- systematic and logical summary of the results of the analysis,
- compliance with citation standards (MLA...),
- language level of the presentation (academic language at least at B2 level),
- quality of the presentation and communication skills.
The evaluation of the thesis will include the areas below with the corresponding weighting (out of 100):
PART A: CONTENT
• Overall structure and organization (adequacy, scope, objectivity, coherence, cohesion) 15
• Theoretical knowledge related to the research topic 15
• Methodology (identifying concepts, research problems, aims, tasks, choosing adequate methods) 15
• Analysis (quality, depth, complexity) 15
• Originality and contribution (degree of originality, own contribution to knowledge) 10
PART B: FORM
• Adequate work with information sources (extent, structure, reliability, adequacy, compliance with a citation style) 15
• Language and style 10
• Typography and layout 5
Students must be proficient to at least CEFR level B2 to attend the bachelor’s thesis defence.
1. The student presents the bachelor's thesis in front of the state examination committee, the supervisor and the opponent of the bachelor's thesis, and those present.
2. The student responds to the comments and questions in the assessments.
3. The student responds to the questions of the state examination committee or the questions in a broader debate.
4. The student responds to the pre-given general question from the supervisor's assessment.
5. A closed vote of the state examination committee on the evaluation of the bachelor's thesis defence.
6. Announcement of the evaluation (of the thesis defence) of the bachelor’s thesis.
0/100 (%)
• Upon successful completion of the course, students will be familiar with the basic requirements for academic writing and with the rules of academic integrity.
• They will have mastered the theory of working with sources and have the skills to compile correct bibliographic entries.
• They will have understood the principles of writing a bachelor's thesis, both in terms of form and content, as laid out by the university's regulations.
• They will have understood the causes of plagiarism, they will be able to recognize its types and know how to avoid it.
• They will have sufficient research skills to obtain, process, and interpret sources.
• They will have mastered the basics for writing a Master’s thesis.
• They will have a deep knowledge of the thesis topic and will be able to approach it both critically and creatively.
All official textbooks for elementary schools and high schools
Updated state education program for the 2nd level of elementary school
Updated state education program for grammar schools with four-year and five-year education program
School education program of the training school
Internal regulations of the school
KOSOVÁ, B. – TOMENGOVÁ, A.: Profesijná praktická príprava budúcich učiteľov. Banská Bystrica: Belianum, 2015, ISBN 978-80-557-0860-7. Dostupné na: https://www.minedu.sk/data/att/8032.pdf
Course assessment:
• 1-hour long classroom observation
• active participation in the extracurricular activities of the teaching mentor
• student evaluation by the teaching mentor,
• evaluation of the teacher's diary submitted by the student by the set deadline to the training supervisor
Grade percentage: A (100-92%); B (91-84%); C (83-76%); D (75-68%); E (67-60%), Fx (59-0%). Not following the set deadlines and the supervisor's instructions may be punished by lowering the grade or not receiving the credits for teacher training.
Slovak, the language of the student's expertise
Familiarising students with the course requirements
Familiarising students with the pedagogical documentation, conceptual and strategic documents of the training school
Participation in classes within the scope of the trainee teacher's full-time duties and extracurricular activities.
Producing classroom observation records from the teaching mentor’s classes
Producing class analyses.
Production of written preparations for lessons.
Producing a teaching diary and submitting it to the Head of Teaching Practice.
After completing the course, the student will:
• deepen their knowledge in the field of generally binding legal regulations related to the work of a teacher, pedagogical and other documentation, conceptual and strategic documents of the school,
• develop their professional competencies necessary for their independent planning, projecting, management, and organisation of the educational process in the relevant subject based on the valid curricular documents while adapting the educational program to specific groups of pupils,
• develop their professional competencies related to the didactic, pedagogic, and psychologic analysis of the individual parts of the lesson,
• develop their competencies to apply the knowledge from educational psychology and subject didactics in the educational process,
• develop their abilities to evaluate diverse teaching situations and processes,
• deepen their knowledge about the differences in children's development that result from their health and social disadvantages or talent, so that they can effectively cooperate with the special educators, psychologists, and other professionals during the educational process, and follow their professional recommendations and findings,
• develop their skills at using didactic materials,
• gain the competencies related to creating a pedagogical portfolio,
• develop their abilities to self-evaluate and to improve their professional development further,
• develop their abilities to assess the suitability of the educational materials,
• develop their communication skills and their abilities to express and accept effective criticism and praise.
Selection of scholarly literature according to the chosen topic of thesis;
Current Directive of the Rector of the Comenius University on the essentials of the final thesis;
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2019-01-09]. Available on: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Available on: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske-studium/zaverecne-prace/
Submitting a partial output in the form of a proposal of the main objectives and structure of the bachelor thesis, methodology, list of referenceswith an overview of available information sources on the selected topic of the bachelor thesis.
Grade percentage:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very well – above average standard,
C: 76-84%, well - reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient – the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient – additional work required
Slovak, (add another language according to the specifics of the study programme in case of language studies)
Definition of the topic and objective of the final thesis.
Study of scholarly literature.
Excerption of the material.
Theoretical-methodological concept of the thesis.
Methodology of processing the research topic.
Methodology of writing the final thesis.
Formal and compositional requirements of the final theses.
Theory of citation.
Academic ethics and integrity, plagiarism, types of plagiarism.
The main principles of the construction of the scholarly text (content and structure, problems).
Requirements for the final thesis according to the internal quality system of the Comenius University. (Základné náležitosti odovzdávania záverečných prác. Základné náležitosti obhajoby záverečných prác.)
preliminary 100%
The student can define the topic of his/her own bachelor thesis, correctly determine the process's procedure and methods, produce a time plan, and acquire the ability to work selectively and correctly with professional literature on the chosen topic. The student has mastered the basics of scholarly text writing obeying academic ethics rules. He/She has mastered the theory of citing and referencing used and has the skills to create bibliographic references and citations. He/She understands the principles of the structure and content of the bachelor thesis depending on the internal quality system of the UK. He/She understands the causes of plagiarism, recognizes different types of plagiarism, and can avoid them.
Selection of scholarly literature according to the chosen topic of thesis;
Current Directive of the Rector of the Comenius University on the essentials of the final thesis;
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2019-01-09]. Available on: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Available on: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske-studium/zaverecne-prace/
Submission of a partial output in the form of a whole chapter of the bachelor thesis.
Grade percentage:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very well – above average standard,
C: 76-84%, well - reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient – the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient – additional work required
Slovak, (add another language according to the specifics of the study programme in case of language studies)
Theoretical-methodological concept of the thesis.
Methodology of processing the research topic.
Formal and compositional requirements of the final theses.
Presentation of results and relevant conclusions within the selected chapter.
preliminary 100%
The student can write a whole chapter of the bachelor thesis using adequate methods and relevant information sources, which they can critically evaluate and appropriately present the results and relevant conclusions.
According to the topic of the bachelor thesis
Submission of the bachelor's thesis by the deadline specified in the timetable of the current academic year for the respective date of the state examination. The bachelor thesis is submitted in a printed version in two bound copies (at least one of which is in hardcover) to the relevant department and in an electronic version via AIS. The thesis must meet the parameters specified by Internal Regulation No. 7/2018 Directive of the Rector of Comenius University on the basic requisites of final theses, rigorous theses and habilitation theses, control of their originality, storage and accessibility at Comenius University in Bratislava. The provisions of Article 14 of the Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts of Comenius University apply to the evaluation of the bachelor thesis as a subject of the state examination. Violation of academic ethics may result in the cancellation of the points scored in the relevant assessment item.
Slovak
1. Contribution of the final thesis to the field of study (the evaluation of the bachelor's thesis takes into account whether the students have adequately demonstrated their ability to work creatively in the field of study in which they graduated from the study programme, reflecting the degree of demonstration of skills and knowledge of the issue, assesses the abilities applied in the collection, interpretation and processing of the basic literature, or the extent to which the students have mastered the application of the theoretical background in practice and whether the hypotheses presented in the thesis are verifiable;
2. Originality of the thesis (the thesis must not be plagiarized, it must not infringe the copyrights of other authors), the documentation for the defence of the thesis as a subject of the state examination also includes an originality protocol from the central register, the results of which are commented on by the supervisor and the opponent in their opinions;
3. Accuracy and correctness of the quotation of used information sources, research results of other authors and author teams, correctness of the description of methods and working procedures of other authors or author teams;
4. Compliance of the structure of the thesis with the prescribed structure defined by Internal Regulation No. 12/2013;
5. Respecting the recommended length of the thesis (the recommended length of a bachelor thesis is usually 30-40 standard pages - 54,000 to 72,000 characters including spaces), the appropriateness of the scope of the thesis is judged by the supervisor;
6. Linguistic and stylistic level of the thesis and formal editing;
7. The manner and form of the thesis defence and the student's ability to respond adequately to comments and questions in the supervisor's and opponent's evaluations.
0%/100%
Students are able to demonstrate their ability to work creatively in the field of study in which they have completed the study programme. Students are able to demonstrate adequate knowledge of the subject matter and apply their skills in collecting, interpreting and processing basic literature, or its application in practice, or are able to solve a subtask that is related to the student's field of study.
All official textbooks for elementary schools and high schools
Updated state education program for the 2nd level of elementary school
Updated state education program for grammar schools with four-year and five-year education program
School education program of the training school
Internal regulations of the school
KOSOVÁ, B. – TOMENGOVÁ, A.: Profesijná praktická príprava budúcich učiteľov. Banská Bystrica: Belianum, 2015, ISBN 978-80-557-0860-7. Dostupné na: https://www.minedu.sk/data/att/8032.pdf
KRATOCHVIL, Viliam. Metafora stromu ako model didaktiky dejepisu. K predpokladom výučby. Bratislava : Raabe, 2019. ISBN 978-80-8140-365-1.
KORTHAGEN, Fred. Jak spojit praxi s teorií: Didaktika realistického vzdělávání učitelů. Brno : Paido, 2011. ISBN 978-80-7315-221-5.
Course assessment:
• 1-hour long classroom observation
• active participation in the extracurricular activities of the teaching mentor
• student evaluation by the teaching mentor,
• evaluation of the teacher's diary submitted by the student by the set deadline to the training supervisor
Grade percentage: A (100-92%); B (91-84%); C (83-76%); D (75-68%); E (67-60%), Fx (59-0%). Not following the set deadlines and the supervisor's instructions may be punished by lowering the grade or not receiving the credits for teacher training.
Slovak, the language of the student's expertise
Familiarising students with the course requirements
Familiarising students with the pedagogical documentation, conceptual and strategic documents of the training school
Participation in classes within the scope of the trainee teacher's full-time duties and extracurricular activities.
Producing classroom observation records from the teaching mentor’s classes
Producing class analyses.
Production of written preparations for lessons.
Producing a teaching diary and submitting it to the Head of Teaching Practice.
100/0
After completing the course, the student will:
• deepen their knowledge in the field of generally binding legal regulations related to the work of a teacher, pedagogical and other documentation, conceptual and strategic documents of the school,
• develop their professional competencies necessary for their independent planning, projecting, management, and organisation of the educational process in the relevant subject based on the valid curricular documents while adapting the educational program to specific groups of pupils,
• develop their professional competencies related to the didactic, pedagogic, and psychologic analysis of the individual parts of the lesson,
• develop their competencies to apply the knowledge from educational psychology and subject didactics in the educational process,
• develop their abilities to evaluate diverse teaching situations and processes,
• deepen their knowledge about the differences in children's development that result from their health and social disadvantages or talent, so that they can effectively cooperate with the special educators, psychologists, and other professionals during the educational process, and follow their professional recommendations and findings,
• develop their skills at using didactic materials,
• gain the competencies related to creating a pedagogical portfolio,
• develop their abilities to self-evaluate and to improve their professional development further,
• develop their abilities to assess the suitability of the educational materials,
• develop their communication skills and their abilities to express and accept effective criticism and praise.
Recommended literature:
Selection of scholarly literature according to the chosen topic of thesis;
Current Directive of the Rector of the Comenius University on the essentials of the final thesis;
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2019-01-09]. Dostupné na: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Dostupné na: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske-studium/zaverecne-prace/
Submitting a partial output in the form of a proposal of the main objectives and structure of the bachelor thesis, methodology, list of references with an overview of available information sources on the selected topic of the bachelor thesis.
Grade percentage:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very well – above average standard,
C: 76-84%, well - reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient – the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient – additional work required
Violation of academic ethics will be punished, and the student will lose all the received points in the relevant assessment.
Slovak
Definition of the topic and objective of the final thesis.
Study of scholarly literature.
Excerption of the material.
Theoretical-methodological concept of the thesis.
Methodology of processing the research topic.
Methodology of writing the final thesis.
Formal and compositional requirements of the final theses.
Theory of citation.
Academic ethics and integrity, plagiarism, types of plagiarism.
The main principles of the construction of the scholarly text (content and structure, problems).
Requirements for the final thesis according to the internal quality system of the Comenius University.
(Základné náležitosti odovzdávania záverečných prác. Základné náležitosti obhajoby záverečných prác.)
100/0
The student can define the topic of his/her own bachelor thesis, correctly determine the process's procedure and methods, produce a time plan, and acquire the ability to work selectively and correctly with professional literature on the chosen topic. The student has mastered the basics of scholarly text writing obeying academic ethics rules. He/She has mastered the theory of citing and referencing used and has the skills to create bibliographic references and citations. He/She understands the principles of the structure and content of the bachelor thesis depending on the internal quality system of the UK. He/She understands the causes of plagiarism, recognizes different types of plagiarism, and can avoid them.
Recommended literature:
Selection of scholarly literature according to the chosen topic of thesis;
Current Directive of the Rector of the Comenius University on the essentials of the final thesis;
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2019-01-09]. Dostupné na: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Dostupné na: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske-studium/zaverecne-prace/
Submission of a partial output in the form of a whole chapter of the bachelor thesis.
Grade percentage:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very well – above average standard,
C: 76-84%, well - reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient – the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient – additional work required
Violation of academic ethics will be punished, and the student will lose all the received points in the relevant assessment.
Slovak
Theoretical-methodological concept of the thesis.
Methodology of processing the research topic.
Formal and compositional requirements of the final theses.
Presentation of results and relevant conclusions within the selected chapter.
100/0
The student can write a whole chapter of the bachelor thesis using adequate methods and relevant information sources, which they can critically evaluate and appropriately present the results and relevant conclusions.
LICHNEROVÁ, L. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác [online]. Bratislava:
Univerzita Komenského, 2016 [cit. 2016-10-09]. Available at: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/ LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf
• Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave,
2015 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Available at: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/ as/2020/20200527/04a_Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf
• Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske- studium/zaverecne-prace/
The student must submit the bachelor's thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year for the relevant date of the state exam. The bachelor thesis is submitted in electronic form via AIS. The work must meet the parameters determined by the internal quality system of Comenius University. The provisions of Article 14 of Internal Regulation no. 5/2020 (Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts of Comenius University) apply to the evaluation of the bachelor's thesis. Bachelor thesis evaluation criteria consider the fulfilment of the goals of the thesis in its assignment, originality of the work verified by protocols of originality from the CRZP and Theses systems, to the results of which the thesis supervisor and the opponent express their opinions in their evaluations. Correctness and accuracy of citation of used information sources, compliance of the structure of the bachelor's thesis with the prescribed composition defined by the internal quality system of Comenius University and linguistic and stylistic level of work and formal adjustments are also taken in account. The adequacy of the length of the thesis is assessed by the thesis supervisor.
The supervisor of the final thesis and its opponent will prepare evaluations of the bachelor's thesis and propose a grade in the A-FX grading scale (0-59% -FX, 60-67% -E, 68-75% -D, 76-83% -C, 84-91% -B, 92-100% -A), which the student receives a minimum of three working days before the defence. In their evaluation the supervisor and opponent will give a particular question related to broader historical context of bachelor thesis which the student will answer during his defence of bachelor thesis.
The student orally and with help of presentation (g.e. powerpoint) presents the content, achieved goals, and conclusions of the bachelor's thesis, and answers the questions and comments of the thesis supervisor, opponent, or members of the examination committee. The committee will comprehensively evaluate the quality of the bachelor's thesis, assess the method and form of defence, and the student's ability to adequately respond to comments and questions from the evaluations of the thesis supervisor and the opponent.
The student orally and with help of presentation (g.e. powerpoint) presents the content, achieved goals, and conclusions of the bachelor's thesis, and answers the questions and comments of the thesis supervisor, opponent, or members of the examination committee. The committee will comprehensively evaluate the quality of the bachelor's thesis, assess the method and form of defence, and the student's ability to adequately respond to comments and questions from the evaluations of the thesis supervisor and the opponent. The evaluation includes also the quality of answers on two specific questions of supervisor and opponent. The student receives their final grade based on the average of the assessment of the thesis supervisor and opponent from their evaluations, and the assessment of the examination committee.
Slovak
1. The student presents the bachelor's thesis in front of the committee for state exams, the opponent of the bachelor's thesis, and those present.
2. The student responds to comments and questions in the evaluations.
3. Answering of 2 specific questions of superviosor and opomńents in their thesis evaluation ralted to the broader historical context of bachalor thesis
4. The student responds to the questions of the committee for state exams or the questions in a broader debate.
0/100
The student has mastered the basic requirements of writing a scientific text in compliance with the rules of academic ethics, is able to work creatively in the field of study in which he completed the study program, and has adequate knowledge and understanding of the relevant issues. The student can apply his skills in the collection, interpretation, and processing of basic scientific literature, or even in its application in practice, or has the ability to solve a partial task related to the focus of the bachelor's thesis. After a successful defence of the bachelor's thesis, the student is able to logically deal with the theoretical background of the bachelor's thesis and respond to questions relating to the relevant issues.
Recommended literature:
All official textbooks for elementary schools and high schools
Updated state education program for the 2nd level of elementary school
Updated state education program for grammar schools with four-year and five-year education program
School education program of the training school
Internal regulations of the school
KOSOVÁ, B. – TOMENGOVÁ, A.: Profesijná praktická príprava budúcich učiteľov. Banská Bystrica: Belianum, 2015, ISBN 978-80-557-0860-7. Dostupné na: https://www.minedu.sk/data/att/8032.pdf
Course assessment:
• 1-hour long classroom observation
• active participation in the extracurricular activities of the teaching mentor
• student evaluation by the teaching mentor,
• evaluation of the teacher's diary submitted by the student by the set deadline to the training supervisor
Grade percentage: A (100-92%); B (91-84%); C (83-76%); D (75-68%); E (67-60%), Fx (59-0%). Not following the set deadlines and the supervisor's instructions may be punished by lowering the grade or not receiving the credits for teacher training.
Hungarian Language (C1)
Familiarising students with the course requirements
Familiarising students with the pedagogical documentation, conceptual and strategic documents of the training school
Participation in classes within the scope of the trainee teacher's full-time duties and extracurricular activities.
Producing classroom observation records from the teaching mentor’s classes
Producing class analyses.
Production of written preparations for lessons.
Producing a teaching diary and submitting it to the Head of Teaching Practice.
After completing the course, the student will:
• deepen their knowledge in the field of generally binding legal regulations related to the work of a teacher, pedagogical and other documentation, conceptual and strategic documents of the school,
• develop their professional competencies necessary for their independent planning, projecting, management, and organisation of the educational process in the relevant subject based on the valid curricular documents while adapting the educational program to specific groups of pupils,
• develop their professional competencies related to the didactic, pedagogic, and psychologic analysis of the individual parts of the lesson,
• develop their competencies to apply the knowledge from educational psychology and subject didactics in the educational process,
• develop their abilities to evaluate diverse teaching situations and processes,
• deepen their knowledge about the differences in children's development that result from their health and social disadvantages or talent, so that they can effectively cooperate with the special educators, psychologists, and other professionals during the educational process, and follow their professional recommendations and findings,
• develop their skills at using didactic materials,
• gain the competencies related to creating a pedagogical portfolio,
• develop their abilities to self-evaluate and to improve their professional development further,
• develop their abilities to assess the suitability of the educational materials,
• develop their communication skills and their abilities to express and accept effective criticism and praise.
Selection of scholarly literature according to the chosen topic of thesis;
Current Directive of the Rector of the Comenius University on the essentials of the final thesis;
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2019-01-09]. Dostupné na: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Dostupné na: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske-studium/zaverecne-prace/
Submitting a partial output in the form of a proposal of the main objectives and structure of the bachelor thesis, methodology, list of referenceswith an overview of available information sources on the selected topic of the bachelor thesis.
Grade percentage:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very well – above average standard,
C: 76-84%, well - reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient – the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient – additional work required
Hungarian Language(C2)
Definition of the topic and objective of the final thesis.
Study of scholarly literature.
Excerption of the material.
Theoretical-methodological concept of the thesis.
Methodology of processing the research topic.
Methodology of writing the final thesis.
Formal and compositional requirements of the final theses.
Theory of citation.
Academic ethics and integrity, plagiarism, types of plagiarism.
The main principles of the construction of the scholarly text (content and structure, problems).
Requirements for the final thesis according to the internal quality system of the Comenius University.
(Základné náležitosti odovzdávania záverečných prác. Základné náležitosti obhajoby záverečných prác.)
100/0
The student can define the topic of his/her own bachelor thesis, correctly determine the process's procedure and methods, produce a time plan, and acquire the ability to work selectively and correctly with professional literature on the chosen topic. The student has mastered the basics of scholarly text writing obeying academic ethics rules. He/She has mastered the theory of citing and referencing used and has the skills to create bibliographic references and citations. He/She understands the principles of the structure and content of the bachelor thesis depending on the internal quality system of the UK. He/She understands the causes of plagiarism, recognizes different types of plagiarism, and can avoid them.
Selection of scholarly literature according to the chosen topic of thesis;
Current Directive of the Rector of the Comenius University on the essentials of the final thesis;
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2019-01-09]. Dostupné na: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Dostupné na: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske-studium/zaverecne-prace/
Submission of a partial output in the form of a whole chapter of the bachelor thesis.
Grade percentage:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very well – above average standard,
C: 76-84%, well - reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient – the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient – additional work required
Hungarian Language (C2)
Theoretical-methodological concept of the thesis.
Methodology of processing the research topic.
Formal and compositional requirements of the final theses.
Presentation of results and relevant conclusions within the selected chapter.
100/0
The student can write a whole chapter of the bachelor thesis using adequate methods and relevant information sources, which they can critically evaluate and appropriately present the results and relevant conclusions.
• LICHNEROVÁ, L. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác [online]. Bratislava:
Univerzita Komenského, 2016 [cit. 2016-10-09]. Dostupné na: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/
LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf
• Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave,
2015 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Dostupné na: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/
as/2020/20200527/04a_Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf
• Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit.
2021-08-09]. Dostupné na: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterskestudium/
zaverecne-prace/
Submission of the bachelor thesis by the deadline specified in the timetable of the current academic year for the respective date of the state examination. The bachelor thesis is submitted in electronic version via AIS. The thesis must comply with the parameters specified by the internal quality system of Charles University. At the assessment of the bachelor thesis shall be subject to the provisions of Article 14 of Internal Regulation No 5/2020 (Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts of Comenius University). The supervisor of the thesis and the thesis advisor shall draw up an evaluation of the bachelor thesis and propose an evaluation of A-FX grading scale, which shall be available to the student at least 3 working days before the defence.
Criteria for evaluation of the bachelor thesis:
1. Contribution of the bachelor thesis, fulfillment of the objectives of the thesis in its assignment and fulfillment of the requirements for the content of the bachelor thesis, the requirements of the thesis given by the internal quality system of Comenius University. The following is assessed: demonstration of knowledge and understanding, the ability to work creatively in the study programme, the ability applied in the collection, interpretation and processing of the basic literature; in the case of a practically oriented bachelor's thesis mastery of the application of theoretical assumptions in practice and the verifiability of hypotheses;
2. Originality of the thesis (the bachelor's thesis must not be plagiarised, must not infringe the author's the rights of other authors); the documentation for the defence of the bachelor thesis also includes protocols originality reports from the CRZP and Theses, on the results of which the thesis supervisor and the opponent comment in their reports;
3. Correctness and correctness of citation of used information sources, research results of other
of other authors and authors' teams, correctness of the description of methods and working procedures of other authors the correctness of the methods used by other authors or author teams;
4. Compliance of the structure of the bachelor thesis with the prescribed structure defined by the internal system quality of the CU;
5. Respect of the recommended scope of the bachelor thesis (recommended scope of the bachelor thesis is usually 30-40 standard pages = 54,000 to 72,000 characters including spaces), adequacy of the scope. The size of the thesis is assessed by the thesis supervisor;
6. The linguistic and stylistic level of the thesis and formal editing.
The student orally presents the content, achieved objectives and conclusions of the bachelor's thesis and answers the questions and comments of the thesis supervisor, opponent, or members of the examination committee. Committee comprehensively evaluate the quality of the bachelor thesis, assess the manner and form of the defence and the ability to the student to respond adequately to the comments and questions in the thesis supervisor's reports and the opponent. The evaluation will be obtained from the arithmetic average of the evaluations from the supervisor's
of the thesis supervisor, the thesis opponent and the evaluation of the examination committee.
Hungarian (C2)
1. Presentation of the bachelor's thesis to students before the state examination committee, opponent and those present.
2. The student's response to comments and questions in the evaluations.
3. Student's response to questions from the State Examination Committee and in discussion.
Intermediate/final mark weighting: 0/100
The student has mastered the basic requirements of writing a professional text, observing the rules
academic ethics, is able to work creatively in the field of study in which he/she graduated
programme, has adequate knowledge and understanding of the subject being studied. Can
apply his/her skills in collecting, interpreting and processing the basic literature, or in its application in practice, or has the ability to solve a sub-task related to the focus of the bachelor thesis. After successful defence of the bachelor thesis, the student is able to logically
deal with the theoretical background of the bachelor thesis problem and respond argumentatively to questions on the processed problem.
BIMMEL, P.; KAST, B; NEUNER, G. Deutschunterricht planen. Fernstudieneinheit 18. München: Goethe-Institut, 2003.
ENDE, K., GROTJAHN, R., KLEPPIN, K., MOHR, I. DLL 06: Curriculare Vorgaben und Unterrichtsplanung. Fort- und Weiterbildung weltweit. Stuttgart: Klett Sprachen, 2013.
ZIEBELL, B.: Unterrichtsbeobachtung und Lehrerverhalten. Fernstudieneinheit 32. München: Goethe-Institut, 2002.
a) during the teaching part (continuously):
Before the beginning of the teaching practice at the beginning of the semester, an introductory meeting with mandatory participation is held, the content of which is to familiarize with the course of the practice and the conditions for its completion.
Completion of 5 visits and analyses at the training school is compulsory. Upon completion of the practicum, students submit a practicum report, focusing on selected aspects of the teaching observation, to the didactic teacher responsible for the organisation of the practicum. Absences from group visits are only accepted in justified cases with documented evidence and are made up where possible.
The student must achieve a minimum success rate of 60%.
(b) In the examination period: 100% pass mark.
Violation of academic ethics will result in the nullification of the points earned in the relevant assessment item.
Grading Scale. A: 100 - 91%, B: 90 - 81%, C: 80 - 73%, D: 72 - 66%, E: 65 - 60%, Fx: 59 - 0%
The exact dates of the practicum and the practicum school will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
German
Before the beginning of the teaching practice at the beginning of the semester, an introductory meeting is held at the faculty with compulsory participation, the content of which is familiarization with the course of the practice and the conditions for its completion. Students will complete Teaching Practice 1 in selected mock schools under the supervision of a trainee teacher in groups. The practice involves a 5 lesson observation followed by a debriefing with the trainee teacher. At the end of the placement, the student completes a placement report, which is handed over to the didactic teacher responsible for the organisation of the placement.
100/0
The student will acquire the basic ability to observe German teaching, to focus on selected aspects of the observation, and to produce a protocol of practice. At the same time, the student is able to reflect on teaching and ask questions about the observation as part of the analysis.
Selection of literature according to the chosen topic of the thesis and recommendations of the thesis supervisor; Current directive of the Rector of Charles University on the basic requisites of final theses; LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia: Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2019-01-09]. Available at: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf.
Continuous assessment - the seminar is conducted through individual consultations with the supervisor/work supervisor. Considering the specifics of the subject, the following are evaluated: systematic preparation of the bachelor thesis in accordance with the objectives set in the assignment, regular consultations with the supervisor of the final thesis and familiarisation of the supervisor of the final thesis with the progress on the agreed tasks, which include: studying the literature on the topic of the bachelor thesis and processing of sub-problems. A grade on the A-FX grading scale will be awarded by the thesis advisor based on completion of the individual requirements agreed upon at the beginning of the semester.
German (level C1-C2), Slovak
1. Defining the main and sub-objectives of the bachelor thesis.
2. Information research on the bachelor thesis.
3. Analysis and critique of literature, historical sources and other
historical and other information sources on the topic of the bachelor thesis.
4. Continuous and rigorous development of the citation apparatus for the bachelor thesis.
5. Preparation of the structure of the bachelor's thesis in the context of its topic and the requirements for the structure of the bachelor's thesis given by the internal quality system of Charles University.
6. Methodological definition of the topic: determination of the research problem, research questions.
7. Terminological definition of the bachelor thesis proble
100/0
After successful completion of the course, the student understands the principles of the construction of the formal and content of the bachelor thesis depending on the internal quality system of the University of Applied Sciences. The student/learner is able to formulate a research problem and research questions and has mastered the principles of academic ethics. Has the basic information competences to excerpt and process basic secondary literature and primary material within the defined topic and the defined theoretical and methodological background.
Selection of literature according to the chosen topic of the thesis and recommendations of the thesis supervisor; Current directive of the Rector of Charles University on the basic requisites of final theses; LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia: Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2019-01-09]. Available at: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf.
Continuous assessment - the seminar is conducted through individual consultations with the supervisor/work supervisor. Considering the specifics of the subject, the following are evaluated: systematic preparation of the bachelor thesis in accordance with the objectives set in the assignment, regular consultations with the supervisor of the final thesis and familiarisation of the supervisor of the final thesis with the progress on the agreed tasks, which include: studying the literature on the topic of the bachelor thesis and processing of sub-problems. A grade on the A-FX grading scale will be awarded by the thesis advisor based on completion of the individual requirements agreed upon at the beginning of the semester.
German (level C1-C2), Slovak
1. Methodology of problem processing.
2. Interpretation and critique of literature, historical sources and other sources of information on the problem of the bachelor's thesis.
3. Final rigorous development of the citation apparatus for the bachelor's thesis. Formal and compositional requirements of the thesis.
4. Processing of the theoretical part of the bachelor thesis.
5. Preparation of the practical part of the bachelor thesis.
6. Verification of hypotheses and evaluation of the objectives of the bachelor thesis.
7. Presentation of results and important conclusions within the chosen chapter.
100/0
After successful completion of the course, the student has acquired basic skills in writing academic text. The student has sufficient information competences to process and interpret basic secondary literature.
The student is able to produce a coherent chapter of a Bachelor's thesis using adequate methods, relevant information sources which he/she can critically evaluate and can present results and important conclusions appropriately.
LICHNEROVÁ, L. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác [online]. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2016 [cit. 2016-10-09]. Dostupné na: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/ LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf. Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2015 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Dostupné na: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/ as/2020/20200527/04a_Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf. Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Dostupné na: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske- studium/zaverecne-prace/
Submission of the Bachelor's thesis by the deadline specified in the timetable of the current academic year for the respective date of the state examination. The bachelor thesis is submitted in an electronic version via AIS. The thesis must comply with the parameters specified by the internal quality system of Charles University. The provisions of Article 14 of the Internal Regulation No. 5/2020 (Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts of Charles University) shall apply to the evaluation of the bachelor thesis. The thesis supervisor and the thesis opponent shall prepare a report on the thesis and propose a grade in the A-FX grading scale, which shall be available to the student at least 3 working days before the defence. 1. Contribution of the bachelor thesis, fulfilment of the objectives of the thesis in its assignment and fulfilment of the requirements for the content of the bachelor thesis given by the internal quality system of Charles University. The following are assessed: demonstration of knowledge and knowledge, ability to work creatively in the study programme, ability applied in collecting, interpreting and processing basic literature; in the case of a practically oriented bachelor thesis, also mastery of application of theoretical bases in practice and verifiability of hypotheses; 2. Originality of the thesis (the bachelor's thesis must not be plagiarized, it must not infringe the copyrights of other authors); the documentation for the defence of the bachelor's thesis includes originality protocols from the CRZP and Theses, the results of which are commented on by the supervisor of the final thesis and the opponent in their opinions; 3. Correctness and correctness of citation of used information sources, research results of other authors and author teams, correctness of description of methods and working procedures of other authors or author teams; 4. Compliance of the structure of the bachelor's thesis with the prescribed structure defined by the internal quality system of Charles University; 5. Respect of the recommended scope of the bachelor's thesis (the recommended scope of the bachelor's thesis is usually 30 - 40 standard pages = 54 000 to 72 000 characters including spaces), the adequacy of the scope of the thesis is assessed by the supervisor of the thesis; 6. The linguistic and stylistic level of the thesis and formal editing. The student orally presents the content, achieved objectives and conclusions of the bachelor's thesis and answers questions and comments of the thesis supervisor, opponent, or members of the examination committee. The committee shall comprehensively evaluate the quality of the bachelor thesis, assess the manner and form of the defence and the student's ability to respond adequately to the comments and questions in the reports of the thesis supervisor and the opponent. The evaluation is obtained from the arithmetic average of the evaluations of the thesis supervisor, the thesis opponent and the evaluation of the examination committee.
1. Presentation of the bachelor's thesis to the students in front of the state examination committee, the opponent of the bachelor's thesis and the attendees. 2. The student's response to comments and questions in the evaluations. 3. The student's response to questions from the State Examination Committee and in discussion.
0/100
The student has mastered the basic requirements of writing a professional text in compliance with the rules of academic ethics, is able to work creatively in the field of study in which he/she graduated from the study programme, has adequate knowledge and knowledge of the subject matter. He/she is able to apply his/her skills in collecting, interpreting and excerpting the basic literature, or in applying it in practice, or has the ability to solve a sub-task related to the focus of the bachelor thesis. After a successful defence of the bachelor thesis, the student can logically deal with the theoretical background of the bachelor thesis problem and respond argumentatively to questions on the treated issue.
All official textbooks for elementary schools and high schools
Updated state education program for the 2nd level of elementary school
Updated state education program for grammar schools with four-year and five-year education program
School education program of the training school
Internal regulations of the school
KOSOVÁ, B. – TOMENGOVÁ, A.: Profesijná praktická príprava budúcich učiteľov. Banská Bystrica:
Belianum, 2015, ISBN 978-80-557-0860-7. Dostupné na: https://www.minedu.sk/data/att/8032.pdf
ŠTURMA, Jaroslav. Didaktika pedagogiky. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus, 1993. 80-7041-228-3.
VALIŠOVÁ, Alena a František SINGULE a Jaroslav VALENTA. Didaktika pedagogiky. Praha: UK, 1990.
VALIŠOVÁ, Alena a Hana KASÍKOVÁ a kol. Pedagogika pro učitele. Praha : Grada, 2007, 402 s. ISBN 8024717344 .
• 1-hour long classroom observation
• active participation in the extracurricular activities of the teaching mentor
• student evaluation by the teaching mentor,
• evaluation of the teacher's diary submitted by the student by the set deadline to the training supervisor
Grade percentage: A (100-92%); B (91-84%); C (83-76%); D (75-68%); E (67-60%), Fx (59-0%). Not following the set deadlines and the supervisor's instructions may be punished by lowering the grade or not receiving the credits for teacher training.
slovak
Familiarising students with the course requirements
Familiarising students with the pedagogical documentation, conceptual and strategic documents of the training school
Participation in classes within the scope of the trainee teacher's full-time duties and extracurricular activities.
Producing classroom observation records from the teaching mentor’s classes
Producing class analyses.
Production of written preparations for lessons.
Producing a teaching diary and submitting it to the Head of Teaching Practice..
100/0
After completing the course, the student will:
• deepen their knowledge in the field of generally binding legal regulations related to the work of a teacher, pedagogical and other documentation, conceptual and strategic documents of the school,
• develop their professional competencies necessary for their independent planning, projecting, management, and organisation of the educational process in the relevant subject based on the valid curricular documents while adapting the educational program to specific groups of pupils,
• develop their professional competencies related to the didactic, pedagogic, and psychologic analysis of the individual parts of the lesson,
• develop their competencies to apply the knowledge from educational psychology and subject didactics in the educational process,
• develop their abilities to evaluate diverse teaching situations and processes,
• deepen their knowledge about the differences in children's development that result from their health and social disadvantages or talent, so that they can effectively cooperate with the special educators, psychologists, and other professionals during the educational process, and follow their professional recommendations and findings,
• develop their skills at using didactic materials,
• gain the competencies related to creating a pedagogical portfolio,
• develop their abilities to self-evaluate and to improve their professional development further,
• develop their abilities to assess the suitability of the educational materials,
develop their communication skills and their abilities to express and accept effective criticism and praise
Informačná a mediálna gramotnosť [online]. Filozofická fakulta UK; Akademická knižnica UK,
2015 [cit. 2021-08-13]. Dostupné na: https://midas.uniba.sk/
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá
pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit.
2021-01-09]. Dostupné na: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia a Ľudmila HRDINÁKOVÁ. Ako dodržať akademickú etiku pri
písaní vedeckých a odborných textov? In: Naša univerzita. 2020, roč. 67, č. 1, s. 62-65.
ISSN (print) 1338-4163. Dostupné tiež na: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/nasa_univerzita/
NU2020-21/201021_Nasa_univerzita_1_20-21.pdf
ŠVEC, Štefan et al. 1998. Metodológia vied o výchove. Bratislava: IRIS, 1998. ISBN 80-88778-73-5.
Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave,
2015 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Dostupné na: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/
as/2020/20200527/04a_Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit.
2021-08-09]. Dostupné na: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterskestudium/zaverecne-prace/
Selection of scholarly literature according to the chosen topic of thesis.
Submitting a partial output in the form of a proposal of the main objectives and structure of the bachelor thesis, methodology, list of references with an overview of available information sources on the selected topic of the bachelor thesis.
Grade percentage:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very well – above average standard,
C: 76-84%, well - reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient – the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient – additional work required.
Slovak
Definition of the topic and objective of the final thesis.
Study of scholarly literature.
Excerption of the material.
Theoretical-methodological concept of the thesis.
Methodology of processing the research topic.
Methodology of writing the final thesis.
Formal and compositional requirements of the final theses.
Theory of citation.
Academic ethics and integrity, plagiarism, types of plagiarism.
The main principles of the construction of the scholarly text (content and structure, problems).
Requirements for the final thesis according to the internal quality system of the Comenius University.
(Basic requirements for submitting final theses. Basic requirements for defending final theses.)
100/0
The student can define the topic of his/her own bachelor thesis, correctly determine the process's procedure and methods, produce a time plan, and acquire the ability to work selectively and correctly with professional literature on the chosen topic. The student has mastered the basics of scholarly text writing obeying academic ethics rules. He/She has mastered the theory of citing and referencing used and has the skills to create bibliographic references and citations. He/She understands the principles of the structure and content of the bachelor thesis depending on the internal quality system of the UK. He/She understands the causes of plagiarism, recognizes different types of plagiarism, and can avoid them.
Informačná a mediálna gramotnosť [online]. Filozofická fakulta UK; Akademická knižnica UK,
2015 [cit. 2021-08-13]. Dostupné na: https://midas.uniba.sk/
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá
pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit.
2021-01-09]. Dostupné na: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia a Ľudmila HRDINÁKOVÁ. Ako dodržať akademickú etiku pri
písaní vedeckých a odborných textov? In: Naša univerzita. 2020, roč. 67, č. 1, s. 62-65.
ISSN (print) 1338-4163. Dostupné tiež na: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/nasa_univerzita/
NU2020-21/201021_Nasa_univerzita_1_20-21.pdf
ŠVEC, Štefan et al. 1998. Metodológia vied o výchove. Bratislava: IRIS, 1998. ISBN 80-88778-73-5.
Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave,
2015 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Dostupné na: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/
as/2020/20200527/04a_Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit.
2021-08-09]. Dostupné na: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterskestudium/zaverecne-prace/
Selection of scholarly literature according to the chosen topic of thesis.
Submission of a partial output in the form of a whole chapter of the bachelor thesis.
Grade percentage:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very well – above average standard,
C: 76-84%, well - reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient – the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient – additional work required.
Slovak
Theoretical-methodological concept of the thesis.
Methodology of processing the research topic.
Formal and compositional requirements of the final theses.
Presentation of results and relevant conclusions within the selected chapter.
100/0
The student can write a whole chapter of the bachelor thesis using adequate methods and relevant information sources, which they can critically evaluate and appropriately present the results and relevant conclusions.
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác [online]. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2016 [cit. 2021-10-10]. Available at: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf
Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2015 [cit. 2021-10-10]. Available at: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/
as/2020/20200527/04a_Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-amagisterske studium/zaverecne-prace/
Further literature according to the topic of the bachelor's thesis.
The student must submit the bachelor's thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year for the relevant date of the state exam. The bachelor thesis is submitted in electronic form via AIS. The work must meet the parameters determined by the internal quality system of Comenius University. The provisions of Article 14 of Internal Regulation no. 5/2020 (Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts of Comenius University) apply to the evaluation of the bachelor's thesis.
The supervisor of the final thesis and its opponent will prepare evaluations of the bachelor's thesis and propose a grade in the A-FX grading scale, which the student receives a minimum of three working days before the defence.
Grading scale: 0-59% -FX, 60-67% -E, 68-75% -D, 76-83% -C, 84-91% -B, 92-100% -A
Bachelor thesis evaluation criteria:
1. The contribution of the bachelor's thesis, the fulfilment of the goals of the thesis in its assignment, and the requirements for the content of the bachelor's thesis given by the internal quality system of Comenius University. The following is assessed: demonstration of knowledge and skills, ability to work creatively in the study program, ability applied in the collection, interpretation, and processing of basic scientific literature; in the case of an empirically oriented bachelor's thesis also mastering the application of theoretical principles in practice and verifiability of hypotheses.
2. Originality of the work (bachelor thesis must not be plagiarized, must not infringe the copyrights of other authors); the documentation for the defence of the bachelor's thesis also includes protocols of originality from the CRZP and Theses systems, to the results of which the thesis supervisor and the opponent express their opinions in their evaluations.
3. Correctness and accuracy of citation of used information sources, research results of other authors and group authors, correctness of the description of methods and working procedures of other authors or group authors.
4. Compliance of the structure of the bachelor's thesis with the prescribed composition defined by the internal quality system of Comenius University.
5. Respecting the recommended length of the bachelor's thesis (the recommended length of the bachelor's thesis is usually 30 – 40 standard pages = 54,000 to 72,000 characters, including spaces), the adequacy of the length of the thesis is assessed by the thesis supervisor.
6. Linguistic and stylistic level of work and formal adjustments.
The student orally presents the content, achieved goals, and conclusions of the bachelor's thesis, and answers the questions and comments of the thesis supervisor, opponent, or members of the examination committee. The committee will comprehensively evaluate the quality of the bachelor's thesis, assess the method and form of defence, and the student's ability to adequately respond to comments and questions from the evaluations of the thesis supervisor and the opponent. The student receives their final grade based on the average of the assessment of the thesis supervisor and opponent from their evaluations, and the assessment of the examination committee.
Slovak
1. The student presents the bachelor's thesis in front of the committee for state exams, the opponent of the bachelor's thesis, and those present.
2. The student responds to comments and questions in the evaluations.
3. The student responds to the questions of the committee for state exams or the questions in a broader debate.
0/100
The student has mastered the basic requirements of writing a scientific text in compliance with the rules of academic ethics, is able to work creatively in the field of study in which he completed the study program, and has adequate knowledge and understanding of the relevant issues. The student can apply his skills in the collection, interpretation, and processing of basic scientific literature, or even in its application in practice, or has the ability to solve a partial task related to the focus of the bachelor's thesis. After a successful defence of the bachelor's thesis, the student is able to logically deal with the theoretical background of the bachelor's thesis and respond to questions relating to the relevant issues.
Bílik, René. Interpretácia umeleckého textu. Trnava: Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis, 2009. ISBN 978-80-8082-289-7.
Bokníková, Andrea. Teória literatúry (úvod do vybraných problémov). Bratislava: Stimul, 2015. ISBN 978-80-8127-144-1.
Harpáň, Michal. Teória literatúry. Bratislava: ESA, 1994. ISBN 80-85684-05-5
Hrabák, Josef: Poetika. Praha: Československý spisovatel, 1973.
Števček, Ján. Estetika a literatúra. Bratislava: Tatran, 1977.
a. During the semester (50 points): for preparation and active attendance of seminars 20 points, two absences allowed; 30 points for written assignment (essay or seminar paper). Requirement for admission to final exam in January: obtaining at least 30 points.
b. During exam term: final exam – 50 points. The exam consists of content discussed on lectures and seminars.
Grading scale: 100 – 92 points: A; 91 – 84 points: B; 83 – 76 points: C; 75 – 68 points: D; 67 – 60 points: E; 59 – 0 points: FX.
Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of earned points in the relevant item.
Slovak
1. Familiarizing students with how the lectures and seminars run.
2. Types of literature: artistic literature, belletry and folklore, boundaries between imaginative and factual literature, functions of literature for children and youth.
3. Literary studies and its disciplines: literary critique, literary history, theory of literature. Examples on how to apply creativity in scientific approach.
4. Similarities and differences between terms theory of literature and poetics. Relationship between poetics and analysis, or interpretation of literary text. Denotation and connotation. Denotácia a konotácia. Significance of subjective approach in interpretation.
5. Model of literary communication according to Nitra school. Author, the perspective on considering his/her biography in interpretation. Authorial myth, subject, lyrical hero etc. Difference between terms text and literary work.
6. Reading and reader typology by J. Števček: naïve, sentimental, and discursive reader. Role of emotions during creation of the text and during reading it – processes of tension and de-tension.
7. Poetic tropes and figures (syntax, and repetition as a principle of expression).
8. Types of verse used in Slovak poetry – overview with focus on sylabotonic verse.
9. Rhythm as a phenomenon of life and literature, meter and its units (feet), mixed verse (logaeds).
10. Simultaneity and succession as lyrical and epical properties. Division of text into stanzas or paragraphs, types of stanzas and significance of paragraph length in prose.
11. Literary genres (lyrical, epical, dramatic). Poetry and prose as fundamental forms of expression of artistic literature.
12. Typology of narrator and narration, experiments with use of second grammatical person. Fabula and syuzhet, paradoxes: the lyrical as undeveloped syuzhet (term of F. Miko) and peculiarities of non-syuzhet prose.
13. Composition and its typology. Motif and its forms. Micro-composition as a way of organizing the text into zone of narrator and zone of literary characters.
50/50
The student will obtain knowledge of the basics of theory of literature. Therefore, he/she will be capable of understanding the essence of artistic literature and its functions, the branches of theory of literature, the theory of literary communication and the theory of a literary work. In this way, the student will become more competent in expertly grasping artistic literature; in its complex interpretation. These competencies are an important part of the process of teaching and lecturing.
KÁKOŠOVÁ, Zuzana: Kapitoly zo slovenskej literatúry 9. - 18. storočie. Typológia a poetika
stredovekej, renesančnej a barokovej literatúry. Bratislava : Univerzita Komenského, 2005. ISBN 80-223-2037-4
MINÁRIK, Jozef:Dejiny slovenskej literatúry 1. Staršia slovenská literatúra (800 - 1780). Bratislava : SPN, 1985.
ŠMATLÁK, Stanislav: Dejiny slovenskej literatúry I. Bratislava : LIC, 2002. ISBN 80-88878-70-5
Z klenotnice staršieho slovenského písomníctva 1 -2. Bratislava : Slovenský Tatran, 1997. ISBN 80-222-0463-3
ČÚZY, L. - KÁKOŠOVÁ, Z. - MICHÁLEK, M. - VOJTECH, M.: Panoráma slovenskej literatúry I. Bratislava : SPN, 2004. ISBN 80-10-00316-6
KÁKOŠOVÁ, Zuzana: Zo staršej slovenskej literatúry 1. Bratislava : Stimul, 2013, dostupné na: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/FIF_ZK_slovlit1.pdf
Additional literature will be presented at the beginning and during the semester.
Absences: More than 2 absences: it is required to report the reason of absence (for example proof of sickness) to the study department FiFUK.
Interim assessment: After completion of the thematic unit: test or written work. Active participation in seminars is also a part of the evaluation. The condition for passing the oral exam is to gain at least 60% of the continuous assessment.
Final evaluation: test or seminar work and oral exam. In the overall evaluation the student must achieve at least 60% of the evaluation in order to complete the course. The criteria for the overall assessment will be specified at the beginning of the semester. Academic integrity violations will not be tolerated and will result in loosing the achieved points.
Slovak, Czech, prescriptive form of Slovak
1. Introduction to the study of older literature
2. Characteristic features of medieval literature
3. Old Slavonic literature, Constantine and Methodius
4. Medieval literature in the 11th - 15th century, characteristics of the historical period and literature
5. Medieval legends and chronicles
6. Characteristic features of renaissance literature
7. Problems of literary humanism
8. Mannerism and decomposition of the Renaissance
9. Renaissance poetry
10. Renaissance verse epics
11. Renaissance and humanistic prose
12. Renaissance drama
40/60
Upon successful completion of this course, students have knowledge of the history of Slovak medieval and renaissance literature, they are able to interpret works in historical and literary contexts, taking into account the European context.
KÁKOŠOVÁ, Zuzana: Kapitoly zo slovenskej literatúry 9. - 18. storočie. Typológia a poetika
stredovekej, renesančnej a barokovej literatúry. Bratislava : Univerzita Komenského, 2005. ISBN 80-223-2037-4
MINÁRIK, Jozef: Baroková literatúra. Bratislava : SPN, 1984.
ŠMATLÁK, Stanislav: Dejiny slovenskej literatúry I. Bratislava : LIC, 2002. ISBN 80-88878-70-5
Z klenotnice staršieho slovenského písomníctva 3. Bratislava : Slovenský Tatran, 1997. ISBN 80-222-0465-X; 80-222-0464-1
ČÚZY, L. - KÁKOŠOVÁ, Z. - MICHÁLEK, M. - VOJTECH, M.: Panoráma slovenskej literatúry I. Bratislava : SPN, 2004. ISBN 80-10-00316-6
KÁKOŠOVÁ, Zuzana: Zo staršej slovenskej literatúry 2. Bratislava : Stimul, 2013, dostupné na:
http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/FIF_ZK_slovlit2.pdf
Additional literature will be presented at the beginning and during the semester.
Absences: More than 2 absences: it is required to report the reason of absence (for example proof of sickness) to the study department FiFUK.
Interim assessment: After completion of the thematic unit: test or written work. Active participation in seminars is also a part of the evaluation. The condition for passing the oral exam is to gain at least 60% of the continuous assessment.
Final evaluation: test or seminar work and oral exam. In the overall evaluation the student must achieve at least 60% of the evaluation in order to complete the course. The criteria for the overall assessment will be specified at the beginning of the semester. Academic integrity violations will not be tolerated and will result in loosing the achieved points.
Slovak, Czech, prescriptive form of Slovak
1. Characteristics of baroque literature
2. Literary languages in the Baroque period
3. Baroque literary genres
4. Baroque Spiritual Poetry I (Protestant)
5. Baroque Spiritual Poetry II (Catholic)
6. Baroque love poetry (Alamod poetry and Štefan Ferdinand Selecký)
7. Baroque historical poetry (Štefan Pilárik)
8. Baroque didactic-reflexive poetry (Peter Benický and HugolínGavlovič)
9. Baroque prose I (memoirs, biographies and autobiographies)
10. Baroque prose II (travel diaries and travelogues)
11. Baroque prose III (defenses and praises of the Slovak nation)
12. Baroque drama, Protestant and Catholic
40/60
Upon successful completion of the course, the student has knowledge of the history of Slovak Baroque literature, is able to interpret texts in literary, historical and interliterary contexts.
VOJTECH, Miloslav: Slovenská klasicistická a preromantická literatúra. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2020. ISBN 978-80-223-5023-5.
VOJTECH, Miloslav: Od baroka k romantizmu. Literárne smery a tendencie v slovenskej literatúre v rokoch 1780 - 1840. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského 2003. ISBN 80-223-1902-3.
MARČOK, Viliam: Počiatky slovenskej novodobej prózy. Bratislava 1968.
ŠTEVČEK, Ján: Dejiny slovenského románu. Bratislava: Tatran 1989.
ŠMATLÁK, Stanislav: Dejiny slovenskej literatúry I, II. Bratislava: NLC, 1997, 1999. ISBN 80-88878-11-X (I.), ISBN 80-88878-50-0 (II.).
Additional literature and sources will be assigned during the first class. Some reading material is available in MS Teams.
1. Active participation in the seminar, presentation based on secondary literature (students have to be able to adequately respond to questions from literary history and literary theory). Without fulfilling the condition of active participation in the seminar, students will not be able to participate in the exam.
2. Participation in lectures.
3. Students are allowed two absences without giving a reason, in case of further absences it is necessary to prove a written document about the reasons for non-participation.
4. The final exam (realized in the exam period) consists of a written test and an oral part. In all parts of the evaluation (written and oral), students have to achieve at least 60 percent success. Academic integrity violations will not be tolerated and will result in loosing the achieved points.
Classification scale:
A: 100% - 93%
B: 92% - 85%
C: 84% - 77%
D: 76% - 69%
E: 68% - 60%
FX: 59% - 0%
Languages: Slovak language, receptive knowledge of the Czech language and the Bernolák´s variant of Slovak language
Slovak poetry in the first phase of the Slovak National Revival (A. Doležal, J. Palkovič, B. Tablic, J. Fándly, P. J. Šafárik);
Prose in the period of Enlightenment Classicism and Pre-Romanticism (J. I. Bajza, J. Fándly, A. Ottmayer, K. Kuzmány, J. Chalupka);
Ján Hollý;
Ján Kollár;
Karol Kuzmány;
Dramatic production and theatrical life in the years 1780 - 1840 (J. Palkovič, Š. Petruš, J. Chalupka);
Verse and prosody in the period of Classicism and Pre-Romanticism;
Artistic translation and interliterary relations;
Literary history and criticism in the years 1780 - 1840.
40 during semester/60 during exam session
Students will acquire knowledge about the literary-historical development of Slovak literature from the beginnings of Classicism to the end of Pre-Romanticism, will become familiar with the typological characteristics of literary periods; will be able to analyse and interpret texts; will be able to perceive history of Slovak literature of the period in its interliterary contexts.
KRULÁKOVÁ, Anna: Tri cesty od romantizmu. Bratislava: UK, 2012, ISBN 978-80-223-2604-9.
ŠMATLÁK, Stanislav: Dejiny slovenskej literatúry II. Bratislava: NLC, 1999, ISBN 80-88878-50-0.
ŠMATLÁK, Stanislav: Dve storočia slovenskej lyriky. Bratislava: Tatran, 1979.
ŠTEVČEK, Ján: Dejiny slovenského románu. Bratislava: Tatran 1989.
ZAJAC, Peter - SCHMARCOVÁ, Ľubica: Slovenský romantizmus. Synopticko-pulzačný model kultúrneho javu. Brno: Host, 2019, ISBN978-80-7491-545-1.
Ďalšia doplnková študijná literatúra k jednotlivým témam bude študentom poskytnutá na začiatku semestra.
Additional literature and sources will be assigned during the first class. Some reading material is available in MS Teams.
1. Active participation in the seminar, presentation based on secondary literature (students have to be able to adequately respond to questions from literary history and literary theory). Without fulfilling the condition of active participation in the seminar, students will not be able to participate in the exam.
2. Participation in lectures.
3. Students are allowed two absences without giving a reason, in case of further absences it is necessary to prove a written document about the reasons for non-participation.
4. The final exam (realized in the exam period) consists of a written test and an oral part. In all parts of the evaluation (written and oral), students have to achieve at least 60 percent success. Academic integrity violations will not be tolerated and will result in loosing the achieved points.
Classification scale:
A: 100% - 93%
B: 92% - 85%
C: 84% - 77%
D: 76% - 69%
E: 68% - 60%
FX: 59% - 0%
Slovak language
Lyrical-epics and epics in Slovak Romanticism (S. Chalupka, A. Sládkovič, J. Botto);
Slovak romantic ballad;
Slovak Romantic Poetry and Reflective Poetry (A. Sládkovič, J. Kráľ, S. Vozár);
Messianic line of Slovak Romanticism (S. B. Hroboň, M. M. Hodža);
Slovak Romantic Prose (J. M. Hurban, J. Kalinčiak);
Sentimental short prose in the 1860s and 1870s (M. Š. Ferienčík, D. Bachát-Dumný);
Postromantic Prose (J. Záborský, Ľ. Kubáni, G. K. Zechenter Laskomerský);
Poetry between Romanticism to Realism (K. Banšell);
Dramatic production and concepts of drama in the period of Romanticism and Post-Romanticism (M. Dohnány, J. Podhradský, J. Palárik, J. Záborský, Ľ. Kubáni);
Literary history and theory in the 19th century;
Translated literature in the period of Romanticism and Post-Romanticism.
40 during semester/60 during exam session
Students will acquire knowledge about the literary-historical development of Slovak literature in the period of Romanticism and Post-Romanticism (40s - 70s of the 19th century), will become familiar with the typological characteristics of literary periods; will be able to analyse and interpret texts; will be able to perceive history of Slovak literature of the period in its interliterary contexts.
ČEPAN, Oskár: Stimuly realizmu. Bratislava: Tatran, 1984.
MIKULOVÁ, Marcela: Paradoxy realizmu. Bratislava: Veda, 2010. ISBN 978-80-224-1153-0.
MIKULOVÁ, Marcela - TARANENKOVÁ, Ivana a kol.: Konfigurácie slovenského realizmu. Synopticko-pulzačný model kultúrneho javu. Brno: Host, 2016, ISBN 978-80-7491-546-8.
PAŠTÉKA, Július: Slovenská dramatika v epoche realizmu. Bratislava: Tatran, 1990, ISBN 80-222-0185-5.
ŠMATLÁK, Stanislav: Dejiny slovenskej literatúry II. Bratislava: NLC, 1999, ISBN 80-88878-50-0.
ŠTEVČEK, Ján: Dejiny slovenského románu. Bratislava: Tatran, 1988.
Additional literature and sources will be assigned during the first class. Some reading material is available in MS Teams.
1. Active participation in the seminar, presentation based on secondary literature (students have to be able to adequately respond to questions from literary history and literary theory). Without fulfilling the condition of active participation in the seminar, students will not be able to participate in the exam.
2. Participation in lectures.
3. Students are allowed two absences without giving a reason, in case of further absences it is necessary to prove a written document about the reasons for non-participation.
4. The final exam (realized in the exam period) consists of a written test and an oral part. In all parts of the evaluation (written and oral), students have to achieve at least 60 percent success. Academic integrity violations will not be tolerated and will result in loosing the achieved points.
Classification scale:
A: 100% - 93%
B: 92% - 85%
C: 84% - 77%
D: 76% - 69%
E: 68% - 60%
FX: 59% - 0%
Slovak language
Poetry in the period of realism (reminiscences of Romanticism in the poetry of S. H. Vajanský, Parnassist tendencies - P. O. Hviezdoslav);
Epics in the period of Realism (P. O. Hviezdoslav, S. H. Vajanský, Ľ. Podjavorinská);
Prose of the founding generation of Realism (S. H. Vajanský, M. Kukučín, E. Maróthy Šoltésová, T. Vansová);
Prose of late Realism in contact with Slovak Modern School (B. Slančíková Timrava, J. G. Tajovský, A. Škarvan);
Prose of the younger generation (L. Podjavorinská, J. Čajak);
Drama in Realism (F. Urbánek, J. Hollý, P. O. Hviezdoslav, J. G. Tajovský);
Literary history and literary criticism, translated literature in Realism.
40 during semester/60 during exam session
Students will acquire knowledge about the literary-historical development of Slovak literature in the period of Realism, will become familiar with the typological characteristics of literary period and its internal differentiations (founding generation of Realism, generation between Realism and Slovak Modern School); will be able to analyse and interpret texts; will be able to perceive history of Slovak literature of the period in its interliterary context.
BÍLIK, René. Interpretácia umeleckého textu. Trnava: Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis, 2009. ISBN 978-80-8082-289-7.
HARPÁŇ, Michal. Teória literatúry. Bratislava: ESA, 1994. ISBN 80-85684-05-5.
HRABÁK, Josef. Poetika. Praha: Československý spisovatel, 1973.
MIKULA, Valér: Hľadanie systému obraznosti. Bratislava: Smena, 1987.
ŠTEVČEK, Ján. Estetika a literatúra. Bratislava: Tatran, 1977
VŠETIČKA, František. Kompoziciána. Preložila Zuzana Vašková. Bratislava: Slovenský spisovateľ, 1986.
ZAJAC, Peter. Tvorivosť literatúry. Bratislava: Slovenský spisovateľ, 1990. ISBN 80-220-0159-7.
ZAMBOR, Ján. Tvarovanie básne, tvarovanie zmyslu. Bratislava: Veda, 2010. ISBN 978-80-224-1154-7.
Definitive list of primary and secondary literature will be specified at the start of the semester, as a result of an agreement between the teacher and students.
What is evaluated:
a) active attendance on seminars, consisting of reading required literature, spoken interpretation during seminars and active participation in discussions (being able to respond to questions from literary history and theory of literature) – 40 percent;
b) presentation during seminar, written assignment or exam during the semester – 60 percent.
The student is allowed to have two absences without specification of the cause, in case of more absences, written evidence of the cause of absence is needed.
Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of earned points in the relevant item.
Slovak
1. Basic difference between a factual text (scientific text, administrative text, report...) and an artistic text. Characteristics of journalistic text. Literature as an artistic text and its research.
2. Three types of readers (according to J. Števček): naïve, sentimental, and discursive reader.
3. Attempting to define terms: analysis of artistic text and interpretation of artistic text.
4. Definition of terms denotation and connotation. Significance of preference of denotation and connotation in artistic texts.
5. Model of literary communication according to Nitra school. Overview of the most-used methods of interpretation in literary work.
6. Dialectics of relationship between poetological analysis of literary text and interpretation.
7. Basic typological differences between lyrical and epic. Narrator in epic text and lyrical subject in lyrical text.
8. Defining basic stanza forms of poetry and literary genres of prose. Defining relationships between form (stanza and genre) and semantics of texts.
9. Basic models of macro-compositional approach in prosaic texts. Fabula and syuzhet in epic works.
10. Analysis and interpretation of a specific poetic text.
11. Analysis and interpretation of a specific prosaic text.
12. Analysis and interpretation of a specific dramatic text.
100/0
Attendees will obtain theoretical knowledge about interpretation of literary text, as well as basic interpretational skills. Interpretation of an artistic text as a method also strengthens soft skills such as complex problem solving and critical thinking and it enables in-depth work with a text in different domains, e. g. in teaching or lecturing.
HRABÁK, Josef. Poetika. Praha: Československý spisovatel, 1973.
KOLI, František. Interpretačné reflexie. Nitra: Aspekt, 2003. ISBN 80-8050-114-9.
MOCNÁ, Dagmar, PETERKA, Josef. Encyklopedie literárních žánrů. Praha: Paseka, 2004. ISBN 80-7185-669-X .
NÜNNING, Ansgar (ed.). Lexikon teorie literatury a kultury. Brno: Host, 2006. ISBN 80-7294-170-4
VŠETIČKA, František. Kompoziciána. Bratislava: Slovenský spisovateľ, 1986.
a. During the semester (50 points): for preparation and active attendance of seminars 20 points, two absences allowed; 30 points for written assignment (essay or seminar paper). Requirement for admission to final exam in January: obtaining at least 30 points.
b. During exam term: final exam – 50 points. The exam consists of content discussed on lectures and seminars.
Violation of academic principles will lead to nullifying points obtained in the respective part of evaluation.
Grading scale: 100 – 92 points: A; 91 – 84 points: B; 83 – 76 points: C; 75 – 68 points: D; 67 – 60 points: E; 59 – 0 points: FX.
Slovak
1. Interpretation of literary text. Origin and meaning of the term interpretation. Interpretation in the model of literary communication. Typology of interpretation.
2. Layers and dimensions of literary text. Specifics of interpretation of intermedial functioning of literary text.
3. Intertextuality and metatextuality.
4. Metaphor and invoked world. Metaphor, its origin and typology.
5. Combining metaphor with metonymy, combining different types of metaphor in poetry or prose. “Traditional” and avantgarde metaphor.
6. Rhyme, assonance, consonance. Types of rhyme. Functions of rhyme.
7. Time in poetry and prose.
8. Space in poetry and prose.
9. Literary character. Character and chronotope. Types of literary characters.
10. Silence as a way of communication.
11. Composition and architectonics of text.
12. Interpretation as a competence (evaluation of students written assignment).
50/50
The student will furthermore develop knowledge of theory of literature. Therefore, he/she will be capable of better understanding of the essence of artistic literature and its functions, the branches of theory of literature, the theory of literary communication and the theory of a literary work. In this way, the student will become even more competent in expertly grasping artistic literature; in its complex interpretation. These competencies are an important part of the process of teaching and lecturing.
BAGIN, Albin. Vitality of verbal formation. Bratislava: Tatran, 1982.
HRABÁK, Josef. Reading about the novel. Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství, 1981.
LOTMAN, Yuri Mikhailovich. The structure of the artistic text. Bratislava: Tatran, 1990. ISBN 80-222-0188-X.
ŠIDÁK, Pavel. Introduction to the study of genology. Prague: Akropolis, 2013. ISBN 978-80-7470-040-8
VŠETIČKA, František. Composite. Bratislava: Slovenský spisovateľ, 1986.
Podmienkou na absolvovanie predmetu je získanie aspoň šesťdesiatich bodov zo sto možných. Body možno získať za aktívnu účasť a prípravu na semináre (40) a interpretačnú esej odovzdanú v posledných týždňoch výučbovej časti zimného semestra (60 bodov). Porušenie akademickej etiky má za následok anulovanie získaných bodov v príslušnej položke.
Povolené sú maximálne dve absencie.
Klasifikačná stupnica: 100 – 92 bodov: A; 91 – 84 bodov: B; 83 – 76 bodov: C; 75 – 68 bodov: D; 67 – 60 bodov: E; 59 – 0 bodov: FX.
1. Prose as a technical variant of literature. Characteristics and typology of epics.
2. Literary types. The relationship between poetry and epics.
3. Epic genres: medium-scale genres.
4. Genres of epic: novel.
5. Fabula and subject in epics.
6. Basic concepts of epics (theme, substance, theme, problem, epic conflict, functionality, penetration, motive, motivation, topos, allusion, ...).
7. Composition and architecture.
8. Narrator and typology of the narrator. The perspective of storytelling.
9. Character - character, type and anthroponymy.
10. Space in prose (epic). The border phenomenon.
11. Time in prose (epic). Time as a compositional and philosophical factor.
12. Artistic prose as a structure.
100/0
The student has a developed ability of advanced professional work with prosaic (epic) text. Understands its individual form-forming aspects and their mutual structural relationship.
BOKNÍKOVÁ, Andrea et al. Portraits of Slovak Writers 1. Bratislava: UK, 1998. ISBN 8022312371.
BOKNÍKOVÁ, Andrea et al. Portraits of Slovak Writers 3. Bratislava: UK, 2003. ISBN 8022317799.
BOKNÍKOVÁ, Andrea et al. Portraits of Slovak Writers 4. Bratislava: UK, 2007. ISBN 9788022323239.
CHMEL, Rudolf. Dictionary of works of Slovak literature of the 20th century. Bratislava: Kalligram & Institute of Slovak Literature SAS, 2006. ISBN: 80-7149-918-8.
ZAMBOR, Jan et al. Portraits of Slovak Writers 2. Bratislava: UK, 1998. ISBN 802231546X.
Supplementary literature will be recommended at the beginning and during the semester.
The course has a 100% continuous assessment:
preparation for seminars and active participation in seminars: 25%
paper / presentation: 25%
seminar work: 50%
Two absences per semester are allowed without excuse. Other absences can only be justified on the basis of confirmation (eg medical reasons).
Continuous assessment is obtained / checked throughout the semester and closes in the last week of teaching.
Overall course evaluation:
100-92 = A, 91-83 = B, 82-74 = C, 73-67 = D, 66-60 = E, 59 and less = Fx
Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of points obtained in the relevant evaluation item.
The seminar will focus on some of the above educational trajectories.
A) Slovak poetry of the 20th century.
B) Slovak prose of the 20th century.
C) Slovak drama of the 20th century.
D) Transformation of genres in 20th century literature.
E) Poetics of literary group, direction, generation.
The trajectory of the given semester, together with the course annotation, will be published on the department's website two weeks before the start of teaching. The exact program of seminars will be announced by the teacher at the beginning of the semester.
100 / 0
Students will gain additional knowledge about individual author's poetics and the functioning of literary texts in contemporary literary-historical and aesthetic contexts. They will get acquainted with contemporary (literary criticism) and later metatexts (monographs and studies about the author, memories, interviews, etc.). They will develop the ability to analyze and interpret a literary text. They will try to indicate the developmental relevance of the text.
DAROVEC, Peter. Súčasná slovenská literatúra v perspektíve literárnej kritiky. Bratislava: Stimul, 2020. ISBN 978-80-8127-284-4. Dostupné na: http://fphil.uniba.sk/stimul
ŠRANK, Jaroslav. Individualizovaná literatúra. Slovenská poézia konca 20. a začiatku 21. storočia z perspektívy nastupujúcich autorov. Bratislava: Cathedra, 2013. ISBN 978-80-89495-12-2.
BARBORÍK, Vladimír. Vývin slovenskej prózy po roku 1989. Neuvedené, 2014. Dostupné na: https://www.academia.edu/11502524/Skript%C3%A1_pr%C3%B3za_po_r_1989
PASSIA Radoslav et al. Hľadanie súčasnosti. Bratislava: Literárne informačné centrum, 2014. ISBN 978-80-8119-085-8.
MIKULA, Valér, et al. Slovník slovenských spisovateľov. Bratislava: Kalligram a Ústav slovenskej literatúry SAV, 2005. ISBN 80-7149-801-7.
A maximum of 2 absences are allowed within the course. The condition for completing the course is active participation in seminars (reading the fiction minimum, studying professional literature, participating in discussions (max 40 p) and the elaboration of the final seminar work (max 60 p). The conditions for completing the course apply to both full-time and distance form of the course (distance form is implemented through MS Teams). Academic integrity violations will not be tolerated and will result in loosing the achieved points.
Classification scale:
100-92 A, 91-84 B, 83-76 C, 75-68 D, 67-60 E, 59 and less Fx
Capacity is limited to 15 students in a seminar group.
1. Interpretive reading of selected text of P. Macsovszky's poetry
2. Interpretive reading of selected text of N. Ružičková's poetry
3. Interpretive reading of selected text of M. Habaja's poetry
4. Interpretive reading of selected text of E. Groch‘s poetry
5. Interpretive reading of selected text of M. Ferenčuhová's poetry
6. Interpretive reading of a selected prose text by V. Klimáček
7. Interpretive reading of a selected prose text by S. Rakús
8. Interpretive reading of a selected prose text by V. Staviarsky
9. Interpretive reading of a selected prose text by I. Gibová
10. Interpretive reading of a selected text by D. Majling
11. Interpretive reading of a selected prose text by A. Sabuchová
12. Interpretive reading of a selected prose text by M. Janáč
The course is evaluated 100% continuously, the evaluation closes in the credit week.
Students will gain an overview of the key tendencies that determine the expression and meaning of contemporary literary work. and the changes of relationship of authors to the literary tradition since 1989. The result of the education will also be a deepening of literary critical thinking, communication skills and creativity of students.
GALÍK, Josef, at al. Panorama české literatury (Literární dějiny od počátků do současnosti). Olomouc: Rubico, 1994. ISBN 80-85839-04-0.
MACHALA, Lubomír. Průvodce po nových jménech české poezie a prózy. Olomouc: Rubico, 1996 ISBN 80-85839-13-X.
DOKOUPIL, Blahoslav, et al. Slovník české prózy 1945 – 1994. Ostrava: Sfinga, 1994. ISBN 80-85491-84-2.
HOLÝ, Jiří, et al. Český parnas. Praha: Galaxie, 1993. ISBN 80-852204-07-X.
LOPATKA, Jan. Předpoklady tvorby. Praha: Československý spisovatel, 1991. ISBN 80-202-0258.
Ongoing - during the teaching part: oral introduction to one of the selected seminar topics (max 10 p), seminar work submitted no later than the end of the teaching part of the semester - in-depth interpretation of the selected problem (significant motif, etc.) related to one of the seminar topics (max 10 p), active participation in seminars, participation in the discussion with relevant inputs (max 10 p), final test in the last two weeks (max 70 p).
A maximum of two excused absences are accepted. Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of earned points in the relevant item.
Classification scale: 100-92 A, 91-84 B, 83-76 C, 75-68 D, 67-60 E, 59 and less Fx
1 Modern Czech Literature - from the Manifesto of Czech Modernism to Modern Revue
2. Avant-garde trends and social consequences - Devětsil association and its representatives
3 Poetry of left-wing, socially and anarchist-oriented authors: from P. Bezruč through J. Wolkr to S. K. Neuman
4 Responses to the War as Absurdities of the Modern Age: Jaroslav Hašek: The Fates of the Good Soldier Švejk during the World Wars - Part 1
5 German Literature in Czech Historical and Cultural Contexts: Franz Kafka: The Process
6 Expressionist tendencies between the two wars: Richard Weiner: An empty chair (from the short story book Skleb)
7 The Pragmatism and Noetics of Karel Čapek: The Glider (as a Part of the Noetic Trilogy)
8 Liberated Theater: J. Voskovec and J. Werich
9 Scary and fun as modern and current: Ladislav Fuchs: The cremator
10 Coping with the mistakes of the "lyrical age": Milan Kundera: Ridiculous loves
11 Language Substandard of General Czech in Literary Text: Bohumil Hrabal: I Served the King of England
12 Poetry of solitude and at the same time social significance: Vladimír Holan: Night with Hamlet
ongoing evaluation 100 %.
Upon successful completion of this course, students will gain a comprehensive picture of the literary-historical development of Czech literature of the 20th century. They will be acquainted with contemporary literary trends, from the advent of modernism through the avant-garde, neo-modernist manifestations of 60's literature to the normalization fragmentation of literature into official ideologically indoctrinated, dissident-samizdat and exile. Through analytical reading of selected texts by representative authors across literary generations, they are also able to interpret the most significant poetic, prose and dramatic works of this literature, important both in the European context and in relation to the relationship with Slovak literature.
GALÍK, Josef, at al. Panorama české literatury (Literární dějiny od počátků do současnosti). Olomouc: Rubico, 1994. ISBN 80-85839-04-0.
MACHALA, Lubomír. Průvodce po nových jménech české poezie a prózy. Olomouc: Rubico, 1996 ISBN 80-85839-13-X.
DOKOUPIL, Blahoslav, et al. Slovník české prózy 1945 – 1994. Ostrava: Sfinga, 1994. ISBN 80-85491-84-2.
HOLÝ, Jiří, et al. Český parnas. Praha: Galaxie, 1993. ISBN 80-852204-07-X.
LOPATKA, Jan. Předpoklady tvorby. Praha: Československý spisovatel, 1991. ISBN 80-202-0258.
Ongoing - during the teaching part: oral introduction to one of the selected seminar topics (max 10 p), seminar work submitted no later than the end of the teaching part of the semester - in-depth interpretation of the selected problem (significant motif, etc.) related to one of the seminar topics (max 10 p), active participation in seminars, participation in the discussion with relevant inputs (max 10 p), final test in the last two weeks (max 70 p).
A maximum of two excused absences are accepted. Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of earned points in the relevant item.
Classification scale: 100-92 A, 91-84 B, 83-76 C, 75-68 D, 67-60 E, 59 and less Fx
capacity is limited to 20 students in a seminar group
1 National character in context and essayistic outputs: Vladimír Macura: Masaryk's shoes
2 Subjective idealism as a forerunner of modernism in literature: Ladislav Klíma: The Suffering of Prince Sternenhoch
3 Poetics as a specific Czech avant-garde direction. Transformations of poetics by V. Nezval, K. Biebl and J. Seifert
4 Modern prose techniques, inspiration from film as new art: Ladislav Vančura: The end of old times
5 An informed return to the 1940s from the perspective of the 1950s: Josef Škvorecký: Cowards.
6 An Informed Return to the 1950s from the Perspective of the 1960s: Milan Kundera: A Joke
7 Poetics and Nostalgic Reminiscences of “Lost Time in Prose: Viktor Fischl: The Fifth Quarter
8 An absurd drama as a reaction to a normalizing reality: Václav Havel
9 Prose of authenticity as a resistance to the normalization world of simulators: Ludvík Vaculík: The Czech Dream
10 The Shoah Literature, Returns to the Holocaust: Arnošt Lustig: A Prayer for Kateřina Horowitzová
11 Czech-Slovak context - intertwining of cultural codes: Egon Bondy: Episode 96
12 New forms of narration in postmodern contexts: Petr Šabach: Shit is burning, Miloš Urban: Dead girls
ongoing evaluation 100 %.
Upon successful completion of this course, students will gain a deeper and more plastic picture of the literary-historical development of Czech literature of the 20th century. The course deepens all the knowledge gained in the course Czech Literature 1. It shows other, but equally important forms of extremely structured and thematically and poetically diverse modern Czech literature. By analytical reading of other texts by representative authors, they are also able to interpret significant poetic, prose and dramatic works of this literature, which is also important in the European context, but also with regard to the relationship with Slovak literature.
The recommended literature will be updated according to the place that will be selected as the destination of the excursion in the given year.
The student must obtain at least 60 points out of 100 possible. The student obtains points by completing the mandatory part of the excursion program (50 points) and preparing a short paper or by completing a colloquium after the excursion (50 points). Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of the obtained points in the relevant evaluation item.
Classification scale: 100-92: A; 91-85: B; 84-75: C; 74-67: D; 66-60: E; 59-0: FX.
The content of the course will depend on the place that will be selected in the given year as the destination of the excursion.
100/0
Through direct contact, the student gets acquainted with literary monuments and literary institutions, museums, archival workplaces and libraries in Slovakia and abroad. As a result, he / she will be able to perceive literature in a more plastic context.
All official textbooks for elementary schools and high schools
Updated state education program for the 2nd level of elementary school
Updated state education program for grammar schools with four-year and five-year education program
School education program of the training school
Internal regulations of the school
KOSOVÁ, B. – TOMENGOVÁ, A.: Profesijná praktická príprava budúcich učiteľov. Banská Bystrica: Belianum, 2015, ISBN 978-80-557-0860-7. Dostupné na: https://www.minedu.sk/data/att/8032.pdf
Course assessment:
• 1-hour long classroom observation
• active participation in the extracurricular activities of the teaching mentor
• student evaluation by the teaching mentor,
• evaluation of the teacher's diary submitted by the student by the set deadline to the training supervisor
Grade percentage: A (100-92 %); B (91-84 %); C (83-76 %); D (75-68 %); E (67-60 %), Fx (59-0 %). Not following the set deadlines and the supervisor's instructions may be punished by lowering the grade or not receiving the credits for teacher training.
Slovak
Familiarising students with the course requirements
Familiarising students with the pedagogical documentation, conceptual and strategic documents of the training school
Participation in classes within the scope of the trainee teacher's full-time duties and extracurricular activities.
Producing classroom observation records from the teaching mentor’s classes
Producing class analyses.
Production of written preparations for lessons.
Producing a teaching diary and submitting it to the Head of Teaching Practice.
100 %
After completing the course, the student will:
• deepen their knowledge in the field of generally binding legal regulations related to the work of a teacher, pedagogical and other documentation, conceptual and strategic documents of the school,
• develop their professional competencies necessary for their independent planning, projecting, management, and organisation of the educational process in the relevant subject based on the valid curricular documents while adapting the educational program to specific groups of pupils,
• develop their professional competencies related to the didactic, pedagogic, and psychologic analysis of the individual parts of the lesson,
• develop their competencies to apply the knowledge from educational psychology and subject didactics in the educational process,
• develop their abilities to evaluate diverse teaching situations and processes,
• deepen their knowledge about the differences in children's development that result from their health and social disadvantages or talent, so that they can effectively cooperate with the special educators, psychologists, and other professionals during the educational process, and follow their professional recommendations and findings,
• develop their skills at using didactic materials,
• gain the competencies related to creating a pedagogical portfolio,
• develop their abilities to self-evaluate and to improve their professional development further,
• develop their abilities to assess the suitability of the educational materials,
• develop their communication skills and their abilities to express and accept effective criticism and praise.
Selection of scholarly literature according to the chosen topic of thesis;
Current Directive of the Rector of the Comenius University on the essentials of the final thesis;
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2019-01-09]. Dostupné na: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Dostupné na: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske-studium/zaverecne-prace/
Submitting a partial output in the form of a proposal of the main objectives and structure of the bachelor thesis, methodology, list of references with an overview of available information sources on the selected topic of the bachelor thesis.
Grade percentage:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very well – above average standard,
C: 76-84%, well - reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient – the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient – additional work required
Violation of academic ethics results in the cancellation of earned points in the relevant item.
Slovak (Czech passive)
Definition of the topic and objective of the final thesis.
Study of scholarly literature.
Excerption of the material.
Theoretical-methodological concept of the thesis.
Methodology of processing the research topic.
Methodology of writing the final thesis.
Formal and compositional requirements of the final theses.
Theory of citation.
Academic ethics and integrity, plagiarism, types of plagiarism.
The main principles of the construction of the scholarly text (content and structure, problems).
Requirements for the final thesis according to the internal quality system of the Comenius University.
(Základné náležitosti odovzdávania záverečných prác. Základné náležitosti obhajoby záverečných prác.)
100/0
The student can define the topic of his/her own bachelor thesis, correctly determine the process's procedure and methods, produce a time plan, and acquire the ability to work selectively and correctly with professional literature on the chosen topic. The student has mastered the basics of scholarly text writing obeying academic ethics rules. He/She has mastered the theory of citing and referencing used and has the skills to create bibliographic references and citations. He/She understands the principles of the structure and content of the bachelor thesis depending on the internal quality system of the UK. He/She understands the causes of plagiarism, recognizes different types of plagiarism, and can avoid them.
Selection of scholarly literature according to the chosen topic of thesis;
Current Directive of the Rector of the Comenius University on the essentials of the final thesis;
LICHNEROVÁ, Lucia. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2019-01-09]. Available at: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prac.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske-studium/zaverecne-prace/
Submission of a partial output in the form of a whole chapter of the bachelor thesis.
Grade percentage:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very well – above average standard,
C: 76-84%, well - reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient – the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient – additional work required
Slovak (Czech passive)
Theoretical-methodological concept of the thesis.
Methodology of processing the research topic.
Formal and compositional requirements of the final theses.
Presentation of results and relevant conclusions within the selected chapter.
100/0
The student can write a whole chapter of the bachelor thesis using adequate methods and relevant information sources, which they can critically evaluate and appropriately present the results and relevant conclusions.
LICHNEROVÁ, L. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác [online]. Bratislava:
Univerzita Komenského, 2016 [cit. 2016-10-09]. Available at: http://stella.uniba.sk/texty/ LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf
Vnútorný predpis č. 5/2020 [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2015 [cit. 2021-09-09]. Available at: https://uniba.sk/fileadmin/ruk/ as/2020/20200527/04a_Studijny_poriadok_FiF_UK.pdf
Záverečné práce [online]. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, 2020 [cit. 2021-08-09]. Available at: https://fphil.uniba.sk/studium/student/bakalarske-a-magisterske studium/zaverecne-prace/
Additional literature depends on the bachelor’s thesis specialization.
Submission of the bachelor's thesis within the deadline specified in the schedule of the current academic year for the relevant date of the state exam. The bachelor thesis is submitted in electronic form via AIS. The thesis must meet the parameters determined by the internal quality system of the Comenius University. The provisions of Article 14 of the Internal Regulation no. 5/2020 (Study Regulations of the Faculty of Arts, Comenius University) apply to the bachelor’s thesis evaluation.
The supervisor of the final thesis and its opponent will prepare assessments of the bachelor's thesis and propose an evaluation in the A-FX grading scale, which the student has at his/her disposal min. 3 working days before the defence. Bachelor thesis evaluation criteria:
The contribution of the bachelor's thesis, the fulfilment of the objectives of the thesis and the requirements for the content of the bachelor’s thesis given by the internal quality system of the Comenius University. The following is assessed: demonstration of knowledge and skills, ability to work creatively in the study program, ability applied to collecting, interpreting and processing of basic professional literature; in the case of a practically oriented bachelor's thesis, mastering the application of theoretical principles in practice and verifiability of hypotheses.
Originality of the thesis (bachelor’s thesis must not be plagiarized, must not infringe the copyrights of other authors); the documentation for the defence of the bachelor's thesis also includes protocols of originality from the CRZP and Theses, to the results of which the thesis supervisor and the opponent express their opinions in their assessments.
Correctness of citing the selected information sources, research results of other authors and author's collectives, correctness of description of methods and working procedures of other authors or author's collectives.
Compliance of the structure of the bachelor's thesis with the prescribed composition defined by the internal quality system of the Comenius University.
Respecting the recommended range of the bachelor's thesis (the recommended range of the bachelor's thesis is usually 30 - 40 standard pages = 54,000 to 72,000 characters, including spaces), the adequacy of the range of the thesis is assessed by the thesis supervisor.
Linguistic and stylistic level of the thesis and formal layout.
The student orally presents the content, achieved goals and conclusions of the bachelor's thesis and answers the questions and comments of the thesis supervisor, opponent, or members of the examination board. The commission will comprehensively evaluate the quality of the bachelor's thesis, assess the method and form of the defence and the student's ability to adequately respond to comments and questions in the assessments of the thesis supervisor and of the opponent.
Part of the colloquial defence of the bachelor's thesis is also the answering of two questions that are related to the theoretical and methodological background of the thesis.
The final evaluation will consider the evaluations from the supervisor's and opponent's assessment, the evaluation of the final thesis defence by the commission and the evaluation of answers to two questions chosen by the commission. In the case of the Fx mark from the second part of the colloquial defence, the same final mark is given to the student.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 0/100
slovak
1. Presentation of the bachelor's thesis to students with the commission for state exams, opponents of the bachelor's thesis and others present.
2. Student’s response to comments and questions in the assessments.
3. Student’s response to the commission's questions and questions in the discussion.
Scale of assessment (preliminary/final): 0/100
The student has mastered the basic requirements of writing a professional text in compliance with the rules of academic ethics, he/she is able to work creatively in the field of study in which he/she completed the study program, he/she has adequate knowledge and understanding of the selected issue. He/she can apply his/her skills to collecting, interpreting and processing of basic professional literature, or to their use in practice or has the ability to solve a partial task related to the focus of the bachelor's thesis. After a successful defence of the bachelor's thesis, the student can logically deal with the theoretical background of the bachelor's thesis and respond to the questions on the selected issues.
The literature will be specified according to the focus of the course at the beginning of the semester.
Students will have access to all presentations, which will be published in the course's Teams group.
The course is evaluated continuously and the condition for its completion is to obtain at least sixty percent of the total evaluation. Active participation, preparation for the course, and completion of the final test are all part of the assessment.
The criteria for the overall assessment will be specified at the beginning of the semester.
Violation of academic ethics by students results in the cancellation of the evaluation in the relevant item.
Absences: 2 absences without apology required. More than 2 absences: an apology is required and submitted to the relevant study assistant at the FiFUK Study Department.
A: 100% - 93%
B: 92% - 85%
C: 84% - 77%
D: 76% - 69%
E: 68% - 60%
FX: 59% - 0%
Slovak
1. Ancient literature (with emphasis on Greek and Roman)
2. Medieval literature (Czech, German, French, Italian, Spanish, English)
3. Renaissance literature (Czech, Italian, French, Spanish, German and English)
4. Baroque literature (Czech, Italian, Spanish and English)
5. Enlightenment and classicism
6. Pre-Romanticism and Romanticism
7. Realism
8. Modern and avant-garde directions
9. Literature of the 20th century between the two wars
10. Literature of the 20th and 21st centuries after 1945
Note: the specification of the program will be published in the course annotation at the beginning of the semester according to its thematic focus.
100/0
Students will gain a basic orientation in world literature from the Middle Ages to the present with an emphasis on selected key personalities and their relations with Slovak literature in various development periods. Interpretive, contextualising and comparative skills will be highlighted.
The literature will be specified according to the focus of the course at the beginning of the semester.
The course is evaluated continuously and the condition for its completion is to obtain at least sixty percent of the total evaluation. It includes active participation and preparation for seminars and the elaboration of an interpretation essay.
The criteria for the overall assessment will be specified at the beginning of the semester.
Violation of academic ethics by students results in the cancellation of the evaluation in the relevant item.
Absences: 2 absences without apology required. More than 2 absences: an apology is required and submitted to the relevant study assistant at the FiFUK Study Department.
Slovak
1. Baroque
2. Enlightenment
3. Classicism
4. Pre-Romanticism
5. Romanticism
6. Realism
7. Modern
8. Avant-garde
9. Literature of the 20th century between the two wars
10. Literature of the 20th and 21st centuries after 1945
Note: the specification of the program will be published in the course annotation at the beginning of the semester according to its thematic focus.
100/0
Students will gain a basic orientation in world literature from the Baroque to the present with an emphasis on selected key personalities and their relations with Slovak literature in various development periods. Interpretive, contextualising and comparative skills will be highlighted.
BAĎURÍKOVÁ, Zita et al. Školská pedagogika. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2001. ISBN 80-223-1536-2.
BREAUX, Annette. Rychlá pomoc pro učitele. Praha: Portál, 2020. ISBN 9788026216605.
HLÁSNA, Slávka et al. Úvod do pedagogiky. Nitra: Enigma, 2006. ISBN 80-89132-29-4.
KRATOCHVÍLOVÁ, Emília et al. Úvod do pedagogiky. Trnava: Pedagogická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity v Trnave, 2007. ISBN 978-80-8082-145-6.
KYRIACOU, CHris. Klíčové dovednosti učitele. Praha: Portál, 2008. ISBN 9788073674342.
VALIŠOVÁ, Alena a Hana KASÍKOVÁ. Pedagogika pro učitele. Praha: Grada, 2007. ISBN 978-80-247-1734-0.
* additional literature will be added at the beginning or during the semester.
during the semester: active participation in seminars, cooperation with other students, elaboration of the assigned topic and its presentation at the seminar, written work
The condition for successful completion of the course is to obtain at least 60% of the maximum possible evaluation of the course. The rating is given on a scale:
A (100-91%, excellent - excellent results),
B (90-81%, very good - above average standard),
C (80-73%, good - normal reliable work),
D (72-66%, satisfactory - acceptable results),
E (65-60%, sufficient - results meet minimum criteria),
Fx (59-0%, insufficient - additional work required)
The condition for meeting the criteria for passing the course is to achieve min. 60% of the total interim evaluation.
Min. 2 justified absences.
Violation of academic ethics will result in the cancellation of the ongoing evaluation.
The exact dates of the mid-term evaluation as well as the topics will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Weight of the intermediate / final evaluation: 100/0
Slovak
1. Educational sciences: traditional and modern concepts.
2. Understanding of education and its explanation.
3. Socialization and education.
4. Philosophical basis of pedagogical thinking. Theoretical concepts of education.
5. Social context of education.
6. Education in the changes of time (basic development trends of pedagogy - J. A. Komenský, J. J. Rousseau, J. H. Pestalozzi, J. F. Herbart and pedagogical currents of the 20th century).
7. Subject and object of education, educational interaction.
8. Teacher's personality and profession.
9. Institutionalization of education. School, its development and functions.
10. Alternative schools.
12. Pupil and his social role, family and its educational function, cooperation with school.
Selected current problems of educational practice.
100/0
Upon successful completion of the course, the student has basic knowledge of selected disciplines of pedagogy about the nature of education, the philosophical basis of pedagogical thinking and theoretical concepts of education in a historical context. Understands basic trade unions, has knowledge of the domains of education. He knows the basic development trends of pedagogy, as well as the basic developmental stages of the school. Understands the school as an institution of formal education and knows the forms of non-formal education. He has basic knowledge about selected current problems of pedagogical practice, about the family and its functions, about the pupil and about learning problems and about educational problems at school. Educational problems, education of students with special educational problems. Educational activities of the school (school climate, hidden curriculum). From education to self-education, free education.
DROŠČÁK, Martin. Úvod do všeobecnej didaktiky pre študentov učiteľstva. Trnava: UCM, 2015 ISBN 978-80-8105-655-0.
KALHOUS, Zděnek a Otto OBST. Školní didaktika. Praha: Portál, 2001. ISBN 978-80-7367-571-4.
KYRIACOU, Chris. Klíčové dovednosti učitele. Cesty k lepšímu vyučování. 2.vyd. Praha: Portál, 2004. ISBN 80-7178-022-7.
PETLÁK. Erich. Všeobecná didaktika. Bratislava: IRIS. 2016. ISBN 987-80-8153-064-7.
SKALKOVÁ, Jarmila. Obecná didaktika. Praha: Grada, 2007. ISBN 978-80-247-1821-7.
TUREK, Ivan. Didaktika. Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer, 2014. ISBN 978-80-8168-004-5.
Minimum success rate: 60 percent Continuous assessment (teaching part): - 20% active participation in the seminar - 40% (summary of 5 assignments - creation of educational goals; creation of a thematic plan of the teacher; didactic analysis of the curriculum, description and practical use of one teaching method; preparation for teaching) Final rating: - 40% final test Classification scale: A (100-92), B (91-84), C (83-76), D (75-68), E (67-60), FX (59% or less). Two absences are acceptable; seminar assignments must all be developed, presented and submitted. The exact date and topics of the mid-term evaluation will be announced at the beginning of the semester. Exam dates will be announced no later than the last week of the training section.
Slovak
1. Historical and current concepts of didactics. 2. Theory of education and learning. 3. Modernization of educational content. Teaching design. 4. Basic program pedagogical documents. Teacher teaching planning. 5. Procedural aspects of teaching. Principles of the teaching process. 6. Teaching communication. 7. Means and conditions of teaching. 8. Teaching methods. 9. Organizational forms of teaching. 10. Pupil learning - cognitive-developmental aspects. 11. Differentiation of teaching according to the specifics of students. 12. Evaluation of teaching processes and results. 13. Theoretical models and concepts of teaching.
60/40
After completing the course, the student has the basic theoretical knowledge of general didactics - subject and methodological profile of didactics. The student has sufficient knowledge, skills and attitudes necessary to practice the profession of teacher, has the knowledge and skills to plan and organize students' learning activities and teaching activities of the teacher.
GAVORA, Peter. Sprievodca metodológiou kvalitatívneho výskumu. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2007, 230 s., ISBN 978-80-223-2317-8.
GULOVÁ, Lenka., ŠÍP, Radim. Výzkumné metódy v pedagogické praxi. Praha: Grada Publishing, 2013, 230s., ISBN 978-80-247-4368-4.
HENDL, Jan. Kvalitativní výzkum. Základní teorie, metody a aplikace. Druhé aktualizované vydání. Praha: Portál, 2008, 407s., ISBN 978-80-7367-485-4.
MAŇÁK, Josef a kol. Slovník pedagogické metodologie. Brno: Paido, 2005, 134s., ISBN 80-210-3802-0.
STRAUSS, Anselm., CORBINOVÁ, Juliet. Základy kvalitativního výskumu. Postupy a techniky zakotvené teorie. Boskovice: Nakladatelství Albert, 1999, 196s., ISBN 80-85834-60-X.
ŠEĎOVÁ, Klára., ŠVAŘÍČEK, Roman. Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. Praha: Portál, 2007, 377 s., ISBN 978-80-7367-313-0.
ŠVEC, Štefan a kol. Metodológia vied o výchove. Kvantitatívno-scientistické a kvalitatívno-humanitné prístupy. Bratislava: IRIS, 1998, 303s., ISBN 80-88778-73-5.
The output of the completed course is during the teaching part (continuously):
• Preparation and implementation of micro-outputs: max. 20 points
• Elaboration of continuous tasks and assignments using the e-learning tool Teacher's Academy of Charles University (2022): max. 30 points
• Continuous knowledge test: max. 30 points
And in the trial period (at the end):
• Final test: max. 40 points
TOTAL: max. 120 points
Students submit tasks and micro-outcomes in the MS Teams e-learning system. The elaborations will be part of their teaching portfolio.
To successfully complete the course, it is necessary to obtain at least 70% of points. The rating is given on a scale:
A - 105 and above (excellent - excellent results),
B - 101 -104 (very good - above average standard),
C - 96 - 100 (good - normal reliable work),
D - 91 - 95 (satisfactory - acceptable results),
E - 90 - 84 (sufficient - the results meet the minimum criteria),
Fx - 83 - 0 (insufficient).
The teacher accepts max. 2 justified absences with proven documents.
The exact date of the continuous assessment will be announced at the beginning of the semester and will also be published in the syllabi of the course.
Exam dates will be published via AIS no later than the last week of the semester.
Slovak, English
1.Communication and learning. Basic finding on the connection between communication, speech and learning: Vygotsky's social-cognitive theory (1970, 1976), Bruner's scaffolding concept, Bachtin's (1986) authoritative vs. dialogical discourse, Mercer's (2000) exploratory talk, McElhone's (2012) uptake and conceptual pressure. Empirically exaime the relationship between communication, interpersonal communication, pedagogical communication, aims, structure, effectivity.
2.Specific features of educational communication, aspects in the classroom: role of verbal and nonverbal communication in the classroom. Verbal communication, nonverbal communication, IRF structure, role of elicitation, specific school language. The physical space in the classroom (types of classroom arrangement) and its influence on the international classrooms.
3.Teacher as the leader of the communication: basic elements of pedagogical situation, how to lead and direct the communication, questions. Schools, communication rules in the classroom, ways, and forms how to address them. Role of the teacher: Relationships in the classroom, cooperation, and conflicts between students and how to deal with them the interpersonal communication. role of questions – elicitation.
4.Pupil’s participation on pedagogical communication, productive vs. unproductive communication, teacher as the leader of the effective communication, how to increase the participation of the students, identification of the participation patterns in the classroom.
5.Concept of dialogic teaching: commucitation format that stimulates student activity, encourages student thinking, and deepens student understanding. Genres and forms of communication situations. Form od dialogic teaching: Discussion and Scraffolded dialogue. General principles of dialogic teaching.
6.Relationship in educational communication between teachers and students . A teacher’s interaction style. Power in the classroom, classroom climate, participation in classroom collective and peer status.
= 70/30.
Upon successful completion of the course, students explain the principles of effective educational communication. They can analyze communication episodes, identify problematic communication aspects of individual monologue, interactive and dialogical communication genres. They can describe the procedures for creating communication opportunities and the stages of co-creation of a learning environment that supports student participation in teaching. They explained the importance and described specific ways of managing pedagogical communication in school classrooms. The implementation of micro-outcomes and forms of training in other pedagogical communication of teachers is able to acquire the acquired theoretical knowledge in the practice of primary and secondary schools.
CANGELOSI, James. S. Strategie řízení třídy: jak získat a udržet spolupráci žáků při výuce. Portál, 1996. ISBN 80-7178-014-6
EGER, Ludvík. Řízení školy. Plzeň: Fraus, 2006. ISBN 8072385836.
HALÁKOVÁ, Zuzana, NAGYOVÁ, Soňa a Tibor NAGY. Školský manažment pre študentov učiteľstva prírodovedných predmetov s praktickými ukážkami. Bratislava: UK, 2019. ISBN 978-80-223-4781-5.
OBDRŽÁLEK, Zděnek. Škola a jej manažment. Bratislava: UK, 2002. ISBN 80-223-1690-3.
OBDRŽÁLEK, Zděnek a Kinga HORVÁTHOVÁ et al. Organizácia a manažment školstva. Terminologický a výkladový slovník. Bratislava: SPN, 2004. ISBN 80-10-00022-1
PISOŇOVÁ, Mária. Osobnostný rozvoj riaditeľa školy – východiská a determinanty : výskumné závery a odporúčania pre školskú riadiacu prax / Iura Edition, s r. o., 2012. ISBN 9788080784706.
SEJČOVÁ, Ľuboslava. 2023. Manažment triedy a osobnosť učiteľa. [elektronický dokument]. - Bratislava : Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2023. [online] ISBN 978-80-223-5567-4 Dostupné na: https://stella.uniba.sk/texty/FIF_LS_trieda_ucitel.pdf
Aktuálne právne predpisy, upravujúce činnosť základných a stredných škôl (zákony, vyhlášky, vnútorné poriadky, pedagogicko-organizačné pokyny), pedagogická dokumentácia.
Aktuálne internetové zdroje a časopisecké pramene (Technológia vzdelávania, Manažment školy v praxi, Kvalita a ďalšie).
The course is completed by evaluation, the ratio of interim / final evaluation is 80/20. The condition for successful completion of the course is to obtain at least 60% of the maximum possible evaluation of the course. The work during the semester on partial tasks from different areas and levels of school management (each worth 5 points), a written test, resp. oral exam in value (10 points). Together, students can earn a maximum of 50 points.
The rating is given on a scale:
A: 93-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 85-92%, very good - above average standard,
C: 76-84%, good - normal reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient - the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient - additional work required
Two absences with proven documents are allowed. The exact date and topics of the mid-term evaluation will be announced at the beginning of the semester. Exam dates will be announced no later than the last week of the training section.
Slovak, Czech
1. Basic terminology of school management.
2. Education system in the Slovak Republic and education management system.
3. School management models.
4. Personality of the leading pedagogical employee - legal and personal requirements.
5. Leadership styles.
6. Hierarchy of workers in education.
7. Control activities in schools, apprenticeship.
8. School and labor legislation (legal regulations governing the activities of primary and secondary schools - laws, decrees, work regulations, pedagogical-organizational instructions, pedagogical documentation).
9. Time management.
10. Edupage.
11. Teacher's professional development.
12. Class teacher
80/20
Knowledge of the school system in the Slovak Republic in comparison with successful education systems in other countries, understanding of the management system and organization of education in the Slovak Republic at all levels, orientation in school and labor legislation, pedagogical documents, electronic systems used in primary and secondary schools (eg Edupage). Ability to apply knowledge of other disciplines in the field of school management.
• BRESTENSKÁ, B. a kol.: Inovatívne učenie s podporou digitálnych technológií. Bratislava : Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2020. ISBN: 978-80-223-4927-7
• KAROLČÍK, Š. – ČIPKOVÁ, E.: Digitálne edukačné zdroje v kontexte hodnotenia ich kvality. 1.vyd. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2020.
• ISTE štandardy pre študentov - Available at: https://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards-for-students
• ISTE štandardy pre pedagógov - Available at: https://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards-for-teachers
• Gormally, Carickman, Peggy; Hallar, Brittan; and Armstrong, Norris (2009) "Effects of Inquiry-based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence," International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: 3(2), Article 16. Available at: http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol3/iss2/16
• Tsung-Hau Jen, Yi-Fen Yeh, Ying-Shao Hsu, Hsin-Kai Wu, Kuan-Ming Chen. (2016). Science teachers' TPACK-Practical: Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach. Computers & Education, Volume 95, Pp. 45-62, Available at: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.009
• REDECKER, Christine – PUNIE, Yves: European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu [online]. European union, 2017. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/fcc33b68-d581-11e7-a5b9-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
• Digitálne technológie menia poznávací proces [online]. Štátny pedagogický ústav Available at: https://www.statpedu.sk/files/sk/o-organizacii/projekty/projekt-dvui/publikacie/digitalne_technologie_menia_poznavaci_proces.pdf
The final grade includes an evaluation for developed models of technology supported teaching, a maximum of 60 points and an oral exam, a maximum of 40 points. The student must obtain at least 30 points for teaching models to be admitted to the oral exam. To pass the oral exam, the student must obtain at least 20 points. The final grade includes an evaluation for the developed teaching models and the final exam.
Grading scale:
• A 100% - 92%
• B 91% - 84%
• C 83% - 76%
• D 75% - 68%
• E 67% - 60%
• FX 59% - 0%
Slovak
Digital resources and digital technologies vs. educational digital resources and educational technologies; Security in the digital world; BYOD in the teaching process - benefits, challenges, limits and restrictions; Digital literacy and its importance in the digital world; Possibilities and limits of the use of digital technologies in support of personalized learning, research and research-oriented teaching; Evaluation of the quality of educational technologies and the possibility of their integration into teaching; Selected digital technologies supporting the teaching process. 1. Digital technologies - historical development, use, present, perspectives. 2. Digital literacy - what we mean by digital literacy, methods and means of DG development, Education and DG. 3. Digital technologies in education - technologies vs. educational technologies, groups of technologies usable in education (Comprehensive educational environment, educational programs, mobile applications, virtual laboratories, applets, modules, accessories ...). 4. Digital technologies in education - educational content, assessment of suitability and adequacy of technology to support teaching, information retrieval, support of special educational needs. 5. Digital technologies in education - tools for communication, cooperation, creation and sharing of results. 6. Digital technologies in education - systems to support education and organization of educational process. 7. Digital technologies in education - teaching methods and strategies that support meaningful and appropriate applications of DT in education. 8. Digital technologies in education - social and ethical aspects of the use of DT in education. 9. Digital content creation - available software tools for creating educational content, teaching materials, quizzes, interactive exercises. 10. Security in the digital age - fake news, hoaxes, detectors and algorithms for their detection. 11. Digital content - procedures for verifying the truthfulness, accuracy, and timeliness of information available on the Internet. 12. Research in the use of digital technologies in education. 13. Research in the use of digital technologies in education.
60/40
By completing the course, the student will be able to critically assess the safety, suitability, and meaningfulness of the application of digital technologies in the teaching process. She/he understands the risks, opportunities, and limits of integrating digital technologies into teaching and their importance in supporting the learning process. The student will be able to assess the quality of digital resources with educational content in the context of teaching needs. She/he can distinguish false, misleading, or truth-altering information and use procedures to verify the truthfulness, timeliness, and scientific accuracy of published facts. The student can design an appropriate and effective application of selected digital technologies into the teaching program.
Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Bem, D. J., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2007). Psychologie. Portál.
Říčan, P. (2021). Cesta životem: Vývojová psychologie. Portál.
Vágnerová, M. (2000). Vývojová psychologie: Dětství, dospělost, stáří. Portál.
The course is completed with an examination. The final grade is based on a ratio of 50% continuous assessment and 50% final assessment. Continuous assessment (50%) includes: a) midterm test (accounts for 30% of the total grade) and b) presentation (accounts for 20% of the total grade). Final assessment (50%) includes: final examination (accounts for 50% of the total grade).
Two absences are permitted without providing a reason. If a student misses more than two seminars due to objective reasons, additional compensatory assignments may be required.
Any violation of academic ethics will result in the annulment of points earned in the respective assessment component.
The final grade is awarded based on the following scale: 100-92% A, 91-84% B, 83-76% C, 75-68% D, 67-60% E, 59,-0% Fx.
Slovak and Czech, English (text understanding)
1. Introduction to Psychology: Psychology as a science, the subject of psychological research, approaches in psychology; the importance and application of psychology in the school environment and in the teaching profession.
2. Psychology as a Science: Research and research methods in psychology; the significance of scientific knowledge, characteristics of scientific work, and methodology of psychological research.
3. Cognitive Processes in Educational Context: Perception and attention processes within the school environment.
4. Cognitive Processes in Educational Context: Memory processes within the school environment.
5. Representation and Organization of Knowledge, Thinking: Characteristics and types of thinking; concepts and reasoning.
6. Intelligence: Theories of intelligence and its measurement; stability and development of intellectual abilities in relation to education; intellectual giftedness.
7. Introduction to Developmental Psychology: Basic concepts, subject of study, and methods of developmental psychology; general psychological development.
8. Selected Developmental Theories I.
9. Selected Developmental Theories II.
10. Developmental Periodization and Characteristics of Developmental Stages: With an emphasis on school-age children.
11. Developmental Periodization and Characteristics of Developmental Stages: With an emphasis on adolescence.
12. Summary.
50/50
The objective of Psychology for Teachers 1 is to provide basic information on the general principles of human experience and behavior. Upon successful completion of the course, the student is able to navigate the terminology of general and developmental psychology, can apply knowledge of general and developmental psychology within an educational context, understands the principles of psychological development, understands the laws governing the development of cognitive processes and their application in the educational process.
Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Bem, D. J., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2007). Psychologie. Portál.
Fontana, D. (1997). Psychologie ve školní praxi. Portál.
Mareš, J. (2013). Pedagogická psychologie. Portál.
Vágnerová, M. (2005). Školní poradenská psychologie pro pedagogy. Karolinum.
Vágnerová, M. (2010). Psychologie osobnosti. Karolinum.
The course is completed with an examination. The final grade is based on a ratio of 40% continuous assessment and 60% final assessment. Continuous assessment (40%) includes: a) midterm test (20% of the total grade) and b) group presentation (20% of the total grade). Final assessment (60%) includes: a) final written test (40% of the total grade) and b) practical component (20% of the total grade), in which students demonstrate their ability to apply acquired knowledge through a case study.
Two absences are permitted without justification. If a student misses more than two seminars due to objective reasons, additional compensatory assignments may be required.
Any violation of academic ethics will result in the annulment of points earned in the respective assessment component.
Grading Scale: 100-92% A, 91-84% B, 83-76% C, 75-68% D, 67-60% E, 59,-0% Fx.
Slovak and Czech, English (text understanding)
1. Personality Psychology and Inter-individual Differences: Understanding personality in psychology.
2. Biological and Social Foundations of Personality: Personality structure – temperament, character, abilities, motivation. The teacher's personality.
3. Psychology of Learning: Types, laws, and conditions of learning. Selected approaches and theories of learning.
4. Psychological Aspects of Motivation in Education: Sources and factors influencing motivation. Types of motivation. Selected theories of motivation.
5. Creativity in Education: Conditions and models of creative learning. Enhancing creativity in students.
6. Student Performance in the Educational Process: Academic success vs. failure/underperformance. Psychological aspects of testing and examination. Pre-exam and exam-related states. Assessment and self-assessment.
7. Psychosocial Climate and Classroom/School Atmosphere as Factors of Optimal Education: Classroom management and leadership.
8. The School Class as a Social Group: The position of the individual student within the group.
9. Learning Disabilities: Behavioral and emotional problems in students. Emotionality, self-image, and aggression in the school environment. Psychological aspects of school inclusion. The role of the school psychologist and their assistance to the school.
10. Positive Psychology in the School Environment: Empathy and prosocial behavior in the classroom. Emotions in education and their significance. Active participation, interest, engagement, and curiosity.
11. Personality in Demanding Life Situations: Coping with stressful situations. Resilience to stress. Mental health and psychohygiene in school.
12. Summary.
40/60
The objective of Psychology for Teachers 2 is to provide insights into personality psychology and educational psychology. The course also aims to increase students' sensitivity to inter-individual diversity within the school environment and to develop their psychological literacy. Furthermore, it focuses on enhancing their ability to apply current knowledge from both theoretical and applied psychological disciplines to educational practice. Upon completion of the course, the student is able to navigate the terminology of personality psychology and educational psychology and can apply this knowledge in educational practice.
STÖRIG, Hans Joachim. Malé dějiny filozofie. Přeložil Petr Rezek, Miroslav Petříček a Karel
Śprunk. Praha: Zvon, 1993. ISBN 80-7113-058-3.
PLATÓN: Dialógy 1-3. Preložil Július Špaňár. Bratislava: Tatran, 1990. ISBN 80-222-0127-8.
EPIKUROS. O šťastnom živote. Preložil Miloslav Okál. Bratislava: Pravda, 1989. ISBN
80-218-0013-5.
XENOFÓN: O prosperujúcej domácnosti. Zo starogréčiny preložil Andrej Kalaš. Bratislava: Kalligram, 2007. ISBN 978-80-7149-958-9.
ZIGO, Milan. Príbehy veľkých myšlienok a tých, čo ich tvorili. Bratislava: Iris, 2018. ISBN
978-80-8200-026-2.
A) Preliminary evaluation during the instruction period: one written examination during the semester assessed by max. 50 points.
b) In the examination period: oral examination. The student will be admitted to the examination only with a minimum of 20 points from the test. The exam assignment contains two questions from the syllabus. For the examination, the student can score max. 50 points.
Grading scale: A: 100-92, B: 91-84, C: 83–76, D: 75-68, E: 67-60, FX: 59-0. The exact date for the test will be announced at the beginning of the semester. The dates for the examination will be announced through AIS no later than in the last week of the instruction period. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation. Violation of academic ethics will be punished, and the student will lose all the received points in the relevant assessment.
Slovak, Czech (receptive acquaintance)
1. The origin of ancient philosophy. Division into periods. Sources.
2. Milesian school: Anaximander and his sociomorphism. Heraclitus.
3. Parmenides and his followers: Atomists, Empedocles, Anaxagoras and their concept of mixture.
4. Sophists and Socrates.
5. Plato: work, era, relationship to Socrates, efforts to reform the society.
6. Plato’s epistemology.
7. Plato’s ontology.
8. Plato’s concept of ideal state.
9. Aristotle: work, relationship to Alexander, historical significance for the history of thought and science.
10. Aristotle’s physics: theory of four causes of motion.
11. Aristotle’s ethics and politics.
12. Hellenistic philosophy. Plotinus, Christianity and the transfer to medieval thought
50% preliminary/50% examination period
After successfully completing the course, the students have knowledge of the basic developmental lines and central figures of ancient philosophical thought. They understand how the different periods of ancient philosophy built on each other and how they differed. They are able to deal with basic philosophical questions and problems in other subjects of his specialised study.
STÖRIG, Hans Joachim. Malé dějiny filozofie. Přeložil Petr Rezek, Miroslav Petříček a Karel
Śprunk. Praha: Zvon, 1993. ISBN 80-7113-058-3.
PLATÓN: Dialógy 1-3. Preložil Július Špaňár. Bratislava: Tatran, 1990. ISBN 80-222-0127-8.
EPIKUROS. O šťastnom živote. Preložil Miloslav Okál. Bratislava: Pravda, 1989. ISBN
80-218-0013-5.
XENOFÓN: O prosperujúcej domácnosti. Zo starogréčiny preložil Andrej Kalaš. Bratislava: Kalligram, 2007. ISBN 978-80-7149-958-9.
ZIGO, Milan. Príbehy veľkých myšlienok a tých, čo ich tvorili. Bratislava: Iris, 2018. ISBN
978-80-8200-026-2.
A) Preliminary evaluation during the instruction period: one written examination during the semester assessed by max. 50 points.
b) In the examination period: oral examination. The student will be admitted to the examination only with a minimum of 20 points from the test. The exam assignment contains two questions from the syllabus. For the examination, the student can score max. 50 points.
Grading scale: A: 100-92, B: 91-84, C: 83–76, D: 75-68, E: 67-60, FX: 59-0. The exact date for the test will be announced at the beginning of the semester. The dates for the examination will be announced through AIS no later than in the last week of the instruction period. The teacher will accept a maximum of two absences with documentation. Violation of academic ethics will be punished, and the student will lose all the received points in the relevant assessment.
Slovak, Czech (receptive acquaintance)
1. The origin of ancient philosophy. Division into periods. Sources.
2. Milesian school: Anaximander and his sociomorphism. Heraclitus.
3. Parmenides and his followers: Atomists, Empedocles, Anaxagoras and their concept of mixture.
4. Sophists and Socrates.
5. Plato: work, era, relationship to Socrates, efforts to reform the society.
6. Plato’s epistemology.
7. Plato’s ontology.
8. Plato’s concept of ideal state.
9. Aristotle: work, relationship to Alexander, historical significance for the history of thought and science.
10. Aristotle’s physics: theory of four causes of motion.
11. Aristotle’s ethics and politics.
12. Hellenistic philosophy. Plotinus, Christianity and the transfer to medieval thought
50% preliminary/50% examination period
After successfully completing the course, the students have knowledge of the basic developmental lines and central figures of ancient philosophical thought. They understand how the different periods of ancient philosophy built on each other and how they differed. They are able to deal with basic philosophical questions and problems in other subjects of his specialised study.
HANKINS, James (ed.). Renesanční filosofie. Praha: OIKOYMENH, 2011. ISBN 978-80-7298-418-3.
RÖD, Wolfgang (ed.). Novověká filosofie I. Od F. Bacona po Spinozu. Praha: OIKOYMENH, 2001. ISBN 80-7298-039-4.
RÖD, Wolfgang (ed.). Novověká filosofie II. Od Newtona po Rousseaua. Praha: OIKOYMENH, 2004. ISBN 80-7298-109-9.
GARIN, Eugenio (ed.). Renesanční člověk a jeho svět. Praha: Vyšehrad, 2003. ISBN 80-7021-653-0.
JOHNSON, Paul. Renesancia. Bratislava: SLOVART, 2002. ISBN 80-7145-681-0.
Preliminary evaluation during the instruction period:
a) Active participation in seminars: 1 point for each seminar, max. 10 points
b) Written paper in the form of a philosophical essay of min. 6 standard pages, max. 20 points
Scoring a minimum of 10 points from the preliminary assessment is a condition to be admitted to the oral exam. Assessment in the examination period:
a) Oral examination of the entire scope of the subject, max. 20 points
Dates and topics of oral examination will be published no later than the last week of the instruction period of the semester. Violation of academic ethics will be punished, and the student will lose all the received points in the relevant assessment. Absences with documentation not exceeding 25% of the classes are accepted.
Grading scale: A – 50-47 points; B – 46-43 points; C – 42-38 points; D – 37-34 points; E - 33-30 points; Fx – 29 points or less.
Slovak, Czech (receptive acquaintance)
1. From the Middle Ages to the Renaissance.
2. Forms of Renaissance philosophy: Renaissance Platonism and Aristotelianism.
3. Renaissance natural philosophy:
4. Renaissance social philosophy and the Reformation.
5. Characteristics of the modern conception of the world.
6. Modern rationalism.
7. Modern empiricism.
8. German Enlightenment.
9. English Enlightenment.
10. French Enlightenment.
11. A step towards German classical philosophy.
Preliminary 60%, in the examination period 40%
After completing the course, students have the basic knowledge enabling them to navigate through the history of Renaissance and modern philosophy. They have knowledge of basic directions and personalities. They know the most important philosophical works of that period. They understand the emergence and development of relevant philosophical concepts. They are able to reflect on the significance of Renaissance and modern ideas important for the formation of modern history.
HANKINS, James (ed.). Renesanční filosofie. Praha: OIKOYMENH, 2011. ISBN 978-80-7298-418-3.
RÖD, Wolfgang (ed.). Novověká filosofie I. Od F. Bacona po Spinozu. Praha: OIKOYMENH, 2001. ISBN 80-7298-039-4.
RÖD, Wolfgang (ed.). Novověká filosofie II. Od Newtona po Rousseaua. Praha: OIKOYMENH, 2004. ISBN 80-7298-109-9.
GARIN, Eugenio (ed.). Renesanční člověk a jeho svět. Praha: Vyšehrad, 2003. ISBN 80-7021-653-0.
JOHNSON, Paul. Renesancia. Bratislava: SLOVART, 2002. ISBN 80-7145-681-0.
Preliminary evaluation during the instruction period:
a) Active participation in seminars: 1 point for each seminar, max. 10 points
b) Written paper in the form of a philosophical essay of min. 6 standard pages, max. 20 points
Scoring a minimum of 10 points from the preliminary assessment is a condition to be admitted to the oral exam. Assessment in the examination period:
a) Oral examination of the entire scope of the subject, max. 20 points
Dates and topics of oral examination will be published no later than the last week of the instruction period of the semester. Violation of academic ethics will be punished, and the student will lose all the received points in the relevant assessment. Absences with documentation not exceeding 25% of the classes are accepted.
Grading scale: A – 50-47 points; B – 46-43 points; C – 42-38 points; D – 37-34 points; E - 33-30 points; Fx – 29 points or less.
Slovak, Czech (receptive acquaintance)
1. From the Middle Ages to the Renaissance.
2. Forms of Renaissance philosophy: Renaissance Platonism and Aristotelianism.
3. Renaissance natural philosophy:
4. Renaissance social philosophy and the Reformation.
5. Characteristics of the modern conception of the world.
6. Modern rationalism.
7. Modern empiricism.
8. German Enlightenment.
9. English Enlightenment.
10. French Enlightenment.
11. A step towards German classical philosophy.
Preliminary 60%, in the examination period 40%
After completing the course, students have the basic knowledge enabling them to navigate through the history of Renaissance and modern philosophy. They have knowledge of basic directions and personalities. They know the most important philosophical works of that period. They understand the emergence and development of relevant philosophical concepts. They are able to reflect on the significance of Renaissance and modern ideas important for the formation of modern history.
de Libera, Alain. Středověká filosofie. Praha: Oikoymenh, 2001. ISBN: 80-7298-026-2.
Heinzmann, Richard. Středověká filosofie. Olomouc: Vydavatelství Olomouc, 2002. ISBN: 80-7182-105-5.
Floss Pavel. Architekti křesťanského středověkého vědění. Praha: Vyšehrad, 2004. ISBN 80-7021-662-X.
Supplementary literature will be presented at the beginning and during the semester. Teachers' presentations are available at MS TEAMS.
During the instruction period of the semester: two tests (first in the first half of the semester, second in the penultimate week of the instruction period of the semester). Tests will be on material covered during the semester. Students can score a maximum of 100 points for both tests, the minimum for passing the course is 60 points. Violation of academic ethics may result in the cancellation of the points scored in the relevant assessment item.
Grading scale: A: 100%-92%;
B: 91%-84%; C: 83%-76%; D: 75%-68%; E: 67%-60% FX: 59%-0%
The teacher will accept a maximum of 2 documented absences. The exact dates of the assessment will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Slovak, Czech (receptive acquaintance)
1. Periodisation of medieval and Renaissance philosophy.
2. Aurelius Augustinus - polemic with scepticism, the problem of time, free will, divine and earthly community.
3. Boethius, John Scotus Eriugena - division of philosophy, problem of universals, division of nature, doctrine of man.
4. Anselm, Peter Abaelard - evidence for the existence of God, the relationship between philosophy and theology, hermeneutics, the problem of universals, ethics of intention.
5. Thomas Aquinas I. - relation of philosophy and theology, analogy of being, ontology.
6. Thomas Aquinas II. - ethics, social and political philosophy.
7. John Duns Scotus - metaphysics and ethics.
8. William Ockham - theory of language and political philosophy.
9. Nicholas of Cusa - philosophy and theology, scholarly ignorance.
10. Renaissance Platonism.
11. Renaissance Aristotelianism.
12. Philosophy of man and political philosophy in the Renaissance.
100% preliminary
After successfully completing the course, students have a basic knowledge of the main representatives and problems of medieval and Renaissance philosophy. They have knowledge of the basic cultural, historical and social realities of the origin and development of medieval and Renaissance philosophy. They can clarify the thought of major figures in medieval and Renaissance philosophy and are able to navigate and make connections to other subjects.
de Libera, Alain. Středověká filosofie. Praha: Oikoymenh, 2001. ISBN: 80-7298-026-2.
Heinzmann, Richard. Středověká filosofie. Olomouc: Vydavatelství Olomouc, 2002. ISBN: 80-7182-105-5.
Floss Pavel. Architekti křesťanského středověkého vědění. Praha: Vyšehrad, 2004. ISBN 80-7021-662-X.
Supplementary literature will be presented at the beginning and during the semester. Teachers' presentations are available at MS TEAMS.
During the instruction period of the semester: two tests (first in the first half of the semester, second in the penultimate week of the instruction period of the semester). Tests will be on material covered during the semester. Students can score a maximum of 100 points for both tests, the minimum for passing the course is 60 points. Violation of academic ethics may result in the cancellation of the points scored in the relevant assessment item.
Grading scale: A: 100%-92%;
B: 91%-84%; C: 83%-76%; D: 75%-68%; E: 67%-60% FX: 59%-0%
The teacher will accept a maximum of 2 documented absences. The exact dates of the assessment will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
Slovak, Czech (receptive acquaintance)
1. Periodisation of medieval and Renaissance philosophy.
2. Aurelius Augustinus - polemic with scepticism, the problem of time, free will, divine and earthly community.
3. Boethius, John Scotus Eriugena - division of philosophy, problem of universals, division of nature, doctrine of man.
4. Anselm, Peter Abaelard - evidence for the existence of God, the relationship between philosophy and theology, hermeneutics, the problem of universals, ethics of intention.
5. Thomas Aquinas I. - relation of philosophy and theology, analogy of being, ontology.
6. Thomas Aquinas II. - ethics, social and political philosophy.
7. John Duns Scotus - metaphysics and ethics.
8. William Ockham - theory of language and political philosophy.
9. Nicholas of Cusa - philosophy and theology, scholarly ignorance.
10. Renaissance Platonism.
11. Renaissance Aristotelianism.
12. Philosophy of man and political philosophy in the Renaissance.
100% preliminary
After successfully completing the course, students have a basic knowledge of the main representatives and problems of medieval and Renaissance philosophy. They have knowledge of the basic cultural, historical and social realities of the origin and development of medieval and Renaissance philosophy. They can clarify the thought of major figures in medieval and Renaissance philosophy and are able to navigate and make connections to other subjects.
Störig, Hans Joachim: Malé dějiny filozofie. Praha, Zvon 1991, 1994.
Mihina, František, Leško, Vladimír a kol.: Metamorfózy poklasickej filozofie. Prešov, FFUPJŠ 1994, Bratislava, Iris 1999.
Coreth, E., Ehlen, P., Ricken, F., Haeffner, G.: Filosofie 20. století. Olomouc: Nakladatelství Olomouc, 2006.
Nida-Rümelin, J.: Slovník současných filosofů.Praha: Garamond, 2001.
Peregrin, J.: Úvod do analytické filosofie. Herrmann & synové, Praha, 1992.
Active participation in classes (max. 3 documented absences), seminar paper: essay, reflection, analysis (max. number of points: 20), written exam in the credit week (max. number of points: 30). Total assessment: max. number of points: 50. (100-92% - A, 91-84% - B, 83-76 – C, 75-68 - D, 67-60 – E). Violation of academic ethics may result in the cancellation of the points scored in the relevant assessment item.
Slovak
1. Introduction. Specific features of 19th century post-classical philosophy. The connection to 20th century philosophy. Problems of classification (scientism, anthropologism) and periodization.
2. The first phase of positivism. Auguste Comte - the foundation of positivism. First Period (Positive Philosophy Course) - Philosophy of science and sociology. Second period (System of Positive Politics, Positivist Catechism) - ethics, politics and positivist religion.
3. English Positivism. Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill - Empiricist psychological epistemology. Inductionism. Ethics and social philosophy. Herbert Spencer. Specific elements of his positivism. Knowable and unknowable. Evolutionism. Ethics and social philosophy.
4. The second phase of positivism. Empirio-criticism. Richard Avenarius. Principled coordination, critique of experience, critique of introjection. Ernst Mach. The theory of neutral elements, economics of thought, critique of mechanism.
5. Arthur Schopenhauer. Voluntaristic irrationalism. The world as idea and the world as will. The meaning of the reason sentence. An understanding of man as an objectification of the will. Pessimism. The ethics of compassion. Genius and saint - overcoming the will.
6. Friedrich Nietzsche. Deepening voluntaristic irrationalism. Basic stages of its development. Dionysian and Apollonian visions of the world. Critique of science, metaphysics and religion (especially Christianity). The decadence and nihilism of Western culture. Immoralism. Reassessment of all values. Übermensch. Will to power. Eternal Return. Nietzsche's “philosophy of life”.
7. Sören Kierkegaard. Existentialist philosophy of man. A critique of classical philosophy (G. W. F. Hegel) and the official church. Stages of existence, the possibility of choosing an attitude towards the world. Emphasis on the human interior and subjectivity. A critique of science. The genuineness of faith. Either - or. The concepts of anxiety and fear.
8. Karl Marx. A critique of Hegel and metaphysics. A contribution to the theory of alienation: economic alienation. A vision of overcoming it by eliminating private property. The materialist concept of history. Dialectics of productive forces and relations of production. Base and superstructure. Socio-economic formations and their lawful succession. A class and classless society. Friedrich Engels and his attempt to construct a system of dialectical and historical materialism.
9. The golden age of American philosophy and classical pragmatism. The sources of pragmatism and its relation to European philosophy. Ch. S. Peirce and his “pragmaticism”. W. James and his philosophy of life. J. Dewey and his philosophy of democracy.
10. The turn to language (linguistic turn). The origin of analytic philosophy. G. Frege. Logical atomism, B. Russell and G. Moore. Vienna Circle. Logical empiricism, R. Carnap. Ordinary language philosophy. L. Wittgenstein.
11. Critical theory of the Frankfurt School. Relation to Marxism and the Dialectic of Enlightenment. T. Adorno and a criticism of culture. J. Habermas and the theory of communicative action. A. Honneth and the social theory of recognition.
12. Neopragmatism. R. Rorty and philosophy as cultural practice. H. Putnam and philosophy in the age of science.
13. Postmodernism. F. Lyotard and the end of great stories. J. Baudrillard and simulacrum. J. Derrida and deconstruction. M. Foucault and the art of being different.
100% preliminary
Upon successful completion of the course, students of non-philosophical disciplines have knowledge of the main trends, concepts, central issues, and ways of solving them, as well as the arguments and key concepts of 19th and 20th century philosophy. They are capable of thinking independently about given problems and solutions and independently justify their own positions on them. They have a clear idea of the main meaning and contribution (ideological, methodological and spiritual-cultural) of the different philosophical trends of the 19th-20th centuries.
Störig, Hans Joachim: Malé dějiny filozofie. Praha, Zvon 1991, 1994.
Mihina, František, Leško, Vladimír a kol.: Metamorfózy poklasickej filozofie. Prešov, FFUPJŠ 1994, Bratislava, Iris 1999.
Coreth, E., Ehlen, P., Ricken, F., Haeffner, G.: Filosofie 20. století. Olomouc: Nakladatelství Olomouc, 2006.
Nida-Rümelin, J.: Slovník současných filosofů.Praha: Garamond, 2001.
Peregrin, J.: Úvod do analytické filosofie. Herrmann & synové, Praha, 1992.
Active participation in classes (max. 3 documented absences), seminar paper: essay, reflection, analysis (max. number of points: 20), written exam in the credit week (max. number of points: 30). Total assessment: max. number of points: 50. (100-92% - A, 91-84% - B, 83-76 – C, 75-68 - D, 67-60 – E). Violation of academic ethics may result in the cancellation of the points scored in the relevant assessment item.
Slovak
1. Introduction. Specific features of 19th century post-classical philosophy. The connection to 20th century philosophy. Problems of classification (scientism, anthropologism) and periodization.
2. The first phase of positivism. Auguste Comte - the foundation of positivism. First Period (Positive Philosophy Course) - Philosophy of science and sociology. Second period (System of Positive Politics, Positivist Catechism) - ethics, politics and positivist religion.
3. English Positivism. Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill - Empiricist psychological epistemology. Inductionism. Ethics and social philosophy. Herbert Spencer. Specific elements of his positivism. Knowable and unknowable. Evolutionism. Ethics and social philosophy.
4. The second phase of positivism. Empirio-criticism. Richard Avenarius. Principled coordination, critique of experience, critique of introjection. Ernst Mach. The theory of neutral elements, economics of thought, critique of mechanism.
5. Arthur Schopenhauer. Voluntaristic irrationalism. The world as idea and the world as will. The meaning of the reason sentence. An understanding of man as an objectification of the will. Pessimism. The ethics of compassion. Genius and saint - overcoming the will.
6. Friedrich Nietzsche. Deepening voluntaristic irrationalism. Basic stages of its development. Dionysian and Apollonian visions of the world. Critique of science, metaphysics and religion (especially Christianity). The decadence and nihilism of Western culture. Immoralism. Reassessment of all values. Übermensch. Will to power. Eternal Return. Nietzsche's “philosophy of life”.
7. Sören Kierkegaard. Existentialist philosophy of man. A critique of classical philosophy (G. W. F. Hegel) and the official church. Stages of existence, the possibility of choosing an attitude towards the world. Emphasis on the human interior and subjectivity. A critique of science. The genuineness of faith. Either - or. The concepts of anxiety and fear.
8. Karl Marx. A critique of Hegel and metaphysics. A contribution to the theory of alienation: economic alienation. A vision of overcoming it by eliminating private property. The materialist concept of history. Dialectics of productive forces and relations of production. Base and superstructure. Socio-economic formations and their lawful succession. A class and classless society. Friedrich Engels and his attempt to construct a system of dialectical and historical materialism.
9. The golden age of American philosophy and classical pragmatism. The sources of pragmatism and its relation to European philosophy. Ch. S. Peirce and his “pragmaticism”. W. James and his philosophy of life. J. Dewey and his philosophy of democracy.
10. The turn to language (linguistic turn). The origin of analytic philosophy. G. Frege. Logical atomism, B. Russell and G. Moore. Vienna Circle. Logical empiricism, R. Carnap. Ordinary language philosophy. L. Wittgenstein.
11. Critical theory of the Frankfurt School. Relation to Marxism and the Dialectic of Enlightenment. T. Adorno and a criticism of culture. J. Habermas and the theory of communicative action. A. Honneth and the social theory of recognition.
12. Neopragmatism. R. Rorty and philosophy as cultural practice. H. Putnam and philosophy in the age of science.
13. Postmodernism. F. Lyotard and the end of great stories. J. Baudrillard and simulacrum. J. Derrida and deconstruction. M. Foucault and the art of being different.
100% preliminary
Upon successful completion of the course, students of non-philosophical disciplines have knowledge of the main trends, concepts, central issues, and ways of solving them, as well as the arguments and key concepts of 19th and 20th century philosophy. They are capable of thinking independently about given problems and solutions and independently justify their own positions on them. They have a clear idea of the main meaning and contribution (ideological, methodological and spiritual-cultural) of the different philosophical trends of the 19th-20th centuries.
TATARKIEWICZ, Wladyslav. Dejiny estetiky. I, Staroveká estetika. Bratislava: Tatran, 1985.
TATARKIEWICZ, Wladyslav. Dejiny estetiky. II, Stredoveká estetika. Bratislava: Tatran, 1988.
TATARKIEWICZ, Wladyslav. Dejiny estetiky. 3, Novoveká estetika. Bratislava: Tatran, 1991. ISBN80-222-0186-3
ECO, Umberto. DĚjiny krásy. Praha: Argo 2015. ISBN 9788025714331
During the semester: 2x written test of lectures and given texts. Violation of the academic ethics will result in the cancellation of the points obtained in the respective assessment item.
Grading scale:
100 – 92: A; 91 – 86: B; 85 – 77: C; 76 – 66: D; 65 – 60: E; 59 – 0: FX
The teacher will accept a maximum of 2 absences with documented evidence.
1. Introduction.
2. Subject of aesthetics and basic concepts of aesthetics.
3. Non-artistic aesthetics.
4. Aesthetics and art of antiquity.
5. Aesthetics and art of the Middle Ages.
6. Aesthetics and art of the Renaissance.
7. Aesthetics and art of Baroque and Rococo.
8. Aesthetics and art of classicism.
9 Aesthetics and art of the 19th century.
10. Aesthetics and art of the 20th century.
11. Photography and film.
12. Final summary.
100/0
The student is familiar with terminology and understands the subject of aesthetics, he/she can reflect and characterize the basic developmental stages of aesthetics and individual arts.
ECO, Umberto. Dějiny ošklivosti. Praha: Argo, 2007. ISBN 978-80-7203-893-0.
LOSEV, Aleksej Fedorovič, ŠESTAKOV, Vjačeslav Pavlovič. Dejiny estetických kategórií. Bratislava : Pravda , 1978.
TATARKIEWICZ, Władysław. Dejiny estetiky I. Bratislava: Tatran, 1985.
Aristoteles. Poetika. Martin: Thetis, 2009. ISBN: 978-80-970115-3-6.
PLATÓN. DialógyI. Bratislava: Tatran, 1990. ISBN 80-222-0125-1.
a) during the teaching part (continuously) a paper (30 points) on a selected topic in the field of basic aesthetic categories.
b) during the examination period: written test (70 points)
The condition for admission to the exam is the achievement of min. 10 points from the ongoing evaluation.
Violation of the academic ethics will result in the cancellation of the points obtained in the respective assessment item.
Grading scale:
100 – 92: A; 91 – 86: B; 85 – 77: C; 76 – 66: D; 65 – 60: E; 59 – 0: FX
The teacher will accept a maximum of 2 absences with documented evidence.
The exact date and topic of the mid-term evaluation will be announced at the beginning of the semester.
The dates of the written test will be published via AIS no later than the last week of the teaching part.
1. Introduction to the issue.
2. Criterion/measure.
3. Harmony.
4. Beauty.
5. Nasty
6. Catharsis
7. kalokagathia.
8. Mimesis.
9. Eidolon.
10. Taste.
11. Kitsch.
12. Final summary.
30/70
Upon successful completion of the course, the student has knowledge of the basic aesthetic categories, which form a supplement to the subjects History of Aesthetics and Aesthetic Theory. He has knowledge that he will apply during the next study in the reflection of historical and theoretical problems of aesthetics and aesthetics of individual arts. He knows the basic principles of aesthetic discourse.
BIELIK, L. Metodologické aspekty vedy. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2019. ISBN 978-80-223-4788-4.
HEND, J. Kvalitativní výzkum. 2. vyd. Praha: Portál, 2008. ISBN 978-80-7367-485-4.
HENDL, J. a J. REMR: Metody výzkumu a evaluace. Praha: Portál, 2017. ISBN 978-80-262-1192-1.
PUNCH, H. F. Úspěšný návrh výzkumu. Praha: Portál, 2015. ISBN 978-80-262-0980-5.
The literature will be provided in electronic form.
Continuous during the semester: homework (20 points), midterm test during the semester (30 points); Final assessment: summative test (50 points). Violation of academic ethics may result in the nullification of points earned in the respective assessment item.
Grading scale: A: 100-93 points; B: 92-85 points; C: 84-77 points; D: 76-69 points; E: 68-60 points; Fx: 59-0 points.
Slovak (work on seminars, part of literature)
Czech (part of literature)
Science and its distinctive features. The language of science. Conceptual methods of science. Empirical methods of science. Social science methods: questionnaire method; interview method; textual analysis, etc. Research design and types of research. Complex methods: causal analysis, scientific explanation, prediction and retrodiction. Hypothesis testing: verification, confirmation, falsification. Theories and models.
50/50
Graduates of the course understand the key categories of scientific methodology and empirical research in the social sciences. They are able to apply basic conceptual methods as well as methods of data collection and analysis to solve research problems. They can distinguish between different types of research and research designs and evaluate their adequacy for achieving research objectives. They are able to apply their knowledge and skills in the preparation of final theses in the profile of their discipline.
ŽIDEK, J.: Turistika a ochrana života a zdravia. Bratislava. FTVŠ UK 2013, ISBN 978-80-223-3398-6
MICHAL, J.: Vybrané kapitoly zo sezónnych činností. Banská Bystrica: PF UMB, ISBN 80-85162-99-7
NEUMAN, J. a kol. : Turistika a sporty v přírodě. Praha, Portál, 2000. ISBN 80-717-8391-9
ŽÍDEK, J.: Turistika. Bratislava, FTVŠ UK, 2004.
KOMPÁN, J.- GORNER, K.: Možnosti uplatnenia turistiky a pohybových aktivít v prírode. Banská Bystrica, FHV UMB, 2007, ISBN 80-8083-365-7.
STEJSKAL, T.: Vodná turistika. Prešov 1999.
SÝKORA, B. a kol.: Turistika a sporty v přírodě. SPN Praha, 1986.
ZAJAC, A. a kol.: Športy a turistika na vode. Bratislava: Šport, 1983.
The final evaluation of the subject includes the completion of all compulsory disciplines and the assessment of the acquired abilities to perform individual disciplines independently, methodically correctly, or with instruction. At least 91% of points must be obtained to get an A rating, 81% and more to get a B rating, 71% and more to get a C rating, 61% to get a D rating, and at least 50% are required to get an E rating. Students will not receive any credits if they score less than 50% of the points.
Slovak
A comprehensive overview of theoretical and practical problems in tourism, stay and physical activities in nature and the prerequisites for their solution. Outdoor sports in connection with the development of modern society. Impact of outdoor sports on the environment, regional development, tourism and the economy. Historical aspects of outdoor sports and their position in society. Basic division of outdoor sports. (Summer, winter, water, board, technical, motor, Olympic ...) Institution and Sport unions that provide outdoor sports in our country and in the world. The structure of sports performance of selected outdoor sports. The structure of sports performance in canoeing, road and mountain biking. Training and improving the technique of implementation of selected outdoor sports. Training and improvement of kayaking and canoeing, road and mountain biking. Training and improvement of shooting with air weapons.
100/0
The student will gain basic theoretical knowledge and acquire practical skills in hiking, spending time and doing physical activities in nature. The student will be able to select a suitable natural area for doing sports in nature. The student can characterize individual sports in nature and forms of their implementation. The student shall be able to use didactic methods of training and improving movement techniques in selected outdoor sports. The student will know the theoretical basis of selection, setting, use and maintenance of basic material equipment for selected sports in nature.
BLAHUTOVÁ, A. (2002). Technika a metodika zjazdového lyžovania.
BLAHUTOVÁ, A. (2017). Technika a didaktika lyžovanie, Učebné texty, KU, Ružomberok 2017
EGYHÁZY, A. (1988). Lyžovanie – Základný lyžiarsky výcvik. Učebné texty pre školenie cvičiteľov. Šport, Bratislava 1988.
HELLEBRANDT, V. (2002). Technika a metodika carvingových oblúkov v zjazdovom lyžovaní. Vysokoškolské učebné texty. FTVŠ Bratislava 2002.
PŘÍBRAMSKÝ, M. (2002). Česká škola lyžování. Carving. Praha: UK FTVS, 2002.
SOSNA, I. Carving ad 1972. (2006). Snow 2006, č.25, s.32 -33.
SOUKUP, J. (1991): Lyžování podle alpských lyžařských škol. Praha, Olympia, 1991.
ŠTUMBAUER, J. - VOBR, R. (2007). Carving. České Budejovice: KOPP, 2007, 125 s.
ŽÍDEK, J. et al. (1993). Lyžovanie. Vysokoškolské skriptá. Bratislava, UK 1993
The final evaluation of the subject includes the completion of all compulsory disciplines and the assessment of the acquired abilities to perform individual disciplines independently, methodically correctly, or with instruction. At least 91% of points must be obtained to get an A rating, 81% and more to get a B rating, 71% and more to get a C rating, 61% to get a D rating, and at least 50% are required to get an E rating. Students will not receive any credits if they score less than 50% of the points.
Slovak
History, terminology, classification of material and technical equipment.
Principles of safety in the mountains.
Basic skiing skills – improvement of technology.
Visiting a ski service in the resort.
100/0
The student will have a basic knowledge about the history of skiing in the world and in Slovakia. The student will be able to use nomenclature, classification scale of licenses, material equipment, terrain knowledge and movement in winter in various weather conditions. The student understands the importance of fitness and technical preparation in downhill skiing and has practical skills of the use and maintenance of equipment. The student will be able to characterize specific ways of moving in the mountain and ski terrain, as well as methods of calling rescue. He recognizes the ways of leading teaching and the functioning of the work of the instructor in the ski school.
LICHNEROVÁ, L. Písanie a obhajoba záverečných prác: vysokoškolské skriptá pre študentov Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave [online]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2016 [cit. 2018-09-09]. Dostupné na: stella.uniba.sk/texty/LL_pisanie_obhajoba_zaverecne_prace.pdf
MEŠKO, Dušan, Dušan KATUŠČÁK a Ján FINDRA. Akademická príručka. Martin: Osveta, 2006. ISBN 80-8063-219-7.
STAROŇOVÁ, K. Vedecké písanie: ako písať akademické a vedecké texty. Martin: Osveta, 2011. ISBN 978-80-8063-359-2.
Preparation of practical assignments connected with course topics. Student is to deliver all the following assignments:
1. Identification and correction of syntactic, morphological and compositional errors in academic texts (10 points)
2. Practical assignment - demonstrating of methodological aspects on chosen or own research (20 points)
3. Practical assignment - formal formatting of academic text in text editor (15 points)
4. Practical exercise (test / 5 tasks) connected to citing (15 points)
5. Preparation of arguments to 3 thesis in the text, also 1 counterargument needs to be stated to the thesis (10 points)
6. Identification of relevant resources which can be potencially used in academic paper (thesis). Students will determine which information resources are suitable for use in academic paper or thesis depending on their proficiency and form. Their desicion will be following substantiated. (10 points)
7. Practical assignment on paratexts and excerption. (20 points)
Overall course evaluation (in %):
100-92: A
91-84: B
83-76: C
75-68: D
67-60: E
59-0: FX
Slovak
The course is intended only for students in the final years of teacher study programs (3rd bac. and 2nd mag.).
Academic writing, scientific writing (characteristics, types).
Scientific text ((characteristics, planning, requirements,development, problems).
Paratexts of the scientific text (foreword, introduction, conclution).
Methodology, methods, hypothesis, research topic formulation, research problem and questions formulation.
Information and data resources for academic work (scientific vs. popular data, primary and secondary resources).
Citing a plagiarism.
Excerping, synopsis, anotated research, academic anotation, abstract, sumarization.
Research paper. Argumentation, essay.
Academic text redaction and formatting.
100/0
Students have basic knowledge of individual forms of academic written expression in terms of content and form. Students have practical skills in the field of academic writing. They understand the differences between popular and scientific text. They are able to avoid the most common mistakes when writing scientific text.
FRANZEN, August. 1992. Malé církevní dějiny. Praha: Zvon. 358 s. ISBN 80-7113-119-9.
HANES, Pavel. 1998. Dejiny kresťanstva. Banská Bystrica: Združenie evanjelikálnych cirkví v SR.
LANE, Tony. 1996. Dějiny křesťanského myšlení. Praha: Návrat domů. 288 s. ISBN 80-85495-47-3
LATOURETTE, Kenneth Scott and Ralph D. WINTER. 1997. A History of Christianity, Vol. 1: Beginnings to 1500. Peabody, MA: Prince Press. ISBN-13: 978-1565633285
NORTH, James. 2001. Dějiny církve od Letnic k dnešku. Praha: Návrat domů. 306 s. ISBN
8072551804
ŘIČAN, Rudolf a Amadeus MOLNÁR. 1989. 12 století církevních dějin. Praha: Kalich. 537 s. ISBN 8070170603.
Literatúra poskytnutá vyučujúcim na Katedre cirkevných dejín:
HINLICKY, Paul. 2002. Čítanka z dejín dogiem. I.diel. Bratislava: EBF UK. 215 s.
The conditions for completing the course:
termination during the trial period
Continuous test ...................... max. 30 points
Compulsory reading + paper ...... max. 20
Attendance ................................... max. 10
Final test ..................... max. 40
Total .................................... max. 100
Rating scale according to points obtained: 100 - 91 (A), 90 - 81 (B), 80 - 73 (C), 72 - 66 (D), 65
- 60 (E), 59 - 0 (Fx)
The formation of Christian church; the spread of Christianity in the first three centuries. Persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire (causes for persecution and the course of persecution); Apologists. Establishment of the church (Episcopal office, Bishops and other functions). Worship services in the early church (Baptism, Eucharist). Heresies in the second and third century. Edict of Milan, recognition of Church in the times of Constantine the Great. Faith disputes in the fourth and fifth centuries. Church fathers. Christian victory over paganism (Theodosius the Great). The origins of the papacy and monasticism. The spread of Christianity after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. Church under Charlemagne
The student masters the historical background, the causes of the formation of Christian church, its position in the Roman Empire in the first centuries and its further development in the period of antiquity and the early Middle Ages.
Hanes, P. Dejiny kresťanstva. Banská Bystrica: Trian, 1998.
Gonzales, J. Sprievodca cirkevným dejinami, (Prel. Michal Valčo), EBF UK.
Latourette, K.S. A History of Christianity: Beginnings to 1500. Peabody, MA: Prince Press, 1997.
James B. North, Dějiny církve od Letnic k dnešku. Praha: Návrat domů, 2001.
Lane, T. Dějiny křesťanského myšlení. Praha: Návrat domů, 1996.
Říčan, A. 12 století církevních dějin. Praha: Kalich, 1989.
Franzen, A. Malé církevní dějiny. Praha: Zvon, 1995.
Bednaříková, J. Frankové a Evropa. Praha: Vyšehrad, 2009.
Hajduk, A. Všeobecné cirkevné dejiny. Od začiatku cirkvi po reformáciu. Bratislava: EBF, 1999.
100% continuous evaluation.
Written essay - 20% of the evaluation.
Written test at the end of the teaching part of the semester - 80% of the evaluation.
Compulsory attendance at all lectures with the exception of two possible absences.
1. Church in the Frankish Empire, consolidation of the papacy in Western Europe, Donatio Constantini, development of the Western Church under Charlemagne, the disintegration of the Carolignian dynasty.
2. Beginning of Feudalism - European conditions and theological problems in the 9th and 10th centuries. Reform in Cluny.
3. Church under Otto I. the Great, schism of 1054, the relationship between the German emperors and the papacy, battles on the investiture, Pope Gregory VII., Concordat of Worms (1122), Innocent III. - medieval peak of papacy ; the importance and causes of the crusades.
4. Scholastics (11th - 15th century), origin of universities, monasticism in the 12th and 13th century, theological personalities of early, peak and late scholasticism, scholastic disputes.
5. 14th - 15th century: Centuries of decline of the papacy, Avignon papacy, conciliarism, humanism and renaissance, renaissance papacy.
100%/0%
Student is familiar with the relationship between church and state in the Middle Ages, the development of church institutions, and the basics of theological work of thinkers of the discussed period.
FILO, Július. 2007. Základy pastorálky, Bratislava: EBF UK.
SMOLÍK, Jozef. 1986. Pastýřska péče, Praha: Kalich.
HALL,Calvin S., LINDZEY, Gardner. 1997. Psychológia osobnosti, Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo.
1983. Handbuch der Seelsorge, Berlin: EVA.
ROGERS, Carl.R. 1996. Ako byť sám sebou, Bratislava: IRIS.
1992. Handbuch der Psychologie für die Seelsorge, 1 a 2. Band, Patmos.
LAMMER, Kerstin. 2004. Den Tod begreifen, Neukirchner.
COOPER-WHITE, Pamela. 2004. Shared Wisdom, use of the self in pastoral care and counseling, Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
FILO, Július. 2007 / 2008. Aplikovaná hermeneutika. Bratislava: EBF UK.
FEE, D. Gordon, STUART Douglas. 1997. Jak číst Bibli s porozuměním. Praha: Návrat domů.
GRONDIN, Jean. 1997. Úvod do hermeneutiky. Praha: Oikúmené.
KUSCHEL, Karl – Josef. 1995. Teologie 20. století; Antologie. Praha: Vyšehrad.
LIGUŠ, Ján. 2002. Biblická hermeneutika; propedeutický úvod. Banská Bystrica: Katedra evanjelikálnej teológie a misie UMB.
OEMING, Manfred. 2001. Úvod do biblickej hermeneutiky; Cesty k pochopení textu. Praha: Vyšehrad.
POKORNÝ, Petr. 2005. Hermeneutika jako teorie porozumění; od základných otázek jazyka k výkladu bible. Praha: Vyšehrad.
SMOLÍK, Josef. 1993. Současné pokusy o interpretaci evangelia. Praha: Oikúmené.
SZÓNDI, Peter. 2003. Úvod do literární hermeneutiky. Brno.
VOKOUN, Jarolav. 2012. Číst Bibli zase jako Bibli. Úvod do teologické interpretace Písma. Praha: Česká biblická společnost.
1995. Pápežská biblická komisia: Interpretácia Biblie v cirkvi; Prejav Jeho Svätosti pápeža Jána Pavla
II. a dokument Pápežskej biblickej komisie; Spišská Kapitula: Katolícke dielo na Slovensku.
Active participation on lectures – notes from assigned reading – 20%
5 short quizzes (10 minutes) during the semester based on the assigned reading – 20%
2 short essays on two topics basic on the reading – 30% (2 x 15%)
Final evaluating essay – 30%
The scale of evaluation:
A = 100 % – 91 %
B = 90 % – 81 %
C = 80 % – 73 %
D = 72 % – 66 %
E = 65 % – 60 %
FX = 59 % – 0 %
100/0
ÁBEL, František, 2015. Dejiny novozmluvnej doby. 2. vyd. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave. 318 s. ISBN 978-80-223-3793-9.
BÁNDY, Juraj, GREŠO, Ján, KIŠS, Igor, redaktori, 1999. Biblia. Písmo Sväté Starej a Novej zmluvy. Liptovský Mikuláš: Tranoscius. 882 s. ISBN 80-7140-182-X.
DONALDSON, Terence L., 2007. Judaism and the Gentiles. Jewish Patterns of Universalism (to 135 CE). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press. 563 s. ISBN 978-1-60258-025-1.
DUNN, James D. G., 2003. Christianity in the Making. Volume 1: Jesus Remebered. Grand Rapids, MI, Cambridge, U.K.: Eerdmans. 1019 s. ISBN 978-0-8028-3931-2.
DUNN, James D. G., 2009. Christianity in the Making. Volume 2: Beginning from Jerusalem. Grand Rapids, MI, Cambridge, U.K.: Eerdmans. 1347 s. ISBN 978-0-8028-3932-9.
DUNN, James D. G., 2015. Christianity in the Making. Volume 3: Neither Jew Nor Greek. A Contested Identity. Grand Rapids, MI, Cambridge, U.K.: Eerdmans. 946 s. ISBN 978-0-8028-3933-6.
DUS, Jan A., POKORNÝ, Petr, eds., 2001. Novozákonní apokryfy I. Neznámá evangelia. Knihovna rané křesťanské literatury, sv. 1. Praha: Vyšehrad. 461 s. ISBN 80-7021-406-6.
DUS, Jan A., ed. et al., 2003. Novozákonní apokryfy II. Příběhy apoštolů. Knihovna rané křesťanské literatury, sv. 2. Praha: Vyšehrad. 564 s. ISBN 80-7021-593-3.
DUS, Jan A., ed. et al., 2007. Novozákonní apokryfy III. Proroctví a apokalypsy. Knihovna rané křesťanské literatury, sv. 3. Praha: Vyšehrad. 563 s. ISBN 978-80-7021-814-3.
FREDRIKSEN, Paula, 2018. When Christians Were Jews. The First Generation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 261 s. ISBN 978-0-300-19051-9.
GÁBRIŠ, Karol, preklad a poznámky, 1990. Apokryfy. Mimokanonické spisy Starej zmluvy podľa Septuaginty. Bratislava: Vesna, Liptovský Mikuláš: Tranoscius. 375 s. ISBN 80-85128-48-9.
GÁBRIŠ, Karol, preklad, 2004. Spisy apoštolských otcov. Doplnené a upravené vydanie. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave. 365 s. ISBN 80-88827-30-2.
GÁBRIŠ, Karol, 1994. Dejiny novozmluvnej doby. Bratislava: ECM. 232 s.
LEIPOLDT, Johannes, GRUNDMANN, Walter (eds.), 1967. Band I: Darstellung des neutestamentlichen Zeitalters. 2. Auflage. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt. 527 s.
LEIPOLDT, Johannes, GRUNDMANN, Walter (eds.), 1976. Band II: Texte zum neutestamentlichen Zeitalter. 5. Auflage. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt. 426 s.
LEIPOLDT, Johannes, 1973. Band III: Bilder zum neutestamentlichen Zeitalter ausgewählt und erläutert. 3. Auflage. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt. 274 s.
LOHSE, Eduard, 1971. Umwelt des Neuen Testaments. Grundrisse zum Neuen Testament 1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht. 221 s.
NEUSNER, Jacob, CHILTON, Bruce D., eds., 2007. In Quest of the Historical Pharisees. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press. 512 s. ISBN 978-1-932792-72-0.
POKORNÝ, Petr, 1998. Píseň o perle. Tajné knihy starověkých gnostiků. 2. rozšírené vydanie. Praha: Vyšehrad. 326 s. ISBN 80-7021-246-2.
RUNESSON, Anders, BINDER, Donald D., and OLSSON, Birger, 2010. The Ancient Synagogue from its Origins to 200 C.E. A Source Book. Leiden, Boston: Brill. 327 s. ISBN 978-90-04-18890-7.
RYŠKOVÁ, Mireia. Doba Ježíše Nazaretského. Praha: Karolinum, 2019. 536 s. ISBN 978-80-246-3532-3.
SCHUBERT, Kurt, 1995. Židovské náboženství v proměnách veků. Přeložil Jindřich Slabý. Praha: Vyšehrad. 285 s. ISBN 80-7021-075-3.
SOUŠEK, Zdeněk, ed., POLÁČEK, Zdeněk, preklad, et al., 1995. Knihy tajemství a moudrosti 1. Mimobiblické židovské spisy: pseudepigrafy. Praha: Vyšehrad. 381 s. ISBN 80-7021-144-X.
SOUŠEK, Zdeněk, ed., HELLER, Jan, preklad, et al., 1998. Knihy tajemství a moudrosti 2. Mimobiblické židovské spisy: pseudepigrafy. Praha: Vyšehrad. 235 s. ISBN 80-7021-300-0.
SOUŠEK, Zdeněk, ed., FARSKÝ, Jiří, preklad, et al., 1999. Knihy tajemství a moudrosti 3. Mimobiblické židovské spisy: pseudepigrafy. Praha: Vyšehrad. 363 s. ISBN 80-7021-244-6.
Completion during the examination period
During the examination period, students take a final exam consisting of a written and an oral part. Successful completion of the written part, which accounts for 30% of the overall assessment, is a prerequisite for taking the oral part of the exam, which accounts for 70% of the overall assessment.
Overall assessment:
A = 100–91%
B = 90–81%
C = 80–73%
D = 72–66%
E = 65–60%
FX = 59–0%
• Introductory issues, explanation of the basic terminology concerning the course
• The Second Temple Judaism: Its origin and development on the background of historical events.
• The Second Temple Judaism: Way of life of Jewish communities living in the Diaspora and those in Galilee and Judea, social background and settings, the religious groups, scriptures, cultural, religious, and ritual notions and traditions, the Temple cult and feast days, the Second Temple Jewish authors.
• The Graeco-Roman world: Hellenism, its specifics and manifestation, Graeco-Roman politics, cultural and religious notions and philosophy – the world of deities, the cult of the emperors, mystery religion cults, popular religious notions, feast days, Roman emperors.
0/100
The student has general knowledge of the historical background and processes in regard to the origin of the early Christian movement, its historical background and development. Students are able to gain and use critical thinking by an analysis and evaluation of the basic knowledge about the process previous to the forming and evaluation of the early Christian churches, particularly: The knowledge of the political, cultural, and religious situation of the ancient world, from the period of destruction of the Babylonian Empire to the period of the dominance of the Roman Empire, its influence on the Second Temple Judaism, the part of which was an early Christian movement, as well as the other significant political, cultural, and religious phenomena of the ancient Graeco-Roman world. Passing this propaedeutic course is a precondition to passing other courses of the New Testament – Exegesis of the New Testament and Theology of the New Testament.
oral exam
All valid textbooks for primary and secondary schools
Innovated SEP for the 2nd grade of elementary school
An innovated SEP for grammar schools with a four-year and five-year educational program
Target requirements for knowledge and skills of high school graduates in biology
ŠkVP training school
Internal rules of the school
Gnoth, M., Ušáková, Fulková, E., Likavský, P., Turanová, L., Čipková, E., Tóthová, A., Grančičová, A. 2003. Pedagogical practice for students of teacher combinations at the Faculty of Science, Comenius University. Bratislava: Comenius University Bratislava, 2003. 140 p.
Kosová, B., Tomengová, A. 2015. Professional practical training of future teachers. Banská Bystrica: Belianum, 2015. 225 p.
DOUŠKOVÁ, K., ĽUPTÁKOVÁ-VANČÍKOVÁ, K. 2009. Pedagogical practice in teacher training. Banská Bystrica: Matej Bel University, 2009. FULKOVÁ, E., GNOTH, M. 2004. Pedagogical practice. Nitra: Slovak University of Agriculture, 2004. GAVORA, P. 1997. ABC observations of teaching. Prešov: Metodicko-pedagogické centrum, 1997. KONTÍROVÁ, S. 2011. Pedagogical practice of students of academic subjects. Košice: Pavel Jozef Šafárik University, 2011.
FULKOVÁ, E., GNOTH, M. 2004. Pedagogical practice. Nitra: Slovak University of Agriculture, 2004.
State curriculum for ISCED 2 and ISCED 3
KONTÍROVÁ, S. 2011. Pedagogical practice of students of academic subjects. Košice: Pavel Jozef Šafárik University, 2011.
Course evaluation is conditional on:
• completing observations (lessons) in the scope of an hour-long training teacher,
• active participation of the student in extracurricular and extracurricular activities of a practicing teacher,
• evaluation of the student by the training teacher,
• evaluation of the pedagogical diary, which the student submits to the head of the pedagogical practice within the set deadline.
In total, a student can get 42 points for pedagogical practice.
The evaluation of the subject is graded in percentage as follows: A (100-91%); B (90-81%); C (80-71%); D (70-61%); E (60-50%). At least 38 points must be obtained to obtain an A rating, at least 34 points to obtain a B rating, at least 30 points to obtain a C rating, at least 26 points to obtain a D rating and at least 21 points to obtain an E rating. Credits will not be awarded to a student who obtains less than 21 points out of the total number of points.
For non-compliance with the set deadlines and instructions of the head of the pedagogical practice, the student may be sanctioned by lowering the evaluation, or by not granting credits for the pedagogical practice.
Getting acquainted with the conditions of implementation of pedagogical practice.
Familiarization with pedagogical documentation, conceptual and strategic documents of the training school.
Participation in teaching within the scope of the training teacher, extra-class and extracurricular activities.
Creation of observation records from the teaching teacher 's lessons.
Creation of lesson analyzes.
Creation of written preparations for lessons.
Creation of a pedagogical diary and its submission to the head of pedagogical practice.
By completing the course, the student:
• deepen knowledge in the field of generally binding legal regulations related to the work of teachers, pedagogical and other documentation, conceptual and strategic documents of the school,
• develop the professional competencies necessary for independent planning, design, management and organization of the educational process in the relevant subject on the basis of valid curricular documents, while adapting educational programs for specific groups of students,
• develop professional competencies associated with didactic, pedagogical, psychological analysis of individual parts of the lesson,
• develop the ability to apply pedagogical-psychological and professional-didactic knowledge in the educational process,
• develop the ability to evaluate diverse pedagogical situations and processes,
• deepen knowledge about the differences in the development of individuals resulting from their health, social disadvantages, talents or talents so that they can effectively cooperate with special pedagogues, psychologists and other professionals in the implementation of the educational process in the conditions of inclusive education and follow their professional recommendations and conclusions
• develop skills in working with teaching aids,
• acquire competencies associated with the creation of a pedagogical portfolio,
• develop competencies of self-assessment and further professional development,
• develop the ability to assess the suitability of the chosen means of education,
• develop communication skills, the ability to express and accept constructive criticism and praise.
Selection of professional literature according to the chosen topic of the thesis;
Current directive of the Rector of Charles University on the basic requirements for final theses;
KATUŠČÁK, D.: Ako písať záverečné a kvalifikačné práce. Nitra: Enigma 2007
Submission of partial output in the form of a proposal for the main objectives and structure of the bachelor's thesis, a search with an overview of available information sources on a selected topic of the bachelor's thesis.
Rating by scale:
A: 92-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 84-91%, very good - above average standard,
C: 76-83%, good - normal reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient - the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient - additional work required
slovak
Definition of the topic and goal of the final work.
Study of professional literature.
Excerpt of the material.
Theoretical and methodological conception of the work.
Problem processing methodology.
Methodology of elaboration of the final work.
Formal-compositional requirements of final theses.
The student is able to define the topic of their bachelor's thesis, can correctly determine the procedures and methods of its processing, divide the process of creation into time stages, gain the ability to work selectively and correctly with the literature on the selected topic.
Selection of professional literature according to the chosen topic of the thesis;
Current directive of the Rector of Charles University on the basic requirements for final theses;
KATUŠČÁK, D.: Ako písať záverečné a kvalifikačné práce. Nitra: Enigma 2007
Submission of partial output in the form of a comprehensive chapter of the bachelor's thesis.
Rating by scale:
A: 92-100%, excellent - excellent results,
B: 84-91%, very good - above average standard,
C: 76-83%, good - normal reliable work,
D: 68-75%, satisfactory - acceptable results,
E: 60-67%, sufficient - the results meet the minimum criteria,
Fx: 0-59%, insufficient - additional work required
slovak
Definition of the topic and goal of the final work.
Study of professional literature.
Excerpt of the material.
Theoretical and methodological conception of the work.
Problem processing methodology.
Methodology of elaboration of the final work.
Formal-compositional requirements of final theses.
The student is able to define the topic of their bachelor's thesis, can correctly determine the procedures and methods of its processing, gain the ability to work selectively and correctly with the literature on the selected topic and appropriately present the results and important conclusions.
according to the topic of the bachelor thesis
Examination: state examination
Slovak, English
Course contents:
1. Contribution of the final thesis for the given field of study applied in the collection, interpretation and processing of basic professional literature, or the extent to which the student has mastered the application of theoretical principles in practice and whether the hypotheses presented in the work are verifiable;
2. Originality of the thesis (the final thesis must not have the character of a plagiarism, must not infringe the copyrights of other authors), part of the documentation for the defense of the final thesis as a subject of state examination is the protocol of originality from the central register.
3. Correctness and correctness of citation of used information sources, research results of other authors and author groups, correctness of description of methods and working procedures of other authors or author groups;
4. Compliance of the structure of the final work with the prescribed composition defined by Internal Regulation no. 12/2013;
5. Respecting the recommended scope of the final thesis (the recommended scope of the bachelor's thesis is usually 30 - 40 standard pages - 54,000 to 72,000 characters, including spaces), the adequacy of the scope of the thesis is assessed by its supervisor;
6. Linguistic and stylistic level of work and formal arrangement;
7. The method and form of the defense of the final thesis and the student's ability to adequately respond to comments and questions in the opinions of the supervisor and the opponent.
8. In the teaching of art-educational subjects, the final work and its defense may also include the presentation of artistic outputs and performances.
0/100
When designing the bachelor's thesis, the student is able to demonstrate the ability to work creatively in the field of study in which he completed the study program. The student is able to demonstrate adequate knowledge of the issue and apply their skills in the collection, interpretation and processing of basic literature, or its application in practice or is able to solve a partial task related to the student's focus.